ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02483975Updated Apr 27, 2020Results posted

Effect of Fluticasone Furoate Inhalation Powder on the Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical Axis of Children Aged 5-11 Years With Asthma

A Phase 3 interventional study of FF and Placebo in Asthma, sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline. Completed at 17 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 5 Years to 11 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-04-27.

Sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
111
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
5 Years to 11 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) have a number of known class effects including hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical (HPA) axis suppression. Although the safety of inhaled Fluticasone Furoate (FF) on the HPA axis of adults and adolescent asthmatic patients has been established, it is important to assess the risk of suppression in children so as to establish whether this medicine can be safely used in this young population. This study aims to evaluate the effect of inhaled FF on the HPA axis of children 5-11 years of age (inclusive) with persistent asthma compared with placebo. Approximately 143 subjects will be enrolled. Subjects will enter a 7 to 14 day run-in period on oral montelukast 4 milligrams (mg) (5 year old subjects) or 5 mg (6-11 year old subjects) once daily. Eligible subjects will be randomized to receive once-daily FF inhalation powder 50 micrograms (mcg) or once-daily placebo inhalation powder in the morning via the ELLIPTA™ inhaler for 42 days. Subjects will continue to receive open label montelukast during the treatment period. All subjects will be provided albuterol/salbutamol inhalation aerosol, to use as needed to treat acute asthma symptoms throughout the study.

ELLIPTA is a registered trademark of the GlaxoSmithKline group of companies.

02

Conditions studied

  • Asthma

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Fluticasone Furoate
  • Asthma
  • HPA axis
  • Children
  • Inhaled corticosteroid
03

In context

Asthma

4,010 studies on the registry are indexed under Asthma; 514 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 111 is above the median of 83 across 2,814 interventional studies indexed under Asthma.

Browse Asthma studies →

Lead sponsor

GlaxoSmithKline is the lead sponsor of 3,647 studies on the registry; 118 are open to participants now.

Of its 264 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 239 (91%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
5 Years to 11 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Informed consent: Written informed consent from at least one parent/care giver and the accompanying informed assent from the subject (where the subject is able to provide assent) prior to admission to the study.

If applicable, subject must be able and willing to give assent to take part in the study according to the local requirement. The study investigator is accountable for determining a child's capacity to assent to participation in a research study, taking into consideration any standards set by the responsible Independent Ethics Committee (IEC)/Institutional Review Board (IRB).

Subject and their legal guardian understands that they must comply with study medication and study assessments.

  • Age: 5-11 years (inclusive) at Visit 1.
  • Weight: Subjects must weigh at least 17 kilograms (kg).
  • Gender: Male and pre-menarchial female. Pre-menarchial females are defined as any female who has yet to begin menses.
  • Diagnosis of asthma: Subjects must have a diagnosis of asthma documented in their medical history at least 6 months prior to Visit 1.
  • Childhood Asthma Control Test (C-ACT): Subjects must have a C-ACT score of >19.
  • Asthma Therapy Prior to Visit 1: Subjects are eligible if they have been using non-corticosteroid controller and/or short-acting beta2-agonist (SABA) bronchodilators alone for at least 4 weeks prior to Visit 1.
  • Ability to use Dry Powder Inhalers: Subjects must demonstrate the ability to use the ELLIPTA inhaler under the supervision of their parents/caregiver.
  • SABA: All subjects must be able to replace their current SABA treatment with albuterol/salbutamol aerosol inhaler at Visit 1 for use as needed for the duration of the study. Albuterol/salbutamol metered dose inhaler (MDI) will be administered with or without a spacer, to be used as determined by the investigator. The use or non-use of the spacer should be consistent for an individual subject throughout the study.
  • Peak Flow Meter/Daily Diary Compliance: A subject must be able to use the study-provided peak flow meter and the subject/caregiver must be able to maintain the electronic diary record.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of Life-Threatening Asthma: Subjects with a history of life-threatening asthma defined for this protocol as an asthma episode that required intubation, hypercapnea requiring non-invasive ventilatory support, respiratory arrest, hypoxic seizures or asthma-related syncopal episode(s).
  • Asthma Exacerbation: Subjects with a history of asthma exacerbation requiring the use of systemic corticosteroids (tablets, suspension, or injection) for at least 3 days or a depot corticosteroid injection (within 3 months) or requiring hospitalization for asthma (within 6 months) prior to screening.
  • Respiratory Infection: Culture-documented or suspected bacterial or viral infection of the upper or lower respiratory tract, sinus or middle ear that is not resolved within 4 weeks of Visit 1 and led to a change in asthma management or in the opinion of the Investigator, expected to affect the subject's asthma status or the subject's ability to participate in the study.
  • Oropharyngeal Examination: A subject will not be eligible for the run-in if he/she has clinical visual evidence of candidiasis at Visit 1.
  • Concurrent Disease: Any significant abnormality or medical condition identified at the screening medical assessment (including serious psychological disorder and congenital metabolic disorders) likely to interfere with the conduct of the study or affect the safety of the patient.
  • Allergies/Intolerance:

Drug Allergy/Intolerance: Any adverse reaction including immediate or delayed hypersensitivity to any Leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA), or intranasal, inhaled, or systemic corticosteroid therapy. Known or suspected sensitivity/intolerance to the constituents of the powder inhaler (i.e. lactose) or montelukast (e.g. phenylalanine).

Milk Protein Allergy: History of severe milk protein allergy.

  • Corticosteroid Use:

Administration of systemic, oral, or depot corticosteroids within 12 weeks of Visit 1 is prohibited and during the study.

Use of an ICS is prohibited during the 8 weeks prior to Visit 1 and during the study.

Use of intranasal corticosteroids is prohibited during the 4 weeks prior to Visit 1 and during the study.

Use of dermatological/topical corticosteroids during the 8 weeks prior to Visit 1 and during the study.

  • Concomitant Medication: Use of prescription or over-the-counter medications that would significantly affect the course of asthma or the HPA axis system of subjects. In addition, use of potent cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) inhibitors within 4 weeks of Visit 1 and during the study (e.g., Clarithromycin, atazanavir, indinavir, itraconazole, ketoconazole, nefazadone, nelfinavir; ritonavir; saquinavir; telithromycin, troleandomycin, voriconazole, mibefradil, cyclosporine).
  • Tobacco/Marijuana Use: Present use of any tobacco or marijuana products.
  • Affiliation with Investigator's Site: A subject will not be eligible for this study if he/she is an immediate family member of the participating investigator, sub-investigator, study coordinator, or employee of the participating investigator.
  • Parental/ Guardian Factors: Parent or Guardian with a history of psychiatric disease, intellectual deficiency, substance abuse or other condition (e.g. inability to read, comprehend or write) which may affect: validity of consent to participate in the study, adequate supervision of the subject during the study, compliance of subject with study medication and study procedures (e.g. completion of daily diary, attending scheduled clinic visits) and subject safety and well-being.
  • Children in Care: Children who are wards of the government or state are not eligible for participation in this study.
  • Clinically significant obesity: Defined as greater than 98th percentile.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
111 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    FF 50 mcg

    Subjects will receive by oral inhalation FF 50 mcg once daily in the morning via ELLIPTA for 42 days. Subjects will continue to receive oral montelukast once daily in the evening and may use albuterol/salbutamol inhalation aerosol as needed.

    Drug: FF · Drug: Montelukast · Drug: Albuterol/Salbutamol

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Subjects will receive by oral inhalation placebo once daily in the morning via ELLIPTA for 42 days. Subjects will continue to receive oral montelukast once daily in the evening and may use albuterol/salbutamol inhalation aerosol as needed.

    Drug: Placebo · Drug: Montelukast · Drug: Albuterol/Salbutamol

Interventions

  • DrugFF

    FF will be provided as a dry powder inhaler with 30 doses per device, each containing 50 mcg of FF as a dry white powder per blister, to be inhaled orally via ELLIPTA.

  • DrugPlacebo

    Placebo will be provided as dry powder inhaler with 30 doses per device, each containing placebo as a dry white powder per blister, to be inhaled orally via ELLIPTA.

  • Montelukast will be provided as 4 mg and 5 mg chewable tablets.

  • DrugAlbuterol/Salbutamol

    Drug page: Albuterol

    Albuterol/Salbutamol will be provided as inhalation aerosol.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline (Expressed as a Ratio) in 0-24 Hour Weighted Mean Serum Cortisol at the End of the Six Week Treatment Period (D 42) in Intention-to-treat (ITT) Population

    The blood samples for statistical analysis of serum cortisol (SC) endpoints were collected on D 0 and D 42 at the indicated time points. The weighted mean was calculated by dividing the area under the curve (AUC) over the 24-hour (hr) time period by the time period. Change from Baseline in 0-24 hr weighted mean SC was calculated as a ratio from Baseline defined as the SC weighted mean (0-24 hours) at Week 6 divided by the Baseline SC weighted mean (0-24 hours).The ratio from Baseline was loge transformed prior to analysis. The loge transformed ratios were compared between treatment groups as treatment ratios, using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model, allowing for the effects of Baseline (loge transformed), age, sex and region. Treatment ratios for comparison was calculated by back-transforming the difference between the Least square (LS) means. Using the pooled estimate of variance, 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) was calculated for the difference.

    Time frame: Baseline, D 0 (Pre-dose, 2hr, 4hr, 8hr, 12hr, 16hr and 24hr) and Day 42 (0hr, 2hr, 4hr, 8hr, 16hr and 24hr)

  2. Change From Baseline (Expressed as a Ratio) in 0-24 Hour Weighted Mean Serum Cortisol at the End of the Six Week Treatment Period (Day 42) in SC Population

    The blood samples for statistical analysis of serum cortisol (SC) endpoints were collected on D0 and D42 at indicated time points. The weighted mean was calculated by dividing the area under curve (AUC) over the 24-hr time period by time period. Change from Baseline in 0-24 hr weighted mean SC was calculated as a ratio from baseline defined as SC weighted mean (0-24 hrs) at Wk 6 divided by the baseline SC weighted mean (0-24 hrs). The ratio as treatment ratios, using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model, allowing for the effects of baseline (loge transformed from baseline was loge transformed prior to analysis. The loge transformed ratios were compared between treatment groups), age, sex and region. Treatment ratios for comparison was calculated by back-transforming the difference between Least square (LS) means. Using the pooled estimate of variance, 95% CIs) was calculated for the difference.

    Time frame: Baseline, Day 0 (Predose, 2hr, 4hr, 8hr, 12hr, 16hr and 24hr) and Day 42 (0hr, 2hr, 4hr, 8hr, 16hr and 24hr)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline (Expressed as a Ratio) in Area Under the Curve (AUC) 0-24 Hour Serum Cortisol at the End of the Six Week Treatment Period (Day 42).

    The blood samples for statistical analysis of area under the curve over the 24 hours (AUC 0-24 hours) endpoints were collected on Day 0 and Day 42 at the indicated time points. The AUC 0-24 hours was calculated using trapezoidal rule. Change from baseline in AUC 0-24 hour was calculated as a ratio from baseline defined as the AUC (0-24 hours) at Week 6 divided by the baseline AUC (0-24 hours) The ratio from baseline was loge transformed prior to analysis. The loge transformed ratios were compared between treatment groups as treatment ratios using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model, allowing for the effects of baseline (loge transformed), age, sex and region. Treatment ratios for comparison was calculated by back-transforming the difference between the Least square (LS) means. Using the pooled estimate of variance, 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) was calculated for the difference. Par. with SC weighted mean (0-24hr) calculated at baseline and Week 6 were analyzed

    Time frame: Baseline and Week Baseline, Day 0 (Predose, 2hr, 4hr, 8hr, 12hr, 16hr and 24hr) and Day 42 (0hr, 2hr, 4hr, 8hr, 16hr and 24hr)

  2. Change From Baseline (Expressed as a Ratio) in 24-hour Urinary Cortisol Excretion at the End of the Six Week Treatment Period (Day 42)

    The 24 hr urinary cortisol excretion was collected over a 24 hour period on Day 0 and Day 42. Change from baseline in 24- hr urinary cortisol excretion was calculated as a ratio from baseline defined as 24-hr urinary cortisol excretion at Week 6 divided by the baseline 24-hr urinary cortisol excretion. The ratio from baseline was loge transformed prior to analysis. The loge transformed ratio was compared between treatment groups using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model, allowing for the effects of baseline (loge transformed), age, sex and region. Treatment ratios for comparison was calculated by back-transforming the difference between the Least square (LS) means. Using the pooled estimate of variance, 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) was calculated for the difference. Participants with 24-hr urinary cortisol excretion at baseline and Week 6 were analyzed.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) Day 42

  3. Change From Baseline (Expressed as a Ratio) in 24-hour 6-beta Hydroxycortisol Excretion at the End of the Six Week Treatment Period (Day 42).

    The 24 hr urinary 6-beta hydroxycortisol excretion was collected over a 24 hour period on Day 0 and Day 42. Change from baseline in 24- hr urinary 6-beta hydroxycortisol excretion was calculated as a ratio from baseline defined as 24-hr urinary 6-beta hydroxycortisol excretion at Week 6 divided by the baseline 24-hr urinary 6-beta hydroxycortisol excretion. The ratio from baseline was loge transformed prior to analysis. The loge transformed ratio was compared between treatment groups using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model, allowing for the effects of baseline (loge transformed), age, sex and region. Treatment ratios for comparison was calculated by back-transforming the difference between the Least square (LS) means. Using the pooled estimate of variance, 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) was calculated for the difference. Participants with 24-hr urinary cortisol excretion at baseline and Week 6 were analyzed.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) Day 42

07

Results

Posted Mar 8, 2017

Participant flow

Eligible participants (par.) aged between 5 to 11 years with asthma were enrolled to either receive fluticasone furoate (FF) or placebo by inhalation through ELLIPTA for 6 weeks (wks) (42 days (D)). A total of 156 par. were screened, of which 111 par. were randomized in the study.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneFluticasone Furoate 50 mcgPlacebo
Started5655
Completed5453
Not completed22
Withdrew: Adverse event01
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up01
Withdrew: Physician decision20

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Baseline (Expressed as a Ratio) in 0-24 Hour Weighted Mean Serum Cortisol at the End of the Six Week Treatment Period (D 42) in Intention-to-treat (ITT) Population

The blood samples for statistical analysis of serum cortisol (SC) endpoints were collected on D 0 and D 42 at the indicated time points. The weighted mean was calculated by dividing the area under the curve (AUC) over the 24-hour (hr) time period by the time period. Change from Baseline in 0-24 hr weighted mean SC was calculated as a ratio from Baseline defined as the SC weighted mean (0-24 hours) at Week 6 divided by the Baseline SC weighted mean (0-24 hours).The ratio from Baseline was loge transformed prior to analysis. The loge transformed ratios were compared between treatment groups as treatment ratios, using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model, allowing for the effects of Baseline (loge transformed), age, sex and region. Treatment ratios for comparison was calculated by back-transforming the difference between the Least square (LS) means. Using the pooled estimate of variance, 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) was calculated for the difference.

Time frame:
Baseline, D 0 (Pre-dose, 2hr, 4hr, 8hr, 12hr, 16hr and 24hr) and Day 42 (0hr, 2hr, 4hr, 8hr, 16hr and 24hr)
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Ratio
Change From Baseline (Expressed as a Ratio) in 0-24 Hour Weighted Mean Serum Cortisol at the End of the Six Week Treatment Period (D 42) in Intention-to-treat (ITT) Population
RatioFluticasone Furoate 50 mcgPlacebo
Change From Baseline (Expressed as a Ratio) in 0-24 Hour Weighted Mean Serum Cortisol at the End of the Six Week Treatment Period (D 42) in Intention-to-treat (ITT) Population1.02 ± 46.711.01 ± 44.79
Statistical analysis
  • Fluticasone Furoate 50 mcg vs Placebo · Least square geometric mean ratio: 0.92 · 95% CI 0.8040 to 1.0505
PrimaryChange From Baseline (Expressed as a Ratio) in 0-24 Hour Weighted Mean Serum Cortisol at the End of the Six Week Treatment Period (Day 42) in SC Population

The blood samples for statistical analysis of serum cortisol (SC) endpoints were collected on D0 and D42 at indicated time points. The weighted mean was calculated by dividing the area under curve (AUC) over the 24-hr time period by time period. Change from Baseline in 0-24 hr weighted mean SC was calculated as a ratio from baseline defined as SC weighted mean (0-24 hrs) at Wk 6 divided by the baseline SC weighted mean (0-24 hrs). The ratio as treatment ratios, using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model, allowing for the effects of baseline (loge transformed from baseline was loge transformed prior to analysis. The loge transformed ratios were compared between treatment groups), age, sex and region. Treatment ratios for comparison was calculated by back-transforming the difference between Least square (LS) means. Using the pooled estimate of variance, 95% CIs) was calculated for the difference.

Time frame:
Baseline, Day 0 (Predose, 2hr, 4hr, 8hr, 12hr, 16hr and 24hr) and Day 42 (0hr, 2hr, 4hr, 8hr, 16hr and 24hr)
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Ratio
Change From Baseline (Expressed as a Ratio) in 0-24 Hour Weighted Mean Serum Cortisol at the End of the Six Week Treatment Period (Day 42) in SC Population
RatioFluticasone Furoate 50 mcgPlacebo
Change From Baseline (Expressed as a Ratio) in 0-24 Hour Weighted Mean Serum Cortisol at the End of the Six Week Treatment Period (Day 42) in SC Population1.02 ± 47.161.00 ± 44.77
Statistical analysis
  • Fluticasone Furoate 50 mcg vs Placebo · Least square geometric mean ratio: 0.93 · 95% CI 0.8096 to 1.0620
SecondaryChange From Baseline (Expressed as a Ratio) in Area Under the Curve (AUC) 0-24 Hour Serum Cortisol at the End of the Six Week Treatment Period (Day 42).

The blood samples for statistical analysis of area under the curve over the 24 hours (AUC 0-24 hours) endpoints were collected on Day 0 and Day 42 at the indicated time points. The AUC 0-24 hours was calculated using trapezoidal rule. Change from baseline in AUC 0-24 hour was calculated as a ratio from baseline defined as the AUC (0-24 hours) at Week 6 divided by the baseline AUC (0-24 hours) The ratio from baseline was loge transformed prior to analysis. The loge transformed ratios were compared between treatment groups as treatment ratios using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model, allowing for the effects of baseline (loge transformed), age, sex and region. Treatment ratios for comparison was calculated by back-transforming the difference between the Least square (LS) means. Using the pooled estimate of variance, 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) was calculated for the difference. Par. with SC weighted mean (0-24hr) calculated at baseline and Week 6 were analyzed

Time frame:
Baseline and Week Baseline, Day 0 (Predose, 2hr, 4hr, 8hr, 12hr, 16hr and 24hr) and Day 42 (0hr, 2hr, 4hr, 8hr, 16hr and 24hr)
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Ratio
Change From Baseline (Expressed as a Ratio) in Area Under the Curve (AUC) 0-24 Hour Serum Cortisol at the End of the Six Week Treatment Period (Day 42).
RatioFluticasone Furoate 50 mcgPlacebo
Change From Baseline (Expressed as a Ratio) in Area Under the Curve (AUC) 0-24 Hour Serum Cortisol at the End of the Six Week Treatment Period (Day 42).1.02 ± 47.111.00 ± 44.73
Statistical analysis
  • Fluticasone Furoate 50 mcg vs Placebo · Least square geometric mean ratio: 0.93 · 95% CI 0.81 to 1.06
SecondaryChange From Baseline (Expressed as a Ratio) in 24-hour Urinary Cortisol Excretion at the End of the Six Week Treatment Period (Day 42)

The 24 hr urinary cortisol excretion was collected over a 24 hour period on Day 0 and Day 42. Change from baseline in 24- hr urinary cortisol excretion was calculated as a ratio from baseline defined as 24-hr urinary cortisol excretion at Week 6 divided by the baseline 24-hr urinary cortisol excretion. The ratio from baseline was loge transformed prior to analysis. The loge transformed ratio was compared between treatment groups using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model, allowing for the effects of baseline (loge transformed), age, sex and region. Treatment ratios for comparison was calculated by back-transforming the difference between the Least square (LS) means. Using the pooled estimate of variance, 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) was calculated for the difference. Participants with 24-hr urinary cortisol excretion at baseline and Week 6 were analyzed.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 0) Day 42
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Ratio
Change From Baseline (Expressed as a Ratio) in 24-hour Urinary Cortisol Excretion at the End of the Six Week Treatment Period (Day 42)
RatioFluticasone Furoate 50 mcgPlacebo
Change From Baseline (Expressed as a Ratio) in 24-hour Urinary Cortisol Excretion at the End of the Six Week Treatment Period (Day 42)0.69 ± 90.201.05 ± 123.86
Statistical analysis
  • Fluticasone Furoate 50 mcg vs Placebo · Least square geometric mean ratio: 0.79 · 95% CI 0.61 to 1.03
SecondaryChange From Baseline (Expressed as a Ratio) in 24-hour 6-beta Hydroxycortisol Excretion at the End of the Six Week Treatment Period (Day 42).

The 24 hr urinary 6-beta hydroxycortisol excretion was collected over a 24 hour period on Day 0 and Day 42. Change from baseline in 24- hr urinary 6-beta hydroxycortisol excretion was calculated as a ratio from baseline defined as 24-hr urinary 6-beta hydroxycortisol excretion at Week 6 divided by the baseline 24-hr urinary 6-beta hydroxycortisol excretion. The ratio from baseline was loge transformed prior to analysis. The loge transformed ratio was compared between treatment groups using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model, allowing for the effects of baseline (loge transformed), age, sex and region. Treatment ratios for comparison was calculated by back-transforming the difference between the Least square (LS) means. Using the pooled estimate of variance, 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) was calculated for the difference. Participants with 24-hr urinary cortisol excretion at baseline and Week 6 were analyzed.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 0) Day 42
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Ratio
Change From Baseline (Expressed as a Ratio) in 24-hour 6-beta Hydroxycortisol Excretion at the End of the Six Week Treatment Period (Day 42).
RatioFluticasone Furoate 50 mcgPlacebo
Change From Baseline (Expressed as a Ratio) in 24-hour 6-beta Hydroxycortisol Excretion at the End of the Six Week Treatment Period (Day 42).0.78 ± 67.430.90 ± 65.54
Statistical analysis
  • Fluticasone Furoate 50 mcg vs Placebo · Least square geometric mean ratio: 0.88 · 95% CI 0.72 to 1.07

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from participants up to 9 weeks.. Non-serious events are listed at a 3% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Fluticasone Furoate 50 mcg—0/56 (0%)4/56 (7.1%)
Placebo—0/55 (0%)6/55 (10.9%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventFluticasone Furoate 50 mcgPlacebo
Upper respiratory tract infectionRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders3/563/55
HeadacheNervous system disorders1/563/55

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)Fluticasone Furoate 50 mcgPlaceboTotal
Overall study8.4 ± 1.978.4 ± 2.008.4 ± 1.97
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Fluticasone Furoate 50 mcgPlaceboTotal
Female203050
Male362561
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Fluticasone Furoate 50 mcgPlaceboTotal
Hispanic or Latino151732
Not Hispanic or Latino413879
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Fluticasone Furoate 50 mcgPlaceboTotal
Black or African American322961
White- White/Caucasian/European Heritage212142
Multiple-American Indian or Alaskan native & white011
Multiple-East Asian Heritage & African American022
Multiple- Asian-Japanese Heritage and White112
Multiple- Black or African American and White213
08

Study locations

17 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Little Rock, Arkansas 72211, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Alhambra, California 91801, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Costa Mesa, California 92626, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Huntington Beach, California 92647, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Newport Beach, California 92663, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Homestead, Florida 33030, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Miami, Florida 33135, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Miami, Florida 33142, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Miami, Florida 33175, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Raleigh, North Carolina 27607, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73112, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73120, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Orangeburg, South Carolina 29118, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Houston, Texas 77055, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Middelburg, Mpumalanga 1055, South Africa
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Panorama, Western Province 7500, South Africa
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Bellville, 7530, South Africa
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Bareille P, Tomkins S, Imber V, Tayob M, Dunn K, Mehta R, Khindri S. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study of once-daily inhaled fluticasone furoate on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical axis of children with asthma. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2020 Feb 4;16:11. doi: 10.1186/s13223-020-0406-6. eCollection 2020. PubMed 32042286 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — IPD for this study will be made available via the Clinical Study Data Request site.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report

Time frame: IPD is available via the Clinical Study Data Request site (click on the link provided below)

Access criteria: Access is provided after a research proposal is submitted and has received approval from the Independent Review Panel and after a Data Sharing Agreement is in place. Access is provided for an initial period of 12 months but an extension can be granted, when justified, for up to another 12 months.

Data sharing details ↗ · clinicalstudydatarequest.com

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Oct 2015 to primary completion in Jun 2016, 8 months.

Results were first posted in Mar 2017, 8 months after primary completion.

Of 167 industry-sponsored phase 3 interventional studies under Asthma, half reached primary completion within 26 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 42. This study's 8 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 194 studies reached it within 27 months; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 42.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 25, 2015
First posted
Jun 29, 2015
StartActual
Oct 9, 2015
Primary completionActual
Jun 20, 2016
CompletionActual
Jun 21, 2016
Results first posted
Mar 8, 2017
Last update
Apr 27, 2020
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 27, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02483975
Lead sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 29, 2015
Start date
Oct 9, 2015
Primary completion
Jun 20, 2016
Completion
Jun 21, 2016
Results posted
Mar 8, 2017
Last update
Apr 27, 2020

Study contacts

GSK Clinical Trials
study director · GlaxoSmithKline

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Fluticasone furoate

Start the discussion