CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02478255Updated Feb 17, 2023Results posted

Longitudinal MR Imaging of Pulmonary Function in Patients Receiving Thoracic Radiation Treatment

A Phase 2 interventional study of Hyperpolarized 129-Xenon gas and MRI in Radiation Injury, sponsored by Bastiaan Driehuys. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-02-17.

Sponsored by Bastiaan Driehuys · Phase 2, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
25
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using inhaled hyper polarized xenon-129 (129Xe) gas, and conventional contrast can help visualize impaired lung function and detect changes over time in patients receiving treatment as well as those who don't. 129Xe is a special type of xenon gas and when inhaled during MRI may be able to show areas of abnormal thickening of parts of the lungs. These images combined with images taken with injected contrast agents or other special types of MRI such as conventional proton (1H) MRI may provide a better way to look at lung structure and function. The ultimate goal is to predict the degree of radiation-induced lung injury that will develop in a given patient for a given treatment plan. The investigators anticipate that these images will provide more specific information about lung disease than standard lung function tests. The use of 129Xe MRI is investigational. Investigational means that these tests have not yet been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and are only available in research studies like this one. In addition, standard MRI with contrast is not typically done as standard of care for monitoring changes due to thoracic radiation therapy, therefore, its use in this study is also considered investigational.

Healthy volunteers are being asked to participate in this study because to develop a database of functional images that are representative of healthy lungs.

02

Conditions studied

  • Radiation Injury

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Radiation induced lung injury
  • Xenon gas
  • hyperpolarized
03

In context

Radiation Injuries

108 studies on the registry are indexed under Radiation Injuries; 46 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 25 is below the median of 68 across 66 interventional studies indexed under Radiation Injuries.

Browse Radiation Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

Bastiaan Driehuys is the lead sponsor of 18 studies on the registry; 9 are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 6 (100%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patient scheduled to undergo thoracic RT at Duke University to a dose of at least 20 Gy
  2. Willing and able to give informed consent and adhere to visit/protocol schedules

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria for Patients:

  1. Subject is less than 18 years old
  2. MRI is contraindicated based on responses to MRI Screening questionnaire
  3. Subject is pregnant or lactating
  4. Respiratory illness of a bacterial or viral etiology within 30 days of MRI
  5. Subject has any form of known cardiac arrhythmia
  6. Subject does not fit into 129Xe vest coil used for MRI
  7. Subject cannot hold his/her breath for 15 seconds
  8. Subject deemed unlikely to be able to comply with instructions during imaging
  9. Medical or psychological conditions which, in the opinion of the investigator, might create undue risk to the subject or interfere with the subject's ability to comply with the protocol requirements

Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria for Healthy Volunteers

  1. Subject meets all criteria above but does not have a clinical diagnosis of respiratory disease.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
25 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Patients scheduled to undergo Radiation Therapy (RT)

    Patients scheduled to undergo Radiation Therapy (RT) for lung cancer, or other malignancies such as breast cancer or lymphoma that involve significant irradiation of the thoracic cavity.

    Drug: Hyperpolarized 129-Xenon gas · Device: MRI

  • Active comparator
    Healthy volunteers

    Drug: Hyperpolarized 129-Xenon gas · Device: MRI

Interventions

  • DrugHyperpolarized 129-Xenon gas

    Hyperpolarized xenon will be administered in multiple doses in volumes up to 25% of subject total lung capacity (TLC) followed by a breath hold of up to 15 seconds. Subsequent 129Xe doses will only be administered once the subject is ready to proceed.

    Also known as: Hyperpolarized 129Xe

  • DeviceMRI

    Conventional 1H MRI will be used to provide anatomical reference scans, as well as pulmonary perfusion.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Pulmonary Function, as Measured by Ventilation Defect Percentage (VDP)

    "Ventilation" is defined as the regional 129Xe airspace signal divided by the top 1% of 129Xe airspace signal (representing open-airway ventilation). A "Ventilation Defect" is defined as any region of lung where the Ventilation signal is more than 2 standard deviations below the mean Ventilation signal of healthy volunteer subjects' lungs. "Ventilation Defect Percentage", or VDP, is defined as the volume of a subject's Ventilation Defects divided by the volume of the subject's lung, multiplied by 100%.

    Time frame: Baseline, following radiation treatment (up to 3 months)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Gas Exchange Defect Percentage (EDP) Following RT (Radiation Treatment)

    "Gas exchange" is defined as the ratio of the signal from 129Xe transiently bonding with hemoglobin in the pulmonary capillaries to the local 129Xe airspace signal. In other publications, the investigators have referred to this as "RBC (red blood cell) transfer". A "Gas Exchange Defect" is defined as any region of lung where the Gas Exchange signal is more than 2 standard deviations below the mean Gas Exchange signal of healthy volunteer subjects' lungs. "Gas Exchange Defect Percentage", or EDP, is defined as the volume of a subject's Gas Exchange Defects divided by the volume of the subject's lung, multiplied by 100%.

    Time frame: Baseline, following RT (up to 3 months)

  2. RBC (Red Blood Cell) to Barrier Ratio Following RT

    "RBC:barrier ratio" is defined as the ratio of the whole lung signal from 129Xe transiently bonding with hemoglobin in the pulmonary capillaries to the whole lung signal from 129Xe in the alveolar barrier tissue.

    Time frame: Baseline, following RT (up to 3 months)

  3. Change in High Barrier Uptake Percentage (HBUP) Following RT

    "Barrier Uptake" is defined as the ratio of the regional signal from 129Xe dissolved in the interstitial space within the alveolar walls to the regional signal from 129Xe in the adjacent airspaces. "High Barrier Uptake" is defined as any region of lung where the Barrier Uptake signal is more than 2 standard deviations above the mean Barrier Uptake signal of healthy volunteer subjects' lungs. "High Barrier Uptake Percentage", or HBUP, is defined as the volume of a subject's lung exhibiting High Barrier Uptake divided by the total volume of the subject's lung, multiplied by 100%.

    Time frame: Baseline, following RT (up to 3 months)

Other outcomes

  1. Change in Perfusion Defect Percentage (PDP) Following RT

    Time frame: Baseline, following RT (up to 3 months)

07

Results

Posted Feb 17, 2023

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePatients Scheduled to Undergo Radiation Therapy (RT)Healthy Volunteers
Started178
Completed98
Not completed80
Withdrew: Physician decision60
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject20

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Pulmonary Function, as Measured by Ventilation Defect Percentage (VDP)

"Ventilation" is defined as the regional 129Xe airspace signal divided by the top 1% of 129Xe airspace signal (representing open-airway ventilation). A "Ventilation Defect" is defined as any region of lung where the Ventilation signal is more than 2 standard deviations below the mean Ventilation signal of healthy volunteer subjects' lungs. "Ventilation Defect Percentage", or VDP, is defined as the volume of a subject's Ventilation Defects divided by the volume of the subject's lung, multiplied by 100%.

Time frame:
Baseline, following radiation treatment (up to 3 months)
Reported as:
Mean · Ventilation Defect Percentage (VDP)
Change in Pulmonary Function, as Measured by Ventilation Defect Percentage (VDP)
Ventilation Defect Percentage (VDP)Patients Scheduled to Undergo Radiation Therapy (RT)Healthy Volunteers
Change in Pulmonary Function, as Measured by Ventilation Defect Percentage (VDP)-2.20 ± 1.7—
Statistical analysis
  • Patients Scheduled to Undergo Radiation Therapy (RT) · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.22
SecondaryChange in Gas Exchange Defect Percentage (EDP) Following RT (Radiation Treatment)

"Gas exchange" is defined as the ratio of the signal from 129Xe transiently bonding with hemoglobin in the pulmonary capillaries to the local 129Xe airspace signal. In other publications, the investigators have referred to this as "RBC (red blood cell) transfer". A "Gas Exchange Defect" is defined as any region of lung where the Gas Exchange signal is more than 2 standard deviations below the mean Gas Exchange signal of healthy volunteer subjects' lungs. "Gas Exchange Defect Percentage", or EDP, is defined as the volume of a subject's Gas Exchange Defects divided by the volume of the subject's lung, multiplied by 100%.

Time frame:
Baseline, following RT (up to 3 months)
Reported as:
Mean · Gas Exchange Defect Percentage (EDP)
Change in Gas Exchange Defect Percentage (EDP) Following RT (Radiation Treatment)
Gas Exchange Defect Percentage (EDP)Patients Scheduled to Undergo Radiation Therapy (RT)Healthy Volunteers
Change in Gas Exchange Defect Percentage (EDP) Following RT (Radiation Treatment)5.20 ± 2.6—
SecondaryRBC (Red Blood Cell) to Barrier Ratio Following RT

"RBC:barrier ratio" is defined as the ratio of the whole lung signal from 129Xe transiently bonding with hemoglobin in the pulmonary capillaries to the whole lung signal from 129Xe in the alveolar barrier tissue.

Time frame:
Baseline, following RT (up to 3 months)
Reported as:
Mean · Ratio
RBC (Red Blood Cell) to Barrier Ratio Following RT
RatioPatients Scheduled to Undergo Radiation Therapy (RT)Healthy Volunteers
RBC (Red Blood Cell) to Barrier Ratio Following RT-0.021 ± 0.016—
SecondaryChange in High Barrier Uptake Percentage (HBUP) Following RT

"Barrier Uptake" is defined as the ratio of the regional signal from 129Xe dissolved in the interstitial space within the alveolar walls to the regional signal from 129Xe in the adjacent airspaces. "High Barrier Uptake" is defined as any region of lung where the Barrier Uptake signal is more than 2 standard deviations above the mean Barrier Uptake signal of healthy volunteer subjects' lungs. "High Barrier Uptake Percentage", or HBUP, is defined as the volume of a subject's lung exhibiting High Barrier Uptake divided by the total volume of the subject's lung, multiplied by 100%.

Time frame:
Baseline, following RT (up to 3 months)
Reported as:
Mean · Interstitial space to alveolar walls (%)
Change in High Barrier Uptake Percentage (HBUP) Following RT
Interstitial space to alveolar walls (%)Patients Scheduled to Undergo Radiation Therapy (RT)Healthy Volunteers
Change in High Barrier Uptake Percentage (HBUP) Following RT5.0 ± 4.0—
Other pre-specifiedChange in Perfusion Defect Percentage (PDP) Following RT
Time frame:
Baseline, following RT (up to 3 months)

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Adverse events

Collected over Up to 24 hours after Xenon MRI. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Patients Scheduled to Undergo Radiation Therapy (RT)0/17 (0%)0/17 (0%)0/17 (0%)
Healthy Volunteers0/8 (0%)0/8 (0%)0/8 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Patients Scheduled to Undergo Radiation Therapy (RT)Healthy VolunteersTotal
Mean64.4 (48 to 87)34 (19 to 70)54.7 (19 to 87)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Patients Scheduled to Undergo Radiation Therapy (RT)Healthy VolunteersTotal
Female516
Male12719
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Patients Scheduled to Undergo Radiation Therapy (RT)Healthy VolunteersTotal
Hispanic or Latino011
Not Hispanic or Latino17724
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Patients Scheduled to Undergo Radiation Therapy (RT)Healthy VolunteersTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian022
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American325
White14317
More than one race011
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Patients Scheduled to Undergo Radiation Therapy (RT)Healthy VolunteersTotal
United States17825
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Duke University Medical Center
    Durham, North Carolina 27713, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jul 26, 2018
  • Informed consent form · Apr 26, 2021

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 17, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02478255
Lead sponsor
Bastiaan Driehuys
Collaborators
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Responsible party
Bastiaan Driehuys (Associate Professor of Radiology, Duke University) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Jun 23, 2015
Start date
Mar 21, 2016
Primary completion
Jan 13, 2022
Completion
Jan 13, 2022
Results posted
Feb 17, 2023
Last update
Feb 17, 2023

Study contacts

Joseph Mammarappallil, M.D.
principal investigator · Duke University
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion