CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02665156Updated Mar 28, 2019

Time Efficiency of Intracorporeal Orthotopic Diversion With Robotic Staplers After Robot Assisted Radical Cystectomy

An interventional study of Intracorporeal stapled neobladder using robotic staplers in Cystectomy, Robotic Surgical Procedures and Surgical Staplers, sponsored by Regina Elena Cancer Institute. Completed at 1 site in Italy. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-03-28.

Sponsored by Regina Elena Cancer Institute · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
33
Allocation
Not applicable
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Objectives and Specific Aims Time efficiency of robot assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with totally intracorporeal stapled orthotopic neobladder remains a main drawback of this procedure. According to a recent consensus panel, the benchmark for intracorporeal orthotopic neobladder should be 5 hours in high volume centers .

This prospective single-stage phase 2 trial is designed to assess the time efficiency of using robotic stapler versus the conventional motorized staplers (Linear stapler articulated Endo GIA™, Covidien) in achieving the target outcome (total operative time \<5 hr).

Perioperative complications (intraoperative and 30-d postoperative complications according to the Clavien classification system), 30-d/90-d/ 180-d complication and readmission rates, early functional outcomes (time to recovery of urinary continence), 180-d and 360-d neobladder stone formation rates will be analyzed to assess the safety and the cost effectiveness of the procedure.

Read the detailed description

The primary end point by which the sample size was determined was a total operative time \<5hr. In the last 50 cases of our series (data unpublished) this benchmark was obtained in 60% of patients (p0), while we expect to improve the time efficiency of the procedure with the use of robotic staplers maintaining the total operative time of the procedure \<5hrs in at least 80% (p1) of cases. According to A'Hern, in order to verify the significance of this hypothesis, the estimated sample size is 33 patients with a power of 80% at a significance level of 5%. The trial will be successful if the total operative time will be \<5hrs in at least 25 out of 33 patients.

The population of this study will include 35 patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer without contraindications to orthotopic neobladder. The first two cases will be excluded in order to provide the entire surgical team the minimal skill necessary for a proper and time efficient use of the new surgical device (robotic stapler). The following 33 consecutive cases will be enrolled and the outcomes analyzed. The estimated time to complete the enrollment is 9 months.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cystectomy
  • Robotic Surgical Procedures
  • Surgical Staplers
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Regina Elena Cancer Institute is the lead sponsor of 92 studies on the registry; 50 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Pathologically confirmed muscle invasive bladder cancer or recurrent high grade urothelial carcinoma (BCG failures)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • All absoulte contraindications to orthotopic neobladder;
  • Anesthesiologic contraindications to penumoeperitoneum and steep Trendelenburg position.
  • cT4 disease;
  • clinical evidence of metastases (cM1) outside the pelvis.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
33 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Robotic Stapled orthotopic neobladder

    Intracorporeal stapled neobladder using robotic staplers: Partly stapled orthotopic neobladder: robotic staplers applied to create the neobladder neck and to suture the left side of the posterior aspect of neobladder. Right side of the posterior aspect of neobladder and the anterior aspect of the neobladder hand sewn.

    Procedure: Intracorporeal stapled neobladder using robotic staplers

Interventions

  • ProcedureIntracorporeal stapled neobladder using robotic staplers

    Robot assisted radical cystecomy. Separate packages extended pelvic lymph node dissection up to aortic bifurcation. Totally intracorporeal orthotopic ileal neobladder with about 45 cm of ileum according to "Vescica Ileal Padovana".

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Improving time efficiency, achieving a total operative <5 hrs in 80% of cases (28/33)

    Time frame: 1 yr

Secondary outcomes

  1. Perioperative complications

    Assessment of perioperative complications 30 days, 90 days and 180 days after surgery

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Readmission rate

    Incidence of readmission

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Neobladder stone formation

    Incidence of neobladder stone formation

    Time frame: 1-yr

  4. Cost analysis

    Time frame: 1-yr

07

Study locations

1 site
  • "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute
    Rome, 00144, Italy
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 28, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02665156
Lead sponsor
Regina Elena Cancer Institute
Collaborators
Intuitive Surgical
Responsible party
Giuseppe SImone (Ph.D., Regina Elena Cancer Institute) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 27, 2016
Start date
Jan 2016
Primary completion
May 2017
Completion
Sep 2018
Last update
Mar 28, 2019

Study contacts

Giuseppe Simone, Ph.D.
principal investigator · "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion