CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02515188Updated Jan 28, 2019

The Effect of Additional Propacetamol Infusion on Post Procedural Outcome and Opioid Consumption During Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation.

An interventional study of Propacetamol and Placebo in Arrhythmia, sponsored by Yonsei University. Completed at 1 site in Korea, Republic of. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 79 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-01-28.

Sponsored by Yonsei University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
98
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years to 79 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Sedation for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation should be performed to achieve analgesia, immobilization, and maintenance of airway. Various anesthetic agents such as propofol, dexmedetomidine, and midazolam were investigated to achieve this goal. However, propofol and midazolam causes respiratory depression and dexmedetomidine occasionally accompanies hypotension or hypertension and bradycardia. Therefore, anesthetic agent that does not induce respiratory depression with stable hemodynamics is needed.

Propacetamol (Denogan®, Yungjin, Seoul, Korea) is injectable prodrug of acetaminophen and 1st line drug for fever and pain. In a previous study, paracetamol reduced morphine consumption after surgery. And paracetamol does not cause respiratory depression. Thus, the investigators hypothesized that addition of propacetamol to previously used sedatives midazolam-remifentanil will reduce opioid consumption during the catheter ablation.

Therefore, the investigators designed this study to investigate the role of addition of propacetamol to previous used midazolam-remifentanil sedation. This study will compare the opioid consumption and respiratory effect of propacetamol with placebo-control for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Arrhythmia

Browse trials for

03

In context

Arrhythmias, Cardiac

885 studies on the registry are indexed under Arrhythmias, Cardiac; 235 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 98 is close to the median of 99 across 429 interventional studies indexed under Arrhythmias, Cardiac.

Browse Arrhythmias, Cardiac studies →

Lead sponsor

Yonsei University is the lead sponsor of 1,387 studies on the registry; 232 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 79 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • patients who are scheduled to undergo catheter ablation for arrhythmia

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects are ineligible if they have liver disease, kidney disease,
  • American society of anesthesiology class 3 or 4,
  • age under 20 years,
  • cognitive dysfunction,
  • disabling mental change disorder,
  • patients are unable to communicate or speak Korean
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
98 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    propacetamol group

    Drug: Propacetamol

  • Placebo comparator
    placebo group

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugPropacetamol

    Randomly selected patients of the propacetamol group are given intravenous propacetamol 2g for 15 minutes on the beginning of the procedure.

    Also known as: Propacetamol (Denogan®, Yungjin, Seoul, Korea)

  • DrugPlacebo

    Placebo group are given intravenous Normal Saline 2g for 15 minutes on the beginning of the procedure.

    Also known as: Normal Saline

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. total amount of opioid consumption

    Total opioid consumption during the procedure will be recorded. And post procedural consumption of analgesics also will be recorded.

    Time frame: 1 day

Secondary outcomes

  1. Respiratory rate

    Time frame: 1 day

  2. Depth of sedation

    depth of sedation measured by Ramsay Sedation Score

    Time frame: 1 day

  3. Post procedural pain

    post procedural pain measured by consumption of analgesics and VAS (Visual Analog Scale)

    Time frame: 1 day

  4. nausea point

    nausea measured by 11-point NRS (Numerical Rating Scale)

    Time frame: 1 day

  5. number of vomiting

    Time frame: 1 day

  6. intra-procedural hemodynamics

    intra-procedural hemodynamics measured by amount of used vasopressors

    Time frame: 1 day

  7. satisfaction of patients

    satisfaction of patient and surgeons measured by 5-point NRS

    Time frame: 1 day

  8. recovery time

    monitored with heart rate and blood pressure

    Time frame: 1 day

  9. satisfaction of surgeons

    satisfaction of patient and surgeons measured by 5-point NRS

    Time frame: 1 day

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine
    Seoul, 120-752, Korea, Republic of
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 28, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02515188
Lead sponsor
Yonsei University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 4, 2015
Start date
Aug 7, 2015
Primary completion
Jun 23, 2016
Completion
Jun 23, 2016
Last update
Jan 28, 2019

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion