ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02501122Updated Jan 31, 2017

Retrospective Analysis in Quality of Care Measures in Pediatric Adenotonsillectomy Patients

An observational study in Adenotonsillectomy, sponsored by Vidya Raman. Completed. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-01-31.

Sponsored by Vidya Raman · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
1,000,000
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to interrogate the Partners for Kids (PFK) and the pediatric health information (PHIS) databases in addition to our own perioperative Nationwide Children's data base to look at outcomes, resource utilization, and cost trends for adenotonsillectomy in the nationally versus locally. The investigators also want compare Nationwide Children's to other regional and national tertiary pediatric institutions.

02

Conditions studied

  • Adenotonsillectomy

Keywords

  • Quality
  • hospital care
  • adenotonsillectomy
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Vidya Raman is the lead sponsor of 9 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients who have undergone anesthesia for adenotonsillectomy, tonsillectomy or adenoidectomy during 2013-2015 at Nationwide Children's Hospital.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients who undergone an adenotonsillectomy, tonsillectomy or adenoidectomy during the past 2 years (2013-2015) who have ICD-9 codes (International Classification of Diseases) in the databases

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-adenotonsillectomy patients
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
1,000,000 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Adenotonsillectomy

    Measuring quality of care in patients undergoing adenotonsillectomy.

    Other: Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS), Partners for Kids (PFK) and Nationwide Children's Hospital Perioperative Database

Interventions

  • OtherPediatric Health Information System (PHIS), Partners for Kids (PFK) and Nationwide Children's Hospital Perioperative Database

    Utilizing these databases to assess standards for quality of care measures in adenotonsillectomy patients.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Gather data from PHIS and contrast local databases (PFK versus Nationwide Children's)

    The significance is to identify outcome measures, resource utilization, and cost of adenotonsillectomy nationally as well as locally.

    Time frame: after patient's discharge, an expected average between 6 months to 2 years

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 31, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02501122
Lead sponsor
Vidya Raman
Responsible party
Vidya Raman (Clinical Assistant Professor, Nationwide Children's Hospital) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Jul 17, 2015
Start date
Dec 2015
Primary completion
Jan 2017
Completion
Jan 2017
Last update
Jan 31, 2017

Study contacts

Vidya Raman, MD
principal investigator · Nationwide Children's Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion