CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02529501BAGUpdated Nov 18, 2016

Spinal Versus General Anesthesia for Ambulatory Anesthesia

An observational study in Spinal Anesthesia, Short General Anesthesia and Outpatient Surgery, sponsored by Nordic Pharma SAS. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-11-18.

Sponsored by Nordic Pharma SAS · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
595
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to describe, in real-life conditions, the factors influencing the choice of anesthesia (spinal anesthesia or short general anesthesia) in outpatient surgery.

Read the detailed description

This is a cross-sectional, observational, prospective, multicentre study, conduct in France among a representative sample of anesthesiologists.

The factors influencing the choice of anesthesia (spinal anesthesia or short general anesthesia) will be assessed in patients undergoing an outpatient surgery. Data will be collected by the physician during the inclusion visit (peripostoperative consultation). Additional data regarding the patient's perception (pain and satisfaction) will be collected using a self-questionnaire 7 days after the surgery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Spinal Anesthesia
  • Short General Anesthesia
  • Outpatient Surgery
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Nordic Pharma SAS is the lead sponsor of 10 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients scheduled for surgery under spinal anesthesia or short general anesthesia will be informed about the study and will be asked to participate.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients undergoing an ambulatory surgery
  • Patients for whom either a spinal anesthesia or a short general anesthesia is planned
  • Patients accepting and able to complete a self-administered questionnaire in French language
  • Informed patients who accept the computer processing of their medical data and their right of access and correction

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with contra-indications to elective ambulatory surgery
  • Emergency surgeries
  • Patient for which both spinal anesthesia and short general anesthesia coexist
  • Patients with contra-indications to spinal anesthesia (due to surgical procedure site, comorbidities or patient's treatment)
  • Patients participating or having participated in the previous month in a clinical trial in anaesthesiology
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
595 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • SA

    Patients undergoing spinal anesthesia

  • GA

    Patients undergoing short general anesthesia

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Factors influencing the choice of anesthesia (spinal anesthesia or short general anesthesia

    All proposed factors will be described using a 4-levels verbal scale (decisive / important / of little importance / unimportant). The factors will be described from the questionnaire completed by the investigator during the inclusion visit, before the surgery. Decisive factors for the choice of anesthesia will be described and compared between the two subgroups.spinal anesthesia and short general anesthesia.

    Time frame: During the perioperative consultation (patients are included at the time of the perioperative consultation prior to their surgery): baseline visit

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patients' characteristics in each subgroups

    Patients' characteristics (demographic data, ASA physical status, risk factors...) will be described from the questionnaire completed by the investigator during the inclusion visit, before the surgery.

    Time frame: At the time of the perioperative consultation prior to their surgery (start of the inclusion visit or baseline visit)

  2. Postoperative period from waking up to eligibility for discharge from hospital according to the type of anesthesia

    Will be described from the questionnaire completed by the investigator during the inclusion visit, after the surgery.

    Time frame: Up to 24h after the surgery

  3. Patients' satisfaction according to the type of anesthesia based on 2 questions using a 4-levels verbal scale

    Will be described from the self-questionnaire completed by the patient 7 days after the surgery.

    Time frame: 7 days after surgery (i.e. 7 days after the inclusion)

  4. Patients' pain according to the type of anesthesia using a VAS scale

    Will be described from the self-questionnaire completed by the patient 7 days after the surgery.

    Time frame: Up to 7 days after surgery

  5. Costs of spinal and general anesthesia

    Will be described from the questionnaire completed by the investigator during the inclusion visit.

    Time frame: The day of the surgery

  6. Use and safety of Baritekal® (prilocaine) if applicable

    Modalities of spinal anesthesia with prilocaine. Percentage and nature of adverse effect (serious or not) after intrathecal anaesthesia with prilocaine.

    Time frame: During surgery

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Nordic Pharma
    Paris, 75007, France
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Capdevila X, Aveline C, Delaunay L, Bouaziz H, Zetlaoui P, Choquet O, Jouffroy L, Herman-Demars H, Bonnet F. Factors Determining the Choice of Spinal Versus General Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Ambulatory Surgery: Results of a Multicenter Observational Study. Adv Ther. 2020 Jan;37(1):527-540. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-01171-6. Epub 2019 Dec 11. PubMed 31828612 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 18, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02529501
Lead sponsor
Nordic Pharma SAS
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 20, 2015
Start date
Jul 2015
Primary completion
Aug 2016
Completion
Aug 2016
Last update
Nov 18, 2016

Study contacts

Hélène HERMAN-DEMARS, MD
study director · Nordic Pharma

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion