An interventional study of Plastibell and conventional sleeve in Circumcision, Male, sponsored by King Saud University. Status unknown at 1 site in Saudi Arabia. Open to male participants aged 3 Months to 12 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-10-27.
Sponsored by King Saud University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Outcome of circumcision with Plastibell or conventional dissection techniques in infants and children: A prospective randomized controlled trial
Aim: to evaluate and compare postoperative and esthetic outcomes after Plastibell and conventional dissection circumcision
Methods:
Randomized Controlled Trial Inclusion criteria: patients younger than 13 years including neonates who required circumcision for various indications.
Exclusion criteria: - patients with bleeding or clotting disorders
Outcome of circumcision with Plastibell or conventional dissection techniques in infants and children: A prospective randomized controlled trial Aim: to evaluate and compare postoperative and esthetic outcomes after Plastibell and conventional dissection circumcision
Methods:
A balanced, parallel group, prospective randomized controlled trial is to be performed over 2 years at our institute. Patients enrollment will commence after approval of our institutional review board as well as obtaining informed consent from the patient's legal guardians.
Participants Inclusion criteria: Patients younger than 13 years including neonates who required circumcision for various indications.
Exclusion criteria: - Patients with bleeding or clotting disorders
Sample size calculation Power calculation was based on aesthetic outcome which was based on previous studies (Nagdeve et al and Fraser et al) wherein 60-69% of subjects operated by Plastibell technique and 43-45% by conventional dissection technique had good satisfaction. Establishing alpha at 0.2 and a power of 0.80 produced a sample size of 50 patients per arm.
Assignment and randomization A block randomization scheme will be used with equal allocation of subjects to the Plastibell and sleeve dissection groups. There are a total of 10 blocks, each having 10 subjects. One block will be selected by simple random sampling and its subjects will be subjected to the intervention.
Protocol All the parents will be informed regarding details of surgery, complications, postoperative care and follow-up protocol. Both procedures are performed under light general anesthesia and either dorsal penile nerve block or caudal block. The first step in both groups is to separate the foreskin from the glans penis and removal of smegma.
In the Plastibell group, the size of the device is chosen according to the lateral-lateral diameter of the glans. A dorsal slit incision is made and then the foreskin is pulled up and the Plastibell device placed between the prepuce and the glans. A non-absorbable string was tightly tied around the device and the distal prepuce is removed.
In the sleeve dissection group, a double incision technique on both outer and inner layers of the foreskin is employed. Hemostasis is achieved by bipolar diathermy, and cut edges are sutured with 5/0 rapide vicryl.
All patients will be managed on a day-care basis. At discharge, they will be prescribed syrup/tablet paracetamol 15mg/kg/dose every 6 hours whenever needed if pain score >_6 based on a visual analog scale for pain assessment. Parents will be told to write down how many times they give analgesic each day until the first postoperative visit.
Follow-up will be done at 14th (or after separation of Plastibell whichever later) and 90th days after surgery.
Written questionnaires will be given to parents at time of discharge Primary endpoint: Parental concerns and satisfaction (questionnaire) Secondary endpoints: Composite Morbidity, Operative Time, Postoperative Pain (analgesic requirements)
King Saud University is the lead sponsor of 164 studies on the registry; 21 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
In the sleeve dissection group, a double incision technique on both outer and inner layers of the foreskin is employed. Hemostasis is achieved by bipolar diathermy, and cut edges are sutured with 5/0 rapide vicryl.
Procedure: conventional sleeve
In the Plastibell group, the size of the device is chosen according to the lateral-lateral diameter of the glans. A dorsal slit incision is made and then the foreskin is pulled up and the Plastibell device placed between the prepuce and the glans. A non-absorbable string was tightly tied around the device and the distal prepuce is removed.
Device: Plastibell
In the Plastibell group, the size of the device is chosen according to the lateral-lateral diameter of the glans. A dorsal slit incision is made and then the foreskin is pulled up and the Plastibell device placed between the prepuce and the glans. A non-absorbable string was tightly tied around the device and the distal prepuce is removed.
In the sleeve dissection group, a double incision technique on both outer and inner layers of the foreskin is employed. Hemostasis is achieved by bipolar diathermy, and cut edges are sutured with 5/0 rapide vicryl.
Questionnaire for Parental satisfaction (overal esthetic outcome)
- Parental satisfaction ( overall esthetic outcome \[ very much satisfied, very satisfied, rather, a little satisfied, not at all satisfied\])
Time frame: 3-6 months
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Postoperative pain measures
VAS ( \>6/10) score would entitle giving paracetamol for patient and the total doses/total days where paracetamol was needed will be calculated
Time frame: 1-2 weeks
Early composite morbidity (incidence % and mean duration)
Early postoperative problems: infection, bleeding, swelling, dysuria, pain (incidence, mean duration, emergency care if necessary
Time frame: 2-4 weeks
Likert -type 5-point scale for Parental concerns about early composite morbidity
parental concerns about them (on a Likert-type 5-point scale \[not at all, a little, rather, very, very much\])
Time frame: 2-4 weeks
This study is status unknown, as verified in Oct 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
King Saud University