CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT02487927Updated Jul 2, 2015

The Classification of Difficult Weaning and the Predictive Value of Relative Factors for Difficult Weaning

An observational study in Intensive Care Medicine, Mechanical Ventilation and Weaning, sponsored by Jianfeng Xie. Status unknown at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 16 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-07-02.

Sponsored by Jianfeng Xie · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Jun 2015), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
110
Ages
16 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To evaluate the distribution of different types of difficult weaning and the predictive value of weaning relative factors.

Read the detailed description

108 patients who passed the spontaneous breathing test (SBT) were included in this study,every patient were performed 30-60 minutes SBT after enrollment.Patients were divided into succeed weaning and difficult weaning group according the results of SBT, the difficult weaning group were futher divided into A(Airway and Lung dysfunction),B(Brain dysfunction),C(Cardic dysfunction),D(Diaphragm dysfunction),E(Endocrine and metabolic dysfunction)five different groups according to the causes of difficult weaning. The respiratory mechanical parameters,the diameter of inferior vena cava and the diaphgram excursion were recorded before SBT and 30 minutes after SBT.

02

Conditions studied

  • Intensive Care Medicine
  • Mechanical Ventilation
  • Weaning
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Jianfeng Xie is the lead sponsor of 12 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

mechanical vetilation patients in ICU, and the patients are weaninng candidates

Inclusion criteria

  • mechanical ventilation patients
  • prepared to weaning
  • sign on the acknowledged

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • endotracheotomy
  • single lung
  • pregnant
  • heart,liver,renal failure
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
110 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Weaning success

    patients pass SBT and weaning without any ventilation in 48 hours

    Behavioral: weaning

  • weaning failure

    patients do not pass SBT or ventilation with any ventilation in 48 hours

    Behavioral: weaning

Interventions

  • Behavioralweaning

    T piece

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. the reasons of difficult weaning

    Time frame: 30 mins

Secondary outcomes

  1. The predictive value of diaphragm associated values in weaning

    Time frame: 30mins

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Zhongda Hospital
    Nanjing, Jiangsu 210009, China
    Recruiting
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 2, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02487927
Lead sponsor
Jianfeng Xie
Responsible party
Jianfeng Xie (Professor, Southeast University, China) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Jul 2, 2015
Start date
Jun 2012
Primary completion
Jul 2015 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 2015 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 2, 2015

Study contacts

Jianfeng Xie, Dr
Contact
panchun1982@gmail.com
+862583262550
Haibo Qiu, Dr
study director · Southeast University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Jun 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion