CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02487810Updated Jul 19, 2019Results posted

Intuition vs. Deliberation in Medical Decision Making

An interventional study of Cognitive load and Deliberative instructions in Decision Making About Life-sustaining Treatment in Patients With Serious Cardiac, Respiratory and Oncological Conditions Likely to Limit Life Expectancy, sponsored by University of Pennsylvania. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 60 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-07-19.

Sponsored by University of Pennsylvania · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
200
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
60 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether there are systematic differences between the decisions patients make intuitively versus deliberatively about life-sustaining medical therapies.

The targeted population is inpatients at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania with serious medical problems. The study will involve facilitated interviews with patients using a survey instrument developed in Qualtrics.

02

Conditions studied

  • Decision Making About Life-sustaining Treatment in Patients With Serious Cardiac, Respiratory and Oncological Conditions Likely to Limit Life Expectancy
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of Pennsylvania is the lead sponsor of 1,635 studies on the registry; 239 are open to participants now.

Of its 154 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 104 (68%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
60 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age 60 and older
  2. Currently an inpatient at Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
  3. Speaks and reads fluently in English
  4. Either

    1. Has one of the following medical conditions:

      • Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with at least severe airflow obstruction on most recent spirometry and/or eligible for long-term oxygen therapy
      • Incurable interstitial lung disease with at least severe restriction on most recent pulmonary function tests and/or eligible for long-term oxygen therapy
      • Congestive heart failure with NYHA Class III or higher and current hospitalization related to heart failure
      • Acute myeloid leukemia
      • Stage IV lymphoma
      • Stage IIIB or Stage IV non-small cell lung cancer, cholangiocarcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, breast cancer, uterine cancer, cervical cancer, ovarian cancer, colorectal cancer, gastric cancer, pancreatic cancer, prostate cancer, urothelial cancer
      • Stage C or D hepatocellular carcinoma
      • Mesothelioma or any malignancy metastatic to the pleura; or
    2. Is hospitalized on oncology, pulmonary or cardiology service and has been hospitalized at least one other time during the last year on the same service
  5. Stable vital signs

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Notation of code status limitation in electronic medical record
  2. Cognitive impairment to the point unable to give informed consent
  3. Current feeding tube placement
  4. Current tracheostomy
  5. Severe pain, shortness of breath or other uncontrolled symptoms
  6. Actively undergoing evaluation for solid organ transplant
  7. First hospitalization after diagnosis of serious illness
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
200 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intuitive

    Patients in each arm will be asked all of the same questions. The only difference between the arms will be the instructions regarding how and when to answer the series of hypothetical questions regarding medical interventions. The instructions will be designed to influence patients to think either intuitively or deliberatively about the questions regarding life-sustaining interventions.

    Behavioral: Cognitive load

  • Experimental
    Deliberative

    Patients in each arm will be asked all of the same questions. The only difference between the arms will be the instructions regarding how and when to answer the series of hypothetical questions regarding medical interventions. The instructions will be designed to influence patients to think either intuitively or deliberatively about the questions regarding life-sustaining interventions.

    Behavioral: Deliberative instructions

Interventions

  • BehavioralCognitive load

    Patients in the intuition arm of the study will be asked to complete a memorization task while they are answering survey questions.

  • BehavioralDeliberative instructions

    Patients in the deliberative arm will be given instructions to take their time and deliberate on their decisions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Acceptance or Refusal of a Feeding Tube for Chronic Aspiration

    Patients in each arm will be asked all of the same questions. The only difference between the arms will be the instructions regarding how and when to answer the series of hypothetical questions regarding acceptance of a feeding tube for chronic aspiration. In this hypothetical scenario, patients are presented with a situation in which they are unable to eat or drink safely such that small amounts of food or liquid go to their lungs and cause trouble with breathing. The instructions will be designed to influence patients to think either intuitively or deliberatively about the questions regarding life-sustaining interventions. Cognitive load: Patients in the intuition arm of the study will be asked to complete a memorization task while they are answering survey questions.

    Time frame: The trial involves a questionnaire that will be given on a single day; patients will not be followed longitudinally

  2. Acceptance or Refusal of Antibiotics

    Patients in each arm will be asked all of the same questions. The only difference between the arms will be the instructions regarding how and when to answer the series of hypothetical questions regarding acceptance of antibiotics. In this hypothetical scenario, patients are presented with an illness severity such that they drift in and out of consciousness some days and are expected to die in several months. The instructions will be designed to influence patients to think either intuitively or deliberatively about the questions regarding life-sustaining interventions. Cognitive load: Patients in the intuition arm of the study will be asked to complete a memorization task while they are answering survey questions.

    Time frame: The trial involves a questionnaire that will be given on a single day; patients will not be followed longitudinally

  3. Acceptance or Refusal of Breathing Machine

    Patients in each arm will be asked all of the same questions. The only difference between the arms will be the instructions regarding how and when to answer the series of hypothetical questions regarding acceptance of a breathing machine. In this hypothetical scenario, patients are presented with a life-threatening illness with 50% chance of survival provided that they receive support from a breathing machine for two weeks. The instructions will be designed to influence patients to think either intuitively or deliberatively about the questions regarding life-sustaining interventions. Cognitive load: Patients in the intuition arm of the study will be asked to complete a memorization task while they are answering survey questions.

    Time frame: The trial involves a questionnaire that will be given on a single day; patients will not be followed longitudinally

  4. Acceptance or Refusal of Tracheostomy

    Patients in each arm will be asked all of the same questions. The only difference between the arms will be the instructions regarding how and when to answer the series of hypothetical questions regarding acceptance of a tracheostomy and support from a breathing machine for at least two months to survive. The instructions will be designed to influence patients to think either intuitively or deliberatively about the questions regarding life-sustaining interventions. Cognitive load: Patients in the intuition arm of the study will be asked to complete a memorization task while they are answering survey questions.

    Time frame: The trial involves a questionnaire that will be given on a single day; patients will not be followed longitudinally

Secondary outcomes

  1. Scores on Uncertainty Subscale of Decisional Conflict Scale

    Decisional uncertainty will be evaluated using the uncertainty subscale of the Decisional Conflict Scale ranging from 0-100 such that 0 = extremely CERTAIN about best choice and 100 = extremely UNCERTAIN about the best choice. Higher values represent MORE UNCERTAINTY with decisions regarding feeding tubes, antibiotics, intubation, and tracheostomy while lower values represent LESS UNCERTAINTY.

    Time frame: The trial involves a questionnaire that will be given on a single day; patients will not be followed longitudinally

  2. Correlation Between Accepting Tracheostomy and Thinking That Being Bed Bound is Equal to or Worse Than Death

    This outcome measures the proportion of participants who accept tracheostomy AND indicate that bed bound is a state that is either equal to, or worse than death. This proportion will be measured separately in the deliberative and intuitive groups; these proportions will then be compared.

    Time frame: The trial involves a questionnaire that will be given on a single day; patients will not be followed longitudinally

  3. Correlation Between Accepting Antibiotics and Thinking That Being Bed Bound is Equal to or Worse Than Death.

    This outcome measures the proportion of participants who accept antibiotics AND indicate that bed bound is a state that is either equal to, or worse than death. This proportion will be measured separately in the deliberative and intuitive groups; these proportions will then be compared.

    Time frame: The trial involves a questionnaire that will be given on a single day; patients will not be followed longitudinally

  4. Correlation Between Accepting Tracheostomy and Thinking That Needing Care All the Time is Equal to or Worse Than Death

    This outcome measures the proportion of participants who accept tracheostomy AND indicate that needing care all the time is a state that is either equal to, or worse than death. This proportion will be measured separately in the deliberative and intuitive groups; these proportions will then be compared.

    Time frame: The trial involves a questionnaire that will be given on a single day; patients will not be followed longitudinally

  5. Correlation Between Accepting Antibiotics and Thinking That Needing Care All the Time is Equal to or Worse Than Death

    This outcome measures the proportion of participants who accept antibiotics AND indicate that needing care all the time is a state that is either equal to, or worse than death. This proportion will be measured separately in the deliberative and intuitive groups; these proportions will then be compared.

    Time frame: The trial involves a questionnaire that will be given on a single day; patients will not be followed longitudinally

  6. Correlation Between Accepting Tracheostomy and Thinking That Living in a Nursing Home is Equal to or Worse Than Death

    This outcome measures the proportion of participants who accept tracheostomy AND indicate that living in a nursing home is a state that is either equal to, or worse than death. This proportion will be measured separately in the deliberative and intuitive groups; these proportions will then be compared.

    Time frame: The trial involves a questionnaire that will be given on a single day; patients will not be followed longitudinally

  7. Correlation Between Accepting Antibiotics and Thinking That Living in a Nursing Home is Equal to or Worse Than Death

    This outcome measures the proportion of participants who accept antibiotics AND indicate that living in a nursing home is a state that is either equal to, or worse than death. This proportion will be measured separately in the deliberative and intuitive groups; these proportions will then be compared.

    Time frame: The trial involves a questionnaire that will be given on a single day; patients will not be followed longitudinally

  8. Correlation Between Accepting Tracheostomy and Thinking That Relying on a Breathing Machine is Equal to or Worse Than Death

    This outcome measures the proportion of participants who accept tracheostomy AND indicate that relying on a breathing machine is a state that is either equal to, or worse than death. This proportion will be measured separately in the deliberative and intuitive groups; these proportions will then be compared.

    Time frame: The trial involves a questionnaire that will be given on a single day; patients will not be followed longitudinally

  9. Correlation Between Accepting a Feeding Tube and Thinking That Relying on a Feeding Tube is Equal to or Worse Than Death

    This outcome measures the proportion of participants who accept a feeding tube AND indicate that relying on a feeding tube is a state that is either equal to, or worse than death. This proportion will be measured separately in the deliberative and intuitive groups; these proportions will then be compared.

    Time frame: The trial involves a questionnaire that will be given on a single day; patients will not be followed longitudinally

07

Results

Posted Jul 19, 2019

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneIntuitiveDeliberative
Started98102
Completed97102
Not completed10
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject10

Outcome measures

PrimaryAcceptance or Refusal of a Feeding Tube for Chronic Aspiration

Patients in each arm will be asked all of the same questions. The only difference between the arms will be the instructions regarding how and when to answer the series of hypothetical questions regarding acceptance of a feeding tube for chronic aspiration. In this hypothetical scenario, patients are presented with a situation in which they are unable to eat or drink safely such that small amounts of food or liquid go to their lungs and cause trouble with breathing. The instructions will be designed to influence patients to think either intuitively or deliberatively about the questions regarding life-sustaining interventions. Cognitive load: Patients in the intuition arm of the study will be asked to complete a memorization task while they are answering survey questions.

Time frame:
The trial involves a questionnaire that will be given on a single day; patients will not be followed longitudinally
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Acceptance or Refusal of a Feeding Tube for Chronic Aspiration
ParticipantsIntuitive ArmDeliberative Arm
Accept Feeding Tube4145
Reject Feeding Tube5657
PrimaryAcceptance or Refusal of Antibiotics

Patients in each arm will be asked all of the same questions. The only difference between the arms will be the instructions regarding how and when to answer the series of hypothetical questions regarding acceptance of antibiotics. In this hypothetical scenario, patients are presented with an illness severity such that they drift in and out of consciousness some days and are expected to die in several months. The instructions will be designed to influence patients to think either intuitively or deliberatively about the questions regarding life-sustaining interventions. Cognitive load: Patients in the intuition arm of the study will be asked to complete a memorization task while they are answering survey questions.

Time frame:
The trial involves a questionnaire that will be given on a single day; patients will not be followed longitudinally
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Acceptance or Refusal of Antibiotics
ParticipantsIntuitive ArmDeliberative Arm
Accept antibiotics3844
Refuse antibiotics5958
PrimaryAcceptance or Refusal of Breathing Machine

Patients in each arm will be asked all of the same questions. The only difference between the arms will be the instructions regarding how and when to answer the series of hypothetical questions regarding acceptance of a breathing machine. In this hypothetical scenario, patients are presented with a life-threatening illness with 50% chance of survival provided that they receive support from a breathing machine for two weeks. The instructions will be designed to influence patients to think either intuitively or deliberatively about the questions regarding life-sustaining interventions. Cognitive load: Patients in the intuition arm of the study will be asked to complete a memorization task while they are answering survey questions.

Time frame:
The trial involves a questionnaire that will be given on a single day; patients will not be followed longitudinally
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Acceptance or Refusal of Breathing Machine
ParticipantsIntuitive ArmDeliberative Arm
Accept intubation5761
Refuse intubation4041
PrimaryAcceptance or Refusal of Tracheostomy

Patients in each arm will be asked all of the same questions. The only difference between the arms will be the instructions regarding how and when to answer the series of hypothetical questions regarding acceptance of a tracheostomy and support from a breathing machine for at least two months to survive. The instructions will be designed to influence patients to think either intuitively or deliberatively about the questions regarding life-sustaining interventions. Cognitive load: Patients in the intuition arm of the study will be asked to complete a memorization task while they are answering survey questions.

Time frame:
The trial involves a questionnaire that will be given on a single day; patients will not be followed longitudinally
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Acceptance or Refusal of Tracheostomy
ParticipantsIntuitive ArmDeliberative Arm
Accept tracheostomy3642
Refuse tracheostomy6160
SecondaryScores on Uncertainty Subscale of Decisional Conflict Scale

Decisional uncertainty will be evaluated using the uncertainty subscale of the Decisional Conflict Scale ranging from 0-100 such that 0 = extremely CERTAIN about best choice and 100 = extremely UNCERTAIN about the best choice. Higher values represent MORE UNCERTAINTY with decisions regarding feeding tubes, antibiotics, intubation, and tracheostomy while lower values represent LESS UNCERTAINTY.

Time frame:
The trial involves a questionnaire that will be given on a single day; patients will not be followed longitudinally
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Scores on Uncertainty Subscale of Decisional Conflict Scale
units on a scaleIntuitive ArmDeliberative Arm
Feeding Tube21.5 ± 23.120.9 ± 21.1
Antibiotics20.3 ± 21.718.9 ± 21.2
Intubation26.2 ± 25.520.8 ± 22.1
Tracheostomy29.4 ± 25.323.6 ± 24.8
SecondaryCorrelation Between Accepting Tracheostomy and Thinking That Being Bed Bound is Equal to or Worse Than Death

This outcome measures the proportion of participants who accept tracheostomy AND indicate that bed bound is a state that is either equal to, or worse than death. This proportion will be measured separately in the deliberative and intuitive groups; these proportions will then be compared.

Time frame:
The trial involves a questionnaire that will be given on a single day; patients will not be followed longitudinally
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Correlation Between Accepting Tracheostomy and Thinking That Being Bed Bound is Equal to or Worse Than Death
ParticipantsIntuitive ArmDeliberative Arm
Accept tracheostomy49
Refuse tracheostomy2228
SecondaryCorrelation Between Accepting Antibiotics and Thinking That Being Bed Bound is Equal to or Worse Than Death.

This outcome measures the proportion of participants who accept antibiotics AND indicate that bed bound is a state that is either equal to, or worse than death. This proportion will be measured separately in the deliberative and intuitive groups; these proportions will then be compared.

Time frame:
The trial involves a questionnaire that will be given on a single day; patients will not be followed longitudinally
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Correlation Between Accepting Antibiotics and Thinking That Being Bed Bound is Equal to or Worse Than Death.
ParticipantsIntuitive ArmDeliberative Arm
Accept Antibiotics613
Refuse Antibiotics2024
SecondaryCorrelation Between Accepting Tracheostomy and Thinking That Needing Care All the Time is Equal to or Worse Than Death

This outcome measures the proportion of participants who accept tracheostomy AND indicate that needing care all the time is a state that is either equal to, or worse than death. This proportion will be measured separately in the deliberative and intuitive groups; these proportions will then be compared.

Time frame:
The trial involves a questionnaire that will be given on a single day; patients will not be followed longitudinally
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Correlation Between Accepting Tracheostomy and Thinking That Needing Care All the Time is Equal to or Worse Than Death
ParticipantsIntuitive ArmDeliberative Arm
Accept Tracheostomy28
Refuse Tracheostomy1917
SecondaryCorrelation Between Accepting Antibiotics and Thinking That Needing Care All the Time is Equal to or Worse Than Death

This outcome measures the proportion of participants who accept antibiotics AND indicate that needing care all the time is a state that is either equal to, or worse than death. This proportion will be measured separately in the deliberative and intuitive groups; these proportions will then be compared.

Time frame:
The trial involves a questionnaire that will be given on a single day; patients will not be followed longitudinally
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Correlation Between Accepting Antibiotics and Thinking That Needing Care All the Time is Equal to or Worse Than Death
ParticipantsIntuitive ArmDeliberative Arm
Accept Antibiotics49
Refuse Antibiotics1716
SecondaryCorrelation Between Accepting Tracheostomy and Thinking That Living in a Nursing Home is Equal to or Worse Than Death

This outcome measures the proportion of participants who accept tracheostomy AND indicate that living in a nursing home is a state that is either equal to, or worse than death. This proportion will be measured separately in the deliberative and intuitive groups; these proportions will then be compared.

Time frame:
The trial involves a questionnaire that will be given on a single day; patients will not be followed longitudinally
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Correlation Between Accepting Tracheostomy and Thinking That Living in a Nursing Home is Equal to or Worse Than Death
ParticipantsIntuitive ArmDeliberative Arm
Accept Tracheostomy45
Refuse Tracheostomy1421
SecondaryCorrelation Between Accepting Antibiotics and Thinking That Living in a Nursing Home is Equal to or Worse Than Death

This outcome measures the proportion of participants who accept antibiotics AND indicate that living in a nursing home is a state that is either equal to, or worse than death. This proportion will be measured separately in the deliberative and intuitive groups; these proportions will then be compared.

Time frame:
The trial involves a questionnaire that will be given on a single day; patients will not be followed longitudinally
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Correlation Between Accepting Antibiotics and Thinking That Living in a Nursing Home is Equal to or Worse Than Death
ParticipantsIntuitive ArmDeliberative Arm
Accept Antibiotics58
Refuse Antibiotics1318
SecondaryCorrelation Between Accepting Tracheostomy and Thinking That Relying on a Breathing Machine is Equal to or Worse Than Death

This outcome measures the proportion of participants who accept tracheostomy AND indicate that relying on a breathing machine is a state that is either equal to, or worse than death. This proportion will be measured separately in the deliberative and intuitive groups; these proportions will then be compared.

Time frame:
The trial involves a questionnaire that will be given on a single day; patients will not be followed longitudinally
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Correlation Between Accepting Tracheostomy and Thinking That Relying on a Breathing Machine is Equal to or Worse Than Death
ParticipantsIntuitive ArmDeliberative Arm
Accept Tracheostomy47
Refuse Tracheostomy2125
SecondaryCorrelation Between Accepting a Feeding Tube and Thinking That Relying on a Feeding Tube is Equal to or Worse Than Death

This outcome measures the proportion of participants who accept a feeding tube AND indicate that relying on a feeding tube is a state that is either equal to, or worse than death. This proportion will be measured separately in the deliberative and intuitive groups; these proportions will then be compared.

Time frame:
The trial involves a questionnaire that will be given on a single day; patients will not be followed longitudinally
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Correlation Between Accepting a Feeding Tube and Thinking That Relying on a Feeding Tube is Equal to or Worse Than Death
ParticipantsIntuitive ArmDeliberative Arm
Accept feeding tube716
Refuse feeding tube3938

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Intuitive——0/97 (0%)
Deliberative——0/102 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)IntuitiveDeliberativeTotal
Mean66.5 ± 4.867.9 ± 5.267.2 ± 5.0
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)IntuitiveDeliberativeTotal
Female333467
Male6468132
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Rubin EB, Buehler AE, Cooney E, Gabler NB, Mante AA, Halpern SD. Intuitive vs Deliberative Approaches to Making Decisions About Life Support: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jan 4;2(1):e187851. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.7851. PubMed 30681717 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 19, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02487810
Lead sponsor
University of Pennsylvania
Collaborators
Leonard Davis Institute
Responsible party
Scott Halpern (Assistant Professor of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 2, 2015
Start date
Jul 2015
Primary completion
Mar 2016
Completion
Mar 2016
Results posted
Jul 19, 2019
Last update
Jul 19, 2019

Study contacts

Scott D Halpern, MD, PhD
principal investigator · University of Pennsylvania

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion