CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT02591381TC vs ST AUSUpdated May 4, 2018

Transcorporal Versus Standard Artificial Urinary Sphincter Placement

An interventional study of Artificial Urinary Sphincter Placement in Urinary Stress Incontinence, sponsored by University of California, San Francisco. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to male participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-05-04.

Sponsored by University of California, San Francisco · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Study was started but closed prior to completion because we could not meet enrollment numbers
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
3
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

The investigators propose a randomized non-blinded comparison of standard vs. transcorporal approach for placement of an artificial urinary sphincter in male patients with stress urinary incontinence after radiation and radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. In the United States, the artificial urinary sphincter (AUS), manufactured by American Medical Systems, is the gold standard surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in men. The cuff, which is the portion of the device that encircles and occludes the urethra, is typically placed directly around the urethra (i.e., "standard" placement). The cuff can erode into the urethra. Transcorporal placement has been introduced as a method to reduce the risk of erosion. Transcorporal placement involves tunneling the cuff through the erectile bodies so as to protect the dorsal aspect of the urethra. This approach has never been compared to standard placement in a randomized fashion. In the randomized trial, no additional procedures beyond the normal care protocol will be required of the patients. The investigators will conduct the study through an established, IRB-approved multi-institutional network of surgeons. Success will be assessed via objective and subjective methods; complications will be tallied in a standardized fashion. Outcomes will be measured at two years.

Read the detailed description

Procedure/ Methods:

Patients will be identified in the urology clinic upon their standard of care visit for AUS placement. The procedures that determine whether a patient is a surgical candidate are as follows:

  • Incontinence Impact Questionnaire Short Form (IIQ-7) and Urinary Incontinence Symptoms index (ISI) standardized questionnaires
  • Physical examination
  • Review of medical history that would preclude surgery
  • Cystoscopy to evaluate and rule out stricture
  • Uroflow/Post void residual to ensure adequate bladder capacity

Pre surgery work up includes:

  • Urine analysis and if indicated urine culture and treatment of urinary tract infection
  • Flow, post-void residual if possible
  • Cystoscopy to rule out bladder neck contracture or urethral stricture
  • History and physical examination
  • Treatment of men with 2 days of chlorhexidine wash to the perineum
  • Incontinence sexual function questionaires
  • Aminogllycoside and other abx prior to surgery
  • 24 hour pad weight

Post-surgery follow up:

  • Routine removal of catheter within 5 days post-op
  • Treatment of antibiotics post-operatively to be limited to 1 week
  • Activation of AUS at 4-8 weeks post-op
  • Incontinence sexual function questionnaires
  • 24 hour pad weight

Routine follow ups will be conducted at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months post-operatively, and yearly thereafter (SOC). Patient characteristics that will be collected include:

  • etiology of the incontinence.
  • pre-operative pad usage
  • prior anti-incontinence procedures
  • adjuvant therapy for prostate cancer such as radiotherapy, or other history of pelvic radiation
  • post-operative urodynamic studies
  • cystoscopy findings
02

Conditions studied

  • Urinary Stress Incontinence

Keywords

  • urinary stress incontinence
03

In context

Urinary Incontinence, Stress

658 studies on the registry are indexed under Urinary Incontinence, Stress; 123 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 3 is below the median of 70 across 509 interventional studies indexed under Urinary Incontinence, Stress.

Browse Urinary Incontinence, Stress studies →

Lead sponsor

University of California, San Francisco is the lead sponsor of 2,133 studies on the registry; 376 are open to participants now.

Of its 262 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 196 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients undergoing an AUS procedure would potentially be candidates for the study

Exclusion Criteria: There are several situations in which either a TC or ST procedure would be specifically indicated, and it would be unethical to randomize these patients to the other procedure.

  • No men without erectile dysfunction
  • No use of injectable agents into the corporal body
  • No prior urethral surgery (Prior surgery defined as; urethroplasty, urethral sling, prior AUS placement or explantation, recto-urethral fistula closure)
  • No current penile prosthesis
  • No concomitant placement of penile prosthesis at the time of AUS placement
  • Males under the age of 18, as well as females, are also excluded
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
3 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    STANDARD AUS Placement

    Standard placement of an artificial urinary sphincter involves a small incision made in the patient's perineum or scrotum and a fluid-filled cuff is placed around the bulbar urethra (the portion of the urethra between the bladder neck and penis). Connected to the cuff with tubing, is a balloon filled with fluid that is placed behind the pubic bone or in the space between the peritoneum and abdominal muscles. A control pump is placed in the scrotum and allows the device to cycle, thus either exerting pressure to close off the urethra or releasing pressure to allow the urethra to open and the patient to void.

    Procedure: Artificial Urinary Sphincter Placement

  • Experimental
    TRANSCORPORAL AUS Placement

    Transcorporal placement has been introduced as a way to reduce risk of erosion and involves tunneling the cuff through the erectile bodies. The same incision is made as for the standard approach, and then an incision is made in each corpus cavernosum (cylinders of tissue that allow for erection). This allows the cuff to be placed around both the urethra and through the lining of the corporal bodies, increasing the bulk of tissue behind the urethra to protect it from erosion.

    Procedure: Artificial Urinary Sphincter Placement

Interventions

  • ProcedureArtificial Urinary Sphincter Placement

    The AUS is the gold standard for treatment of severe stress urinary incontinence, particularly in patients following surgical resection of the prostate for prostate cancer. AUSs are small devices that prevent urinary flow via compression of the urethra, thus mimicking the native urinary sphincter.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Revision or removal surgery for AUS cuff problems other than mechanical failure: these include cuff erosion, impending erosion (discretion of surgeon), persistent retention due to small cuff, urethral atrophy

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of up to 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Rate of post-operative urinary retention

    Urinary retention defined as urinary catheter placement for more than 5 days post-op.

    Time frame: Up to 2-4 weeks

  2. Change in 24 hour pad test at 3 months post-op compared to pre-op

    Time frame: 3 months post op

  3. Erectile function as measured pre and post AUS placement via the Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM)

    Sexual health is an important part of an individual's overall physical and emotional well being. This questionnaire is designed to help identify if the patient may be experiencing erectile dysfunction.

    Time frame: 3 month post op, 12 month post op

  4. Incontinence impact as measured by the Incontinence Symptom Index (ISI)

    This brief questionnaire is designed to assess the severity of the patient's urinary incontinence

    Time frame: 3 month post op, 12 month post op

  5. Quality of Life impact as measured by the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire--Short Form (IIQ)

    Some people find that accidental urine loss may affect their activities, relationships, and feelings. The questions in this assessment refer to areas in the subjects life that may have been influenced or changed by incontinent symptoms.

    Time frame: 3 month post op, 12 month post op

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of California San Francisco
    San Francisco, California 94143, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Haab F, Trockman BA, Zimmern PE, Leach GE. Quality of life and continence assessment of the artificial urinary sphincter in men with minimum 3.5 years of followup. J Urol. 1997 Aug;158(2):435-9. PubMed 9224318 ↗
  • Dalkin BL, Wessells H, Cui H. A national survey of urinary and health related quality of life outcomes in men with an artificial urinary sphincter for post-radical prostatectomy incontinence. J Urol. 2003 Jan;169(1):237-9. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64076-1. PubMed 12478144 ↗
  • Guralnick ML, Miller E, Toh KL, Webster GD. Transcorporal artificial urinary sphincter cuff placement in cases requiring revision for erosion and urethral atrophy. J Urol. 2002 May;167(5):2075-8; discussion 2079. PubMed 11956443 ↗
  • Aaronson DS, Elliott SP, McAninch JW. Transcorporal artificial urinary sphincter placement for incontinence in high-risk patients after treatment of prostate cancer. Urology. 2008 Oct;72(4):825-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.06.065. Epub 2008 Aug 26. PubMed 18752838 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 4, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02591381
Lead sponsor
University of California, San Francisco
Collaborators
University of Minnesota, Baylor College of Medicine, University of Iowa, University of Kansas, Central Ohio Urology Group, Loyola University Chicago, Lahey Clinic, University of Washington, New York University, University of California, San Diego, University of Utah
Responsible party
Benjamin Breyer, MD (Chief of Urology, University of California, San Francisco) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 29, 2015
Start date
Oct 2015
Primary completion
Oct 2017
Completion
Oct 2017
Last update
May 4, 2018

Study contacts

benjamin n breyer, MD, MAS, FAC
principal investigator · University of California, San Francisco

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in May 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion