An interventional study of Use of [18f]FDG - PET/CT for the diagnosis and staging of non-small cell lung carcinoma in Non-small Cell Lung Carcinoma, sponsored by Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group. Completed at 1 site in Brazil. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-02-23.
Sponsored by Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic
To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the 18Fluor-fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) in the Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) as compared to mediastinoscopy for staging of non-small cel lung carcinoma.
The main aim of this study is to validate the [18F]FDG on PET/CT for the diagnosis of metastatic ganglions at the mediastinum in SUS patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma considering sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, accuracy. Other specific aims are:
7,243 studies on the registry are indexed under Lung Neoplasms; 1,557 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 108 is above the median of 60 across 5,295 interventional studies indexed under Lung Neoplasms.
Browse Lung Neoplasms studies →Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group is the lead sponsor of 46 studies on the registry; 9 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
SUS patients with diagnosis or suspicion of non-small cell lung carcinoma with an indication for mediastinoscopy
Other: Use of [18f]FDG - PET/CT for the diagnosis and staging of non-small cell lung carcinoma
Validate the [18F]FDG as an alternative method for non-small lung carcinoma diagnosis
Time frame: 4 years
Number of patients diagnosed in a positive manner with the gold standard and with the alternative method
Time frame: up to 30 days following recruitment
Number of patients with a negative diagnosis according to the gold standard and the alternative method
Time frame: up to 30 days following recruitment
Number of true positives among positive diagnosed patients with the alternative method
Time frame: up to 30 days following recruitment
Number of false positives among patients negatively diagnosed with the alternative method
Time frame: up to 30 days following recruitment
Plan to share: Undecided
This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group