CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02578420Updated Jul 26, 2017

Back to Basics - Effects, Narratives and Routes of Administration of Open-label Placebo

An interventional study of open-label placebo and deceptive placebo in Placebo Effect, Pain and Expectancy, sponsored by University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland. Completed at 1 site in Switzerland. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-07-26.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
160
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To date, very little is known about the mechanisms of open-label placebo treatment and there is a lack in highly controlled experimental designs. Therefore, the planned project will test well-established explanatory models of (deceptive) placebo, i.e., (1) expectancy, (2) meaning response, in an open-label placebo design, investigating their influence on placebo analgesia.

Read the detailed description

The current project will consist of one experimental study and one qualitative study:

  1. the effects of open-label, and deceptive placebo administration on placebo analgesia will be directly compared when both groups have a comparable expectancy-inducing scientific rationale;
  2. subjective meaning models will be assessed by comparing subjective narratives of the placebo effect in open-label and deceptive placebo groups in a nested qualitative study.

The experimental study will be a randomized experiment with healthy subjects (N=120), and pain will be induced using a standardized heat pain paradigm (Medoc, Ramatishai, Israel; thermo-sensory analyzer (TSA)-II). Effects of the experimental conditions will be assessed both objectively (i.e. heat pain threshold and tolerance) and subjectively (i.e. subjective pain ratings, pain intensity and unpleasantness). Furthermore, investigators will randomly select 30 participants to take part in a nested qualitative study in order to qualitatively assess the meaning response by comparing subjective narratives of the placebo effect in the open-label and deceptive placebo groups, as well as in the control group.

02

Conditions studied

  • Placebo Effect
  • Pain
  • Expectancy
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland is the lead sponsor of 968 studies on the registry; 191 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Healthy male and female adults aged 18-65
  • Healthy by self-report statement, thus no known current or chronic somatic diseases or psychiatric disorders
  • Right-handedness (Oldfield, 1971),
  • Willing to participate in study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Medicine or Psychology Students
  • Any acute or chronic disease (chronic pain, hypertension, heart disease, renal disease, liver disease, diabetes) as well as skin pathologies, neuropathies or nerve entrapment symptoms, sensory abnormalities affecting the tactile or thermal modality
  • Current medications (psychoactive medication, narcotics, intake of analgesics) or being currently in psychological or psychiatric treatment
  • Insufficient German language skills to understand the instructions
  • Previous participation in studies using pain assessment (threshold and tolerance) with Peltier Devices
  • Daily consumption of more than three alcoholic standard beverages per day (a standard alcoholic beverage is defined as either 3dl beer or 1 dl wine or 2cl spirits)
  • Current or regular drug consumption (THC, cocaine, heroin, etc.)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
160 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    open-label placebo

    Participants (N=40) will have the information that they are receiving an inert cream (i.e. "placebo"). Placebo will be described as an inert or inactive cream, with no medication in it. Additionally, participants will be told that "placebo has been shown in rigorous clinical testing to produce significant mind-body self-healing processes." The placebo administration will be combined with the following scientific rationale/verbal suggestion: (a) placebos are effective analgesics, (b) classical conditioning as a possible mechanism of this effect, (c) compliance is important for outcome and (d) positive expectations increase placebo effects, but are not necessary.

    Other: open-label placebo

  • Sham comparator
    deceptive placebo

    Participants (N=40) will have the information that they are receiving an analgesic cream ("Antidolor, containing "Lidocain"), while in fact they will receive an inert cream, only. Antidolor will be described as an analgesic cream.

    Other: deceptive placebo

  • Placebo comparator
    control group

    Participants (N=40) will have the information that they are receiving an inert control cream.

    Other: open-label placebo

  • No intervention
    no treatment group

    Participants (N=40) will be told that they are in the "no treatment group" and that they will not receive an analgesic cream.

Interventions

  • Otheropen-label placebo

    Placebo Cream, openly described as "Placebo"

  • Otherdeceptive placebo

    Placebo Cream, described as "Voltaren, containing Diclofenac"

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. subjective intensity and unpleasantness ratings of heat pain tolerance

    Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    Time frame: 2 hours

  2. objective heat pain tolerance

    Temperatures

    Time frame: 2 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Expectancy of Relief Scale (ERS; Erwartungsfragebogen)

    Time frame: 2 hours

  2. Credibility and Effectiveness of the placebo analgesia expectation; adapted Version of the Context Model Questionnaire; Kontextmodellfragebogen (KMF)

    Time frame: 2 hours

  3. multidimensional sensitivities questionnaire (Mehrdimensionaler Befindlichkeitsfragebogen (MDBF))

    Time frame: 2 hours

  4. sociodemographic questionnaire (Soziodemographischer Fragebogen (SDD))

    Time frame: 2 hours

  5. Revised Life Orientation Test (LOT-R)

    Time frame: 2 hours

  6. NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI)

    Time frame: 2 hours

  7. questionnaire on competence and locus of control (Fragebogen zu Kompetenz- und Kontrollüberzeugungen (FKK))

    Time frame: 2 hours

  8. Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-D)

    Time frame: 2 hours

  9. Beliefs in holistic health and holistic treatments; Complementary and Alternative Medicine Beliefs Intentory (CAMBI)

    Time frame: 2 hours

  10. Desire for Relief Scale (DRS)

    Time frame: 2 hours

  11. subjective intensity and unpleasantness ratings of heat pain threshold

    Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    Time frame: 2 hours

  12. objective heat pain threshold

    Temperatures

    Time frame: 2 hours

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Basel
    Basel, 4055, Switzerland
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Locher C, Buergler S, Frey Nascimento A, Kost L, Blease C, Gaab J. Lay perspectives of the open-label placebo rationale: a qualitative study of participants in an experimental trial. BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 18;11(8):e053346. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053346. PubMed 34408060 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 26, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02578420
Lead sponsor
University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 19, 2015
Start date
Jan 2016
Primary completion
Jul 2016
Completion
Jun 2017
Last update
Jul 26, 2017

Study contacts

Jens Gaab, Prof
study chair · Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Department of Psychology, University of Basel

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion