CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02655848BITEUpdated Oct 1, 2019

Tenotomy or Tenodesis of Long Head Biceps in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair

An interventional study of Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and LHB Tenodesis in Rotator Cuff Syndrome, sponsored by Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis. Completed at 10 sites in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 50 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-10-01.

Sponsored by Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
98
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
50 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

During arthroscopic rotator cuff (infraspinatus/supraspinatus) repair, biceps tendon lesions are frequently encountered. However, the most optimal treatment of the diseased long head of the biceps (LHB) tendon during rotator cuff repair remains a topic of debate: tenotomy or tenodesis. The hypothesis is that there is no difference in functional outcome between LHB tenotomy and LHB tenodesis when performed in adjunct to arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Read the detailed description

Patients older than 50 years with a supraspinatus and/or infraspinatus tendon rupture sized smaller than 3cm, who are encountered with LHB pathology, will be randomized to either LHB tenotomy or LHB tenodesis. Clinical and self-reported data will be collected pre-operatively, and 6 weeks, 3 months, and 1 year after surgery.

Primary outcome is overall shoulder function evaluated with the Constant score. As additional measures of shoulder function, the Dutch Oxford Shoulder Test and the Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand questionnaire will be assessed. Other evaluations include cosmetic appearance evaluated by the ''Popeye'' deformity, arm cramping pain, elbow flexion strength, MRI evaluation, quality of life, and cost of surgery. To detect non-inferiority with a one-sided, two-sample t-test with a 80% power and a significance level (alpha) of 0.025, the required sample size is 98 patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Rotator Cuff Syndrome

Keywords

  • Popeye
  • Long Head Biceps Tendon
  • Arthroscopy
  • Functional result
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis is the lead sponsor of 22 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients older than 50 years
  • Degenerative rotator cuff lesion of supraspinatus/infraspinatus tendon, smaller than three centimeter.
  • Patients need to be able to read and write in Dutch or English language in order to complete the questionnaires, and sign informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acute, traumatic or partial thickness rotator cuff rupture, or in case a full thickness tear is larger than 3 cm measured using an arthroscopic ruler.
  • Accompanying subscapularis tendon lesion
  • Hour-glass deformation bicepstendon origin or in case of accompanying subscapularis tendon rupture.
  • Osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint
  • Acromion to humeral head distance measuring 6mm or smaller.
  • Prior surgery to the involved shoulder
  • Dementia or inability to complete questionnaires and assessments
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
98 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    @ Cuff repair with LHB tenodesis

    In case of pathologic changes of the long Head Biceps tendon, a tenodesis is performed in adjunct to performing an arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

    Procedure: Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair · Procedure: LHB Tenodesis

  • Active comparator
    @ cuff repair with LHB tenotomy

    In case of pathologic changes of the long Head Biceps tendon, a tenotomy is performed in adjunct to performing an arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

    Procedure: Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair · Procedure: LHB Tenotomy

Interventions

  • ProcedureArthroscopic rotator cuff repair

    Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using suture anchors

  • ProcedureLHB Tenodesis

    Arthroscopic tenotomy and subsequent fixation of long head biceps proximal in the biceps groove

  • ProcedureLHB Tenotomy

    Arthroscopic tenotomy of long head biceps

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Shoulder function quantified with the Constant score (0-100)

    Sum of the items below: ADL: Patient reported shoulder function during work (0-4), recreation/sports (0-4), and sleep (0-2). Pain: Patient reported pain in the shoulder (severe=0,moderate=5,mild=10,no pain=15). ROM: Anteflexion up to waist(2)/xiphoid process(4)/neck(6)/head(8)/above head(10) Elevation in degrees: 0-30(0)/31-60(2)/61-90(4)/91-120(6)/121-150(8)/151-180(10) Abduction in degrees: 0-30(0)/31-60(2)/61-90(4)/91-120(6)/121-150(8)/151-180(10) External rotation: impossible to reach head with hand(0)/hand behind head-elbow forward(2)/hand behind head-elbow backward(4)/hand on head-elbow forward(6)/hand on head-elbow backward(8)/full elevation hand from head(10) Internal rotation: dorsal part of the hand reaching lateral thigh(0)/buttock(2)/lumbo-sacral junction(4)/L3(6)/Th12(8)/between scapulae(10). Abduction force at 90 degrees in pounds (max. 25)

    Time frame: 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Popeye phenomenon

    Presence of a Popeye deformity in the upper arm (yes/no), as reported by the patient, the treating surgeon, and a blinded assessor.

    Time frame: 1 year

  2. Cosmetic appearance

    Patients will assess cosmetic appearance on a VAS scale.

    Time frame: 1 year

  3. MRI-based location of the biceps tendon

    MRI imaging at 1 year after surgery will be used to assess the location of the proximal biceps tendon. Absence of the biceps tendon in the bicipital groove confirms a successfully performed LHB tenotomy. Absence of the biceps tendon in the bicipital groove confirms failed LHB tendodesis. In addition, the rotator cuff is classified as fully healed, partially healed or recurrent rupture.

    Time frame: 1 year

  4. Self-reported shoulder function

    Patients will complete two validated questionnaires: the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (DASH) and the Dutch Oxford Shoulder Test (DOST)

    Time frame: 1 year

  5. Pain

    Patients will be asked to report if they have pain (yes/no), and to indicate the level of pain on a VAS scale. The VAS scores will be recorded separately for general pain and for pain in the bicipital groove.

    Time frame: 1 year

  6. Elbow flexion strength

    A dynamometer will be used to assess elbow flexion strength with the lower arm in full supination. The Elbow Strength Index is calculated by dividing the strength in the affected side by the strength in the contralateral side.

    Time frame: 1 year

  7. Quality of life

    Patients will complete the validated questionnaire 'EQ-5D', which covers 5 domains (mobility, personal care, daily activities, pain and mood), as well as a 100 point thermometer on general health.

    Time frame: 1 year

  8. Post-operative status of rotator cuff

    Based on MRI imaging at 1 year after surgery, the rotator cuff is classified as fully healed, partially healed or recurrent rupture.

    Time frame: 1 year

  9. Duration of surgery

    The duration of surgery will be calculated based on the start and end times of each surgery.

    Time frame: 1 year

  10. Complications

    All complications and serious adverse events in the study population are recorded.

    Time frame: 1 year

07

Study locations

10 sites
  • Slootervaart ziekenhuis
    Amsterdam, 1066EC, Netherlands
  • Kliniek De Lairesse
    Amsterdam, 1075BG, Netherlands
  • OLVG
    Amsterdam, 1090HM, Netherlands
  • Gelre ziekenhuis
    Apeldoorn, 7334DZ, Netherlands
  • Amphia ziekenhuis
    Breda, 4819JV, Netherlands
  • Groene Hart Ziekenhuis
    Gouda, 2803HH, Netherlands
  • Tergooi Ziekenhuizen
    Hilversum, Netherlands
  • Spaarne Ziekenhuis
    Hoofddorp, Netherlands
  • St Antonius
    Nieuwegein, 3430EM, Netherlands
  • Canisius Wilehelmina Zkh
    Nijmegen, Netherlands
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Gurnani N, van Deurzen DF, Janmaat VT, van den Bekerom MP. Tenotomy or tenodesis for pathology of the long head of the biceps brachii: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Dec;24(12):3765-3771. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3640-6. Epub 2015 May 15. PubMed 25975753 ↗
  • Zhang Q, Zhou J, Ge H, Cheng B. Tenotomy or tenodesis for long head biceps lesions in shoulders with reparable rotator cuff tears: a prospective randomised trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Feb;23(2):464-9. doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2587-8. Epub 2013 Jul 5. PubMed 23828089 ↗
  • Galasso O, Gasparini G, De Benedetto M, Familiari F, Castricini R. Tenotomy versus tenodesis in the treatment of the long head of biceps brachii tendon lesions. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012 Oct 22;13:205. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-205. PubMed 23088416 ↗
  • van Deurzen DF, Scholtes VA, Willigenburg NW, Gurnani N, Verweij LP, van den Bekerom MP; BITE collaboration group. Long head BIceps TEnodesis or tenotomy in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: BITE study protocol. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Aug 30;17(1):375. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1230-5. PubMed 27577549 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 1, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02655848
Lead sponsor
Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis
Collaborators
Nederlandse Vereniging voor Arthroscopie, Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Responsible party
DFP van Deurzen (Orthopedic Surgeon, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 14, 2016
Start date
Jul 2012
Primary completion
Sep 2019
Completion
Sep 2019
Last update
Oct 1, 2019

Study contacts

Derek van Deurzen, MD
principal investigator · OLVG

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion