ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02509936Updated Nov 26, 2019Results posted

Promoting Physical Growth and Positive Development in Severely Stunted Guatemalan Children

An interventional study of Home-based nutrition education and Standard-of-care nutrition support in Malnutrition and Developmental Disabilities, sponsored by Wuqu' Kawoq, Maya Health Alliance. Completed at 1 site in Guatemala. Open to participants aged 6 Months to 24 Months. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-11-26.

Sponsored by Wuqu' Kawoq, Maya Health Alliance · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
324
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
6 Months to 24 Months
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study seeks to evaluate the impact of an intensive home-based education intervention targeting severely stunted Guatemalan children for catch up growth and improved development. Half of the children in the study will receive standard of care, which includes micronutrient supplementation and a food ration. The other half of children in the study will receive, in addition to the above, home-based dietary assessment and individualized parental nutrition education.

02

Conditions studied

  • Malnutrition
  • Developmental Disabilities
03

In context

Malnutrition

1,277 studies on the registry are indexed under Malnutrition; 230 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 324 is above the median of 118 across 843 interventional studies indexed under Malnutrition.

Browse Malnutrition studies →

Lead sponsor

Wuqu' Kawoq, Maya Health Alliance is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Months to 24 Months
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Child aged 6-24 months at time of enrollment
  • Height/length for age Z score of less than -2.5
  • Child lives with parent/legal guardian

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of acute malnutrition (weight for length/height Z score of less than -2)
  • Presence of other severe medical illness (e.g. congenital heart disease, genetic abnormality)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
324 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Standard of Care Arm

    In this arm enrolled children will receive the national standard of care for growth support, which includes growth monitoring, a food ration, and a multiple micronutrient powder supplement.

    Dietary Supplement: Standard-of-care nutrition support

  • Experimental
    Home-based Education

    In the intervention arm, children will receive the national standard of care for growth support, which includes growth monitoring, a food ration, and a multiple micronutrient powder supplement. In addition, they will receive monthly home visits from a community health promoter who will provide detailed dietary assessments and individualized dietary coaching and education to parents.

    Behavioral: Home-based nutrition education · Dietary Supplement: Standard-of-care nutrition support

Interventions

  • BehavioralHome-based nutrition education

    Health promoters will use 24-hour dietary recall information to assess meal frequency and dietary diversity and then provide tailored nutrition coaching to parents.

  • Dietary supplementStandard-of-care nutrition support

    Subjects will be provided with a standard food ration and with a multiple micronutrient powder dietary supplement (Chispitas)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Height/Length for Age Z Score

    Change in height/length over 6 months. Tool used is the WHO Child Growth Reference Standards. Change values calculated as: 6 month (z-score) minus Baseline (z-score).

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Cognitive Development

    Change in cognitive development Z score over 6 months. Tool used: Bayley III Cognitive Development Observational Checklist. Z-scores derived internally from the entire baseline measurement data set for the study. A z-score of 0 is equal to the mean cognitive score for the study population at baseline. Lower numbers indicate values lower than the baseline study population mean mean and higher numbers indicate values higher than this mean. Higher values above zero are indicative of cognitive scores higher than mean baseline score for the study population. Lower values below zero are indicative of cognitive scores lower than mean baseline score for the study population. For outcomes, change values are calculated as 6 month (z-score) minus Baseline (z-score)

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months

  2. Socioemotional Development

    Change in socioemotional development score over 6 months. Tool used: Bayley III Socioemotional Development Parent Questionnaire. Z-scores derived internally from the entire baseline measurement data set for the study. A z-score of 0 is equal to the mean socioemotional score for the study population at baseline. Lower numbers indicate values lower than the baseline study population mean mean and higher numbers indicate values higher than this mean. Higher values above zero are indicative of socioemotional scores higher than mean baseline score for the study population. Lower values below zero are indicative of socioemotional scores lower than mean baseline score for the study population. For outcomes, change values are calculated as 6 month (z-score) minus Baseline (z-score)

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months

  3. Gross Motor Development

    Change in gross motor development score over 6 months. Tool used: Bayley III Gross Motor Observational Checklist. Z-scores derived internally from the entire baseline measurement data set for the study. A z-score of 0 is equal to the mean gross motor score for the study population at baseline. Lower numbers indicate values lower than the baseline study population mean mean and higher numbers indicate values higher than this mean. Higher values above zero are indicative of gross motor scores higher than mean baseline score for the study population. Lower values below zero are indicative of gross motor scores lower than mean baseline score for the study population. For outcomes, change values are calculated as 6 month (z-score) minus Baseline (z-score)

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months

  4. Fine Motor Development

    Change in fine motor development score over 6 months. Tool used: Bayley III Fine Motor Observational Checklist. Z-scores derived internally from the entire baseline measurement data set for the study. A z-score of 0 is equal to the mean fine motor score for the study population at baseline. Lower numbers indicate values lower than the baseline study population mean mean and higher numbers indicate values higher than this mean. Higher values above zero are indicative of fine motor scores higher than mean baseline score for the study population. Lower values below zero are indicative of fine motor scores lower than mean baseline score for the study population. For outcomes, change values are calculated as 6 month (z-score) minus Baseline (z-score)

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months

  5. Receptive Language Development

    Change in receptive language development score over 6 months. Tool used: Bayley III Receptive Language Observational Checklist. Z-scores derived internally from the entire baseline measurement data set for the study. A z-score of 0 is equal to the mean receptive language score for the study population at baseline. Lower numbers indicate values lower than the baseline study population mean mean and higher numbers indicate values higher than this mean. Higher values above zero are indicative of receptive language scores higher than mean baseline score for the study population. Lower values below zero are indicative of receptive language scores lower than mean baseline score for the study population. For outcomes, change values are calculated as 6 month (z-score) minus Baseline (z-score)

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months

  6. Expressive Language Development

    Change in expressive language development score over 6 months. Tool used: Bayley III Expressive Language Observational Checklist. Z-scores derived internally from the entire baseline measurement data set for the study. A z-score of 0 is equal to the mean expressive language score for the study population at baseline. Lower numbers indicate values lower than the baseline study population mean mean and higher numbers indicate values higher than this mean. Higher values above zero are indicative of expressive language scores higher than mean baseline score for the study population. Lower values below zero are indicative of expressive language scores lower than mean baseline score for the study population. For outcomes, change values are calculated as 6 month (z-score) minus Baseline (z-score)

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months

  7. Minimum Diet Diversity

    Number of participants meeting the age appropriate minimum number of food groups consumed per day. This is defined according to the WHO's Infant and Young Child Feeding Indicators guidelines as greater or equal to 4 food groups consumed in the last 24 - hour period. The 7 possible food groups are: (1) grains, roots, tubers; (2) legumes, nuts; (3) dairy products; (4) flesh foods; (5) eggs; (6) vitamin A-rich fruits and vegetables; (7) other fruits and vegetables.

    Time frame: 0 months, 6 months

  8. Minimum Meal Frequency

    Number of participants meetings the age-appropriate number of solid meals per day. This is defined according to the WHO's Infant and Young Child Feeding Indicators guidelines as 2 solid meals in the last 24-hour period for breastfed infants 6-8 months old; 3 solid meals in the last 24-hour period for breastfed infants 9 months or older; 4 solid meals in the last 24-hour period for non-breastfed infants.

    Time frame: 0 months, 6 months

  9. Minimum Acceptable Diet

    Number of participants who meet both minimum diet diversity and minimum meal frequency indicators. Minimum diet diversity and minimum meal frequency are both defined according to the WHO's Infant and Young Child Feeding Indicators guidelines. See the entries for minimum diet diversity and minimum meal frequency in this record for more details.

    Time frame: 0 months, 6 months

07

Results

Posted Nov 26, 2019

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneStandard of Care ArmHome-based Education
Started163161
Completed151145
Not completed1216

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Height/Length for Age Z Score

Change in height/length over 6 months. Tool used is the WHO Child Growth Reference Standards. Change values calculated as: 6 month (z-score) minus Baseline (z-score).

Time frame:
Baseline, 6 months
Reported as:
Mean · Z scores
Change in Height/Length for Age Z Score
Z scoresStandard of Care ArmHome-based Education
Change in Height/Length for Age Z Score-0.02 ± 0.450.05 ± 0.48
SecondaryCognitive Development

Change in cognitive development Z score over 6 months. Tool used: Bayley III Cognitive Development Observational Checklist. Z-scores derived internally from the entire baseline measurement data set for the study. A z-score of 0 is equal to the mean cognitive score for the study population at baseline. Lower numbers indicate values lower than the baseline study population mean mean and higher numbers indicate values higher than this mean. Higher values above zero are indicative of cognitive scores higher than mean baseline score for the study population. Lower values below zero are indicative of cognitive scores lower than mean baseline score for the study population. For outcomes, change values are calculated as 6 month (z-score) minus Baseline (z-score)

Time frame:
Baseline, 6 months
Reported as:
Mean · Z score
Cognitive Development
Z scoreStandard of Care ArmHome-based Education
Cognitive Development0.38 (0.05 to 0.72)0.28 (-0.14 to 0.71)
SecondarySocioemotional Development

Change in socioemotional development score over 6 months. Tool used: Bayley III Socioemotional Development Parent Questionnaire. Z-scores derived internally from the entire baseline measurement data set for the study. A z-score of 0 is equal to the mean socioemotional score for the study population at baseline. Lower numbers indicate values lower than the baseline study population mean mean and higher numbers indicate values higher than this mean. Higher values above zero are indicative of socioemotional scores higher than mean baseline score for the study population. Lower values below zero are indicative of socioemotional scores lower than mean baseline score for the study population. For outcomes, change values are calculated as 6 month (z-score) minus Baseline (z-score)

Time frame:
Baseline, 6 months
Reported as:
Mean · Z score
Socioemotional Development
Z scoreStandard of Care ArmHome-based Education
Socioemotional Development0.44 (0.07 to 0.81)0.20 (-0.13 to 0.53)
SecondaryGross Motor Development

Change in gross motor development score over 6 months. Tool used: Bayley III Gross Motor Observational Checklist. Z-scores derived internally from the entire baseline measurement data set for the study. A z-score of 0 is equal to the mean gross motor score for the study population at baseline. Lower numbers indicate values lower than the baseline study population mean mean and higher numbers indicate values higher than this mean. Higher values above zero are indicative of gross motor scores higher than mean baseline score for the study population. Lower values below zero are indicative of gross motor scores lower than mean baseline score for the study population. For outcomes, change values are calculated as 6 month (z-score) minus Baseline (z-score)

Time frame:
Baseline, 6 months
Reported as:
Mean · Z score
Gross Motor Development
Z scoreStandard of Care ArmHome-based Education
Gross Motor Development0.51 (0.18 to 0.85)0.70 (0.3 to 1.1)
SecondaryFine Motor Development

Change in fine motor development score over 6 months. Tool used: Bayley III Fine Motor Observational Checklist. Z-scores derived internally from the entire baseline measurement data set for the study. A z-score of 0 is equal to the mean fine motor score for the study population at baseline. Lower numbers indicate values lower than the baseline study population mean mean and higher numbers indicate values higher than this mean. Higher values above zero are indicative of fine motor scores higher than mean baseline score for the study population. Lower values below zero are indicative of fine motor scores lower than mean baseline score for the study population. For outcomes, change values are calculated as 6 month (z-score) minus Baseline (z-score)

Time frame:
Baseline, 6 months
Reported as:
Mean · Z score
Fine Motor Development
Z scoreStandard of Care ArmHome-based Education
Fine Motor Development0.27 (-0.09 to 0.63)0.4 (0.04 to 0.76)
SecondaryReceptive Language Development

Change in receptive language development score over 6 months. Tool used: Bayley III Receptive Language Observational Checklist. Z-scores derived internally from the entire baseline measurement data set for the study. A z-score of 0 is equal to the mean receptive language score for the study population at baseline. Lower numbers indicate values lower than the baseline study population mean mean and higher numbers indicate values higher than this mean. Higher values above zero are indicative of receptive language scores higher than mean baseline score for the study population. Lower values below zero are indicative of receptive language scores lower than mean baseline score for the study population. For outcomes, change values are calculated as 6 month (z-score) minus Baseline (z-score)

Time frame:
Baseline, 6 months
Reported as:
Mean · Z score
Receptive Language Development
Z scoreStandard of Care ArmHome-based Education
Receptive Language Development0.56 (0.21 to 0.92)0.49 (0.11 to 0.86)
SecondaryExpressive Language Development

Change in expressive language development score over 6 months. Tool used: Bayley III Expressive Language Observational Checklist. Z-scores derived internally from the entire baseline measurement data set for the study. A z-score of 0 is equal to the mean expressive language score for the study population at baseline. Lower numbers indicate values lower than the baseline study population mean mean and higher numbers indicate values higher than this mean. Higher values above zero are indicative of expressive language scores higher than mean baseline score for the study population. Lower values below zero are indicative of expressive language scores lower than mean baseline score for the study population. For outcomes, change values are calculated as 6 month (z-score) minus Baseline (z-score)

Time frame:
Baseline, 6 months
Reported as:
Mean · Z score
Expressive Language Development
Z scoreStandard of Care ArmHome-based Education
Expressive Language Development0.63 (0.34 to 0.93)0.69 (0.38 to 0.99)
SecondaryMinimum Diet Diversity

Number of participants meeting the age appropriate minimum number of food groups consumed per day. This is defined according to the WHO's Infant and Young Child Feeding Indicators guidelines as greater or equal to 4 food groups consumed in the last 24 - hour period. The 7 possible food groups are: (1) grains, roots, tubers; (2) legumes, nuts; (3) dairy products; (4) flesh foods; (5) eggs; (6) vitamin A-rich fruits and vegetables; (7) other fruits and vegetables.

Time frame:
0 months, 6 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Minimum Diet Diversity
ParticipantsStandard of Care ArmHome-based Education
Minimum Diet Diversity115135
SecondaryMinimum Meal Frequency

Number of participants meetings the age-appropriate number of solid meals per day. This is defined according to the WHO's Infant and Young Child Feeding Indicators guidelines as 2 solid meals in the last 24-hour period for breastfed infants 6-8 months old; 3 solid meals in the last 24-hour period for breastfed infants 9 months or older; 4 solid meals in the last 24-hour period for non-breastfed infants.

Time frame:
0 months, 6 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Minimum Meal Frequency
ParticipantsStandard of Care ArmHome-based Education
Minimum Meal Frequency131129
SecondaryMinimum Acceptable Diet

Number of participants who meet both minimum diet diversity and minimum meal frequency indicators. Minimum diet diversity and minimum meal frequency are both defined according to the WHO's Infant and Young Child Feeding Indicators guidelines. See the entries for minimum diet diversity and minimum meal frequency in this record for more details.

Time frame:
0 months, 6 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Minimum Acceptable Diet
ParticipantsStandard of Care ArmHome-based Education
Minimum Acceptable Diet104123

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Standard of Care Arm—0/163 (0%)0/163 (0%)
Home-based Education—0/161 (0%)0/161 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Standard of Care ArmHome-based EducationTotal
<=18 years163161324
Between 18 and 65 years000
>=65 years000
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Months)Standard of Care ArmHome-based EducationTotal
Mean15.1 ± 5.215.8 ± 5.215.4 ± 5.2
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Standard of Care ArmHome-based EducationTotal
Female7369142
Male9092182
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Standard of Care ArmHome-based EducationTotal
Guatemala163161324
Weight for age Z score
Weight for age Z score(Z score)Standard of Care ArmHome-based EducationTotal
Mean-1.92 ± 0.79-1.95 ± 0.76-1.93 ± 0.77
Length/height for age
Length/height for age(Z score)Standard of Care ArmHome-based EducationTotal
Mean-3.41 ± 0.74-3.47 ± 0.73-3.43 ± 0.73
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Wuqu' Kawoq
    Tecpan, Chimaltenango, Guatemala
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Martinez B, Cardona S, Rodas P, Lubina M, Gonzalez A, Farley Webb M, Grazioso MDP, Rohloff P. Developmental outcomes of an individualised complementary feeding intervention for stunted children: a substudy from a larger randomised controlled trial in Guatemala. BMJ Paediatr Open. 2018 Oct 3;2(1):e000314. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2018-000314. eCollection 2018. PubMed 30306144 ↗
  • Martinez B, Webb MF, Gonzalez A, Douglas K, Grazioso MDP, Rohloff P. Complementary feeding intervention on stunted Guatemalan children: a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Paediatr Open. 2018 Apr 27;2(1):e000213. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2017-000213. eCollection 2018. PubMed 29719876 ↗
10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Aug 2015, a primary completion of Oct 2016 and a completion of Oct 2016. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Nov 2019, 3 years 1 month after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 17, 2015
First posted
Jul 28, 2015
Start
Aug 2015
Primary completionActual
Oct 2016
CompletionActual
Oct 2016
Results first posted
Nov 26, 2019
Last update
Nov 26, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 26, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02509936
Lead sponsor
Wuqu' Kawoq, Maya Health Alliance
Collaborators
Universidad del Valle, Guatemala, Grand Challenges Canada
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 28, 2015
Start date
Aug 2015
Primary completion
Oct 2016
Completion
Oct 2016
Results posted
Nov 26, 2019
Last update
Nov 26, 2019

Study contacts

Peter Rohloff, MD PhD
principal investigator · Wuqu' Kawoq
Maria Grazioso, PhD
principal investigator · Universidad del Valle, Guatemala

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion