CClinicalTrials.gg
Temporarily not availableNCT02572440Updated Oct 9, 2015

Autologous Platelet-rich Plasma (aPRP) for Complex Aortic Arch Surgerymacrovascular Operation

An expanded access record providing Sorin XTRA/Sorin Group, in Autologous Blood Transfusion, sponsored by Beijing Anzhen Hospital. Temporarily not available at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-10-09.

Sponsored by Beijing Anzhen Hospital · Expanded access

Study type
Expanded access
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Perioperative blood loss continues to be a serious problem in complex aortic arch surgery using deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA). Major blood loss causes increased morbidity and mortality [1]. These patients often require transfusion of allogeneic blood products. It has been estimated shortages of blood supply in China will worsen [2]. Clinicians have made significant progress to decrease the quality of allogenic blood transfusion.

Increasing postoperative hemorrhage risk of aortic arch patients undergoing DHCA may be related to CPB induced hemostatic defect, the use of the CPB is likely to contribute to coagulation factor lost and platelet dysfunction [3, 4]. We are aware of the potential benefit of aPRP, withdrawal of aPRP immediately before initiating CPB appears to be a promising approach because it avoids CPB-related platelet damage and limits post-CPB blood loss. So we adopted and used aPRP as a blood conservation technique to reduce blood transfusion in aortic arch surgery with DHCA. Autologous red blood cells were infused to maintain a HGB level above 100 g/L after heparin neutralizing activity. And aPRPs were transfused after heparin neutralizing activity as no active bleeding was observed. Our goal was to determine the effect between aPRP and homologous transfusion on perioperative bleeding during complex aortic arch surgery using DHCA.

Read the detailed description
  1. Patient selection 42 type A aortic dissections patients were asked to participate in a prospective, randomized trial comparing aPRP technique with regular blood conservation. 6 patients were excluded The patients were randomized into two groups: regular blood conservation group(n=18) and aPRP group(n=18). Patients gave informed consent, and ethical permission was approved by the Human Ethics Committee of Beijing Anzhen Hospital. The grouping situation is blinded to the surgeon, perfusionist and statistician.
  2. Anesthesia and monitoring method All patients were monitored according to the American Society of Anesthesia guidelines and received standard general anesthesia. A post-operative analgesic pump was used until four days after surgery. The same group of surgeons performed all operations. Extracorporeal circulation used DHCA and axillary arterial anterograde cerebral perfusion. In addition, the same group of physicians managed extracorporeal circulation.
  3. Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma Harvest Technique In the treatment group, shortly after administration of general anesthesia, blood was collected via central venous catheter 60 ml per minute (that was proven to be safe) and approximately 15-20 mL/kg of whole blood was collected. The harvested blood was then centrifuged at 2400 rpm to separate the red blood cells (RBC) from the autologous platelet rich plasma (aPRP). The separated blood component was processed by acid sodium citrate glucose solution (AcD-A) for anti-coagulation. No systemic heparin was administered at this time. The aPRP component was then stored at 20℃ - 24℃. When the blood withdrawal was proceeding, lactated ringer's solution and succinylated gelatin were used via the peripheral vein to dilate circulating capacity and maintain hemodynamic stability. A vasoactive drug was used if necessary. The systematic heparinization began after blood collection had completed. General blood salvage was performed during surgery and transfused according to the patient's actual intraoperative needs.

    The mean quantity of whole blood collected for Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma Harvest was 1037 ± 286 mL. The control group was only subjected to general intraoperative blood conservation using red blood cell salvage and allogenic blood transfusion.

  4. Transfusion Practice Autologous red blood cells were infused to maintain the HGB level above 100 g/L. While on CPB, the hemoglobin (HGB) level was maintained between 70 g/L to 90 g/L. Salvaged blood was also used following CPB. FFP, platelets, and aPRP were transfused after protamine reversed heparinization, since no active bleeding was observed. Therapeutic transfusion triggers were: INR TEG-R>11 min for FFP administration; TEG-a \<63 degrees for human fibrinogen; and TEG-MA \<52 mm for aphaeresis platelets
02

Conditions studied

  • Autologous Blood Transfusion

Keywords

  • Aortic arch surgery; Blood conservation; aPRP
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Beijing Anzhen Hospital is the lead sponsor of 188 studies on the registry; 100 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All

Inclusion criteria

  • adults older than 18 years old, type A aortic dissections patients undergoing frozen elephant trunk with total arch replacement (Bentall plus Sun's surgery) with DHCA.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients with hepatitis B virus infection, coagulation disorder, anemia (HBG\<11mg/dl), stopping anticoagulants less than 7 days and end-stage renal disease dependent on hemodialysis.
05

Access details

Study type
Expanded access

Available treatment

  • ProcedureSorin XTRA/Sorin Group,
06

Where to request access

1 site
  • Beijing Anzhen Hospital
    Beijing, Beijing 100038, China
07

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 9, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02572440
Lead sponsor
Beijing Anzhen Hospital
Responsible party
Zhao Liyun (Vice-president anesthesiology department Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Beijing Anzhen Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 9, 2015
Start date
Oct 2014
Primary completion
Jun 2015
Last update
Oct 9, 2015
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Requesting access

Expanded access is arranged between your doctor and the company. Ask your care team to contact the provider listed on this record.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion