An interventional study of Digital cognitive aid in Cognitive Aids, sponsored by CEJKA Jean-Christophe. Completed at 1 site in France. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-07-26.
Sponsored by CEJKA Jean-Christophe · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The purpose of this study is to determine whether a wearable digital cognitive aid has an effect in the management of simulated crises in anesthesia or intensive care.
" Errare humanum est ", to err is human. This Latin saying attributed to Seneca shows that since the dawn of time, human beings are aware that managing complex situations will always be an inexhaustible source of mistakes. This is particularly true in anesthesia and intensive care in which situations are often complex and stressful, thus leading to mistakes or inadequate management. Improvement might arise from the use of cognitive aids.
The investigators designed a smartphone application including 5 scenarios of anesthesia and intensive care crises (malignant hyperthermia, anaphylactic shock, acute toxicity of local anesthetics, severe and symptomatic hyperkaliemia, ventricular fibrillation), easy to use with a manual validation of every simple step. Investigators seek to compare the technical and non technical management of these crises with and without this wearable cognitive aid.
CEJKA Jean-Christophe is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
The digital cognitive aid is designed as a smartphone app. Intervention : cognitive aid during anesthesia and intensive care crises management.
Device: Digital cognitive aid
Anesthesia and intensive care crises managed without any cognitive aid.
Digital cognitive aid during anesthesia and intensive care crises.
Technical Performance as compared to a Reference Task List
Number of tasks successfully performed, rated on remote video review
Time frame: Time 0-30 min
Plan to share: No
This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
CEJKA Jean-Christophe