CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02481479SCARFUpdated Mar 30, 2020

Saxagliptin and Cardiac Structure and Function

A Phase 4 interventional study of Saxagliptin and Saxagliptin in Diabetes Mellitus, Non-Insulin-Dependent and Heart Failure, sponsored by Unity Health Toronto. Completed at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-03-30.

Sponsored by Unity Health Toronto · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
18
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Diabetes is associated with a substantially increased risk of heart failure, which is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Despite the development of new therapeutic strategies to improve glycemic control, recent clinical data from the saxagliptin assessment of vascular outcomes recorded in patients with diabetes mellitus-thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (SAVOR-TIMI) 53 study observed an unexpected finding of an excess of adjudicated heart failure hospitalizations. This excess occurred in the setting of pre-existing heart failure (HF) hospitalization and in those with elevated biomarkers for heart failure such as N terminal pro Brain type natriuretic peptide (NT-pro BNP). A wealth of preclinical data did not suggest a mechanistic basis for an excess of heart failure events, however these preclinical studies primarily focused upon prevention based strategies as opposed to regression studies once established heart failure was present. This proposal seeks to understand if and how dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i,specifically saxagliptin) may influence the development of heart failure, by evaluating changes in cardiac structure and function using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Read the detailed description

The cardiovascular safety and potential cardioprotective effects of diabetes drugs have been the focus of recent research. Currently, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requires all new anti-diabetic drugs to demonstrate no important increase in cardiovascular adverse events before approval.

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors (gliptins) are oral incretin-based agents that increase glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) level, with proven anti-hyperglycemic effects and are increasingly used in the management of type 2 diabetes. In a rat model of diabetes and myocardial infarction, sitagliptin treatment improved passive left ventricular compliance, increased endothelial cell density, reduced myocyte hypertrophy and collagen abundance. GLP-1 and DDP-4 inhibition with vildagliptin improve cardiac function, cardiac remodeling, and survival in animal models of pressure-overload and chronic heart failure. However, in another study of post-MI cardiac remodeling in mice, vildagliptin failed to show any early or late protective effects on cardiac function.

Some clinical studies suggest that GLP-1 infusion is associated with an absolute increase in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients with heart failure, although data are conflicting. The GLP-1 receptor analog, exenatide may reduce infarct size in patients with myocardial infarction but does not improve LVEF.

The Cardiovascular Outcomes Study of Alogliptin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Acute Coronary Syndrome EXAMINE trial randomized assigned 5340 patients with type 2 diabetes and recent acute coronary syndrome to alogliptin or placebo, and found no increase in adverse cardiovascular events in the alogliptin group. In SAVOR-TIMI 53, 16,492 patients with type 2 diabetes who had a history of, or were at risk for, cardiovascular events were randomized to receive saxagliptin or placebo. Over a median follow-up of 2.1 years, the primary composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or ischemic stroke did not differ significantly between the 2 groups (P=0.99 for superiority; P\<0.001 for noninferiority). However, patients in the saxagliptin group were more likely to be hospitalized for heart failure, which was not ascertained in the EXAMINE trial. Furthermore, the Sitagliptin Cardiovascular Outcome Study (TECOS), which examined the DPP4i sitagliptin versus placebo in high risk patients for a cardiovascular event demonstrated cardiovascular safety (P\<0.001 for non inferiority), and there was no signal for excess heart failure hospitalizations.

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) has emerged as the "gold standard" for measuring LV volume, mass, and ejection fraction. LV volume measurements by cardiac MRI do not rely on geometric assumptions. CMR measurements have excellent intra-observer, inter-observer, and inter-study variability, which were superior to other imaging techniques. The high inter-study reproducibility of CMR affords a substantial reduction in the required sample size to demonstrate even small changes in LV volume, LV mass or LVEF, or conversely, to reliably exclude clinically important changes. Furthermore, CMR tagging allows detailed and quantitative assessment of regional LV diastolic and systolic function. For example, in the Multiethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA), CMR can detect subtle alterations in global and regional LV functions in patients with traditional and novel cardiovascular risk factors. Although prior studies have failed to demonstrate any beneficial effects of improved glycemic control on myocardial function, CMR promises to be a more sensitive and accurate technique.

Accordingly, the investigators propose to use CMR to examine the cardiac structure, global and regional function among patients with type 2 diabetes treated with saxagliptin.

02

Conditions studied

  • Diabetes Mellitus, Non-Insulin-Dependent
  • Heart Failure
03

In context

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

9,359 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; 1,318 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 18 is below the median of 80 across 7,525 interventional studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 studies →

Lead sponsor

Unity Health Toronto is the lead sponsor of 434 studies on the registry; 76 are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 1 (20%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Adult (≥18 years old) men or women with type 2 diabetes diagnosed for ≥ 6 months
  2. HbA1c 7.5 - 9.5%
  3. Receiving background therapy with metformin (additional anti-hyperglycemic agents are permitted)
  4. Clinical decision to initiate saxagliptin to improve glycemic control, as per treating physician

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. GLP-1 receptor agonist or DPP4 inhibitor treatment within the past 6 months, or known intolerance
  2. eGFR \<30
  3. Baseline LVEF \<40%
  4. NYHA Class III-IV or recent hospitalization for decompensated HF (\<3 months)
  5. Unstable coronary syndromes or recent revascularization within the past 3 months, or planned revascularization in the next 6 months
  6. Significant (moderate or severe, or symptomatic) valvular disease
  7. Pregnancy/childbearing potential
  8. Routine contraindications to CMR Subjects who drop out from the study will have a repeat CMR examination as soon as possible after drug discontinuation.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
18 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Single group -Paired comparison

    Saxagliptin 2.5mg or 5mg od

    Drug: Saxagliptin

Interventions

  • DrugSaxagliptin

    Eligible patients will undergo baseline CMR, commence treatment and then after 6 months undergo repeat CMR

    Also known as: Onglyza

  • DrugSaxagliptin

    Eligible patients will undergo baseline echocardiogram, commence treatment and then after 6 months undergo repeat echocardiogram

    Also known as: Onglyza

  • Drugsaxagliptin

    Eligible patients will undergo baseline venipuncture, commence treatment and then after 6 months undergo repeat venipuncture

    Also known as: Onglyza

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The change in LVEF from baseline to 6 months

    assess LVEF at baseline and at 6 months following treatment. CMR based LVEF assessment using Cvi 42.

    Time frame: baseline, 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. The change in E/e' from baseline to 6 months

    Echocardiography assessed E and E', to determine ratio, and assess change from baseline to 6 months.

    Time frame: baseline, 6 months

  2. change in class indicators of signs and symptoms of heart failure at each visit

    assess NYHA class at baseline and at 6 months

    Time frame: baseline, 6 months

  3. Change in log-scale in NT-pro BNP

    assess NT-ProBNP at baseline and at 6 months

    Time frame: baseline, 6 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • St Michael's Hospital
    Toronto, Ontario M5B1W8, Canada
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes

Supporting information: Study protocol, Icf, Csr

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 30, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02481479
Lead sponsor
Unity Health Toronto
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 25, 2015
Start date
Jun 2015
Primary completion
Aug 2018
Completion
Aug 2018
Last update
Mar 30, 2020

Study contacts

Subodh Verma, MD
study director · Professor of Surgery

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion