A Phase 4 interventional study of Comforting Conversation and Standard Communication in Colonoscopy, sponsored by Jeppe Thue Jensen. Status unknown at 1 site in Denmark. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-09-29.
Sponsored by Jeppe Thue Jensen · Phase 4, Interventional, and Supportive care
Does comforting conversation during colonoscopy improve on patient satisfaction, compliance and pain management.
Does comforting conversation during colonoscopy improve on patient satisfaction, compliance and pain management. A randomized controlled trial on comforting conversation or standard communication during colonoscopy. Using a mixed methods model, a qualitative study will be conducted to clarify what patients deem as important or effective conversation during colonoscopy. A randomized controlled trial will hereafter be conducted, where the results from the initial study will be utilized in the conversation during colonoscopy.
This is the only study on the registry with Jeppe Thue Jensen as lead sponsor.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Conversation according to the initital qualitative study.
Behavioral: Comforting Conversation · Behavioral: Standard Communication
Standard information prior to and during endoscopy.
Behavioral: Standard Communication
Pain management, distraction, diversion, empathy. Dependent on qualitative study results.
Information on procedure type, duration, findings, key landmarks, possibility of analgesic treatment, pause in procedure.
Patient Satisfaction
Questionnaire with 5 point Likert like scale
Time frame: on average 20 minutes after completed colonoscopy.
Per-procedural Pain management
Pain/discomfort prior to-, every 5. minutes and post-procedure with patients using the Visual Analogue Scale
Time frame: From inclusion to completed procedure. On average 45 minutes from first to last measurement.
This study is status unknown, as verified in Sep 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.