CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02563860StatinsUpdated Jul 12, 2019Results posted

Pharmacological Treatment of Rett Syndrome With Statins

A Phase 2 interventional study of Lovastatin in Rett Syndrome, sponsored by Montefiore Medical Center. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 3 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-07-12.

Sponsored by Montefiore Medical Center · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
3 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This is a phase 2 , open label, dose escalating study of Lovastatin in Rett syndrome.

Read the detailed description

Excess neuronal cholesterol plays a role in the pathophysiology of Rett syndrome(RTT) and the investigators hypothesise that inhibition of cholesterol synthesis in the CNS will reduce neuronal cholesterol and lead to improvement in Rett syndrome related symptoms.

Goal: To determine the optimal dosing regiment of Lovastatin for patients with RTT and to identify the most appropriate primary outcome measure for the subsequent Phase 3 study.

Phase 2, dose escalation study.

Primary outcome: Gait speed Secondary outcomes: respiratory function, cognition, EEG (encephalopathy), Rett syndrome severity scale, neurodevelopmental assessment (QOL)

20 ambulatory female patients with genetically confirmed.

02

Conditions studied

  • Rett Syndrome

Keywords

  • Treatment trial
  • Lovastatin
03

In context

Rett Syndrome

98 studies on the registry are indexed under Rett Syndrome; 20 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 20 is below the median of 30 across 64 interventional studies indexed under Rett Syndrome.

Browse Rett Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Montefiore Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 402 studies on the registry; 70 are open to participants now.

Of its 81 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 73 (90%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
3 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Females patients,
  • Genetically confirmed RTT,
  • Ambulatory.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of co morbid non-Rett related disease,
  • History of adverse reaction/hypersensitivity to statins,
  • Levels of aspartate-amino trans-ferase (AST), alanine-amino transferase (ALT) or creatine kinase (CK) triple the normal values,
  • Active liver disease,
  • Concomitant use of strong CYP3A4 inhibitors,
  • Condition predis-posing to renal failure secondary to rhabdomyolysis (scoliosis surgery within 6 months),
  • Oral contraceptives use.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
20 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Open label

    Treatment with Lovastatin, dose escalating trial according to the following schedule: 10 mg daily for 8 week 20 mg daily for 8 weeks 40 mg daily for 16 weeks.

    Drug: Lovastatin

Interventions

  • DrugLovastatin

    dose escallating

    Also known as: Mevacor

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Gait Velocity as Measured by GAITRite System

    To perform quantitative gait assessment using a computerized walkway with embedded pressure sendors (GAIT rite)

    Time frame: During final week of treatment, week 32

Secondary outcomes

  1. Visual Memory Novelty Score as Assessed by TobiiTX 300 Eyetracking System

    Novelty score is considered a composite measure of visual memory.Test is a standardized neuropsychological test( "Rose test") adapted for eye tracking system. The present study made use of a well-established battery of "visual paired comparison" problems .There were nine problems: five using achromatic photos of faces and four using multicolored abstract patterns paired stimuli , separated by 23°. For each problem, two identical stimuli are briefly presented side by side for familiarization, then the familiar and a new one are paired on test Recognition(memory) is indexed by a novelty score (percentage of looking to the novel target on test). Higher novelty scores were related to better recognition (index of better memory) Scores range from 0.0-1.0 (0-100%) and indicate 1) more overall looking at novel target and (2) more fixations to novel targets. Score of .5 (50%) indicates looking "by change" only with no recognition.

    Time frame: final week of treatment, Week 32

07

Results

Posted May 7, 2019

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneOpen Label
Started20
Completed19
Not completed1

Outcome measures

PrimaryGait Velocity as Measured by GAITRite System

To perform quantitative gait assessment using a computerized walkway with embedded pressure sendors (GAIT rite)

Time frame:
During final week of treatment, week 32
Reported as:
Median · cm/sec
Gait Velocity as Measured by GAITRite System
cm/secOpen Label
Gait Velocity as Measured by GAITRite System58.6 (43.8 to 71.1)
SecondaryVisual Memory Novelty Score as Assessed by TobiiTX 300 Eyetracking System

Novelty score is considered a composite measure of visual memory.Test is a standardized neuropsychological test( "Rose test") adapted for eye tracking system. The present study made use of a well-established battery of "visual paired comparison" problems .There were nine problems: five using achromatic photos of faces and four using multicolored abstract patterns paired stimuli , separated by 23°. For each problem, two identical stimuli are briefly presented side by side for familiarization, then the familiar and a new one are paired on test Recognition(memory) is indexed by a novelty score (percentage of looking to the novel target on test). Higher novelty scores were related to better recognition (index of better memory) Scores range from 0.0-1.0 (0-100%) and indicate 1) more overall looking at novel target and (2) more fixations to novel targets. Score of .5 (50%) indicates looking "by change" only with no recognition.

Time frame:
final week of treatment, Week 32
Reported as:
Median · percent
Visual Memory Novelty Score as Assessed by TobiiTX 300 Eyetracking System
percentOpen Label
Pre-treatment44.85 (25.85 to 68.10)
Post treatment58.93 (47.55 to 70.25)

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Open Label0/20 (0%)0/20 (0%)1/20 (5%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventOpen Label
mildPsychiatric disorders1/20

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Open Label
<=18 years20
Between 18 and 65 years0
>=65 years0
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Open Label
Female20
Male0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Open Label
United States20
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Montefiore Medical center
    Bronx, New York 10467, United States
09

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 12, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02563860
Lead sponsor
Montefiore Medical Center
Collaborators
Rett Syndrome Research Trust
Responsible party
Aleksandra Djukic (Professor of Clinical Neurology, Director, Tri State Rett Syndrome Center, Montefiore Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 30, 2015
Start date
Jul 2015
Primary completion
Jul 2016
Completion
Jul 2016
Results posted
May 7, 2019
Last update
Jul 12, 2019

Study contacts

Aleksandra Djukic, MD PhD
principal investigator · Montefiore Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion