CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02596659Updated Nov 4, 2015

Effectiveness of Radial Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy on Tennis Elbow

An interventional study of Radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy (rESWT) and sham shockwave therapy in Lateral Epicondylosis, Lateral Epicondylitis and Tennis Elbow, sponsored by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Taiwan. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-11-04.

Sponsored by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background:

Tennis elbow, also known as lateral epicondylitis, is the inflammatory status of insertion site of common extensor tendon to humerus. It is usually related to overuse of local muscle. Radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy (rESWT) is a non-invasive physical treatment. It applies shockwave energy to the lesion site, enhancing the growth of microvascularity, inducing tissue repair, and thus relieving the symptom.

The purpose of this study is to understand the therapeutic effect of rESWT to tennis elbow.

Material and Methods

  • Subjects: 30 patients will be recruited from outpatient department of physical medicine and rehabilitation department.
  • Duration: 2013.09.01-2015.05.31
  • Methods: The patients will be randomly divided into the experimental group and the control group through the draw, with 15 patients in each group. Patients in the experimental group receive rESWT plus routine rehabilitation program. Patients in the control group receive sham shockwave therapy plus routine rehabilitation program.
  • Assessment: Before the therapy starts, patients who match the inclusion criteria will be evaluated using tools mentioned below:
  • General data: age, sex, body height, body weight, affected side, medical history
  • Assess upper extremity function and symptom with Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (DASH)
  • Assess severity of pain with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
  • Assess grip strength with grip strength dynamometer
  • Measure the size of tear (if any) of common extensor tendon through ultrasonography, and assess the texture of common extensor tendon through real-time sonoelastography (RTS)

Patients will be followed up 6 weeks, 3months, and 6 months after therapy starts. They will be re-assessed of upper extremity function and symptom, severity of pain, grip strength, and presentation on ultrasonography and RTS.

02

Conditions studied

  • Lateral Epicondylosis
  • Lateral Epicondylitis
  • Tennis Elbow

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • lateral epicondylosis
  • lateral epicondylitis
  • shockwave
  • sonoelastography
  • tennis elbow
  • pain intensity
  • grip strength
  • upper limb function
  • stiffness of common extensor tendon
03

In context

Tennis Elbow

284 studies on the registry are indexed under Tennis Elbow; 60 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 30 is below the median of 50 across 253 interventional studies indexed under Tennis Elbow.

Browse Tennis Elbow studies →

Lead sponsor

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital is the lead sponsor of 1,064 studies on the registry; 235 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged > 18 years old
  • Lateral elbow pain lasting > 3 months
  • Pain induced by direct compression on the lateral epicondyle or common extensor tendon, resistant wrist extension and pronation in the elbow extension position, or static stretching of common extensor tendon through the palmer flexion in wrist pronation and elbow extension position

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Generalized inflammatory arthritis (e.g., rheumatic arthritis)
  • Pain at the proximal part of involved arm (e.g., shoulder pain, neck pain)
  • Pain other than elbow pain at the involved arm
  • Abnormal neurogenic symptom over the involved arm (e.g., radicular pain, hands numbness, hemiplegia)
  • Wound or skin lesion at the elbow of the involved arm
  • Pregnancy
  • Severe local or systemic infection
  • Malignancy
  • Coagulopathy
  • Cardiac pacemaker
  • History of surgical treatment at the elbow of the involved arm
  • Non-steroid anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use orally or topically at the elbow of the involved arm in the past week
  • Local steroid injection at the elbow of the involved arm in the past 3 months
  • Oral steroid use in the past 6 weeks
  • Refusal to sign the informed consent
  • Impairment in self-expression (e.g., dementia, aphasia)
  • Inability/unwillingness to participate in all the measurements.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    The experimental group

    Participants in the experimental group received radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy (rESWT) plus physical therapy for 3 weeks.

    Procedure: Radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy (rESWT) · Procedure: Physical therapy

  • Sham comparator
    The control group

    Participants in the control group received sham shockwave therapy plus physical therapy for 3 weeks.

    Procedure: sham shockwave therapy · Procedure: Physical therapy

Interventions

  • ProcedureRadial extracorporeal shock wave therapy (rESWT)

    Each participant in the experimental group received rESWT for 3 sessions, consisting of 2000 impulses for each session, and one session per week over 3 weeks (a total of 6000 shock waves were given). The pneumatic pressure was set at the maximum level tolerable for each patient. The frequency of pulses was set at 10 Hz.

  • Proceduresham shockwave therapy

    Sham shockwave therapy were given by the same physiatrist using the same machine as the experimental group, with the same rESWT protocol (3 sessions, 2000 impulses for each session, one session per week over 3 weeks) and the same frequency (10 Hz) of impulses, but the pneumatic pressure was set at 0.1 bar, with a similar sound to the regular rESWT but without actual energy conduction.

  • ProcedurePhysical therapy

    The physical therapy program was performed 3 times a week over the same 3 weeks as rESWT, and consisted of 5 minutes of ultrasound diathermy, 15 minutes of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), and 10 minutes of therapeutic exercise, including wrist common extensor stretching and self-massage.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Changes in pain intensity

    Participants were asked to rate their present pain intensity, as caused by the tennis elbow, from 0-10 using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). If participants had bilateral tennis elbow, the side with the worse pain intensity was chosen for the assessment.

    Time frame: At baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks

  2. Changes in grip strength

    Maximal grip strength of the involved arm was assessed using a grip strength dynamometer. Participants were asked to grip the dynamometer 3 times, at 15- second rest intervals, and the highest grip strength number was recorded.

    Time frame: At baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks

  3. Changes in upper limb function

    Upper extremity disability and symptoms were assessed using the Taiwan version Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire.

    Time frame: At baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks

  4. Changes in stiffness of common extensor tendon

    The changes in stiffness of common extensor tendon were assessed with sonoelastography. The images of sonoelastography were interpreted with the modified RTS scoring system and analyzed with color histogram.

    Time frame: At baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Changes in size of tear within common extensor tendon

    On the 2-D image, the common extensor tendon was located. If there was tear within common extensor tendon, diameters in the 3-D dimension were measured and the size of the tear was calculated as a spheroid.

    Time frame: At baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
    Kaohsiung city, 833, Taiwan
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Khoury V, Cardinal E. "Tenomalacia": a new sonographic sign of tendinopathy? Eur Radiol. 2009 Jan;19(1):144-6. doi: 10.1007/s00330-008-1112-9. Epub 2008 Aug 2. PubMed 18677489 ↗
  • De Zordo T, Lill SR, Fink C, Feuchtner GM, Jaschke W, Bellmann-Weiler R, Klauser AS. Real-time sonoelastography of lateral epicondylitis: comparison of findings between patients and healthy volunteers. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Jul;193(1):180-5. doi: 10.2214/AJR.08.2020. PubMed 19542412 ↗
  • Kwon DR, Park GY, Lee SU, Chung I. Spastic cerebral palsy in children: dynamic sonoelastographic findings of medial gastrocnemius. Radiology. 2012 Jun;263(3):794-801. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12102478. Epub 2012 Apr 10. PubMed 22495685 ↗
  • Ahn KS, Kang CH, Hong SJ, Jeong WK. Ultrasound elastography of lateral epicondylosis: clinical feasibility of quantitative elastographic measurements. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 May;202(5):1094-9. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.11003. PubMed 24758665 ↗
  • Speed C. A systematic review of shockwave therapies in soft tissue conditions: focusing on the evidence. Br J Sports Med. 2014 Nov;48(21):1538-42. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091961. Epub 2013 Aug 5. PubMed 23918444 ↗
  • Spacca G, Necozione S, Cacchio A. Radial shock wave therapy for lateral epicondylitis: a prospective randomised controlled single-blind study. Eura Medicophys. 2005 Mar;41(1):17-25. PubMed 16175767 ↗
  • Ilieva EM, Minchev RM, Petrova NS. Radial shock wave therapy in patients with lateral epicondylitis. Folia Med (Plovdiv). 2012 Jul-Sep;54(3):35-41. doi: 10.2478/v10153-011-0095-5. PubMed 23270205 ↗
  • Gunduz R, Malas FU, Borman P, Kocaoglu S, Ozcakar L. Physical therapy, corticosteroid injection, and extracorporeal shock wave treatment in lateral epicondylitis. Clinical and ultrasonographical comparison. Clin Rheumatol. 2012 May;31(5):807-12. doi: 10.1007/s10067-012-1939-y. Epub 2012 Jan 27. PubMed 22278162 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 4, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02596659
Lead sponsor
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 4, 2015
Start date
Sep 2013
Primary completion
May 2015
Completion
May 2015
Last update
Nov 4, 2015

Study contacts

Tsung-Hsun Yang, MD
principal investigator · Kaohsiung Chang Cung Memorial Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion