CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02470247IPC-AngioUpdated May 24, 2023

Interest of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning for Prevention of Contrast Medium-induced Nephropathy in High Risk Patients

An interventional study of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning (RIPC) and SHAM Remote Ischemic Preconditioning (SHAM RIPC) in Nephropathy, sponsored by Rennes University Hospital. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-05-24.

Sponsored by Rennes University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
26
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Diagnostic imaging for vascular investigations and endovascular procedures frequently require the use of contrast medium. Besides contrast medium-induced hypersensitivity, an acute kidney injury can appear: the contrast-induced nephropathy (NPCI).

NPCI is associated with an increase of patients' morbidity and mortality. One of the conventional methods proposed to limit this NPCI is an oral administration of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) associated with hydration performed 12 hours before and 12 hours after the injection. However, in some patients this method cannot be performed due to a high risk of heart failure although they are generally at high risk of NPCI.

Recently, it has been shown, in a randomized trial, that remote ischemic preconditioning (several cycles of upper-arm ischemia-reperfusion with a pressure cuff inflator) associated with hydratation and NAC reduced the occurrence of NPCI after a coronary angiography as compared with NAC and hydration only. .

We hypothesized that the use of RIPC in patients at high risk of NPCI and who cannot receive NAC and hydratation (e.g. patients with aortic stenosis and eligible for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI)) could be promising.

Read the detailed description

Study design :

Prospective, single-center, randomized, controlled, single-blind, with RIPC procedure (Pre-CI) versus "SHAM" ischemic preconditioning (SHAM Pre -CI) (control). This test will follow the CONSORT Statement (http://www.consort-statement.org/).

This is a randomized, controlled, single-blind trial, assessing the incidence of NPCI (after a CTA ) between two group of patients, one receiving RIPC procedure and the other group receiving a "SHAM" RIPC (control group).

RIPC is accomplished by performing 4 cycles of alternating 5-minute inflation and 5-minute deflation of a standard upper-arm blood pressure cuff, to induce transient and repetitive arm ischemia and reperfusion.

RIPC will be started just before the CTA, and the time between the last inflation cycle and the beginning of the CTA will be less than 45 minutes. The "SHAM" RIPC will be carried out with the same number of cycles that the RIPC but cuff will be inflated to the diastolic pressure of the subject and the cuff will be deflated to10 mmHg in order to maintain a non- ischemic compression (blind patient protocol).

Main objective :

To assess the efficacy of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) in preventing contrast-induced nephropathy (NPCI) after injected CT scanner in patients at high risk of NPCI.

Secondary objectives :

  1. To assess the effects of RIPC on a second marker of renal failure (Cystatin C ) ;
  2. To determine the pathophysiological mechanisms involved in the RIPC (role of oxidative stress ; for the first 40 patients) ;
  3. To assess the effect of RIPC on renal function after a second injection of contrast-medium during coronary angiography performed 2 to 4 days after the injected CTA ;
  4. To assess the tolerance of RIPC procedure ;
  5. To assess the impact on mortality at 6 months.
02

Conditions studied

  • Nephropathy

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
03

In context

Kidney Diseases

3,840 studies on the registry are indexed under Kidney Diseases; 500 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 26 is below the median of 70 across 2,640 interventional studies indexed under Kidney Diseases.

Browse Kidney Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

Rennes University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 440 studies on the registry; 51 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age greater than 18 years, no upper age limit ;
  • Patient which may hospitalized for a medical check-up before a percutaneous aortic valve implantation (CTA and coronarography);
  • Patient at risk for NPCI defined by a Mehran risk classification system ≥11 (Annexe 2) ;
  • Willing to provide free and informed written consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pathology of the upper-limbs limiting the use of the cuff (bilateral amputation, arteriovenous fistula);
  • Critical renal disease requiring hemodialysis ;
  • Person who is not affiliated to a health care system insurance
  • Inability to understand the instructions of the study;
  • Absolute contraindication to of iodinated contrast medium injection (anaphylactic shock history to contrast media, especially Xenetix, clearance (MDRD) less than 30mL/min/1.73m2) ;
  • Pregnancy
  • Simultaneous participation in other protocol;
  • Person with legal protection, person deprived of liberty.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
26 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Remote ischemic preconditioning

    Remote Ischemic Preconditioning (RIPC) is accomplished by performing 4 cycles of alternating 5-minute inflation and 5-minute deflation of a standard upper-arm blood pressure cuff, to induce transient and repetitive arm ischemia and reperfusion. RIPC will be started just before the CTA, and the time between the last inflation cycle and the beginning of the CTA will be less than 45 minutes.

    Other: Remote Ischemic Preconditioning (RIPC)

  • Sham comparator
    SHAM remote ischemic preconditioning

    The SHAM Remote Ischemic Preconditioning ("SHAM" RIPC) will be carried out with the same number of cycles that the RIPC but cuff will be inflated to the diastolic pressure of the subject and the cuff will be deflated to10 mmHg in order to maintain a non- ischemic compression (blind patient protocol).

    Other: SHAM Remote Ischemic Preconditioning (SHAM RIPC)

Interventions

  • OtherRemote Ischemic Preconditioning (RIPC)

    RIPC is accomplished by performing 4 cycles of alternating 5-minute inflation and 5-minute deflation of a standard upper-arm blood pressure cuff, to induce transient and repetitive arm ischemia and reperfusion. RIPC will be started just before the CTA, and the time between the last inflation cycle and the beginning of the CTA will be less than 45 minutes.

  • OtherSHAM Remote Ischemic Preconditioning (SHAM RIPC)

    The SHAM Remote Ischemic Preconditioning ("SHAM" RIPC) will be carried out with the same number of cycles that the RIPC but cuff will be inflated to the diastolic pressure of the subject and the cuff will be deflated to10 mmHg in order to maintain a non- ischemic compression (blind patient protocol).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of NPCI

    Incidence of NPCI defined as an increase in serum creatinine ≥ 0.5 mg / dL or a relative increase of 25 % above baseline at 48 hours after contrast medium exposure.

    Time frame: 48 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Cystatin C

    Changes of serum Cystatin C between day 0 and day 1, and day 0 and day 2.

    Time frame: 2 days

  2. Oxydative stress

    Changes in markers of oxydative stress (in the first 40 patients included) : * at day 0, after the RIPC procedure or SHAM-RIPC procedure (+ 5 min) before CTA ; * after CTA (+ 30 min) and 24 hours after CTA (day 1).

    Time frame: 24 hours

  3. Renal function

    Changes in serum creatinine and Cystatin C between day 0 and measured values after coronarography (day 6 ).

    Time frame: 6 days

  4. Pain

    A standardized pain scale (ranged from 0 to 10; 0 : no pain; 10 : maximum of pain).

    Time frame: Day 0

  5. Mortality

    Assessment of mortality at six months.

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Rennes University Hospital
    Rennes, Britanny 35033, France
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Belabbas D, Koch C, Chaudru S, Lederlin M, Laviolle B, Le Pabic E, Boulmier D, Heautot JF, Mahe G. Effects of Remote Ischemic Pre-Conditioning to Prevent Contrast-Induced Nephropathy after Intravenous Contrast Medium Injection: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Korean J Radiol. 2020 Nov;21(11):1230-1238. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2019.0916. Epub 2020 Jul 27. PubMed 32729273 ↗
  • Koch C, Chaudru S, Lederlin M, Jaquinandi V, Kaladji A, Mahe G. Remote Ischemic Preconditioning and Contrast-Induced Nephropathy: A Systematic Review. Ann Vasc Surg. 2016 Apr;32:176-87. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2015.10.017. Epub 2016 Jan 21. PubMed 26802296 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 24, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02470247
Lead sponsor
Rennes University Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 12, 2015
Start date
Oct 6, 2015
Primary completion
Aug 24, 2017
Completion
Oct 31, 2020
Last update
May 24, 2023

Study contacts

Guillaume Mahe, MD
principal investigator · Rennes University Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion