CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02522585Updated Apr 20, 2016

p16 and Ki-67 Stainings and Natural Killer (NK) Cells in CIN-II Management

An observational study in Cervical Cancer, sponsored by Parc de Salut Mar. Completed. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-04-20.

Sponsored by Parc de Salut Mar · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The objective of this study is to evaluate the outcome of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 (CIN-II) patients followed up without treatment for 24 months according to p16 and ki-67 immunohistochemical staining and to the expression of NK cell receptors.

Read the detailed description

Cervical cancer and its precursor lesions, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), represents a significant public health problem,induced by persistent infection of human papillomavirus (HPV). It is known that a significant percentage of CIN regresses spontaneously and only a minority of these lesions progress to cervical cancer. CIN-II is an intermediate state that can regress to CIN-I or less, or progress to CIN-III spontaneously. The rate of spontaneous regression and progression in follow-up studies are around 40-60% and 10-20%, respectively. Overestimating CIN-II lesions may cause overtreatment by excisional treatment and increase the risk of subsequent obstetric complications.

Patients newly diagnosed with CIN-II colposcopy-directed biopsy who agreed to follow up at four months intervals for at least 12 months with cervical cytology and colposcopy, were prospectively recruited. p16, ki-67 and NK receptors expression were analyzed in all CIN-II biopsies. Total regression, partial regression, persistence and progression rates of CIN-II were defined as a final outcome.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cervical Cancer

Keywords

  • expectant management
  • p16
  • immunohistochemistry
  • regression
  • progression
  • cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
03

In context

Uterine Cervical Dysplasia

356 studies on the registry are indexed under Uterine Cervical Dysplasia; 68 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 100 is below the median of 470 across 96 observational studies indexed under Uterine Cervical Dysplasia.

Browse Uterine Cervical Dysplasia studies →

Lead sponsor

Parc de Salut Mar is the lead sponsor of 180 studies on the registry; 27 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adult females with CIN-II lesion on cervical biopsy that agree to a conservative management during a period not more than 24 months, referred to the low genital tract diseases clinic of Hospital del Mar.

Inclusion criteria

  • preferred expectant management than immediate treatment
  • exocervical histological diagnosis of CIN-II
  • lesion completely visualized by colposcopy
  • entire squamocolumnar junction of the cervix was visible
  • showing no evidence of any immunodeficiency disease
  • no history of previous cervical treatment
  • could be followed-up every four months during one year
  • signed consent form

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • not coming to follow up appointments
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Conservative management

    Patients diagnosed of CIN-II by directed biopsy

    Other: Conservative management

Interventions

  • OtherConservative management

    Control of CIN-II with cytology and colposcopy to try to avoid unnecessary surgery

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Status of cervix pathology using cervical smear test (CIN grade)

    Cervical cytology test and colposcopy every 4 months starting with diagnose CIN-II or CIN-III means presence of lesion, CIN-I is regression of the lesion, and Negative is abscence of lesion.

    Time frame: 2 years

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Discacciati MG, de Souza CA, d'Otavianno MG, Angelo-Andrade LA, Westin MC, Rabelo-Santos SH, Zeferino LC. Outcome of expectant management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 in women followed for 12 months. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011 Apr;155(2):204-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.12.002. Epub 2010 Dec 28. PubMed 21193261 ↗
  • Tsoumpou I, Arbyn M, Kyrgiou M, Wentzensen N, Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch P, Malamou-Mitsi V, Paraskevaidis E. p16(INK4a) immunostaining in cytological and histological specimens from the uterine cervix: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Treat Rev. 2009 May;35(3):210-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2008.10.005. Epub 2009 Mar 3. PubMed 19261387 ↗
  • del Pino M, Garcia S, Fuste V, Alonso I, Fuste P, Torne A, Ordi J. Value of p16(INK4a) as a marker of progression/regression in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Nov;201(5):488.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.05.046. Epub 2009 Aug 15. PubMed 19683687 ↗
  • Galgano MT, Castle PE, Atkins KA, Brix WK, Nassau SR, Stoler MH. Using biomarkers as objective standards in the diagnosis of cervical biopsies. Am J Surg Pathol. 2010 Aug;34(8):1077-87. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181e8b2c4. PubMed 20661011 ↗
  • Guedes AC, Brenna SM, Coelho SA, Martinez EZ, Syrjanen KJ, Zeferino LC. p16(INK4a) Expression does not predict the outcome of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2007 Sep-Oct;17(5):1099-103. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2007.00899.x. Epub 2007 Mar 15. PubMed 17367324 ↗
  • McAllum B, Sykes PH, Sadler L, Macnab H, Simcock BJ, Mekhail AK. Is the treatment of CIN 2 always necessary in women under 25 years old? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Nov;205(5):478.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.06.069. Epub 2011 Jun 25. PubMed 21872201 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 20, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02522585
Lead sponsor
Parc de Salut Mar
Responsible party
Jordi Genoves (MD, PhD, Parc de Salut Mar) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 13, 2015
Start date
Dec 2011
Primary completion
Nov 2015
Completion
Dec 2015
Last update
Apr 20, 2016

Study contacts

Gemma Mancebo, PhD
principal investigator · Parc de Salut Mar
Ramon Carreras, PhD
study chair · Parc de Salut Mar

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion