CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02461017Updated Jul 2, 2017

Endotracheal Tube Audible Leak Test

An observational study in Anesthesia Intubation Complication and Mechanical Ventilation Complication, sponsored by University of Mississippi Medical Center. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 1 Month to 8 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-07-02.

Sponsored by University of Mississippi Medical Center · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
86
Ages
1 Month to 8 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The endotracheal tube (ETT) leak test (LT), or audible leak test is a widely performed assessment to verify appropriate tube size in neonates, infants and children. However, many factors are known to influence the audible leak test. Even though the test is widely performed, the accuracy has not been evaluated.

Read the detailed description

The endotracheal tube (ETT) leak test (LT), or audible leak when the peak airway pressures reach 15-30 cmH2O, is a commonly performed assessment to confirm that an endotracheal tube size is appropriate for a child in order to minimize the risk of airway injury and adverse events after removal of ETT. Many factors are known to affect the results of the leak test and variation in results among experienced anesthesiologists may be as great as 38%, but the accuracy of the audible leak test by directly observing the presence of a leak around the ETT has not been evaluated. This study will attempt to use direct visualization of the air leak to correlate to and assess the accuracy of the audible air leak test.

02

Conditions studied

  • Anesthesia Intubation Complication
  • Mechanical Ventilation Complication

Keywords

  • intubation
  • ventilation
  • airway
  • airleak
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of Mississippi Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 125 studies on the registry; 19 are open to participants now.

Of its 7 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 4 (57%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
1 Month to 8 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Children aged between 1 month (post-natal) and 8 years scheduled for ENT surgery requiring general anesthesia with an endotracheal tube.

Inclusion criteria

  • Children aged between 1 month (post-natal) and 8 years scheduled for ENT surgery requiring general anesthesia with an endotracheal tube.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known history of subglottic stenosis
  • Known history of recurrent croup
  • Known history of endolaryngeal or subglottic lesions
  • Parents refusal of participation in study
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
86 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Endotracheal Leak

    Assess for Audible Endotracheal Leak; Assess for Endotracheal Leak with direct visualization under rigid bronchoscope

    Other: Assess for Audible Endotracheal Leak · Other: Assess for Endotracheal Leak with direct visualization under rigid bronchoscope

Interventions

  • OtherAssess for Audible Endotracheal Leak

    In supine position, the head will be positioned in neutral position. With fresh gas flow at 2-5L/min, and pop off valve in the anesthesia machine closed and pressure in the inspiratory circuit is slowly increased until an audible leak is heard at the mouth. That pressure will be recorded.

  • OtherAssess for Endotracheal Leak with direct visualization under rigid bronchoscope

    In the same patient position, a flexible nasal laryngoscope will be inserted and positioned superior to the laryngeal inlet by the surgeon. With fresh gas flow at 2-5L/min, and pop off valve in the anesthesia machine closed, the pressure in the inspiratory circuit will be increased slowly until a leak around the TT will be visualized by inspecting the supraglottic area for bubbles or air movement around the TT. The peak pressure at which leak is observed physically will be recorded. This is the end of the study.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Primary Objective Evidence of an audible endotracheal leak and/or direct visualized endotracheal leak

    Evidence of an audible endotracheal leak and/or direct visualized endotracheal leak using a flexible nasal laryngoscope positioned superior to the laryngeal inlet.

    Time frame: one year.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Secondary Objective Evidence suggesting a relationship between the presence of an audible leak and direct visualization for cuffed and uncuffed TT's

    Evidence suggesting a relationship between the presence of an audible leak and direct visualization for cuffed and uncuffed TT's.

    Time frame: one year.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Mississippi Medical Center
    Jackson, Mississippi 39216, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Suominen P, Taivainen T, Tuominen N, Voipio V, Wirtavuori K, Hiller A, Korpela R, Karjalainen T, Meretoja O. Optimally fitted tracheal tubes decrease the probability of postextubation adverse events in children undergoing general anesthesia. Paediatr Anaesth. 2006 Jun;16(6):641-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2005.01832.x. PubMed 16719880 ↗
  • Finholt DA, Henry DB, Raphaely RC. Factors affecting leak around tracheal tubes in children. Can Anaesth Soc J. 1985 Jul;32(4):326-9. doi: 10.1007/BF03011335. PubMed 4027762 ↗
  • Schwartz RE, Stayer SA, Pasquariello CA. Tracheal tube leak test--is there inter-observer agreement? Can J Anaesth. 1993 Nov;40(11):1049-52. doi: 10.1007/BF03009476. PubMed 8269566 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 2, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02461017
Lead sponsor
University of Mississippi Medical Center
Responsible party
Madhankumar Sathyamoorthy (Assistant Professor, University of Mississippi Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 3, 2015
Start date
Dec 7, 2015
Primary completion
Jan 9, 2017
Completion
Feb 21, 2017
Last update
Jul 2, 2017

Study contacts

Madhankumar Sathyamoorthy, MBBS, MS
principal investigator · Univeristy of Mississippi Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion