ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02537431Updated Jun 18, 2024Results posted

Open Label Study of KRN23 on Osteomalacia in Adults With X-linked Hypophosphatemia (XLH)

A Phase 3 interventional study of burosumab in X-linked Hypophosphatemia, sponsored by Kyowa Kirin, Inc.. Completed at 14 sites in 6 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-06-18.

Sponsored by Kyowa Kirin, Inc. · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
14
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary objective of this study is to establish the effect of KRN23 treatment on improvement in XLH-associated osteomalacia as determined by osteoid volume (osteoid volume/bone volume, OV/BV).

02

Conditions studied

  • X-linked Hypophosphatemia

Keywords

  • KRN23
  • Fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23)
  • XLH
  • X-linked Hypophosphatemia
03

In context

Familial Hypophosphatemic Rickets

49 studies on the registry are indexed under Familial Hypophosphatemic Rickets; 8 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 14 is below the median of 28 across 29 interventional studies indexed under Familial Hypophosphatemic Rickets.

Browse Familial Hypophosphatemic Rickets studies →

Lead sponsor

Kyowa Kirin, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 36 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Of its 7 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 3 (43%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Male or female, aged 18 - 65 years, inclusive
  2. Diagnosis of XLH supported by classic clinical features of adult XLH (such as short stature or bowed legs), and at least one of the following at Screening:

    • Documented phosphate regulating gene with homology to endopeptidases located on the X chromosome (PHEX) PHEX mutation in either the patient or in a directly related family member with appropriate X-linked inheritance
    • Serum intact FGF23 (iFGF23) level > 30 pg/mL by Kainos assay
  3. Biochemical findings consistent with XLH based on overnight fasting (min. 8 hours):

    • Serum phosphorus \< 2.5 mg/dL at Screening
    • Ratio of renal tubular maximum phosphate reabsorption rate to (TmP/GFR) \< 2.5 mg/dL at Screening
  4. Presence of skeletal pain attributed to XLH/osteomalacia, as defined by a score of ≥ 4 on the Brief Pain Inventory question 3 (BPI-Q3, Worst Pain) at Screening. (Skeletal pain that, in the opinion of the investigator, is attributed solely to causes other than XLH/osteomalacia-for example, back pain or joint pain in the presence of severe osteoarthritis by radiograph in that anatomical location-in the absence of any skeletal pain likely attributed to XLH/osteomalacia should not be considered for eligibility)
  5. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥ 60 mL/min (using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration [CKD-EPI] equation) or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) eGFR of 45 to \<60 mL/min at Screening with confirmation that the renal insufficiency is not due to nephrocalcinosis
  6. Provide written after the nature of the study has been explained, and prior to any research-related procedures. If the subject in a minor, provide written assent and have a legally authorized representative willing and able to provide written informed consent, after the nature of the study has been explained, and prior to any research-related procedures
  7. Willing to provide access to prior medical records for the collection of biochemical and radiographic data and disease history
  8. Females of must have a negative urine pregnancy test at Screening and be willing to have additional pregnancy tests during the study. Females considered not to be of childbearing potential include those who have been in menopause for at least two years prior to Screening, or have had tubal ligation at least one year prior to Screening, or have had a total hysterectomy or bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy.
  9. Participants of child-bearing potential or with partners of child-bearing potential who have not undergone a total hysterectomy or a bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and are sexually active must consent to use two effective methods of as determined by the site investigator (i.e. oral hormonal contraceptives, patch hormonal contraceptives, vaginal ring, intrauterine device, physical double-barrier methods, surgical hysterectomy, vasectomy, tubal ligation, or true abstinence) from the period following the signing of the informed consent through 12 weeks after last dose of study drug
  10. Must, in the opinion of the investigator, be willing and able to complete all aspects of the study, adhere to the study visit schedule and comply with the assessments

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Use of any pharmacologic vitamin D metabolite or analog (e.g. calcitriol, doxercalciferol, and paricalcitol) within the 2 years before Screening
  2. Use of oral phosphate within 2 years before Screening
  3. Use of aluminum hydroxide antacids, acetazolamides, and thiazides within 7 days prior to Screening
  4. Use of bisphosphonates in the 2 years prior to Screening
  5. Use of denosumab in the 6 months prior to Screening
  6. Use of teriparatide in the 2 months prior to Screening
  7. Chronic use of systemic defined as more than 10 days in the 2 months prior to Screening
  8. Corrected serum calcium level ≥ 10.8 mg/dL (2.7 mmol/L) at Screening
  9. Serum intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) ≥ 2.5 times the (ULN) at Screening
  10. Use of medication to suppress parathyroid hormone (PTH) (cinacalcet for example) within 60 days prior to Screening
  11. /Partial thromboplastin time (PT/PTT) outside the normal range at Screening
  12. Evidence of any disease or use of anticoagulant medication (such as warfarin, heparin, direct thrombin inhibitors, or Xa inhibitors (xabans) that, in the opinion of the investigator, cannot be discontinued) that may increase the risk of bleeding during the procedure
  13. Pregnant or breastfeeding at Screening or planning to become pregnant (self or partner) at any time during the study
  14. Unable or unwilling to withhold prohibited medications throughout the study
  15. Documented dependence on narcotics
  16. Use of KRN23, or any other therapeutic monoclonal antibody within 90 days prior to Screening
  17. Use of product or investigational medical device within 30 days prior to Screening, or requirement for any investigational agent prior to completion of all scheduled study assessments.

    OR, in Japan, use of any investigational product or investigational medical device within 4 months prior to Screening, or requirement for any investigational agent prior to completion of all scheduled study assessments.

  18. Presence or history of any , allergic or anaphylactic reactions to any monoclonal antibody or KRN23 that, in the judgment of the investigator, places the subject at increased risk for adverse effects
  19. History of allergic reaction or adverse reactions to tetracycline or demeclocycline
  20. Prior history of positive test for antibody, surface antigen, and/or antibody
  21. History of recurrent infection (other than dental abscesses, which are known to be associated with XLH) or predisposition to infection, or of known immunodeficiency
  22. Presence of malignant neoplasm (except basal cell carcinoma)
  23. Presence of a concurrent disease or condition that would interfere with study participation or affect safety
  24. Presence or history of any condition that, in the view of the investigator, places the subject at high risk of poor treatment compliance or of not completing the study
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(14)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

INR, PT and aPTT (clotting tests)

Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.

Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Excipients

The other ingredients in a medicine besides the active drug, such as fillers, colours or preservatives.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
14 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Open-Label Burosumab Q4W

    1.0 mg/kg burosumab monthly (Q4W), calculated based on baseline weight and up to a maximum dose of 90 mg.

    Biological: burosumab

Interventions

  • Biologicalburosumab

    solution for subcutaneous injection

    Also known as: KRN23, UX023, Crysvita

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percent Change From Baseline in OV/BV at Week 48

    OV/BV: percent of a given volume of bone tissue that consists of unmineralized bone (osteoid).

    Time frame: Baseline, 48 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving Mean Serum Phosphorus Levels Above the Lower Limit of Normal (LLN) at the Mid-Point of the Dose Interval, as Averaged Across Dose Cycles Between Baseline and Week 24

    The LLN was defined as 2.5 mg/dL (0.81 mmol/L). The 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated using Wilson score method.

    Time frame: Baseline, up to 24 weeks

  2. Percent Change From Baseline in O.Th at Week 48

    O.Th: mean thickness, given in micrometers, for osteoid seams.

    Time frame: Baseline, 48 weeks

  3. Percent Change From Baseline in OS/BS at Week 48

    OS/Bs: percent of bone surface covered in osteoid.

    Time frame: Baseline, 48 weeks

  4. Percent Change From Baseline in MLt at Week 48

    MLt: average time interval between osteoid formation and its subsequent mineralization; calculated by dividing the osteoid thickness by the adjusted apposition rate (O.Th/Aj.AR). Aj.AR; amount of new bone created (bone formation rate over the entire osteoid surface). Based on imputed MLt values.

    Time frame: Baseline, 48 weeks

  5. Change From Baseline in MAR at Week 48

    MAR: linear rate of new bone deposition; mean distance between the double labels, divided by the time interval between them.

    Time frame: Baseline, 48 weeks

  6. Change From Baseline in MS/BS at Week 48

    MS/BS: percent of bone surface that displays a tetracycline label reflecting active mineralization; calculated as the double-labeled surface plus one half of the single-labeled surface and is expressed as a function of total bone surface (\[dLS + sLS/2\]/BS). It is a measure of the proportion of bone surface upon which new mineralized bone was being deposited during the period of tetracycline labeling.

    Time frame: Baseline, 48 weeks

  7. Change From Baseline in BFR/BS at Week 48

    BFR/BS: amount of new bone formed in unit time per unit of bone surface; calculated by multiplying MS/BS by the MAR. MS/BS: percent of bone surface that displays a tetracycline label reflecting active mineralization; calculated as the double-labeled surface plus one half of the single-labeled surface and is expressed as a function of total bone surface (\[dLS + sLS/2\]/BS). It is a measure of the proportion of bone surface upon which new mineralized bone was being deposited during the period of tetracycline labeling. MAR: linear rate of new bone deposition; mean distance between the double labels, divided by the time interval between them.

    Time frame: Baseline, 48 weeks

  8. Change From Baseline in BFR/OS at Week 48

    BFR/OS: bone formation rate to osteoid surface ratio, related to the Aj.AR (amount of new bone created \[bone formation rate over the entire osteoid surface\]).

    Time frame: Baseline, 48 weeks

  9. Change From Baseline in BFR/BV at Week 48

    BFR/BV: equivalent to bone turnover rate.

    Time frame: Baseline, 48 weeks

  10. Percentage of Participants Achieving Mean Serum Phosphorus Levels Above the LLN at the End of the Dosing Cycle Between Baseline and Week 24

    The LLN was defined as 2.5 mg/dL (0.81 mmol/L). The 95% CI was calculated using Wilson score method.

    Time frame: Baseline, up to 24 weeks

  11. Mean Change of Serum Phosphorus Levels at the Mid-Point of Dosing Cycle, as Averaged Across Dose Cycles Between Baseline and Week 24

    Time frame: Baseline, up to 24 weeks

  12. Percent Change of Serum Phosphorus Levels at the Mid-Point of Dosing Cycle, as Averaged Across Dose Cycles Between Baseline and Week 24

    Time frame: Baseline, up to 24 weeks

  13. Mean Change of Serum Phosphorus Levels at the End of Dosing Cycle, as Averaged Across Dose Cycles Between Baseline and Week 24

    Time frame: Baseline, up to 24 weeks

  14. Percentage Change of Serum Phosphorus Levels at the End of Dosing Cycle, as Averaged Across Dose Cycles Between Baseline and Week 24

    Time frame: Baseline, up to 24 weeks

  15. Time-Adjusted Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Serum Phosphorus Between Baseline and Week 24

    Time frame: Baseline, up to 24 weeks

  16. Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2D

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 20, Week 21, Week 22, Week 24, Week 48, Week 60, Week 70, Week 72, Week 84, Week 94, Week 96, Week 108, Week 120, Week 132

  17. Change From Baseline Over Time in 24-Hour Urinary Phosphorus

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96, End of Study II (EOSII) (up to Week 141)

  18. Change From Baseline Over Time in TmP/GFR

    TmP/GFR: ratio of renal tubular maximum reabsorption rate of phosphate to glomerular filtration rate.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 12, Week 22, Week 24, Week 48, Week 60, Week 72, Week 84, Week 96, EOSII (up to Week 141)

  19. Change From Baseline Over Time in TRP

    TRP: tubular reabsorption of phosphate.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 12, Week 22, Week 24, Week 48, Week 60, Week 72, Week 84, Week 96, EOSII (up to Week 141)

  20. Change From Baseline Over Time in P1NP

    P1NP: procollagen type 1 N-propeptide.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96, EOSII (up to Week 141)

  21. Percent Change From Baseline Over Time in P1NP

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96, EOSII (up to Week 141)

  22. Change From Baseline Over Time in CTx

    CTx: carboxy-terminal cross-linked telopeptide of type I collagen.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96, EOSII (up to Week 141)

  23. Percent Change From Baseline Over Time in CTx

    CTx: carboxy-terminal cross-linked telopeptide of type I collagen.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96, EOSII (up to Week 141)

  24. Change From Baseline Over Time in BALP

    BALP: bone-specific alkaline phosphatase.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96, EOSII (up to Week 141)

  25. Percent Change From Baseline Over Time in BALP

    BALP: bone-specific alkaline phosphatase.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96, EOSII (up to Week 141)

07

Results

Posted Sep 25, 2018

Participant flow

Open-Label Period (Week 0 to Week 48)
Participant flow — Open-Label Period (Week 0 to Week 48)
MilestoneOpen-Label Burosumab Q4W
Started14
Completed13
Not completed1
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject1
Treatment Extension Period I
Participant flow — Treatment Extension Period I
MilestoneOpen-Label Burosumab Q4W
Started13
Completed13
Not completed0
Treatment Extension Period II
Participant flow — Treatment Extension Period II
MilestoneOpen-Label Burosumab Q4W
Started8
Completed8
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercent Change From Baseline in OV/BV at Week 48

OV/BV: percent of a given volume of bone tissue that consists of unmineralized bone (osteoid).

Time frame:
Baseline, 48 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · percentage change of unmineralized bone
Percent Change From Baseline in OV/BV at Week 48
percentage change of unmineralized boneOpen-Label Burosumab Q4W
Percent Change From Baseline in OV/BV at Week 48-54.18 ± 20.211
Statistical analysis
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · t-test · p = < 0.0001 (The null hypothesis of no mean percent change from baseline is tested using t-test.) · Mean: -54.18 · 95% CI -68.64 to -39.72
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving Mean Serum Phosphorus Levels Above the Lower Limit of Normal (LLN) at the Mid-Point of the Dose Interval, as Averaged Across Dose Cycles Between Baseline and Week 24

The LLN was defined as 2.5 mg/dL (0.81 mmol/L). The 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated using Wilson score method.

Time frame:
Baseline, up to 24 weeks
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving Mean Serum Phosphorus Levels Above the Lower Limit of Normal (LLN) at the Mid-Point of the Dose Interval, as Averaged Across Dose Cycles Between Baseline and Week 24
percentage of participantsOpen-Label Burosumab Q4W
Percentage of Participants Achieving Mean Serum Phosphorus Levels Above the Lower Limit of Normal (LLN) at the Mid-Point of the Dose Interval, as Averaged Across Dose Cycles Between Baseline and Week 2492.9 (68.5 to 98.7)
Statistical analysis
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · binomial test · p = <0.0001 (The p-value is for testing the proportion of participants achieving the mean serum phosphorus levels above the LLN (2.5 mg/dL \[0.81 mmol/L\]) against 0% from the binomial test.)
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline in O.Th at Week 48

O.Th: mean thickness, given in micrometers, for osteoid seams.

Time frame:
Baseline, 48 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · percentage change in thickness
Percent Change From Baseline in O.Th at Week 48
percentage change in thicknessOpen-Label Burosumab Q4W
Percent Change From Baseline in O.Th at Week 48-32.21 ± 11.966
Statistical analysis
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · t-test · p = <0.0001 (The null hypothesis of no mean percent change from baseline is tested using t-test.) · Mean: -32.21 · 95% CI -40.25 to -24.17
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline in OS/BS at Week 48

OS/Bs: percent of bone surface covered in osteoid.

Time frame:
Baseline, 48 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · percent change of bone surface covered
Percent Change From Baseline in OS/BS at Week 48
percent change of bone surface coveredOpen-Label Burosumab Q4W
Percent Change From Baseline in OS/BS at Week 48-26.00 ± 15.012
Statistical analysis
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · t-test · p = 0.0002 (The null hypothesis of no mean percent change from baseline is tested using t-test.) · Mean: -26.00 · 95% CI -36.08 to -15.91
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline in MLt at Week 48

MLt: average time interval between osteoid formation and its subsequent mineralization; calculated by dividing the osteoid thickness by the adjusted apposition rate (O.Th/Aj.AR). Aj.AR; amount of new bone created (bone formation rate over the entire osteoid surface). Based on imputed MLt values.

Time frame:
Baseline, 48 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · percent change in average time interval
Percent Change From Baseline in MLt at Week 48
percent change in average time intervalOpen-Label Burosumab Q4W
Percent Change From Baseline in MLt at Week 48-52.24 ± 58.487
Statistical analysis
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · t-test · p = 0.0199 (The null hypothesis of no mean percent change from baseline is tested using t-test.) · Mean: -52.24 · 95% CI -94.08 to -10.41
SecondaryChange From Baseline in MAR at Week 48

MAR: linear rate of new bone deposition; mean distance between the double labels, divided by the time interval between them.

Time frame:
Baseline, 48 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · µm/day
Change From Baseline in MAR at Week 48
µm/dayOpen-Label Burosumab Q4W
Change From Baseline in MAR at Week 480.04 ± 0.506
SecondaryChange From Baseline in MS/BS at Week 48

MS/BS: percent of bone surface that displays a tetracycline label reflecting active mineralization; calculated as the double-labeled surface plus one half of the single-labeled surface and is expressed as a function of total bone surface (\[dLS + sLS/2\]/BS). It is a measure of the proportion of bone surface upon which new mineralized bone was being deposited during the period of tetracycline labeling.

Time frame:
Baseline, 48 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · percent of mineralizing surface
Change From Baseline in MS/BS at Week 48
percent of mineralizing surfaceOpen-Label Burosumab Q4W
Change From Baseline in MS/BS at Week 481.32 ± 4.365
SecondaryChange From Baseline in BFR/BS at Week 48

BFR/BS: amount of new bone formed in unit time per unit of bone surface; calculated by multiplying MS/BS by the MAR. MS/BS: percent of bone surface that displays a tetracycline label reflecting active mineralization; calculated as the double-labeled surface plus one half of the single-labeled surface and is expressed as a function of total bone surface (\[dLS + sLS/2\]/BS). It is a measure of the proportion of bone surface upon which new mineralized bone was being deposited during the period of tetracycline labeling. MAR: linear rate of new bone deposition; mean distance between the double labels, divided by the time interval between them.

Time frame:
Baseline, 48 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · µm^3/µm^2/year
Change From Baseline in BFR/BS at Week 48
µm^3/µm^2/yearOpen-Label Burosumab Q4W
Change From Baseline in BFR/BS at Week 48-4.90 ± 27.356
SecondaryChange From Baseline in BFR/OS at Week 48

BFR/OS: bone formation rate to osteoid surface ratio, related to the Aj.AR (amount of new bone created \[bone formation rate over the entire osteoid surface\]).

Time frame:
Baseline, 48 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · µm^3/µm^2/year
Change From Baseline in BFR/OS at Week 48
µm^3/µm^2/yearOpen-Label Burosumab Q4W
Change From Baseline in BFR/OS at Week 48-1557.25 ± 3139.075
SecondaryChange From Baseline in BFR/BV at Week 48

BFR/BV: equivalent to bone turnover rate.

Time frame:
Baseline, 48 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of bone turnover/year
Change From Baseline in BFR/BV at Week 48
percentage of bone turnover/yearOpen-Label Burosumab Q4W
Change From Baseline in BFR/BV at Week 48-13.50 ± 32.904
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving Mean Serum Phosphorus Levels Above the LLN at the End of the Dosing Cycle Between Baseline and Week 24

The LLN was defined as 2.5 mg/dL (0.81 mmol/L). The 95% CI was calculated using Wilson score method.

Time frame:
Baseline, up to 24 weeks
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving Mean Serum Phosphorus Levels Above the LLN at the End of the Dosing Cycle Between Baseline and Week 24
percentage of participantsOpen-Label Burosumab Q4W
Percentage of Participants Achieving Mean Serum Phosphorus Levels Above the LLN at the End of the Dosing Cycle Between Baseline and Week 2478.6 (52.4 to 92.4)
SecondaryMean Change of Serum Phosphorus Levels at the Mid-Point of Dosing Cycle, as Averaged Across Dose Cycles Between Baseline and Week 24
Time frame:
Baseline, up to 24 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dL
Mean Change of Serum Phosphorus Levels at the Mid-Point of Dosing Cycle, as Averaged Across Dose Cycles Between Baseline and Week 24
mg/dLOpen-Label Burosumab Q4W
Mean Change of Serum Phosphorus Levels at the Mid-Point of Dosing Cycle, as Averaged Across Dose Cycles Between Baseline and Week 241.07 ± 0.300
SecondaryPercent Change of Serum Phosphorus Levels at the Mid-Point of Dosing Cycle, as Averaged Across Dose Cycles Between Baseline and Week 24
Time frame:
Baseline, up to 24 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · percent change of serum phosphorus level
Percent Change of Serum Phosphorus Levels at the Mid-Point of Dosing Cycle, as Averaged Across Dose Cycles Between Baseline and Week 24
percent change of serum phosphorus levelOpen-Label Burosumab Q4W
Percent Change of Serum Phosphorus Levels at the Mid-Point of Dosing Cycle, as Averaged Across Dose Cycles Between Baseline and Week 2450.39 ± 19.942
SecondaryMean Change of Serum Phosphorus Levels at the End of Dosing Cycle, as Averaged Across Dose Cycles Between Baseline and Week 24
Time frame:
Baseline, up to 24 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dL
Mean Change of Serum Phosphorus Levels at the End of Dosing Cycle, as Averaged Across Dose Cycles Between Baseline and Week 24
mg/dLOpen-Label Burosumab Q4W
Mean Change of Serum Phosphorus Levels at the End of Dosing Cycle, as Averaged Across Dose Cycles Between Baseline and Week 240.46 ± 0.303
SecondaryPercentage Change of Serum Phosphorus Levels at the End of Dosing Cycle, as Averaged Across Dose Cycles Between Baseline and Week 24
Time frame:
Baseline, up to 24 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · percent change of serum phosphorus level
Percentage Change of Serum Phosphorus Levels at the End of Dosing Cycle, as Averaged Across Dose Cycles Between Baseline and Week 24
percent change of serum phosphorus levelOpen-Label Burosumab Q4W
Percentage Change of Serum Phosphorus Levels at the End of Dosing Cycle, as Averaged Across Dose Cycles Between Baseline and Week 2423.32 ± 19.836
SecondaryTime-Adjusted Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Serum Phosphorus Between Baseline and Week 24
Time frame:
Baseline, up to 24 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dL
Time-Adjusted Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Serum Phosphorus Between Baseline and Week 24
mg/dLOpen-Label Burosumab Q4W
Time-Adjusted Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Serum Phosphorus Between Baseline and Week 243.023 ± 0.2716
SecondaryChange From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2D
Time frame:
Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 20, Week 21, Week 22, Week 24, Week 48, Week 60, Week 70, Week 72, Week 84, Week 94, Week 96, Week 108, Week 120, Week 132
Reported as:
Least squares mean · pg/mL
Change From Baseline Over Time in Serum 1,25(OH)2D
pg/mLOpen-Label Burosumab Q4W
Week 1107.75 ± 15.964
Week 248.41 ± 7.397
Week 413.58 ± 3.435
Week 20-1.34 ± 3.617
Week 2131.75 ± 5.233
Week 2211.50 ± 4.060
Week 24-3.04 ± 4.891
Week 48-1.72 ± 4.190
Week 60-5.73 ± 3.395
Week 703.36 ± 3.987
Week 72-5.55 ± 2.895
Week 84-5.55 ± 2.962
Week 949.63 ± 4.239
Week 96-6.09 ± 2.403
Week 1080.02 ± 4.714
Week 1201.45 ± 4.197
Week 132-1.69 ± 1.993
Statistical analysis
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Least squares mean (gee): 107.75 · 95% CI 76.46 to 139.03From the generalized estimation equation (GEE) model which includes change from baseline for 1, 25 (OH)2 D as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of 1, 25 (OH)2 D as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: 48.41 · 95% CI 33.91 to 62.91From the GEE model which includes the change from baseline for 1, 25 (OH)2 D as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of 1, 25 (OH)2 D as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: 13.58 · 95% CI 6.85 to 20.31From the GEE model which includes the change from baseline for 1, 25 (OH)2 D as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of 1, 25 (OH)2 D as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: -1.34 · 95% CI -8.43 to 5.75From the GEE model which includes the change from baseline for 1, 25 (OH)2 D as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of 1, 25 (OH)2 D as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: 31.75 · 95% CI 21.49 to 42.00From the GEE model which includes the change from baseline for 1, 25 (OH)2 D as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of 1, 25 (OH)2 D as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: 11.50 · 95% CI 3.54 to 19.46From the GEE model which includes the change from baseline for 1, 25 (OH)2 D as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of 1, 25 (OH)2 D as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: -3.04 · 95% CI -12.62 to 6.55From the GEE model which includes the change from baseline for 1, 25 (OH)2 D as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of 1, 25 (OH)2 D as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · GEE model · p = 0.6821 · Ls mean: -1.72 · 95% CI -9.93 to 6.50From the GEE model which includes the change from baseline for 1, 25 (OH)2 D as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of 1, 25 (OH)2 D as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: -5.73 · 95% CI -12.38 to 0.92From the GEE model which includes the change from baseline for 1, 25 (OH)2 D as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of 1, 25 (OH)2 D as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: 3.36 · 95% CI -4.45 to 11.18From the GEE model which includes the change from baseline for 1, 25 (OH)2 D as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of 1, 25 (OH)2 D as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: -5.55 · 95% CI -11.22 to 0.13From the GEE model which includes the change from baseline for 1, 25 (OH)2 D as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of 1, 25 (OH)2 D as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: -5.55 · 95% CI -11.35 to 0.26From the GEE model which includes the change from baseline for 1, 25 (OH)2 D as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of 1, 25 (OH)2 D as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: 9.63 · 95% CI 1.33 to 17.94From the GEE model which includes the change from baseline for 1, 25 (OH)2 D as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of 1, 25 (OH)2 D as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: -6.09 · 95% CI -10.80 to -1.38
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: 0.02 · 95% CI -9.22 to 9.26From the GEE model which includes the change from baseline for 1, 25 (OH)2 D as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of 1, 25 (OH)2 D as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: 1.45 · 95% CI -6.77 to 9.68From the GEE model which includes the change from baseline for 1, 25 (OH)2 D as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of 1, 25 (OH)2 D as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: -1.69 · 95% CI -5.60 to 2.21From the GEE model which includes the change from baseline for 1, 25 (OH)2 D as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of 1, 25 (OH)2 D as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
SecondaryChange From Baseline Over Time in 24-Hour Urinary Phosphorus
Time frame:
Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96, End of Study II (EOSII) (up to Week 141)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · g/24 hours
Change From Baseline Over Time in 24-Hour Urinary Phosphorus
g/24 hoursOpen-Label Burosumab Q4W
Week 120.10 ± 0.128
Week 24-0.04 ± 0.075
Week 36-0.01 ± 0.059
Week 48-0.04 ± 0.076
Week 720.00 ± 0.096
Week 96-0.13 ± 0.082
EOSII-0.07 ± 0.171
Statistical analysis
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: 0.10 · 95% CI -0.15 to 0.35From the GEE model; includes change from baseline from baseline for 24-Hour urinary phosphorus as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of 24-Hour urinary phosphorus as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: -0.04 · 95% CI -0.19 to 0.11From the GEE model; includes change from baseline from baseline for 24-Hour urinary phosphorus as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of 24-Hour urinary phosphorus as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: -0.01 · 95% CI -0.12 to 0.11From the GEE model; includes change from baseline from baseline for 24-Hour urinary phosphorus as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of 24-Hour urinary phosphorus as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · GEE model · p = 0.6021 · Ls mean: -0.04 · 95% CI -0.19 to 0.11From the GEE model; includes change from baseline from baseline for 24-Hour urinary phosphorus as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of 24-Hour urinary phosphorus as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: 0.00 · 95% CI -0.19 to 0.19From the GEE model; includes change from baseline from baseline for 24-Hour urinary phosphorus as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of 24-Hour urinary phosphorus as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: -0.13 · 95% CI -0.29 to 0.03From the GEE model; includes change from baseline from baseline for 24-Hour urinary phosphorus as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of 24-Hour urinary phosphorus as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: -0.07 · 95% CI -0.41 to 0.26From the GEE model; includes change from baseline from baseline for 24-Hour urinary phosphorus as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of 24-Hour urinary phosphorus as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
SecondaryChange From Baseline Over Time in TmP/GFR

TmP/GFR: ratio of renal tubular maximum reabsorption rate of phosphate to glomerular filtration rate.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 12, Week 22, Week 24, Week 48, Week 60, Week 72, Week 84, Week 96, EOSII (up to Week 141)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · mg/dL
Change From Baseline Over Time in TmP/GFR
mg/dLOpen-Label Burosumab Q4W
Week 21.76 ± 0.136
Week 40.78 ± 0.097
Week 120.58 ± 0.122
Week 220.87 ± 0.064
Week 240.44 ± 0.101
Week 480.20 ± 0.097
Week 600.30 ± 0.171
Week 720.28 ± 0.127
Week 840.39 ± 0.136
Week 960.29 ± 0.097
EOSII0.21 ± 0.068
Statistical analysis
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: 1.76 · 95% CI 1.49 to 2.03From the GEE model, which includes the change from baseline for TmP/GFR as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of TmP/GFR as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: 0.78 · 95% CI 0.59 to 0.97From the GEE model, which includes the change from baseline for TmP/GFR as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of TmP/GFR as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: 0.58 · 95% CI 0.34 to 0.82From the GEE model, which includes the change from baseline for TmP/GFR as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of TmP/GFR as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: 0.87 · 95% CI 0.74 to 0.99From the GEE model, which includes the change from baseline for TmP/GFR as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of TmP/GFR as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: 0.44 · 95% CI 0.24 to 0.64From the GEE model, which includes the change from baseline for TmP/GFR as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of TmP/GFR as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · GEE model · p = 0.0430 · Ls mean: 0.20 · 95% CI 0.01 to 0.38From the GEE model, which includes the change from baseline for TmP/GFR as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of TmP/GFR as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: 0.30 · 95% CI -0.04 to 0.64From the GEE model, which includes the change from baseline for TmP/GFR as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of TmP/GFR as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: 0.28 · 95% CI 0.03 to 0.52From the GEE model, which includes the change from baseline for TmP/GFR as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of TmP/GFR as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: 0.39 · 95% CI 0.13 to 0.66From the GEE model, which includes the change from baseline for TmP/GFR as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of TmP/GFR as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: 0.29 · 95% CI 0.10 to 0.48From the GEE model, which includes the change from baseline for TmP/GFR as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of TmP/GFR as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: 0.21 · 95% CI 0.08 to 0.34From the GEE model, which includes the change from baseline for TmP/GFR as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of TmP/GFR as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
SecondaryChange From Baseline Over Time in TRP

TRP: tubular reabsorption of phosphate.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 12, Week 22, Week 24, Week 48, Week 60, Week 72, Week 84, Week 96, EOSII (up to Week 141)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · fraction of phosphorus reabsorbed
Change From Baseline Over Time in TRP
fraction of phosphorus reabsorbedOpen-Label Burosumab Q4W
Week 20.07 ± 0.005
Week 40.03 ± 0.013
Week 120.01 ± 0.013
Week 220.04 ± 0.007
Week 240.01 ± 0.015
Week 48-0.00 ± 0.021
Week 600.03 ± 0.016
Week 72-0.02 ± 0.035
Week 840.02 ± 0.019
Week 960.02 ± 0.014
EOSII0.01 ± 0.011
Statistical analysis
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: 0.07 · 95% CI 0.06 to 0.08From the GEE model, which includes the change from baseline or percent change from baseline for TRP as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of TRP as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: 0.03 · 95% CI 0.01 to 0.06From the GEE model which includes the change from baseline or percent change from baseline for TRP as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of TRP as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: 0.01 · 95% CI -0.01 to 0.04From the GEE model which includes the change from baseline or percent change from baseline for TRP as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of TRP as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: 0.04 · 95% CI 0.02 to 0.05From the GEE model which includes the change from baseline or percent change from baseline for TRP as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of TRP as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: 0.01 · 95% CI -0.02 to 0.04
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · GEE model · p = 0.8377 · Ls mean: -0.00 · 95% CI -0.05 to 0.04From the GEE model which includes the change from baseline or percent change from baseline for TRP as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of TRP as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: 0.03 · 95% CI -0.00 to 0.06From the GEE model which includes the change from baseline or percent change from baseline for TRP as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of TRP as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: -0.02 · 95% CI -0.09 to 0.05From the GEE model which includes the change from baseline or percent change from baseline for TRP as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of TRP as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: 0.02 · 95% CI -0.01 to 0.06From the GEE model which includes the change from baseline or percent change from baseline for TRP as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of TRP as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: 0.02 · 95% CI -0.01 to 0.05From the GEE model which includes the change from baseline or percent change from baseline for TRP as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of TRP as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: 0.01 · 95% CI -0.01 to 0.03From the GEE model which includes the change from baseline or percent change from baseline for TRP as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of TRP as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
SecondaryChange From Baseline Over Time in P1NP

P1NP: procollagen type 1 N-propeptide.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96, EOSII (up to Week 141)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · ng/mL
Change From Baseline Over Time in P1NP
ng/mLOpen-Label Burosumab Q4W
Week 1299.18 ± 11.403
Week 24104.33 ± 11.153
Week 4852.49 ± 11.554
Week 7237.29 ± 12.294
Week 9629.29 ± 13.321
EOSII2.14 ± 10.105
Statistical analysis
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: 99.18 · 95% CI 76.83 to 121.53From the GEE model, which includes the change from baseline for P1NP as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of P1NP as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: 104.33 · 95% CI 82.47 to 126.19From the GEE model, which includes the change from baseline for P1NP as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of P1NP as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · GEE model · p = < 0.0001 · Ls mean: 52.49 · 95% CI 29.84 to 75.13From the GEE model, which includes the change from baseline for P1NP as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of P1NP as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: 37.29 · 95% CI 13.19 to 61.38From the GEE model, which includes the change from baseline for P1NP as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of P1NP as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: 29.29 · 95% CI 3.18 to 55.40From the GEE model, which includes the change from baseline for P1NP as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of P1NP as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: 2.14 · 95% CI -17.67 to 21.94From the GEE model, which includes the change from baseline for P1NP as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of P1NP as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in P1NP
Time frame:
Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96, EOSII (up to Week 141)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · percent change in P1NP
Percent Change From Baseline Over Time in P1NP
percent change in P1NPOpen-Label Burosumab Q4W
Week 12133.08 ± 13.680
Week 24137.80 ± 15.741
Week 4876.86 ± 14.114
Week 7250.46 ± 13.659
Week 9641.36 ± 11.566
EOSII26.20 ± 9.919
Statistical analysis
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: 133.08 · 95% CI 106.26 to 159.89From the GEE model, which includes the percent change from baseline for P1NP as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of P1NP as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: 137.80 · 95% CI 106.95 to 168.65From the GEE model, which includes the percent change from baseline for P1NP as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of P1NP as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · GEE model · p = < 0.0001 · Ls mean: 76.86 · 95% CI 49.20 to 104.53From the GEE model, which includes the percent change from baseline for P1NP as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of P1NP as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: 50.46 · 95% CI 23.69 to 77.23From the GEE model, which includes the percent change from baseline for P1NP as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of P1NP as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: 41.36 · 95% CI 18.69 to 64.03From the GEE model, which includes the percent change from baseline for P1NP as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of P1NP as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: 26.20 · 95% CI 6.76 to 45.64From the GEE model, which includes the percent change from baseline for P1NP as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of P1NP as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
SecondaryChange From Baseline Over Time in CTx

CTx: carboxy-terminal cross-linked telopeptide of type I collagen.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96, EOSII (up to Week 141)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · pg/mL
Change From Baseline Over Time in CTx
pg/mLOpen-Label Burosumab Q4W
Week 12464.84 ± 61.696
Week 24404.13 ± 55.948
Week 48175.13 ± 44.022
Week 72143.11 ± 92.503
Week 9676.80 ± 57.357
EOSII-41.32 ± 83.144
Statistical analysis
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: 464.84 · 95% CI 343.92 to 585.77From the GEE model which includes the change from baseline for CTx as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of CTx as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: 404.13 · 95% CI 294.47 to 513.78From the GEE model which includes the change from baseline for CTx as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of CTx as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · GEE model · p = < 0.0001 · Ls mean: 175.13 · 95% CI 88.85 to 261.41From the GEE model which includes the change from baseline for CTx as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of CTx as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: 143.11 · 95% CI -38.20 to 324.41From the GEE model which includes the change from baseline for CTx as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of CTx as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: 76.80 · 95% CI -35.62 to 189.22From the GEE model which includes the change from baseline for CTx as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of CTx as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: -41.32 · 95% CI -204.28 to 121.64From the GEE model which includes the change from baseline for CTx as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of CTx as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in CTx

CTx: carboxy-terminal cross-linked telopeptide of type I collagen.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96, EOSII (up to Week 141)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · percent change in CTx
Percent Change From Baseline Over Time in CTx
percent change in CTxOpen-Label Burosumab Q4W
Week 1289.68 ± 13.316
Week 2470.17 ± 10.341
Week 4835.86 ± 7.396
Week 7234.00 ± 14.016
Week 9625.86 ± 8.461
EOSII17.88 ± 9.284
Statistical analysis
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: 89.68 · 95% CI 63.58 to 115.78From the GEE model which includes the percent change from baseline for CTx as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of CTx as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: 70.17 · 95% CI 49.90 to 90.44From the GEE model which includes the percent change from baseline for CTx as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of CTx as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · GEE model · p = < 0.0001 · Ls mean: 35.86 · 95% CI 21.37 to 50.36From the GEE model which includes the percent change from baseline for CTx as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of CTx as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: 34.00 · 95% CI 6.53 to 61.47From the GEE model which includes the percent change from baseline for CTx as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of CTx as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: 25.86 · 95% CI 9.27 to 42.44From the GEE model which includes the percent change from baseline for CTx as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of CTx as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: 17.88 · 95% CI -0.32 to 36.07From the GEE model which includes the percent change from baseline for CTx as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of CTx as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
SecondaryChange From Baseline Over Time in BALP

BALP: bone-specific alkaline phosphatase.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96, EOSII (up to Week 141)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · μg/L
Change From Baseline Over Time in BALP
μg/LOpen-Label Burosumab Q4W
Week 1210.93 ± 3.547
Week 245.82 ± 2.980
Week 484.50 ± 3.990
Week 723.13 ± 2.435
Week 961.14 ± 2.028
EOSII-5.80 ± 3.396
Statistical analysis
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: 10.93 · 95% CI 3.98 to 17.89From the GEE model, which includes the change from baseline for Bone ALP as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of Bone ALP as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: 5.82 · 95% CI -0.02 to 11.66From the GEE model, which includes the change from baseline for Bone ALP as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of Bone ALP as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · GEE model · p = 0.2592 · Ls mean: 4.50 · 95% CI -3.32 to 12.32From the GEE model, which includes the change from baseline for Bone ALP as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of Bone ALP as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: 3.13 · 95% CI -1.64 to 7.90From the GEE model, which includes the change from baseline for Bone ALP as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of Bone ALP as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: 1.14 · 95% CI -2.84 to 5.11From the GEE model, which includes the change from baseline for Bone ALP as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of Bone ALP as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: -5.80 · 95% CI -12.46 to 0.85From the GEE model, which includes the change from baseline for Bone ALP as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of Bone ALP as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline Over Time in BALP

BALP: bone-specific alkaline phosphatase.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96, EOSII (up to Week 141)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · percent change in BALP
Percent Change From Baseline Over Time in BALP
percent change in BALPOpen-Label Burosumab Q4W
Week 1252.54 ± 15.999
Week 2431.37 ± 11.808
Week 4824.35 ± 17.630
Week 7215.13 ± 13.431
Week 966.92 ± 10.387
EOSII-27.30 ± 12.767
Statistical analysis
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: 52.54 · 95% CI 21.18 to 83.90From the GEE model, which includes the percent change from baseline for Bone ALP as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of Bone ALP as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: 31.37 · 95% CI 8.23 to 54.51From the GEE model, which includes the percent change from baseline for Bone ALP as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of Bone ALP as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · GEE model · p = 0.1672 · L: 24.35 · 95% CI -10.20 to 58.90From the GEE model, which includes the percent change from baseline for Bone ALP as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of Bone ALP as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: 15.13 · 95% CI -11.19 to 41.46From the GEE model, which includes the percent change from baseline for Bone ALP as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of Bone ALP as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: 6.92 · 95% CI -13.44 to 27.28From the GEE model, which includes the percent change from baseline for Bone ALP as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of Bone ALP as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
  • Open-Label Burosumab Q4W · Ls mean: -27.30 · 95% CI -52.33 to -2.28From the GEE model, which includes the percent change from baseline for Bone ALP as the dependent variable, visit as fixed factors, and baseline of Bone ALP as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.

Adverse events

Collected over Week 0 to EOSII (up to Week 141). Mean (SE) duration of exposure to study drug was 716 (35.1) days. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Open-Label Burosumab Q4W0/14 (0%)4/14 (28.6%)14/14 (100%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventOpen-Label Burosumab Q4W
Atrial FibrillationCardiac disorders1/14
Obstruction GastricGastrointestinal disorders1/14
Splenic RuptureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/14
MigraineNervous system disorders1/14
ParaesthesiaNervous system disorders1/14
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 156
Most frequent other events
EventOpen-Label Burosumab Q4W
Tooth AbscessInfections and infestations7/14
Procedural PainInjury, poisoning and procedural complications7/14
Back PainMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders6/14
PainGeneral disorders5/14
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders5/14
ToothacheGastrointestinal disorders4/14
InfluenzaInfections and infestations4/14
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations4/14
Muscle SpasmsMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders4/14
OsteoarthritisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders4/14

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Open-Label Burosumab Q4W
Mean40.13 ± 8.725
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Open-Label Burosumab Q4W
Female8
Male6
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Open-Label Burosumab Q4W
Hispanic or Latino1
Not Hispanic or Latino13
Unknown or Not Reported0
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Open-Label Burosumab Q4W
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian4
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American1
White9
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported0
Osteoid Volume/Bone Volume (OV/BV)
Osteoid Volume/Bone Volume (OV/BV)(percentage of osteoid volume)Open-Label Burosumab Q4W
Mean26.12 ± 12.357
Serum Phosphorus
Serum Phosphorus(mg/dL)Open-Label Burosumab Q4W
Mean2.24 ± 0.396
Osteoid Thickness (O.Th)
Osteoid Thickness (O.Th)(µm)Open-Label Burosumab Q4W
Mean17.21 ± 4.105
Osteoid Surface/Bone Surface (OS/BS)
Osteoid Surface/Bone Surface (OS/BS)(percentage of osteoid surface)Open-Label Burosumab Q4W
Mean91.73 ± 3.438

14 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

14 sites
  • UCSF Medical Center at Mission
    San Francisco, California 94158, United States
  • Yale University School of Medicine - Yale New-Haven Hospital/Yale Center for Clinical Investigation
    New Haven, Connecticut 06510, United States
  • Indiana University Department of Medicine University Hospital
    Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, United States
  • Duke University Medical Center
    Durham, North Carolina 27710, United States
  • Houston Methodist Hospital
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
  • Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
    Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8L1, Canada
  • Shriners Hospital for Children
    Montreal, Quebec H3G 1A6, Canada
  • Aarhus University Hospital-Dept of Endocrinology and Internal Medicine
    Aarhus, 8000, Denmark
  • CHU de Bicêtre, Service d'Endocrinologie et des Maladies de la Reproduction
    Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, 94275, France
  • CHU Paris Centre - Hôpital Cochin
    Paris, 75014, France
  • Osaka University Hospital
    Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
  • Hokkaido University Hospital
    Sapporo, 060-8648, Japan
  • The University of Tokyo Hospital
    Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
  • Seoul National University Hospital
    Seoul, 110-744, Korea, Republic of
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Fratzl-Zelman N, Hartmann MA, Gamsjaeger S, Rokidi S, Paschalis EP, Blouin S, Zwerina J. Bone Matrix Mineralization and Response to Burosumab in Adult Patients With X-Linked Hypophosphatemia: Results From the Phase 3, Single-Arm International Trial. J Bone Miner Res. 2022 Sep;37(9):1665-1678. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.4641. Epub 2022 Aug 10. PubMed 35775373 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 18, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02537431
Lead sponsor
Kyowa Kirin, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 1, 2015
Start date
Dec 23, 2015
Primary completion
Aug 30, 2017
Completion
Dec 13, 2018
Results posted
Sep 25, 2018
Last update
Jun 18, 2024

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Burosumab

Start the discussion