CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT02587208Updated Oct 27, 2015

Plastibell Versus Conventional Dissection Techniques for Circumcision in Infants and Children

An interventional study of Plastibell and conventional sleeve in Circumcision, Male, sponsored by King Saud University. Status unknown at 1 site in Saudi Arabia. Open to male participants aged 3 Months to 12 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-10-27.

Sponsored by King Saud University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Oct 2015), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
3 Months to 12 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

Outcome of circumcision with Plastibell or conventional dissection techniques in infants and children: A prospective randomized controlled trial

Aim: to evaluate and compare postoperative and esthetic outcomes after Plastibell and conventional dissection circumcision

Methods:

Randomized Controlled Trial Inclusion criteria: patients younger than 13 years including neonates who required circumcision for various indications.

Exclusion criteria: - patients with bleeding or clotting disorders

  • Those whose parents insisted on a particular type of surgery
  • Children with lateral- lateral diameter of the glans over which a Plastibell device could not be placed Primary endpoint: parental concerns and satisfaction (questionnaire) Secondary endpoints: composite morbidity, operative time, postoperative pain (analgesic requirements)
  • Early postoperative problems: infection, bleeding, swelling, dysuria, pain (incidence, mean duration, emergency care if necessary, parental concerns about them (on a Likert-type 5-point scale [ not at all, a little, rather, very, very much])
  • Irregular scar, jumbling of tissues at the site of frenulum (assessed by physician)
  • Postoperative adhesions (assessed by physician)
  • Postoperative pain and analgesic requirements (paracetamol 15 mg/kg PO Q6 hrs for 48 hrs then PRN) number of doses and days required for analgesia as judged by parents, VAS ( >- 6 SCORE ), Kaplan-Meier analysis (time to event)
  • Parental satisfaction ( overall esthetic outcome [ very much satisfied, very satisfied, rather, a little satisfied, not at all satisfied])
  • Parental satisfaction ( skin removal): excess skin removal, insufficient skin removal [ not at all, a little, rather, very, very much]
  • Time for bell separation (mean +-SD), Kaplan-Meier analysis for different age groups
Read the detailed description

Outcome of circumcision with Plastibell or conventional dissection techniques in infants and children: A prospective randomized controlled trial Aim: to evaluate and compare postoperative and esthetic outcomes after Plastibell and conventional dissection circumcision

Methods:

A balanced, parallel group, prospective randomized controlled trial is to be performed over 2 years at our institute. Patients enrollment will commence after approval of our institutional review board as well as obtaining informed consent from the patient's legal guardians.

Participants Inclusion criteria: Patients younger than 13 years including neonates who required circumcision for various indications.

Exclusion criteria: - Patients with bleeding or clotting disorders

  • Patients with hypospadias or other penile anomalies
  • Those whose parents insisted on a particular type of surgery
  • Children with lateral- lateral diameter of the glans over which a Plastibell device could not be placed Interventions The subjects will be randomized and allocated into two groups: the Plastibell and sleeve dissection techniques.

Sample size calculation Power calculation was based on aesthetic outcome which was based on previous studies (Nagdeve et al and Fraser et al) wherein 60-69% of subjects operated by Plastibell technique and 43-45% by conventional dissection technique had good satisfaction. Establishing alpha at 0.2 and a power of 0.80 produced a sample size of 50 patients per arm.

Assignment and randomization A block randomization scheme will be used with equal allocation of subjects to the Plastibell and sleeve dissection groups. There are a total of 10 blocks, each having 10 subjects. One block will be selected by simple random sampling and its subjects will be subjected to the intervention.

Protocol All the parents will be informed regarding details of surgery, complications, postoperative care and follow-up protocol. Both procedures are performed under light general anesthesia and either dorsal penile nerve block or caudal block. The first step in both groups is to separate the foreskin from the glans penis and removal of smegma.

In the Plastibell group, the size of the device is chosen according to the lateral-lateral diameter of the glans. A dorsal slit incision is made and then the foreskin is pulled up and the Plastibell device placed between the prepuce and the glans. A non-absorbable string was tightly tied around the device and the distal prepuce is removed.

In the sleeve dissection group, a double incision technique on both outer and inner layers of the foreskin is employed. Hemostasis is achieved by bipolar diathermy, and cut edges are sutured with 5/0 rapide vicryl.

All patients will be managed on a day-care basis. At discharge, they will be prescribed syrup/tablet paracetamol 15mg/kg/dose every 6 hours whenever needed if pain score >_6 based on a visual analog scale for pain assessment. Parents will be told to write down how many times they give analgesic each day until the first postoperative visit.

Follow-up will be done at 14th (or after separation of Plastibell whichever later) and 90th days after surgery.

Written questionnaires will be given to parents at time of discharge Primary endpoint: Parental concerns and satisfaction (questionnaire) Secondary endpoints: Composite Morbidity, Operative Time, Postoperative Pain (analgesic requirements)

  • Early postoperative problems: infection, bleeding, swelling, dysuria, pain (incidence, mean duration, emergency care if necessary, parental concerns about them (on a Likert-type 5-point scale [not at all, a little, rather, very, very much])
  • Irregular scar, jumbling of tissues at the site of frenulum (assessed by physician)
  • Postoperative adhesions (assessed by physician)
  • Postoperative pain and analgesic requirements (paracetamol 15 mg/kg PO Q6 hrs PRN) number of doses and days required for analgesia as judged by parents, VAS ( >- 6 SCORE ), Kaplan-Meier analysis (time to event)
  • Parental satisfaction ( overall esthetic outcome [ very much satisfied, very satisfied, rather, a little satisfied, not at all satisfied])
  • Parental satisfaction ( skin removal): excess skin removal, insufficient skin removal [ not at all, a little, rather, very, very much]
  • Time for bell separation (mean +-SD), Kaplan-Meier analysis for different age groups
02

Conditions studied

  • Circumcision, Male

Keywords

  • circumcision
  • plastibell
  • infants
  • open sleeve
03

In context

Lead sponsor

King Saud University is the lead sponsor of 164 studies on the registry; 21 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
3 Months to 12 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients 3 months - 12 years (inclusive) who required circumcision for various indications.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with bleeding or clotting disorders
  • Those whose parents insisted on a particular type of surgery
  • Children with lateral- lateral diameter of the glans over which a Plastibell device could not be placed
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    conventional sleeve

    In the sleeve dissection group, a double incision technique on both outer and inner layers of the foreskin is employed. Hemostasis is achieved by bipolar diathermy, and cut edges are sutured with 5/0 rapide vicryl.

    Procedure: conventional sleeve

  • Active comparator
    plastibell

    In the Plastibell group, the size of the device is chosen according to the lateral-lateral diameter of the glans. A dorsal slit incision is made and then the foreskin is pulled up and the Plastibell device placed between the prepuce and the glans. A non-absorbable string was tightly tied around the device and the distal prepuce is removed.

    Device: Plastibell

Interventions

  • DevicePlastibell

    In the Plastibell group, the size of the device is chosen according to the lateral-lateral diameter of the glans. A dorsal slit incision is made and then the foreskin is pulled up and the Plastibell device placed between the prepuce and the glans. A non-absorbable string was tightly tied around the device and the distal prepuce is removed.

  • Procedureconventional sleeve

    In the sleeve dissection group, a double incision technique on both outer and inner layers of the foreskin is employed. Hemostasis is achieved by bipolar diathermy, and cut edges are sutured with 5/0 rapide vicryl.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Questionnaire for Parental satisfaction (overal esthetic outcome)

    - Parental satisfaction ( overall esthetic outcome \[ very much satisfied, very satisfied, rather, a little satisfied, not at all satisfied\])

    Time frame: 3-6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Postoperative pain measures

    VAS ( \>6/10) score would entitle giving paracetamol for patient and the total doses/total days where paracetamol was needed will be calculated

    Time frame: 1-2 weeks

  2. Early composite morbidity (incidence % and mean duration)

    Early postoperative problems: infection, bleeding, swelling, dysuria, pain (incidence, mean duration, emergency care if necessary

    Time frame: 2-4 weeks

  3. Likert -type 5-point scale for Parental concerns about early composite morbidity

    parental concerns about them (on a Likert-type 5-point scale \[not at all, a little, rather, very, very much\])

    Time frame: 2-4 weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • King Saud University
    Riyadh, 11472, Saudi Arabia
    Recruiting
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 27, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02587208
Lead sponsor
King Saud University
Responsible party
Dr Abdulrahman Alzahem (Associate professor, King Saud University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 27, 2015
Start date
Jan 2015
Primary completion
Dec 2015 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 2016 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 27, 2015

Study contacts

Abdulrahman Alzahem, MBBS, FRCSC
Contact
aalzahem@ksu.edu.sa
+966114695277
Abdulrahman Alzahem, MBBS, FRCSC
principal investigator · King Saud University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Oct 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion