CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02645019Updated Jun 15, 2023Results posted

The Effect of EGD Probe Insertion on the Intracuff Pressure of the Laryngeal Mask Airway or Cuffed Endotracheal Tube in Children

An observational study in Esophagogastroduodensocopy (EGD) Procedure, sponsored by Mineto Kamata. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged Up to 18 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-06-15.

Sponsored by Mineto Kamata · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100
Ages
Up to 18 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A prospective study designed to access changes in the intracuff pressure of a laryngeal mask airway (LMA) or cuffed endotracheal tube (cETT) during placement of an esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) probe during an EGD in the pediatric population.

02

Conditions studied

  • Esophagogastroduodensocopy (EGD) Procedure
03

In context

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Mineto Kamata as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 18 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Patients from 0-18 years old having EGD procedure with LMA or cuffed ETT.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients from 0-18 years old having EGD procedure with a LMA or cuffed ETT.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a history of tracheomalacia, bronchomalacia or any other airway issues.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Cuffed ETT

    Airway secured using a cuffed endotracheal tube.

    Device: Cuffed ETT

  • LMA 2

    Airway secured using a size 2 laryngeal mask airway.

    Device: Cuffed LMA

  • LMA 2.5

    Airway secured using a size 2.5 laryngeal mask airway.

    Device: Cuffed LMA

  • LMA 3

    Airway secured using a size 3 laryngeal mask airway.

    Device: Cuffed LMA

  • LMA 4

    Airway secured using a size 4 laryngeal mask airway.

    Device: Cuffed LMA

Interventions

  • DeviceCuffed ETT

    Cuffed endotracheal tube.

  • DeviceCuffed LMA

    Cuffed laryngeal mask airway.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Intracuff Pressures During Probe Insertion

    Intracuff pressure in cmH2O of cuffed ETT or LMA during EGD probe insertion.

    Time frame: At time of EGD probe insertion

  2. Intracuff Pressure With Probe in Place

    Intracuff pressure in cmH2O of cuffed ETT or LMA during EGD while probe is in place.

    Time frame: At time of EGD while probe is in place

  3. Intracuff Pressure After Probe Removal

    Intracuff pressure in cmH2O of cuffed ETT or LMA after EGD probe is removed.

    Time frame: Immediately after probe removal

07

Results

Posted Dec 30, 2019

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneCuffed ETTLMA 2LMA 2.5LMA 3LMA 4
Started1315153324
Completed1315153324
Not completed00000

Outcome measures

PrimaryIntracuff Pressures During Probe Insertion

Intracuff pressure in cmH2O of cuffed ETT or LMA during EGD probe insertion.

Time frame:
At time of EGD probe insertion
Reported as:
Mean · cmH2O
Intracuff Pressures During Probe Insertion
cmH2OLMA 2LMA 2.5LMA 3LMA 4Cuffed ETT
Intracuff Pressures During Probe Insertion22 ± 1434 ± 941 ± 1537 ± 1224 ± 25
PrimaryIntracuff Pressure With Probe in Place

Intracuff pressure in cmH2O of cuffed ETT or LMA during EGD while probe is in place.

Time frame:
At time of EGD while probe is in place
Reported as:
Mean · cmH2O
Intracuff Pressure With Probe in Place
cmH2OLMA 2LMA 2.5LMA 3LMA 4Cuffed ETT
Intracuff Pressure With Probe in Place22 ± 1435 ± 939 ± 1336 ± 1124 ± 25
PrimaryIntracuff Pressure After Probe Removal

Intracuff pressure in cmH2O of cuffed ETT or LMA after EGD probe is removed.

Time frame:
Immediately after probe removal
Reported as:
Mean · cmH2O
Intracuff Pressure After Probe Removal
cmH2OLMA 2LMA 2.5LMA 3LMA 4Cuffed ETT
Intracuff Pressure After Probe Removal15 ± 1126 ± 1031 ± 1129 ± 1021 ± 25

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
LMA 20/15 (0%)0/15 (0%)0/15 (0%)
LMA 2.50/15 (0%)0/15 (0%)0/15 (0%)
LMA 30/33 (0%)0/33 (0%)0/33 (0%)
LMA 40/24 (0%)0/24 (0%)0/24 (0%)
Cuffed ETT0/13 (0%)0/13 (0%)0/13 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)LMA 2LMA 2.5LMA 3LMA 4Cuffed ETTTotal
<=18 years1515332413100
Between 18 and 65 years000000
>=65 years000000
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)LMA 2LMA 2.5LMA 3LMA 4Cuffed ETTTotal
Female971910752
Male681414648
Intracuff pressure immediately following intubation
Intracuff pressure immediately following intubation(cmH2O)LMA 2LMA 2.5LMA 3LMA 4Cuffed ETTTotal
Mean15 ± 1325 ± 1034 ± 1032 ± 1019 ± 2627 ± 15
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Nationwide Children's Hospital
    Columbus, Ohio 43205, United States
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 15, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02645019
Lead sponsor
Mineto Kamata
Responsible party
Mineto Kamata (Anesthesia Clinical Fellow, Nationwide Children's Hospital) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Jan 1, 2016
Start date
Dec 2015
Primary completion
Oct 2016
Completion
Oct 2016
Results posted
Dec 30, 2019
Last update
Jun 15, 2023

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion