An interventional study of Bipolar Polypectomy and Mechanical Polypectomy in Endometrial Polyps, sponsored by University of Cagliari. Status unknown. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-03-09.
Sponsored by University of Cagliari · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Hysteroscopy today is considered the gold standard for the diagnosis and treatment of endometrial polyps. Several hysteroscopic systems to resect endometrial polyps are currently available. Among Others bipolar systems and microscissors or graspers, both of theme make part of routine clinical practice and are universally accepted.
The aim of the study is to compare the efficacy of bipolar resection energy polypectomy versus microscissors or graspers These procedures assume a lower cost and are associated with a lower surgical risk due to their realization without anesthesia .
Hypothesis: Resection of polyps outpatient laser diode has a similar or superior to that of the bipolar electrode tolerability. The diode laser is a viable , quick , simple technique with a high percentage of resection and high degree of satisfaction of patients
University of Cagliari is the lead sponsor of 82 studies on the registry; 17 are open to participants now.
Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 1 (20%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Polyps resection with bipolar electrode
Procedure: Bipolar Polypectomy · Device: Bipolar electrode
Polyps resection with microscissors or graspers
Procedure: Mechanical Polypectomy · Device: Microscissors or graspers
Polyps resection with bipolar electrode
Polyps resection with microscissors or graspers
Bipolar electrode used to performs polypectomy
Mechanical instruments used to performs polypectomy
To assess the tolerability of polypectomy using a validated visual analogue pain scale
Time frame: we measure pain after resection of endometrial polyps, with 5 minutes for the patient thinks
Assess the recurrence of polyps after 3 months of resection (another hysteroscopy).
Time frame: 3 months after resection of the polyp, repeat hysteroscopy to assess recurrence
No study locations are listed for this record.
This study is status unknown, as verified in Mar 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University of Cagliari