CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02601833Updated Nov 22, 2021Results posted

Effectiveness of Silver Diamine Fluoride as a Treatment for Caries in Comparison to Traditional Restorative Techniques

A Phase 3 interventional study of Silver Diamine Fluoride and Conventional Caries Management in Caries, sponsored by University of Michigan. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 2 Years to 10 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-11-22.

Sponsored by University of Michigan · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
98
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
2 Years to 10 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to compare standard fillings and silver diamine fluoride (SDF) for treatment of cavities in baby teeth. The investigators will compare the effectiveness of stopping the cavity, cost of the treatments and the opinions of the families and the dental providers.

Read the detailed description

To determine the effectiveness of the application of silver diamine fluoride (SDF) in comparison to conventional restorative treatments in International Caries Detection and Assessment System criteria (ICDAS) 5 and 6, one and two surface carious lesions in primary molars which will be assessed based on major and minor failure criteria when followed for one year. Additionally, parents'/children's and providers' perceptions will be assessed as well as the cost of both regimens, to include both chair time spent and materials' costs.

02

Conditions studied

  • Caries

Keywords

  • Caries
  • Cavity
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of Michigan is the lead sponsor of 1,475 studies on the registry; 196 are open to participants now.

Of its 162 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 128 (79%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
2 Years to 10 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Presence of at least one active (soft) cavitated carious lesions in the primary dentition, extending into dentin (ICDAS 5 or 6)
  • The selected tooth must have a one or two surface lesion (more than 1/3 of the crown of the tooth must be remaining) and must allow for direct application of SDF
  • Study teeth will not have any spontaneous or elicited pain due to caries, tooth mobility, or signs of pulpal infection
  • Selected primary teeth must have an anticipated exfoliation date greater than 12 months away

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hereditary developmental defects such as Amelogenesis Imperfecta and Dentinogenesis Imperfecta
  • Severe medical conditions that do not allow the child to be managed in the clinic
  • Known allergy /sensitivity to dental materials being used, including SDF
  • Inability of the child to cooperate for treatment, recall examinations, or periapical radiographs
  • Wards of the State, for consenting reasons
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
98 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Silver Diamine Fluoride

    This arm will receive Silver Diamine Fluoride applied to their carious lesion, in lieu of restoration placement, with the goal of arresting caries.

    Device: Silver Diamine Fluoride

  • Active comparator
    Conventional Caries Management

    Restorative dental care according to American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry guidelines. This treatment typically includes administration of local anesthesia, placement of rubber dam, caries removal with rotary and hand instruments, and placement of a final restoration.

    Procedure: Conventional Caries Management

Interventions

  • DeviceSilver Diamine Fluoride

    No caries removal will take place. The tooth will be dried and Silver Diamine Fluoride will be placed on the carious dentin until saturated. Excess will be blotted dry with a cotton pellet.

    Also known as: Silver Dental Arrest

  • ProcedureConventional Caries Management

    These children will receive restorative dental care in alignment with the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry guidelines, within the confines of the Mott Children's Health Center clinic. This treatment typically includes administration of local anesthesia, placement of rubber dam, caries removal with rotary and hand instruments, and placement of a final restoration.

    Also known as: Filling, Restoration

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Caries Arrest of Teeth in the SDF Group Measured by Change in Size

    Number of participants in the SDF arm that had an increase in lesion size at any point in the 12 months of the trial, as this is a treatment failure. Treatment failures were assessed throughout the 12 month duration of the trial, and children with treatment failures were then removed from the trial for further clinical treatment.

    Time frame: 12 Months

  2. Caries Arrest of Teeth in the SDF Group Measured by Dentin Color (Yellow, Brown, Black)

    Color of the cavity at the end of the trial

    Time frame: 12 Months

  3. Caries Arrest of Teeth in the SDF Group Measured by Dentin Texture (Soft, Hard)

    Texture of the cavity's dentin of soft means the cavity is still an active infection. If the cavity is hard, the cavity is no longer an active infection (has been arrested). Please note dentin texture cannot be assessed for the Conventional group as the dentin is no longer accessible following baseline treatment.

    Time frame: 12 Months

  4. Restoration Integrity for Teeth in Control Group (Secondary Caries, Lost Restoration, Restoration Needing Repair)

    Secondary caries, lost restorations, or restorations needing repair are treatment failures. Treatment failures were assessed throughout the 12 month duration of the trial, and children with treatment failures were removed from the trial for further clinical treatment.

    Time frame: 12 Months

  5. Signs of Pulpal Pathology (Lesion Reaching the Pulp Requiring Pulpular Treatment-pulpotomy and/or Pulpectomy-, Reversible Pulpitis, Irreversible Pulpitis, Abscess)

    Signs of pulpal pathology are treatment failures. Treatment failures were assessed throughout the 12 month duration of the trial, and children with treatment failures were removed from the trial for further clinical treatment.

    Time frame: 12 Months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Providers Who Find Treatment With SDF More Favorable in Time for Treatment (More, Same, Less)

    Data collected at baseline only.

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Number of Providers Who Find Treatment With SDF More Favorable in Ease of Treatment (Easier, Harder, Same Difficulty)

    Time frame: Baseline

  3. Number of Providers Who Find Treatment With SDF More Favorable in Preference of Treatment Modality (More Preferable, no Preference, Less Preferable)

    Time frame: Baseline

  4. Parent Assessment of Appearance of Child's Teeth

    Parents were asked "Are you concerned with the appearance of your child's teeth?"

    Time frame: 12 Months

  5. Parent Assessment of Treatment Provided

    Parents were asked "If your child had another cavity, would you be willing to have that tooth treated with the same treatment option provided to your child in this study?"

    Time frame: 12 Months

  6. Child Assessment of Appearance of Teeth (Very Happy, Not Happy or Sad, Very Sad)

    Time frame: 12 Months

  7. Child Assessment of Experience During Dental Visit (Didn't Hurt, Hurt a Little, Hurt a Lot)

    Time frame: 12 Months

  8. Costs of Treatment (Dollars)

    Cost of one application of SDF and one 1-2 surface conventional restoration. Cost was calculated by taking the average Medicaid reimbursement across all U.S. states.

    Time frame: Baseline

  9. Time of Treatment Procedures (Duration of Time in Minutes)

    Time frame: Baseline

07

Results

Posted Nov 22, 2021

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneSilver Diamine FluorideConventional Caries Management
Started5642
Completed4029
Not completed1613

Outcome measures

PrimaryCaries Arrest of Teeth in the SDF Group Measured by Change in Size

Number of participants in the SDF arm that had an increase in lesion size at any point in the 12 months of the trial, as this is a treatment failure. Treatment failures were assessed throughout the 12 month duration of the trial, and children with treatment failures were then removed from the trial for further clinical treatment.

Time frame:
12 Months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Caries Arrest of Teeth in the SDF Group Measured by Change in Size
ParticipantsSilver Diamine Fluoride
Caries Arrest of Teeth in the SDF Group Measured by Change in Size10
PrimaryCaries Arrest of Teeth in the SDF Group Measured by Dentin Color (Yellow, Brown, Black)

Color of the cavity at the end of the trial

Time frame:
12 Months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Caries Arrest of Teeth in the SDF Group Measured by Dentin Color (Yellow, Brown, Black)
ParticipantsSilver Diamine Fluoride
Black37
Brown0
Yellow2
PrimaryCaries Arrest of Teeth in the SDF Group Measured by Dentin Texture (Soft, Hard)

Texture of the cavity's dentin of soft means the cavity is still an active infection. If the cavity is hard, the cavity is no longer an active infection (has been arrested). Please note dentin texture cannot be assessed for the Conventional group as the dentin is no longer accessible following baseline treatment.

Time frame:
12 Months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Caries Arrest of Teeth in the SDF Group Measured by Dentin Texture (Soft, Hard)
ParticipantsSilver Diamine Fluoride
Soft Dentin10
Hard Dentin29
PrimaryRestoration Integrity for Teeth in Control Group (Secondary Caries, Lost Restoration, Restoration Needing Repair)

Secondary caries, lost restorations, or restorations needing repair are treatment failures. Treatment failures were assessed throughout the 12 month duration of the trial, and children with treatment failures were removed from the trial for further clinical treatment.

Time frame:
12 Months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Restoration Integrity for Teeth in Control Group (Secondary Caries, Lost Restoration, Restoration Needing Repair)
ParticipantsConventional Caries Management
Missing restoration1
Secondary caries and lesion progression1
Intact restoration40
PrimarySigns of Pulpal Pathology (Lesion Reaching the Pulp Requiring Pulpular Treatment-pulpotomy and/or Pulpectomy-, Reversible Pulpitis, Irreversible Pulpitis, Abscess)

Signs of pulpal pathology are treatment failures. Treatment failures were assessed throughout the 12 month duration of the trial, and children with treatment failures were removed from the trial for further clinical treatment.

Time frame:
12 Months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Signs of Pulpal Pathology (Lesion Reaching the Pulp Requiring Pulpular Treatment-pulpotomy and/or Pulpectomy-, Reversible Pulpitis, Irreversible Pulpitis, Abscess)
ParticipantsSilver Diamine FluorideConventional Caries Management
Reversible Pulpitis11
Reversible Pulpitis and Later Periapical Infection20
Periapical Infection20
No Sign of Pulpal Pathology5141
SecondaryNumber of Providers Who Find Treatment With SDF More Favorable in Time for Treatment (More, Same, Less)

Data collected at baseline only.

Time frame:
Baseline
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Providers Who Find Treatment With SDF More Favorable in Time for Treatment (More, Same, Less)
ParticipantsSilver Diamine FluorideConventional Caries Management
More time012
Same amount of time127
Less time553
SecondaryNumber of Providers Who Find Treatment With SDF More Favorable in Ease of Treatment (Easier, Harder, Same Difficulty)
Time frame:
Baseline
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Providers Who Find Treatment With SDF More Favorable in Ease of Treatment (Easier, Harder, Same Difficulty)
ParticipantsSilver Diamine FluorideConventional Caries Management
Easier for the provider462
The same level of difficulty for provider1031
Harder for the provider09
SecondaryNumber of Providers Who Find Treatment With SDF More Favorable in Preference of Treatment Modality (More Preferable, no Preference, Less Preferable)
Time frame:
Baseline
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Providers Who Find Treatment With SDF More Favorable in Preference of Treatment Modality (More Preferable, no Preference, Less Preferable)
ParticipantsSilver Diamine FluorideConventional Caries Management
More preferable treatment for provider210
No preference in treatment for provider3541
Less preferable treatment for provider01
SecondaryParent Assessment of Appearance of Child's Teeth

Parents were asked "Are you concerned with the appearance of your child's teeth?"

Time frame:
12 Months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Parent Assessment of Appearance of Child's Teeth
ParticipantsSilver Diamine FluorideConventional Caries Management
No3326
Yes73
SecondaryParent Assessment of Treatment Provided

Parents were asked "If your child had another cavity, would you be willing to have that tooth treated with the same treatment option provided to your child in this study?"

Time frame:
12 Months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Parent Assessment of Treatment Provided
ParticipantsSilver Diamine FluorideConventional Caries Management
No73
Yes3326
SecondaryChild Assessment of Appearance of Teeth (Very Happy, Not Happy or Sad, Very Sad)
Time frame:
12 Months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Child Assessment of Appearance of Teeth (Very Happy, Not Happy or Sad, Very Sad)
ParticipantsSilver Diamine FluorideConventional Caries Management
Very Happy2926
Not Happy or Sad73
Very Sad40
SecondaryChild Assessment of Experience During Dental Visit (Didn't Hurt, Hurt a Little, Hurt a Lot)
Time frame:
12 Months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Child Assessment of Experience During Dental Visit (Didn't Hurt, Hurt a Little, Hurt a Lot)
ParticipantsSilver Diamine FluorideConventional Caries Management
Didn't Hurt at All2725
Hurt a Little104
Hurt a Lot30
SecondaryCosts of Treatment (Dollars)

Cost of one application of SDF and one 1-2 surface conventional restoration. Cost was calculated by taking the average Medicaid reimbursement across all U.S. states.

Time frame:
Baseline
Reported as:
Mean · Dollars
Costs of Treatment (Dollars)
DollarsSilver Diamine FluorideConventional Caries Management
Costs of Treatment (Dollars)20.62 (2.71 to 98.50)79.68 (30.00 to 178.80)
SecondaryTime of Treatment Procedures (Duration of Time in Minutes)
Time frame:
Baseline
Reported as:
Mean · Time in Minutes
Time of Treatment Procedures (Duration of Time in Minutes)
Time in MinutesSilver Diamine FluorideConventional Caries Management
Time of Treatment Procedures (Duration of Time in Minutes)5 (5 to 10)30 (17 to 40)

Adverse events

Collected over 1 year. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Silver Diamine Fluoride0/56 (0%)0/56 (0%)36/56 (64.3%)
Conventional Caries Management0/42 (0%)0/42 (0%)3/42 (7.1%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventSilver Diamine FluorideConventional Caries Management
Active (soft) LesionInfections and infestations25/56—
Active (soft) Lesion with ProgressionInfections and infestations7/56—
Radiographic signs of periapical infectionInfections and infestations4/560/42
ExtractionInfections and infestations3/560/42
Hard (arrested) Lesion with ProgressionInfections and infestations3/56—
Reversible PulpitisInfections and infestations3/561/42
Missing RestorationInfections and infestations—1/42
Secondary caries and lesion progressionInfections and infestations—1/42

Baseline characteristics

Treatment failures were assessed throughout the 12 month duration of the trial.

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Silver Diamine FluorideConventional Caries ManagementTotal
<=18 years564298
Between 18 and 65 years000
>=65 years000
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Silver Diamine FluorideConventional Caries ManagementTotal
Mean4.7 ± 1.94.8 ± 1.74.8 ± 1.8
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Silver Diamine FluorideConventional Caries ManagementTotal
Female291645
Male272653
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Silver Diamine FluorideConventional Caries ManagementTotal
Hispanic or Latino527
Not Hispanic or Latino514091
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Silver Diamine FluorideConventional Caries ManagementTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian101
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American322254
White141630
More than one race6410
Unknown or Not Reported303
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Silver Diamine FluorideConventional Caries ManagementTotal
United States564298
dmft
dmft(dmft)Silver Diamine FluorideConventional Caries ManagementTotal
Mean5.6 ± 3.77.2 ± 3.86.3 ± 3.9
08

Study locations

2 sites
  • University of Michigan School of Dentistry
    Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States
  • Mott Children's Health Center
    Flint, Michigan 48503, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Cleary J, Al-Hadidi R, Scully A, Yahn W, Zaid Z, Boynton JR, Eckert GJ, Yanca E, Fontana M. A 12-Month Randomized Clinical Trial of 38% SDF vs. Restorative Treatment. JDR Clin Trans Res. 2022 Apr;7(2):135-144. doi: 10.1177/23800844211072741. Epub 2022 Feb 4. PubMed 35120408 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Apr 27, 2016

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 22, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02601833
Lead sponsor
University of Michigan
Collaborators
Mott Children's Health Center
Responsible party
Margherita Fontana (Professor, University of Michigan) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 10, 2015
Start date
Jan 2016
Primary completion
Sep 18, 2020
Completion
Sep 18, 2020
Results posted
Nov 22, 2021
Last update
Nov 22, 2021

Study contacts

Margherita R Fontana, DDS, PhD
principal investigator · University of Michigan

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion