CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02453711Updated Apr 17, 2020Results posted

Investigation of Safety and Efficacy of Once-daily Semaglutide in Obese Subjects Without Diabetes Mellitus

A Phase 2 interventional study of semaglutide and liraglutide in Metabolism and Nutrition Disorder and Obesity, sponsored by Novo Nordisk A/S. Completed at 74 sites in 8 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-04-17.

Sponsored by Novo Nordisk A/S · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
957
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This trial is conducted globally. The aim of this trial is to investigate safety and efficacy of once-daily semaglutide in obese subjects without diabetes mellitus.

02

Conditions studied

  • Metabolism and Nutrition Disorder
  • Obesity
03

In context

Diabetes Mellitus

10,925 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus; 1,319 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 957 is above the median of 80 across 8,367 interventional studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus studies →

Lead sponsor

Novo Nordisk A/S is the lead sponsor of 1,370 studies on the registry; 102 are open to participants now.

Of its 198 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 94 (47%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria: - Informed consent obtained before any trial-related activities. Trial-related activities are any procedures that are carried out as part of the trial, including activities to determine suitability for the trial - Male or female, age 18 years or older at the time of signing inform consent - Body mass index (BMI) equal or above 30.0 kg/m\^2 at the screening visit - At least one unsuccessful weight loss attempt per investigator judgement Exclusion Criteria: - A HbA1c (glycosylated haemoglobin) equal to or above 6.5% at screening or diagnosed with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus - Treatment with glucose lowering agent(s) within 90 days before screening - Screening calcitonin equal to or above 50 ng/L (pg/mL) - Personal or family history of medullary thyroid carcinoma or multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2 - History of pancreatitis (acute or chronic) - Obesity induced by endocrine disorders (e.g. Cushing Syndrome) - Treatment with any medication within 90 days before screening that based on investigator's judgement may cause significant weight change - Previous surgical treatment for obesity (liposuction and/or abdominoplasty performed 1 year before screening is allowed) - History of major depressive disorder within 2 years before randomisation - Any lifetime history of a suicidal attempt - Female who is pregnant, breast-feeding or intends to become pregnant or is of childbearing potential and not using an adequate contraceptive method (adequate contraceptive measures as required by local regulation or practice)

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
957 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Sema 0.05 mg

    Dose 0.05 mg

    Drug: semaglutide

  • Experimental
    Sema 0.1 mg

    Dose 0.05 or 0.1 mg with dose escalation every fourth week

    Drug: semaglutide

  • Experimental
    Sema 0.2 mg

    Dose 0.05, 0.1 or 0.2 mg with dose escalation every fourth week

    Drug: semaglutide

  • Experimental
    Sema 0.3 mg

    Dose 0.05, 0.1, 0.2 or 0.3 mg with dose escalation every fourth week

    Drug: semaglutide

  • Experimental
    Sema 0.4 mg

    Dose 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, or 0.4 mg with dose escalation every fourth week

    Drug: semaglutide

  • Experimental
    Sema 0.3 mg (fast dose escalation)

    Dose 0.05, 0.1, 0.2 or 0.3 mg with dose escalation every second week

    Drug: semaglutide

  • Experimental
    Sema 0.4 mg (fast dose escalation)

    Dose 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, or 0.4 mg with dose escalation every second week

    Drug: semaglutide

  • Active comparator
    Lira 3.0 mg

    Dose 0.6, 1.2, 1.8, 2.4, 3.0 mg with dose escalation every week

    Drug: liraglutide

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo Sema 0.05 mg

    Placebo arm matching active arm Sema 0.05 mg

    Drug: placebo

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo Sema 0.1 mg

    Placebo arm matching active arm Sema 0.1 mg

    Drug: placebo

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo Sema 0.2 mg

    Placebo arm matching active arm Sema 0.2 mg

    Drug: placebo

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo Sema 0.3 mg

    Placebo arm matching active arm Sema 0.3 mg

    Drug: placebo

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo Sema 0.4 mg

    Placebo arm matching active arm Sema 0.4 mg

    Drug: placebo

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo Sema 0.3 mg (fast dose escalation)

    Placebo arm matching active arm Sema 0.3 mg (fast dose escalation)

    Drug: placebo

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo Sema 0.4 mg (fast dose escalation)

    Placebo arm matching active arm Sema 0.4 mg (fast dose escalation)

    Drug: placebo

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo Lira 3.0 mg

    Placebo arm matching active arm Lira 3.0 mg

    Drug: placebo

Interventions

  • Drugsemaglutide

    Once-daily subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) administration with dose escalation.

  • Drugliraglutide

    Once-daily subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) administration with dose escalation.

  • Drugplacebo

    Once-daily subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) administration.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Relative Change in Body Weight (%)

    Relative change from baseline (week 0) in body weight was evaluated at week 52. Analysis of in-trial data with missing observations imputed from the pooled placebo arms based on a jump to reference multiple (x1000) imputation (J2R-MI) approach. Week 52 responses were analysed using an analysis of covariance model with treatment, region and sex as factors and baseline body weight as covariate. In-trial observation period was defined as the period from randomisation to last contact with trial site.

    Time frame: Week 0, Week 52

Secondary outcomes

  1. Participants With Weight Loss of ≥5% of Baseline Body Weight

    Presented results are percentage of participants who lost more than or equal to 5% of their baseline (week 0) body weight at week 52. Analysis of observed in-trial data with missing observations imputed from the pooled placebo arms based on a jump to reference multiple (x1000) imputation (J2R-MI) approach. Week 52 responses were analysed using a binary logistic regression model with treatment, region and sex as factors and baseline body weight as covariate. In-trial observation period was defined as the period from randomisation to last contact with trial site.

    Time frame: Week 52

  2. Participants With Weight Loss of ≥10% of Baseline Body Weight

    Presented results are percentage of participants who lost more than or equal to 10% of their baseline (week 0) body weight at week 52. Analysis of observed in-trial data with missing observations imputed from the pooled placebo arms based on a jump to reference multiple (x1000) imputation (J2R-MI) approach. Week 52 responses were analysed using a binary logistic regression model with treatment, region and sex as factors and baseline body weight as covariate. In-trial observation period was defined as the period from randomisation to last contact with trial site.

    Time frame: Week 52

  3. Change in Body Weight (kg)

    Change from baseline (week 0) in body weight was evaluated at week 52. Analysis of in-trial data with missing observations imputed from the pooled placebo arms based on a jump to reference multiple (x1000) imputation (J2R-MI) approach. Week 52 responses were analysed using an analysis of covariance model with treatment, region and sex as factors and baseline body weight as covariate. Results are based on the in-trial observation period which was defined as the period from randomisation to last contact with trial site.

    Time frame: Week 0, Week 52

  4. Change in Waist Circumference

    Change from baseline (week 0) in waist circumference was evaluated at week 52. Analysis of in-trial data with missing observations imputed from the pooled placebo arms based on a jump to reference multiple (x1000) imputation (J2R-MI) approach. Week 52 responses were analysed using an analysis of covariance model with treatment, region and sex as factors and baseline waist circumference as covariate. Results are based on the in-trial observation period which was defined as the period from randomisation to last contact with trial site.

    Time frame: Week 0, Week 52

  5. Change in Waist to Hip Circumference Ratio

    Change from baseline (week 0) in waist to hip circumference ratio was evaluated at week 52. Analysis of in-trial data with missing observations imputed from the pooled placebo arms based on a jump to reference multiple (x1000) imputation (J2R-MI) approach. Week 52 responses were analysed using an analysis of covariance model with treatment, region and sex as factors and baseline waist to hip circumference ratio as covariate. Results are based on the in-trial observation period which was defined as the period from randomisation to last contact with trial site.

    Time frame: Week 0, Week 52

  6. Change in BMI

    Change from baseline (week 0) in body mass index (BMI) was evaluated at week 52. Analysis of in-trial data with missing observations imputed from the pooled placebo arms based on a jump to reference multiple (x1000) imputation (J2R-MI) approach. Week 52 responses were analysed using an analysis of covariance model with treatment, region and sex as factors and baseline BMI as covariate. Results are based on the in-trial observation period which was defined as the period from randomisation to last contact with trial site.

    Time frame: Week 0, Week 52

  7. Change in HbA1c

    Change from baseline (week 0) in glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) was evaluated at week 52. Analysis of in-trial data with missing observations imputed from the pooled placebo arms based on a jump to reference multiple (x1000) imputation (J2R-MI) approach. Week 52 responses were analysed using an analysis of covariance model with treatment, region and sex as factors and baseline HbA1c as covariate. Results are based on the in-trial observation period which was defined as the period from randomisation to last contact with trial site.

    Time frame: Week 0, Week 52

  8. Change in FPG

    Change from baseline (week 0) in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) was evaluated at week 52. Analysis of in-trial data with missing observations imputed from the pooled placebo arms based on a jump to reference multiple (x1000) imputation (J2R-MI) approach. Week 52 responses were analysed using an analysis of covariance model with treatment, region and sex as factors and baseline FPG as covariate. Results are based on the in-trial observation period which was defined as the period from randomisation to last contact with trial site.

    Time frame: Week 0, Week 52

  9. Change in Glycaemic Category (Normoglycaemia, Pre-diabetes, T2D)

    The categorisation of glycaemic status as described in the protocol was not aligned with the usual diagnosis criteria which require repeated testing of blood glucose to confirm the diagnosis and allows for the diagnosis to be made based on random glucose assessments and/or 2-hour glucose assessments during an oral glucose tolerance test. Therefore, data were not collected for this outcome measure.

    Time frame: Week 0, Week 52

  10. Change in SBP

    Change from baseline (week 0) in systolic blood pressure (SBP) was evaluated at week 52. Analysis of in-trial data with missing observations imputed from the pooled placebo arms based on a jump to reference multiple (x1000) imputation (J2R-MI) approach. Week 52 responses were analysed using an analysis of covariance model with treatment, region and sex as factors and baseline SBP as covariate. Results are based on the in-trial observation period which was defined as the period from randomisation to last contact with trial site.

    Time frame: Week 0, Week 52

  11. Change in DBP

    Change from baseline (week 0) in diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was evaluated at week 52. Analysis of in-trial data with missing observations imputed from the pooled placebo arms based on a jump to reference multiple (x1000) imputation (J2R-MI) approach. Week 52 responses were analysed using an analysis of covariance model with treatment, region and sex as factors and baseline DBP as covariate. Results are based on the in-trial observation period which was defined as the period from randomisation to last contact with trial site.

    Time frame: Week 0, Week 52

  12. Change in Lipids (Total Cholesterol, LDL Cholesterol, HDL Cholesterol, VLDL Cholesterol, Triglycerides and FFA)

    Change from baseline (week 0) in lipids (total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol and triglycerides) was evaluated at week 52. Analysis of in-trial data with missing observations imputed from the pooled placebo arms based on a jump to reference multiple (x1000) imputation (J2R-MI) approach. Week 52 responses were analysed using an analysis of covariance model with treatment, region and sex as factors and respective baseline lipid value as covariate. Results are based on the in-trial observation period which was defined as the period from randomisation to last contact with trial site. Free fatty acid (FFA) results are not presented as the values were considered invalid. The shipment of the samples to be tested for FFA was not as per the requirement.

    Time frame: Week 0, Week 52

  13. Change in hsCRP

    Change from baseline (week 0) in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) was evaluated at week 52. Analysis of in-trial data with missing observations imputed from the pooled placebo arms based on a jump to reference multiple (x1000) imputation (J2R-MI) approach. Week 52 responses were analysed using an analysis of covariance model with treatment, region and sex as factors and baseline hsCRP as covariate. Results are based on the in-trial observation period which was defined as the period from randomisation to last contact with trial site.

    Time frame: Week 0, Week 52

  14. Change in IWQoL Lite

    The planned analyses of the Impact of Weight on Quality of Life Lite (IWQoL-Lite) for Clinical Trials scores were not performed. The measure was still under development, and Novo Nordisk had not obtained a validated scoring of the instrument by the time of analysis of the trial results. Therefore, the total and subdomain scores on the IWQoL-Lite could not be provided.

    Time frame: Week 0, Week 52

  15. Change in SF-36

    Short Form-36 (SF-36) is a 36-item patient-reported survey of patient health that measures the participant's overall health-related quality of life (HRQoL). SF-36v2™ (acute version) questionnaire measured eight domains of functional health and well-being as well as two component summary scores (physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS)). The 0-100 scale scores (where higher scores indicated a better HRQoL) from the SF-36 were converted to norm-based scores to enable a direct interpretation in relation to the distribution of the scores in the 2009 U.S. general population. In the metric of norm-based scores, 50 and 10 corresponds to the mean and standard deviation respectively of the 2009 U.S. general population. Change from baseline (week 0) in the domain scores and component summary (PCS and MCS) scores were evaluated at week 52. A positive change score indicates an improvement since baseline. Results are based on the in-trial observation period.

    Time frame: Week 0, Week 52

  16. Participants With Change in Concomitant Medications (Antihypertensive and Lipid-lowering Medications)

    Participants' status on receiving concomitant medication (antihypertensive and lipid-lowering medications) at week 0 (yes/no) and week 52 (decreased, no change, increased or missing) are presented. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period which was defined as the period from first trial product administration to last trial product administration.

    Time frame: Week 0, Week 52

  17. Compliance With Nutritional Counselling

    This outcome measure presents "nutritional compliance results" recorded at weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52. Nutritional compliance was recorded on a 0 to 10 numeric rating scale (NRS), with higher scores representing better compliance.

    Time frame: Week 4-52

  18. Number of AEs During the Trial

    Adverse events (AEs) were recorded from week 0 to week 59. Results are based on the in-trial observation period which was defined as the period from randomisation to last contact with trial site.

    Time frame: Week 0-59

  19. Number of Hypoglycaemic Episodes During the Trial

    Hypoglycaemic episodes were identified by either: 1) Subject reporting of symptoms of hypoglycaemia (low blood sugar) or 2) fasting plasma glucose (FPG) values ≤3.9 mmol/L (70 mg/dL) from blood sampling at site visits. Hypoglycaemic episodes were recorded from week 0 to week 59. Results are based on the in-trial observation period which was defined as the period from randomisation to last contact with trial site.

    Time frame: Week 0-59

  20. Number of New and Ongoing Nausea, Vomiting, Diarrhoea, and Constipation Events by Week

    Presented results are the number of nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, and constipation events recorded from week 0 to week 59. Results are based on the in-trial observation period which was defined as the period from randomisation to last contact with trial site.

    Time frame: Week 0-59

  21. Nausea: Individual Scores of Nausea Questionnaire and Severity by NRS Score

    This outcome measure presents results recorded at week 52. If a participant experienced an event of nausea within 24 hours prior to a site visit, a nausea questionnaire had to be completed. Participants experiencing such events were to answer 5 different categories in the questionnaire ('duration of nausea', 'time from the latest injection of trial product to the onset of nausea', 'time from last food intake to the onset of nausea', 'nausea accompanied by vomiting (yes/no)' and 'severity of nausea (worst during episode)'). Severity of nausea was recorded on a 0 to 10 numeric rating scale (NRS), where 0 = 'No nausea' and 10 = 'Nausea as bad as it could be'. Results are based on the in-trial observation period which was defined as the period from randomisation to last contact with trial site.

    Time frame: Week 52

  22. Change in ECG

    Number of participants with electrocardiogram (ECG) results, "normal; abnormal, not clinically significant (NCS) or abnormal, clinically significant (CS)" was recorded at baseline (week 0) and week 52. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period which was defined as the period from first trial product administration to last trial product administration.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 52

  23. Change in Pulse

    Change from baseline (week 0) in pulse rate was evaluated at week 52. Analysis of observed data using a mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) with treatment, region and sex as factors and baseline pulse as covariate, all nested within visit. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period which was defined as the period from first trial product administration to last trial product administration.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 52

  24. Change in Haematology: Haemoglobin

    Change from baseline (week 0) in haemoglobin was evaluated at week 52. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period which was defined as the period from first trial product administration to last trial product administration.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 52

  25. Change in Haematology: Haematocrit

    Change from baseline (week 0) in haematocrit was evaluated at week 52. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period which was defined as the period from first trial product administration to last trial product administration.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 52

  26. Change in Haematology: Thrombocytes, Leucocytes and Differential Count

    Change from baseline (week 0) in haematological parameters, "thrombocytes, leucocytes and differential cell count (eosinophils, neutrophils, basophils, monocytes and lymphocytes)" were evaluated at week 52. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period which was defined as the period from first trial product administration to last trial product administration.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 52

  27. Change in Haematology: Erythrocytes

    Change from baseline (week 0) in erythrocytes was evaluated at week 52. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period which was defined as the period from first trial product administration to last trial product administration.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 52

  28. Change in Biochemistry: Creatinine and Bilirubin (Total)

    Change from baseline (week 0) in biochemistry parameters, "creatinine and bilirubin (total)" were evaluated at week 52. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period which was defined as the period from first trial product administration to last trial product administration.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 52

  29. Change in Biochemistry: Creatinine Kinase, Amylase, Lipase, ALT, AST and ALP

    Change from baseline (week 0) in biochemistry parameters, "creatinine kinase, amylase, lipase, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP)" were evaluated at week 52. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period which was defined as the period from first trial product administration to last trial product administration.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 52

  30. Change in Biochemistry: Urea, Sodium, Potassium and Calcium (Total)

    Change from baseline (week 0) in biochemistry parameters, "urea, sodium, potassium and calcium (total)" were evaluated at week 52. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period which was defined as the period from first trial product administration to last trial product administration.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 52

  31. Change in Biochemistry: Albumin

    Change from baseline (week 0) in albumin was evaluated at week 52. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period which was defined as the period from first trial product administration to last trial product administration.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 52

  32. Change in Biochemistry: Calcitonin

    Change from baseline (week 0) in calcitonin was evaluated at week 52. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period which was defined as the period from first trial product administration to last trial product administration.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 52

  33. Change in Biochemistry: TSH

    Change from baseline (week 0) in thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) was evaluated at week 52. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period which was defined as the period from first trial product administration to last trial product administration.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 52

  34. Change in Mental Health Assessed by C-SSRS

    Presented results are the number of participants with Columbia Suicidality Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) results recorded during baseline (week 0) and post baseline (week 4-52) visits. For classification of the events reported on the C-SSRS, the following categories were used: 1) Suicidal ideation, 2) Suicidal behaviour and 3) Non-suicidal self-injurious behaviour. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period which was defined as the period from first trial product administration to last trial product administration.

    Time frame: Week 0 and Week 4-59

  35. Change in Mental Health Assessed by PHQ-9

    Patient health questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) was recorded at baseline (week 0) and week 52. The PHQ-9 questionnaire is a 9-item depression module included in the patient health questionnaire, a self-administered diagnostic tool used for assessment of mental disorders. On the PHQ-9, the participant rates the frequency of 9 items on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). The PHQ-9 total score ranges from 0-27; total scores of 1-4 represent no depression, total scores of 5-9 represent mild depression, total scores of 10-14 represent moderate depression, total scores of 15-19 represent moderately severe depression and total scores of 20-27 represent severe depression. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period which was defined as the period from first trial product administration to last trial product administration.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 52

  36. Anti-semaglutide Antibodies During and After Treatment

    Participants were tested for anti-semaglutide antibodies from week 0 (post treatment) to week 52 (at weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52). This outcome measure is applicable only for the semaglutide treatment arms.

    Time frame: Week 0-52

07

Results

Posted Apr 17, 2020

Participant flow

The trial was conducted at 71 sites in 8 countries as follows: Australia: 5, Belgium: 5, Canada: 9, Germany: 6, Israel: 7, Russian Federation: 10, United Kingdom (UK):8, United States (US): 21. Along with this, recruitment of participants was planned at 3 sites (1 each in Germany, Russian Federation, and US), but where no participants were screened

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneSemaglutide 0.05 mgSemaglutide 0.1 mgSemaglutide 0.2 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mgSemaglutide 0.4 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mg (Fast Escalation)Semaglutide 0.4 mg (Fast Escalation)Liraglutide 3.0 mgPlacebo Pool
Started103102103103102102103103136
Full analysis set103102103103102102103103136
Safety analysis set103102103103102102103103136
Completed929594961009610096123
Not completed11797263713
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject546411017
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up532315266
Withdrew: Death000000100
Withdrew: Unclassified101000000

Outcome measures

PrimaryRelative Change in Body Weight (%)

Relative change from baseline (week 0) in body weight was evaluated at week 52. Analysis of in-trial data with missing observations imputed from the pooled placebo arms based on a jump to reference multiple (x1000) imputation (J2R-MI) approach. Week 52 responses were analysed using an analysis of covariance model with treatment, region and sex as factors and baseline body weight as covariate. In-trial observation period was defined as the period from randomisation to last contact with trial site.

Time frame:
Week 0, Week 52
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Percentage (%) of body weight
Relative Change in Body Weight (%)
Percentage (%) of body weightSemaglutide 0.05 mgSemaglutide 0.1 mgSemaglutide 0.2 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mgSemaglutide 0.4 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mg (Fast Escalation)Semaglutide 0.4 mg (Fast Escalation)Liraglutide 3.0 mgPlacebo Pool
Relative Change in Body Weight (%)-5.99 ± 0.85-8.62 ± 0.84-11.60 ± 0.85-11.17 ± 0.85-13.84 ± 0.83-11.38 ± 0.85-16.29 ± 0.83-7.76 ± 0.85-2.29 ± 0.74
Statistical analysis
  • Semaglutide 0.05 mg vs Placebo Pool · ANCOVA · p = =0.0055 · Treatment difference (%-points): -3.70 · 95% CI -6.55 to -0.85Semaglutide 0.05 mg - placebo pool
  • Semaglutide 0.1 mg vs Placebo Pool · ANCOVA · p = <0.0001 · Treatment difference (%-points): -6.32 · 95% CI -9.16 to -3.49Semaglutide 0.1 mg - placebo pool
  • Semaglutide 0.2 mg vs Placebo Pool · ANCOVA · p = <0.0001 · Treatment difference (%-points): -9.31 · 95% CI -12.15 to -6.46Semaglutide 0.2 mg - placebo pool
  • Semaglutide 0.3 mg vs Placebo Pool · ANCOVA · p = <0.0001 · Treatment difference (%-points): -8.88 · 95% CI -11.72 to -6.03Semaglutide 0.3 mg - placebo pool
  • Semaglutide 0.4 mg vs Placebo Pool · ANCOVA · p = <0.0001 · Treatment difference (%-points): -11.55 · 95% CI -14.38 to -8.72Semaglutide 0.4 mg - placebo pool
SecondaryParticipants With Weight Loss of ≥5% of Baseline Body Weight

Presented results are percentage of participants who lost more than or equal to 5% of their baseline (week 0) body weight at week 52. Analysis of observed in-trial data with missing observations imputed from the pooled placebo arms based on a jump to reference multiple (x1000) imputation (J2R-MI) approach. Week 52 responses were analysed using a binary logistic regression model with treatment, region and sex as factors and baseline body weight as covariate. In-trial observation period was defined as the period from randomisation to last contact with trial site.

Time frame:
Week 52
Reported as:
Number · Percentage (%) of participants
Participants With Weight Loss of ≥5% of Baseline Body Weight
Percentage (%) of participantsSemaglutide 0.05 mgSemaglutide 0.1 mgSemaglutide 0.2 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mgSemaglutide 0.4 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mg (Fast Escalation)Semaglutide 0.4 mg (Fast Escalation)Liraglutide 3.0 mgPlacebo Pool
Participants With Weight Loss of ≥5% of Baseline Body Weight53.5067.4974.9180.5282.5272.1989.5866.1222.87
SecondaryParticipants With Weight Loss of ≥10% of Baseline Body Weight

Presented results are percentage of participants who lost more than or equal to 10% of their baseline (week 0) body weight at week 52. Analysis of observed in-trial data with missing observations imputed from the pooled placebo arms based on a jump to reference multiple (x1000) imputation (J2R-MI) approach. Week 52 responses were analysed using a binary logistic regression model with treatment, region and sex as factors and baseline body weight as covariate. In-trial observation period was defined as the period from randomisation to last contact with trial site.

Time frame:
Week 52
Reported as:
Number · Percentage (%) of participants
Participants With Weight Loss of ≥10% of Baseline Body Weight
Percentage (%) of participantsSemaglutide 0.05 mgSemaglutide 0.1 mgSemaglutide 0.2 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mgSemaglutide 0.4 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mg (Fast Escalation)Semaglutide 0.4 mg (Fast Escalation)Liraglutide 3.0 mgPlacebo Pool
Participants With Weight Loss of ≥10% of Baseline Body Weight18.9436.5755.9557.7664.6158.4571.9133.9810.08
SecondaryChange in Body Weight (kg)

Change from baseline (week 0) in body weight was evaluated at week 52. Analysis of in-trial data with missing observations imputed from the pooled placebo arms based on a jump to reference multiple (x1000) imputation (J2R-MI) approach. Week 52 responses were analysed using an analysis of covariance model with treatment, region and sex as factors and baseline body weight as covariate. Results are based on the in-trial observation period which was defined as the period from randomisation to last contact with trial site.

Time frame:
Week 0, Week 52
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Kilogram (kg)
Change in Body Weight (kg)
Kilogram (kg)Semaglutide 0.05 mgSemaglutide 0.1 mgSemaglutide 0.2 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mgSemaglutide 0.4 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mg (Fast Escalation)Semaglutide 0.4 mg (Fast Escalation)Liraglutide 3.0 mgPlacebo Pool
Change in Body Weight (kg)-6.66 ± 0.94-9.34 ± 0.93-12.30 ± 0.93-12.45 ± 0.93-15.15 ± 0.92-12.54 ± 0.93-17.36 ± 0.92-8.47 ± 0.93-2.48 ± 0.82
SecondaryChange in Waist Circumference

Change from baseline (week 0) in waist circumference was evaluated at week 52. Analysis of in-trial data with missing observations imputed from the pooled placebo arms based on a jump to reference multiple (x1000) imputation (J2R-MI) approach. Week 52 responses were analysed using an analysis of covariance model with treatment, region and sex as factors and baseline waist circumference as covariate. Results are based on the in-trial observation period which was defined as the period from randomisation to last contact with trial site.

Time frame:
Week 0, Week 52
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Centimetre (cm)
Change in Waist Circumference
Centimetre (cm)Semaglutide 0.05 mgSemaglutide 0.1 mgSemaglutide 0.2 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mgSemaglutide 0.4 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mg (Fast Escalation)Semaglutide 0.4 mg (Fast Escalation)Liraglutide 3.0 mgPlacebo Pool
Change in Waist Circumference-6.11 ± 0.93-8.75 ± 0.90-11.02 ± 0.89-10.91 ± 0.89-12.31 ± 0.91-11.06 ± 0.95-14.88 ± 0.88-8.35 ± 0.89-3.47 ± 0.81
SecondaryChange in Waist to Hip Circumference Ratio

Change from baseline (week 0) in waist to hip circumference ratio was evaluated at week 52. Analysis of in-trial data with missing observations imputed from the pooled placebo arms based on a jump to reference multiple (x1000) imputation (J2R-MI) approach. Week 52 responses were analysed using an analysis of covariance model with treatment, region and sex as factors and baseline waist to hip circumference ratio as covariate. Results are based on the in-trial observation period which was defined as the period from randomisation to last contact with trial site.

Time frame:
Week 0, Week 52
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Waist to hip circumference ratio
Change in Waist to Hip Circumference Ratio
Waist to hip circumference ratioSemaglutide 0.05 mgSemaglutide 0.1 mgSemaglutide 0.2 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mgSemaglutide 0.4 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mg (Fast Escalation)Semaglutide 0.4 mg (Fast Escalation)Liraglutide 3.0 mgPlacebo Pool
Change in Waist to Hip Circumference Ratio-0.01 ± 0.01-0.02 ± 0.01-0.02 ± 0.01-0.03 ± 0.01-0.02 ± 0.01-0.02 ± 0.01-0.03 ± 0.01-0.02 ± 0.01-0.01 ± 0.00
SecondaryChange in BMI

Change from baseline (week 0) in body mass index (BMI) was evaluated at week 52. Analysis of in-trial data with missing observations imputed from the pooled placebo arms based on a jump to reference multiple (x1000) imputation (J2R-MI) approach. Week 52 responses were analysed using an analysis of covariance model with treatment, region and sex as factors and baseline BMI as covariate. Results are based on the in-trial observation period which was defined as the period from randomisation to last contact with trial site.

Time frame:
Week 0, Week 52
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Kilogram per square meter (kg/m^2)
Change in BMI
Kilogram per square meter (kg/m^2)Semaglutide 0.05 mgSemaglutide 0.1 mgSemaglutide 0.2 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mgSemaglutide 0.4 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mg (Fast Escalation)Semaglutide 0.4 mg (Fast Escalation)Liraglutide 3.0 mgPlacebo Pool
Change in BMI-2.37 ± 0.33-3.36 ± 0.33-4.38 ± 0.33-4.40 ± 0.33-5.40 ± 0.33-4.48 ± 0.33-6.21 ± 0.33-3.03 ± 0.33-0.88 ± 0.29
SecondaryChange in HbA1c

Change from baseline (week 0) in glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) was evaluated at week 52. Analysis of in-trial data with missing observations imputed from the pooled placebo arms based on a jump to reference multiple (x1000) imputation (J2R-MI) approach. Week 52 responses were analysed using an analysis of covariance model with treatment, region and sex as factors and baseline HbA1c as covariate. Results are based on the in-trial observation period which was defined as the period from randomisation to last contact with trial site.

Time frame:
Week 0, Week 52
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Percentage of HbA1c
Change in HbA1c
Percentage of HbA1cSemaglutide 0.05 mgSemaglutide 0.1 mgSemaglutide 0.2 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mgSemaglutide 0.4 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mg (Fast Escalation)Semaglutide 0.4 mg (Fast Escalation)Liraglutide 3.0 mgPlacebo Pool
Change in HbA1c-0.13 ± 0.03-0.21 ± 0.03-0.28 ± 0.03-0.23 ± 0.03-0.29 ± 0.03-0.25 ± 0.03-0.34 ± 0.03-0.21 ± 0.03-0.01 ± 0.03
SecondaryChange in FPG

Change from baseline (week 0) in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) was evaluated at week 52. Analysis of in-trial data with missing observations imputed from the pooled placebo arms based on a jump to reference multiple (x1000) imputation (J2R-MI) approach. Week 52 responses were analysed using an analysis of covariance model with treatment, region and sex as factors and baseline FPG as covariate. Results are based on the in-trial observation period which was defined as the period from randomisation to last contact with trial site.

Time frame:
Week 0, Week 52
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Millimoles per litre (mmol/L)
Change in FPG
Millimoles per litre (mmol/L)Semaglutide 0.05 mgSemaglutide 0.1 mgSemaglutide 0.2 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mgSemaglutide 0.4 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mg (Fast Escalation)Semaglutide 0.4 mg (Fast Escalation)Liraglutide 3.0 mgPlacebo Pool
Change in FPG-0.29 ± 0.06-0.35 ± 0.06-0.40 ± 0.06-0.39 ± 0.06-0.43 ± 0.06-0.38 ± 0.06-0.51 ± 0.06-0.35 ± 0.060.01 ± 0.05
SecondaryChange in Glycaemic Category (Normoglycaemia, Pre-diabetes, T2D)

The categorisation of glycaemic status as described in the protocol was not aligned with the usual diagnosis criteria which require repeated testing of blood glucose to confirm the diagnosis and allows for the diagnosis to be made based on random glucose assessments and/or 2-hour glucose assessments during an oral glucose tolerance test. Therefore, data were not collected for this outcome measure.

Time frame:
Week 0, Week 52

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryChange in SBP

Change from baseline (week 0) in systolic blood pressure (SBP) was evaluated at week 52. Analysis of in-trial data with missing observations imputed from the pooled placebo arms based on a jump to reference multiple (x1000) imputation (J2R-MI) approach. Week 52 responses were analysed using an analysis of covariance model with treatment, region and sex as factors and baseline SBP as covariate. Results are based on the in-trial observation period which was defined as the period from randomisation to last contact with trial site.

Time frame:
Week 0, Week 52
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Change in SBP
Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Semaglutide 0.05 mgSemaglutide 0.1 mgSemaglutide 0.2 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mgSemaglutide 0.4 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mg (Fast Escalation)Semaglutide 0.4 mg (Fast Escalation)Liraglutide 3.0 mgPlacebo Pool
Change in SBP-4.46 ± 1.20-5.76 ± 1.18-6.26 ± 1.19-6.41 ± 1.19-5.81 ± 1.16-6.07 ± 1.19-10.26 ± 1.16-5.45 ± 1.18-1.58 ± 1.04
SecondaryChange in DBP

Change from baseline (week 0) in diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was evaluated at week 52. Analysis of in-trial data with missing observations imputed from the pooled placebo arms based on a jump to reference multiple (x1000) imputation (J2R-MI) approach. Week 52 responses were analysed using an analysis of covariance model with treatment, region and sex as factors and baseline DBP as covariate. Results are based on the in-trial observation period which was defined as the period from randomisation to last contact with trial site.

Time frame:
Week 0, Week 52
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Change in DBP
Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Semaglutide 0.05 mgSemaglutide 0.1 mgSemaglutide 0.2 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mgSemaglutide 0.4 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mg (Fast Escalation)Semaglutide 0.4 mg (Fast Escalation)Liraglutide 3.0 mgPlacebo Pool
Change in DBP-2.55 ± 0.84-2.65 ± 0.82-4.09 ± 0.83-2.98 ± 0.83-3.61 ± 0.80-2.20 ± 0.83-5.52 ± 0.80-2.70 ± 0.82-1.50 ± 0.73
SecondaryChange in Lipids (Total Cholesterol, LDL Cholesterol, HDL Cholesterol, VLDL Cholesterol, Triglycerides and FFA)

Change from baseline (week 0) in lipids (total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol and triglycerides) was evaluated at week 52. Analysis of in-trial data with missing observations imputed from the pooled placebo arms based on a jump to reference multiple (x1000) imputation (J2R-MI) approach. Week 52 responses were analysed using an analysis of covariance model with treatment, region and sex as factors and respective baseline lipid value as covariate. Results are based on the in-trial observation period which was defined as the period from randomisation to last contact with trial site. Free fatty acid (FFA) results are not presented as the values were considered invalid. The shipment of the samples to be tested for FFA was not as per the requirement.

Time frame:
Week 0, Week 52
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Millimoles per litre (mmol/L)
Change in Lipids (Total Cholesterol, LDL Cholesterol, HDL Cholesterol, VLDL Cholesterol, Triglycerides and FFA)
Millimoles per litre (mmol/L)Semaglutide 0.05 mgSemaglutide 0.1 mgSemaglutide 0.2 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mgSemaglutide 0.4 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mg (Fast Escalation)Semaglutide 0.4 mg (Fast Escalation)Liraglutide 3.0 mgPlacebo Pool
Total cholesterol0.96 ± 0.020.95 ± 0.010.93 ± 0.010.93 ± 0.010.93 ± 0.010.93 ± 0.020.92 ± 0.010.96 ± 0.010.97 ± 0.01
LDL cholesterol0.97 ± 0.020.93 ± 0.020.93 ± 0.020.92 ± 0.020.93 ± 0.020.92 ± 0.020.91 ± 0.020.95 ± 0.020.97 ± 0.02
HDL cholesterol0.99 ± 0.011.02 ± 0.011.02 ± 0.011.02 ± 0.011.00 ± 0.011.00 ± 0.021.01 ± 0.011.00 ± 0.011.00 ± 0.01
VLDL cholesterol0.90 ± 0.030.89 ± 0.030.81 ± 0.030.85 ± 0.030.81 ± 0.030.87 ± 0.040.81 ± 0.030.91 ± 0.030.95 ± 0.03
Triglycerides0.89 ± 0.040.88 ± 0.030.81 ± 0.030.85 ± 0.030.80 ± 0.030.87 ± 0.040.80 ± 0.030.90 ± 0.030.95 ± 0.03
SecondaryChange in hsCRP

Change from baseline (week 0) in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) was evaluated at week 52. Analysis of in-trial data with missing observations imputed from the pooled placebo arms based on a jump to reference multiple (x1000) imputation (J2R-MI) approach. Week 52 responses were analysed using an analysis of covariance model with treatment, region and sex as factors and baseline hsCRP as covariate. Results are based on the in-trial observation period which was defined as the period from randomisation to last contact with trial site.

Time frame:
Week 0, Week 52
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Milligrams per decilitre (mg/dL)
Change in hsCRP
Milligrams per decilitre (mg/dL)Semaglutide 0.05 mgSemaglutide 0.1 mgSemaglutide 0.2 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mgSemaglutide 0.4 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mg (Fast Escalation)Semaglutide 0.4 mg (Fast Escalation)Liraglutide 3.0 mgPlacebo Pool
Change in hsCRP0.71 ± 0.070.65 ± 0.060.57 ± 0.050.66 ± 0.060.54 ± 0.050.58 ± 0.050.44 ± 0.040.72 ± 0.060.82 ± 0.07
SecondaryChange in IWQoL Lite

The planned analyses of the Impact of Weight on Quality of Life Lite (IWQoL-Lite) for Clinical Trials scores were not performed. The measure was still under development, and Novo Nordisk had not obtained a validated scoring of the instrument by the time of analysis of the trial results. Therefore, the total and subdomain scores on the IWQoL-Lite could not be provided.

Time frame:
Week 0, Week 52

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryChange in SF-36

Short Form-36 (SF-36) is a 36-item patient-reported survey of patient health that measures the participant's overall health-related quality of life (HRQoL). SF-36v2™ (acute version) questionnaire measured eight domains of functional health and well-being as well as two component summary scores (physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS)). The 0-100 scale scores (where higher scores indicated a better HRQoL) from the SF-36 were converted to norm-based scores to enable a direct interpretation in relation to the distribution of the scores in the 2009 U.S. general population. In the metric of norm-based scores, 50 and 10 corresponds to the mean and standard deviation respectively of the 2009 U.S. general population. Change from baseline (week 0) in the domain scores and component summary (PCS and MCS) scores were evaluated at week 52. A positive change score indicates an improvement since baseline. Results are based on the in-trial observation period.

Time frame:
Week 0, Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a scale
Change in SF-36
Score on a scaleSemaglutide 0.05 mgSemaglutide 0.1 mgSemaglutide 0.2 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mgSemaglutide 0.4 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mg (Fast Escalation)Semaglutide 0.4 mg (Fast Escalation)Liraglutide 3.0 mgPlacebo Pool
Bodily pain1.85 ± 10.993.01 ± 6.414.27 ± 7.143.82 ± 7.115.16 ± 8.021.88 ± 9.255.11 ± 10.622.48 ± 7.461.21 ± 9.39
General health2.03 ± 5.982.51 ± 7.234.17 ± 6.521.20 ± 5.885.85 ± 7.625.85 ± 7.114.81 ± 10.333.95 ± 6.611.39 ± 8.98
Mental health0.42 ± 7.760.24 ± 6.572.82 ± 8.67-0.55 ± 6.482.47 ± 7.031.02 ± 6.931.64 ± 6.841.91 ± 6.06-0.38 ± 8.98
Physical functioning6.00 ± 6.924.67 ± 8.176.52 ± 5.914.75 ± 4.078.74 ± 7.667.27 ± 6.327.28 ± 6.276.79 ± 6.402.28 ± 7.56
Role-emotional3.31 ± 6.35-1.69 ± 6.611.17 ± 7.031.25 ± 7.472.24 ± 8.910.18 ± 3.692.11 ± 6.170.25 ± 5.010.63 ± 5.30
Role-physical3.45 ± 8.244.37 ± 10.237.35 ± 8.853.40 ± 5.434.53 ± 7.457.12 ± 8.215.51 ± 8.495.37 ± 6.821.52 ± 9.47
Social functioning0.81 ± 6.540.71 ± 7.041.36 ± 7.69-0.88 ± 8.812.81 ± 9.652.23 ± 7.07-0.91 ± 11.100.35 ± 5.62-0.29 ± 7.71
Vitality1.73 ± 7.615.16 ± 11.088.90 ± 8.613.22 ± 6.429.37 ± 9.755.96 ± 7.947.02 ± 9.354.83 ± 10.843.38 ± 10.21
Physical component summary4.16 ± 7.705.51 ± 8.047.14 ± 6.384.70 ± 4.677.67 ± 6.937.54 ± 8.297.28 ± 8.546.21 ± 5.682.29 ± 9.33
Mental component summary0.25 ± 5.94-1.15 ± 6.671.45 ± 8.54-1.10 ± 7.791.97 ± 8.26-0.25 ± 6.660.20 ± 7.13-0.26 ± 5.69-0.05 ± 6.67
SecondaryParticipants With Change in Concomitant Medications (Antihypertensive and Lipid-lowering Medications)

Participants' status on receiving concomitant medication (antihypertensive and lipid-lowering medications) at week 0 (yes/no) and week 52 (decreased, no change, increased or missing) are presented. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period which was defined as the period from first trial product administration to last trial product administration.

Time frame:
Week 0, Week 52
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Participants With Change in Concomitant Medications (Antihypertensive and Lipid-lowering Medications)
ParticipantsSemaglutide 0.05 mgSemaglutide 0.1 mgSemaglutide 0.2 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mgSemaglutide 0.4 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mg (Fast Escalation)Semaglutide 0.4 mg (Fast Escalation)Liraglutide 3.0 mgPlacebo Pool
Week 0: Antihypertensive medication (Yes)373128313632293650
Week 0: Antihypertensive medication (No)667175726670746786
Week 52: Antihypertensive medication (Decreased)3386106736
Week 52: Antihypertensive medication (No change)687476757064807489
Week 52: Antihypertensive medication (Increased)492625486
Week 52: Antihypertensive medication (Missing)221100012
Week 0: Lipid-lowering medication (Yes)201713152220132528
Week 0: Lipid-lowering medication (No)8385908880829078108
Week 52: Lipid-lowering medication (Decreased)013113312
Week 52: Lipid-lowering medication (No change)738381847971878394
Week 52: Lipid-lowering medication (Increased)222221115
Week 52: Lipid-lowering medication (Missing)221100012
SecondaryCompliance With Nutritional Counselling

This outcome measure presents "nutritional compliance results" recorded at weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52. Nutritional compliance was recorded on a 0 to 10 numeric rating scale (NRS), with higher scores representing better compliance.

Time frame:
Week 4-52
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a scale
Compliance With Nutritional Counselling
Score on a scaleSemaglutide 0.05 mgSemaglutide 0.1 mgSemaglutide 0.2 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mgSemaglutide 0.4 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mg (Fast Escalation)Semaglutide 0.4 mg (Fast Escalation)Liraglutide 3.0 mgPlacebo Pool
Week-46.85 ± 1.997.30 ± 1.967.17 ± 1.897.07 ± 2.277.20 ± 2.197.05 ± 2.027.30 ± 1.847.21 ± 2.136.08 ± 2.32
Week-86.53 ± 2.287.24 ± 1.916.82 ± 2.067.13 ± 2.037.00 ± 2.167.25 ± 1.847.65 ± 1.766.92 ± 2.185.85 ± 2.44
Week-126.70 ± 2.137.26 ± 2.267.22 ± 2.057.04 ± 2.177.11 ± 2.267.35 ± 1.967.64 ± 1.717.01 ± 1.936.14 ± 2.44
Week-166.85 ± 2.087.22 ± 1.967.36 ± 1.927.04 ± 2.057.61 ± 1.877.27 ± 2.117.71 ± 1.666.98 ± 1.876.31 ± 2.33
Week-206.92 ± 2.017.20 ± 1.986.87 ± 2.107.14 ± 1.887.64 ± 1.687.24 ± 2.167.74 ± 1.476.85 ± 2.206.24 ± 2.27
Week-246.49 ± 2.257.14 ± 2.057.07 ± 2.167.17 ± 1.867.63 ± 1.767.05 ± 1.967.55 ± 1.866.69 ± 2.126.06 ± 2.45
Week-286.94 ± 2.047.54 ± 1.787.10 ± 2.047.11 ± 1.737.46 ± 1.947.53 ± 1.577.47 ± 1.906.69 ± 2.046.34 ± 2.27
Week-326.83 ± 2.126.97 ± 2.237.12 ± 1.937.07 ± 2.077.72 ± 1.767.13 ± 2.237.29 ± 1.916.94 ± 2.015.86 ± 2.13
Week-366.87 ± 1.947.12 ± 2.027.03 ± 2.286.86 ± 1.987.20 ± 2.027.33 ± 1.847.34 ± 1.576.63 ± 2.166.10 ± 2.20
Week-406.86 ± 1.966.88 ± 2.407.07 ± 2.057.03 ± 1.977.40 ± 1.897.01 ± 1.817.26 ± 1.876.52 ± 2.075.90 ± 2.10
Week-446.83 ± 1.826.95 ± 2.106.96 ± 1.926.96 ± 2.017.30 ± 2.136.87 ± 1.987.30 ± 1.986.60 ± 1.855.99 ± 2.08
Week-486.82 ± 2.087.05 ± 1.916.88 ± 2.006.92 ± 2.167.12 ± 2.317.01 ± 2.037.23 ± 1.786.01 ± 2.496.16 ± 2.23
Week-527.23 ± 1.697.22 ± 1.987.05 ± 2.046.85 ± 2.477.36 ± 2.227.36 ± 1.857.31 ± 2.026.87 ± 2.076.09 ± 2.39
SecondaryNumber of AEs During the Trial

Adverse events (AEs) were recorded from week 0 to week 59. Results are based on the in-trial observation period which was defined as the period from randomisation to last contact with trial site.

Time frame:
Week 0-59
Reported as:
Number · Events
Number of AEs During the Trial
EventsSemaglutide 0.05 mgSemaglutide 0.1 mgSemaglutide 0.2 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mgSemaglutide 0.4 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mg (Fast Escalation)Semaglutide 0.4 mg (Fast Escalation)Liraglutide 3.0 mgPlacebo Pool
Number of AEs During the Trial547730738587775737681612650
SecondaryNumber of Hypoglycaemic Episodes During the Trial

Hypoglycaemic episodes were identified by either: 1) Subject reporting of symptoms of hypoglycaemia (low blood sugar) or 2) fasting plasma glucose (FPG) values ≤3.9 mmol/L (70 mg/dL) from blood sampling at site visits. Hypoglycaemic episodes were recorded from week 0 to week 59. Results are based on the in-trial observation period which was defined as the period from randomisation to last contact with trial site.

Time frame:
Week 0-59
Reported as:
Number · Episodes
Number of Hypoglycaemic Episodes During the Trial
EpisodesSemaglutide 0.05 mgSemaglutide 0.1 mgSemaglutide 0.2 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mgSemaglutide 0.4 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mg (Fast Escalation)Semaglutide 0.4 mg (Fast Escalation)Liraglutide 3.0 mgPlacebo Pool
Number of Hypoglycaemic Episodes During the Trial1648102016418
SecondaryNumber of New and Ongoing Nausea, Vomiting, Diarrhoea, and Constipation Events by Week

Presented results are the number of nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, and constipation events recorded from week 0 to week 59. Results are based on the in-trial observation period which was defined as the period from randomisation to last contact with trial site.

Time frame:
Week 0-59
Reported as:
Number · Events
Number of New and Ongoing Nausea, Vomiting, Diarrhoea, and Constipation Events by Week
EventsSemaglutide 0.05 mgSemaglutide 0.1 mgSemaglutide 0.2 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mgSemaglutide 0.4 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mg (Fast Escalation)Semaglutide 0.4 mg (Fast Escalation)Liraglutide 3.0 mgPlacebo Pool
Nausea4180746994106978930
Vomiting10294118353247176
Diarrhoea293761546354494623
Constipation15273325352334307
SecondaryNausea: Individual Scores of Nausea Questionnaire and Severity by NRS Score

This outcome measure presents results recorded at week 52. If a participant experienced an event of nausea within 24 hours prior to a site visit, a nausea questionnaire had to be completed. Participants experiencing such events were to answer 5 different categories in the questionnaire ('duration of nausea', 'time from the latest injection of trial product to the onset of nausea', 'time from last food intake to the onset of nausea', 'nausea accompanied by vomiting (yes/no)' and 'severity of nausea (worst during episode)'). Severity of nausea was recorded on a 0 to 10 numeric rating scale (NRS), where 0 = 'No nausea' and 10 = 'Nausea as bad as it could be'. Results are based on the in-trial observation period which was defined as the period from randomisation to last contact with trial site.

Time frame:
Week 52
Reported as:
Number · Events
Nausea: Individual Scores of Nausea Questionnaire and Severity by NRS Score
EventsSemaglutide 0.05 mgSemaglutide 0.1 mgSemaglutide 0.2 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mgSemaglutide 0.4 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mg (Fast Escalation)Semaglutide 0.4 mg (Fast Escalation)Liraglutide 3.0 mgPlacebo Pool
Duration of nausea:<30 min—01——————
Duration of nausea: 30 min-2 hr—00——————
Duration of nausea: 2-4 hr—00——————
Duration of nausea: 4-8 hr—10——————
Duration of nausea: >8 hr—00——————
Latest injection to onset time: 0-3 hr—00——————
Latest injection to onset time: 3-6 hr—00——————
Latest injection to onset time: 6-12 hr—10——————
Latest injection to onset time: 12-18 hr—01——————
Latest injection to onset time: >18 hr—00——————
Last food intake to onset time: 0-1 hr—01——————
Last food intake to onset time: 1-2 hr—10——————
Last food intake to onset time: 2-3 hr—00——————
Last food intake to onset time: 3-6 hr—00——————
Last food intake to onset time: >6 hr—00——————
Nausea accompanied by vomiting (Yes)—00——————
Nausea accompanied by vomiting (No)—11——————
Severity of nausea: 0—00——————
Severity of nausea: 1—00——————
Severity of nausea: 2—00——————
Severity of nausea: 3—00——————
Severity of nausea: 4—01——————
Severity of nausea: 5—10——————
Severity of nausea: 6—00——————
Severity of nausea: 7—00——————
Severity of nausea: 8—00——————
Severity of nausea: 9—00——————
Severity of nausea: 10—00——————
SecondaryChange in ECG

Number of participants with electrocardiogram (ECG) results, "normal; abnormal, not clinically significant (NCS) or abnormal, clinically significant (CS)" was recorded at baseline (week 0) and week 52. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period which was defined as the period from first trial product administration to last trial product administration.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 52
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Change in ECG
ParticipantsSemaglutide 0.05 mgSemaglutide 0.1 mgSemaglutide 0.2 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mgSemaglutide 0.4 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mg (Fast Escalation)Semaglutide 0.4 mg (Fast Escalation)Liraglutide 3.0 mgPlacebo Pool
Week: 0 — Normal706974626270746885
Week: 0 — Abnormal, NCS333129413832273551
Week: 0 — Abnormal, CS020020200
Week: 52 — Normal577367585755645966
Week: 52 — Abnormal, NCS251818312921282640
Week: 52 — Abnormal, CS002011010
SecondaryChange in Pulse

Change from baseline (week 0) in pulse rate was evaluated at week 52. Analysis of observed data using a mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) with treatment, region and sex as factors and baseline pulse as covariate, all nested within visit. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period which was defined as the period from first trial product administration to last trial product administration.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 52
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Beats per minute
Change in Pulse
Beats per minuteSemaglutide 0.05 mgSemaglutide 0.1 mgSemaglutide 0.2 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mgSemaglutide 0.4 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mg (Fast Escalation)Semaglutide 0.4 mg (Fast Escalation)Liraglutide 3.0 mgPlacebo Pool
Change in Pulse-0.33 ± 0.883.46 ± 0.831.88 ± 0.842.38 ± 0.832.54 ± 0.852.34 ± 0.892.15 ± 0.822.63 ± 0.84-0.86 ± 0.76
SecondaryChange in Haematology: Haemoglobin

Change from baseline (week 0) in haemoglobin was evaluated at week 52. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period which was defined as the period from first trial product administration to last trial product administration.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 52
Reported as:
Mean · Millimoles per litre (mmol/L)
Change in Haematology: Haemoglobin
Millimoles per litre (mmol/L)Semaglutide 0.05 mgSemaglutide 0.1 mgSemaglutide 0.2 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mgSemaglutide 0.4 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mg (Fast Escalation)Semaglutide 0.4 mg (Fast Escalation)Liraglutide 3.0 mgPlacebo Pool
Change in Haematology: Haemoglobin0.01 ± 0.48-0.08 ± 0.65-0.02 ± 0.47-0.07 ± 0.510.00 ± 0.50-0.07 ± 0.470.02 ± 0.470.11 ± 0.48-0.01 ± 0.45
SecondaryChange in Haematology: Haematocrit

Change from baseline (week 0) in haematocrit was evaluated at week 52. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period which was defined as the period from first trial product administration to last trial product administration.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 52
Reported as:
Mean · Percentage of red blood cells
Change in Haematology: Haematocrit
Percentage of red blood cellsSemaglutide 0.05 mgSemaglutide 0.1 mgSemaglutide 0.2 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mgSemaglutide 0.4 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mg (Fast Escalation)Semaglutide 0.4 mg (Fast Escalation)Liraglutide 3.0 mgPlacebo Pool
Change in Haematology: Haematocrit-0.25 ± 2.48-0.58 ± 3.28-0.42 ± 2.26-0.49 ± 2.67-0.31 ± 2.75-0.68 ± 2.82-0.15 ± 2.670.26 ± 2.700.26 ± 2.44
SecondaryChange in Haematology: Thrombocytes, Leucocytes and Differential Count

Change from baseline (week 0) in haematological parameters, "thrombocytes, leucocytes and differential cell count (eosinophils, neutrophils, basophils, monocytes and lymphocytes)" were evaluated at week 52. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period which was defined as the period from first trial product administration to last trial product administration.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 52
Reported as:
Mean · 10^9 cells/litre (L)
Change in Haematology: Thrombocytes, Leucocytes and Differential Count
10^9 cells/litre (L)Semaglutide 0.05 mgSemaglutide 0.1 mgSemaglutide 0.2 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mgSemaglutide 0.4 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mg (Fast Escalation)Semaglutide 0.4 mg (Fast Escalation)Liraglutide 3.0 mgPlacebo Pool
Thrombocytes-2.08 ± 35.262.95 ± 43.02-8.17 ± 42.592.79 ± 41.28-0.52 ± 39.59-5.76 ± 53.41-3.32 ± 45.024.83 ± 37.70-6.11 ± 39.11
Leucocytes-0.47 ± 1.38-0.24 ± 1.44-0.23 ± 1.81-0.50 ± 1.42-0.68 ± 1.41-0.66 ± 1.90-0.40 ± 1.43-0.17 ± 1.41-0.44 ± 1.62
Eosinophils0.02 ± 0.110.02 ± 0.16-0.01 ± 0.09-0.02 ± 0.130.00 ± 0.080.01 ± 0.09-0.01 ± 0.080.01 ± 0.100.00 ± 0.08
Neutrophils-0.36 ± 1.17-0.07 ± 1.22-0.05 ± 1.62-0.22 ± 1.24-0.51 ± 1.27-0.57 ± 1.76-0.23 ± 1.19-0.12 ± 1.11-0.33 ± 1.28
Basophils0.00 ± 0.03-0.00 ± 0.04-0.00 ± 0.03-0.01 ± 0.03-0.00 ± 0.03-0.01 ± 0.040.00 ± 0.04-0.00 ± 0.040.00 ± 0.04
Monocytes-0.04 ± 0.18-0.04 ± 0.120.01 ± 0.12-0.02 ± 0.10-0.02 ± 0.12-0.01 ± 0.13-0.03 ± 0.11-0.01 ± 0.14-0.02 ± 0.11
Lymphocytes-0.10 ± 0.36-0.16 ± 0.46-0.17 ± 0.38-0.24 ± 0.50-0.15 ± 0.36-0.08 ± 0.41-0.14 ± 0.37-0.06 ± 0.42-0.09 ± 0.66
SecondaryChange in Haematology: Erythrocytes

Change from baseline (week 0) in erythrocytes was evaluated at week 52. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period which was defined as the period from first trial product administration to last trial product administration.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 52
Reported as:
Mean · 10^12 cells/litre (L)
Change in Haematology: Erythrocytes
10^12 cells/litre (L)Semaglutide 0.05 mgSemaglutide 0.1 mgSemaglutide 0.2 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mgSemaglutide 0.4 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mg (Fast Escalation)Semaglutide 0.4 mg (Fast Escalation)Liraglutide 3.0 mgPlacebo Pool
Change in Haematology: Erythrocytes-0.01 ± 0.26-0.06 ± 0.35-0.03 ± 0.27-0.04 ± 0.25-0.01 ± 0.29-0.04 ± 0.24-0.01 ± 0.270.05 ± 0.300.04 ± 0.24
SecondaryChange in Biochemistry: Creatinine and Bilirubin (Total)

Change from baseline (week 0) in biochemistry parameters, "creatinine and bilirubin (total)" were evaluated at week 52. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period which was defined as the period from first trial product administration to last trial product administration.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 52
Reported as:
Mean · Micromole/litre (umol/L)
Change in Biochemistry: Creatinine and Bilirubin (Total)
Micromole/litre (umol/L)Semaglutide 0.05 mgSemaglutide 0.1 mgSemaglutide 0.2 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mgSemaglutide 0.4 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mg (Fast Escalation)Semaglutide 0.4 mg (Fast Escalation)Liraglutide 3.0 mgPlacebo Pool
Creatinine-1.14 ± 6.53-0.85 ± 7.59-1.09 ± 6.110.76 ± 8.111.48 ± 29.731.05 ± 8.45-2.10 ± 8.49-0.81 ± 7.160.28 ± 8.06
Bilirubin (total)0.30 ± 3.701.12 ± 3.601.59 ± 3.111.33 ± 3.611.23 ± 5.181.02 ± 4.041.67 ± 4.281.02 ± 3.671.09 ± 4.45
SecondaryChange in Biochemistry: Creatinine Kinase, Amylase, Lipase, ALT, AST and ALP

Change from baseline (week 0) in biochemistry parameters, "creatinine kinase, amylase, lipase, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP)" were evaluated at week 52. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period which was defined as the period from first trial product administration to last trial product administration.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 52
Reported as:
Mean · Unit/litre (U/L)
Change in Biochemistry: Creatinine Kinase, Amylase, Lipase, ALT, AST and ALP
Unit/litre (U/L)Semaglutide 0.05 mgSemaglutide 0.1 mgSemaglutide 0.2 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mgSemaglutide 0.4 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mg (Fast Escalation)Semaglutide 0.4 mg (Fast Escalation)Liraglutide 3.0 mgPlacebo Pool
Creatinine kinase0.53 ± 68.43-44.75 ± 266.88-13.20 ± 44.33-46.34 ± 163.09-29.91 ± 95.05-8.86 ± 47.28-28.08 ± 122.61-3.09 ± 172.4653.36 ± 571.63
Amylase3.35 ± 13.824.84 ± 13.059.20 ± 12.727.53 ± 13.947.67 ± 16.268.39 ± 20.287.78 ± 14.827.12 ± 15.723.41 ± 12.27
Lipase5.62 ± 32.228.83 ± 28.1017.55 ± 41.2013.28 ± 34.8613.33 ± 17.9214.92 ± 44.3115.09 ± 36.2811.86 ± 27.481.63 ± 11.57
ALT-5.82 ± 20.97-5.45 ± 12.64-7.44 ± 17.14-9.15 ± 23.09-3.64 ± 11.30-9.07 ± 20.96-7.17 ± 12.62-2.95 ± 14.19-3.03 ± 11.91
AST-1.08 ± 12.17-1.99 ± 7.95-2.33 ± 7.61-3.32 ± 10.22-2.07 ± 6.70-1.62 ± 10.78-2.73 ± 6.10-1.48 ± 10.130.00 ± 11.08
ALP-3.42 ± 13.04-3.44 ± 16.00-6.21 ± 10.96-6.70 ± 13.89-4.25 ± 12.65-3.50 ± 15.61-8.20 ± 14.13-0.52 ± 9.80-1.46 ± 11.39
SecondaryChange in Biochemistry: Urea, Sodium, Potassium and Calcium (Total)

Change from baseline (week 0) in biochemistry parameters, "urea, sodium, potassium and calcium (total)" were evaluated at week 52. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period which was defined as the period from first trial product administration to last trial product administration.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 52
Reported as:
Mean · Millimole/litre (mmol/L)
Change in Biochemistry: Urea, Sodium, Potassium and Calcium (Total)
Millimole/litre (mmol/L)Semaglutide 0.05 mgSemaglutide 0.1 mgSemaglutide 0.2 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mgSemaglutide 0.4 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mg (Fast Escalation)Semaglutide 0.4 mg (Fast Escalation)Liraglutide 3.0 mgPlacebo Pool
Urea-0.04 ± 1.060.16 ± 1.26-0.01 ± 1.21-0.10 ± 1.25-0.00 ± 1.88-0.06 ± 1.33-0.33 ± 1.120.03 ± 1.060.21 ± 1.21
Sodium-0.18 ± 2.47-0.27 ± 1.77-0.40 ± 2.41-0.82 ± 2.36-0.92 ± 2.62-0.76 ± 3.49-0.74 ± 2.71-0.37 ± 2.08-0.35 ± 2.08
Potassium0.01 ± 0.300.01 ± 0.38-0.00 ± 0.31-0.04 ± 0.36-0.10 ± 0.410.00 ± 0.36-0.11 ± 0.44-0.02 ± 0.35-0.04 ± 0.36
Calcium (total)0.01 ± 0.07-0.01 ± 0.090.01 ± 0.080.01 ± 0.080.00 ± 0.09-0.00 ± 0.080.00 ± 0.090.02 ± 0.08-0.00 ± 0.08
SecondaryChange in Biochemistry: Albumin

Change from baseline (week 0) in albumin was evaluated at week 52. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period which was defined as the period from first trial product administration to last trial product administration.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 52
Reported as:
Mean · Gram/decilitre (g/dL)
Change in Biochemistry: Albumin
Gram/decilitre (g/dL)Semaglutide 0.05 mgSemaglutide 0.1 mgSemaglutide 0.2 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mgSemaglutide 0.4 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mg (Fast Escalation)Semaglutide 0.4 mg (Fast Escalation)Liraglutide 3.0 mgPlacebo Pool
Change in Biochemistry: Albumin0.03 ± 0.180.01 ± 0.210.07 ± 0.200.05 ± 0.210.03 ± 0.220.01 ± 0.210.02 ± 0.230.06 ± 0.180.04 ± 0.20
SecondaryChange in Biochemistry: Calcitonin

Change from baseline (week 0) in calcitonin was evaluated at week 52. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period which was defined as the period from first trial product administration to last trial product administration.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 52
Reported as:
Mean · Nanogram/litre (ng/L)
Change in Biochemistry: Calcitonin
Nanogram/litre (ng/L)Semaglutide 0.05 mgSemaglutide 0.1 mgSemaglutide 0.2 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mgSemaglutide 0.4 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mg (Fast Escalation)Semaglutide 0.4 mg (Fast Escalation)Liraglutide 3.0 mgPlacebo Pool
Change in Biochemistry: Calcitonin0.08 ± 0.710.03 ± 1.070.04 ± 0.440.04 ± 0.180.17 ± 0.79-0.01 ± 0.730.20 ± 0.720.29 ± 1.27-0.12 ± 2.16
SecondaryChange in Biochemistry: TSH

Change from baseline (week 0) in thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) was evaluated at week 52. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period which was defined as the period from first trial product administration to last trial product administration.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 52
Reported as:
Mean · Milli-international units/litre (mIU/L)
Change in Biochemistry: TSH
Milli-international units/litre (mIU/L)Semaglutide 0.05 mgSemaglutide 0.1 mgSemaglutide 0.2 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mgSemaglutide 0.4 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mg (Fast Escalation)Semaglutide 0.4 mg (Fast Escalation)Liraglutide 3.0 mgPlacebo Pool
Change in Biochemistry: TSH-0.31 ± 1.62-0.10 ± 1.10-0.22 ± 0.85-0.18 ± 1.04-0.10 ± 0.96-0.12 ± 0.84-0.43 ± 1.010.02 ± 0.88-0.07 ± 0.97
SecondaryChange in Mental Health Assessed by C-SSRS

Presented results are the number of participants with Columbia Suicidality Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) results recorded during baseline (week 0) and post baseline (week 4-52) visits. For classification of the events reported on the C-SSRS, the following categories were used: 1) Suicidal ideation, 2) Suicidal behaviour and 3) Non-suicidal self-injurious behaviour. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period which was defined as the period from first trial product administration to last trial product administration.

Time frame:
Week 0 and Week 4-59
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Change in Mental Health Assessed by C-SSRS
ParticipantsSemaglutide 0.05 mgSemaglutide 0.1 mgSemaglutide 0.2 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mgSemaglutide 0.4 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mg (Fast Escalation)Semaglutide 0.4 mg (Fast Escalation)Liraglutide 3.0 mgPlacebo Pool
Wk 0: Suicidal ideation001210000
Wk 0: Suicidal behaviour000100000
Wk 0: Non-suicidal self-injurious behaviour000000000
Wk 4-59: Suicidal ideation101200021
Wk 4-59: Suicidal behaviour000000000
Wk 4-59: Non-suicidal self-injurious behaviour000000000
SecondaryChange in Mental Health Assessed by PHQ-9

Patient health questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) was recorded at baseline (week 0) and week 52. The PHQ-9 questionnaire is a 9-item depression module included in the patient health questionnaire, a self-administered diagnostic tool used for assessment of mental disorders. On the PHQ-9, the participant rates the frequency of 9 items on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). The PHQ-9 total score ranges from 0-27; total scores of 1-4 represent no depression, total scores of 5-9 represent mild depression, total scores of 10-14 represent moderate depression, total scores of 15-19 represent moderately severe depression and total scores of 20-27 represent severe depression. Results are based on the on-treatment observation period which was defined as the period from first trial product administration to last trial product administration.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 52
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a scale
Change in Mental Health Assessed by PHQ-9
Score on a scaleSemaglutide 0.05 mgSemaglutide 0.1 mgSemaglutide 0.2 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mgSemaglutide 0.4 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mg (Fast Escalation)Semaglutide 0.4 mg (Fast Escalation)Liraglutide 3.0 mgPlacebo Pool
Week 02.5 ± 3.41.7 ± 2.12.1 ± 2.61.5 ± 1.92.5 ± 2.91.7 ± 2.62.0 ± 2.22.0 ± 2.52.5 ± 3.1
Week 521.5 ± 2.21.1 ± 1.81.3 ± 2.01.1 ± 1.71.0 ± 1.81.1 ± 1.40.9 ± 1.61.3 ± 2.01.7 ± 2.6
SecondaryAnti-semaglutide Antibodies During and After Treatment

Participants were tested for anti-semaglutide antibodies from week 0 (post treatment) to week 52 (at weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52). This outcome measure is applicable only for the semaglutide treatment arms.

Time frame:
Week 0-52
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Anti-semaglutide Antibodies During and After Treatment
ParticipantsSemaglutide 0.05 mgSemaglutide 0.1 mgSemaglutide 0.2 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mgSemaglutide 0.4 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mg (Fast Escalation)Semaglutide 0.4 mg (Fast Escalation)
Anti-semaglutide Antibodies During and After Treatment0000000

Adverse events

Collected over Week 0 up to Week 59 (treatment period: week 0 to week 52 + follow-up period: week 53 to week 59).. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Semaglutide 0.05 mg0/103 (0%)13/103 (12.6%)83/103 (80.6%)
Semaglutide 0.1 mg0/102 (0%)8/102 (7.8%)87/102 (85.3%)
Semaglutide 0.2 mg0/103 (0%)5/103 (4.9%)84/103 (81.6%)
Semaglutide 0.3 mg0/103 (0%)6/103 (5.8%)85/103 (82.5%)
Semaglutide 0.4 mg0/102 (0%)13/102 (12.7%)90/102 (88.2%)
Semaglutide 0.3 mg (Fast Escalation)0/102 (0%)6/102 (5.9%)91/102 (89.2%)
Semaglutide 0.4 mg (Fast Escalation)1/103 (1%)7/103 (6.8%)88/103 (85.4%)
Liraglutide 3.0 mg0/103 (0%)4/103 (3.9%)83/103 (80.6%)
Placebo Pool0/136 (0%)11/136 (8.1%)87/136 (64%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 78
Most frequent serious events
EventSemaglutide 0.05 mgSemaglutide 0.1 mgSemaglutide 0.2 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mgSemaglutide 0.4 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mg (Fast Escalation)Semaglutide 0.4 mg (Fast Escalation)Liraglutide 3.0 mgPlacebo Pool
CholelithiasisHepatobiliary disorders0/1030/1021/1030/1031/1023/1021/1030/1030/136
OsteoarthritisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders3/1030/1020/1031/1030/1020/1020/1030/1030/136
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/1032/1020/1031/1030/1020/1020/1030/1030/136
Pancreatitis acuteGastrointestinal disorders0/1030/1020/1030/1030/1022/1020/1030/1030/136
ObesityMetabolism and nutrition disorders0/1030/1020/1030/1030/1020/1020/1030/1032/136
Acute kidney injuryRenal and urinary disorders0/1030/1020/1030/1031/1020/1020/1030/1030/136
Angina pectorisCardiac disorders0/1030/1020/1030/1031/1020/1020/1030/1030/136
Angina unstableCardiac disorders0/1030/1020/1030/1031/1020/1020/1030/1030/136
Cauda equina syndromeNervous system disorders0/1030/1020/1030/1031/1020/1020/1030/1030/136
CellulitisInfections and infestations1/1031/1020/1030/1030/1020/1020/1030/1031/136
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 36
Most frequent other events
EventSemaglutide 0.05 mgSemaglutide 0.1 mgSemaglutide 0.2 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mgSemaglutide 0.4 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mg (Fast Escalation)Semaglutide 0.4 mg (Fast Escalation)Liraglutide 3.0 mgPlacebo Pool
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders32/10342/10245/10343/10349/10255/10250/10346/10324/136
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders20/10325/10235/10327/10338/10228/10228/10329/10316/136
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders13/10322/10226/10318/10324/10219/10229/10324/1036/136
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders8/10318/10224/10311/10317/10221/10223/10311/1036/136
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations16/10323/10219/10315/10319/10216/10220/10316/10316/136
HeadacheNervous system disorders7/10315/10210/10310/10320/10214/10211/10315/10315/136
Decreased appetiteMetabolism and nutrition disorders8/10317/10213/10313/10314/10218/10220/10312/1035/136
EructationGastrointestinal disorders4/1038/10214/1038/1037/10217/10210/1036/1031/136
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders5/1033/10216/1038/1039/1028/1025/1034/1033/136
DyspepsiaGastrointestinal disorders3/1038/1026/10314/10314/10215/10213/1038/1034/136

Baseline characteristics

Overall number of baseline participants = full analysis set (FAS) which included all randomised participants. Number Analyzed = number of participants with available data.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)Semaglutide 0.05 mgSemaglutide 0.1 mgSemaglutide 0.2 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mgSemaglutide 0.4 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mg (Fast Escalation)Semaglutide 0.4 mg (Fast Escalation)Liraglutide 3.0 mgPlacebo PoolTotal
Mean46.97 ± 12.8045.24 ± 12.6244.37 ± 11.2446.73 ± 12.0248.37 ± 13.4447.10 ± 12.0546.07 ± 13.5148.50 ± 11.2246.42 ± 12.8046.63 ± 12.46
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Semaglutide 0.05 mgSemaglutide 0.1 mgSemaglutide 0.2 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mgSemaglutide 0.4 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mg (Fast Escalation)Semaglutide 0.4 mg (Fast Escalation)Liraglutide 3.0 mgPlacebo PoolTotal
Female676666666666676788619
Male363637373636363648338
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Semaglutide 0.05 mgSemaglutide 0.1 mgSemaglutide 0.2 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mgSemaglutide 0.4 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mg (Fast Escalation)Semaglutide 0.4 mg (Fast Escalation)Liraglutide 3.0 mgPlacebo PoolTotal
White887672747176687897700
Black or African American57103100791061
Asian2010031119
American Indian or Alaska Native0001101014
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0100001013
Other0103110129
Not applicable81720221922251424171
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Semaglutide 0.05 mgSemaglutide 0.1 mgSemaglutide 0.2 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mgSemaglutide 0.4 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mg (Fast Escalation)Semaglutide 0.4 mg (Fast Escalation)Liraglutide 3.0 mgPlacebo PoolTotal
Hispanic or Latino376134636755
Not Hispanic or Latino9686937990829193117827
Not applicable49411814941275
Body weight
Body weight(Kilogram (Kg))Semaglutide 0.05 mgSemaglutide 0.1 mgSemaglutide 0.2 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mgSemaglutide 0.4 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mg (Fast Escalation)Semaglutide 0.4 mg (Fast Escalation)Liraglutide 3.0 mgPlacebo PoolTotal
Mean111.29 ± 23.17111.31 ± 21.47114.49 ± 24.53111.51 ± 22.96113.20 ± 26.42108.11 ± 22.08109.56 ± 21.33108.71 ± 21.94114.19 ± 25.37111.48 ± 23.39
Glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c)
Glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c)(Percentage (%) of HbA1c)Semaglutide 0.05 mgSemaglutide 0.1 mgSemaglutide 0.2 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mgSemaglutide 0.4 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mg (Fast Escalation)Semaglutide 0.4 mg (Fast Escalation)Liraglutide 3.0 mgPlacebo PoolTotal
Mean5.51 ± 0.355.45 ± 0.435.41 ± 0.395.51 ± 0.385.47 ± 0.425.48 ± 0.415.49 ± 0.425.53 ± 0.385.54 ± 0.385.49 ± 0.40
Fasting plasma glucose (FPG)
Fasting plasma glucose (FPG)(Millimoles per litre (mmol/L))Semaglutide 0.05 mgSemaglutide 0.1 mgSemaglutide 0.2 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mgSemaglutide 0.4 mgSemaglutide 0.3 mg (Fast Escalation)Semaglutide 0.4 mg (Fast Escalation)Liraglutide 3.0 mgPlacebo PoolTotal
Mean5.48 ± 0.645.48 ± 0.555.41 ± 0.775.48 ± 0.735.40 ± 0.675.43 ± 0.645.54 ± 0.875.55 ± 0.735.50 ± 0.625.48 ± 0.69
08

Study locations

74 sites
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Anaheim, California 92801, United States
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    San Diego, California 92108, United States
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Golden, Colorado 80401, United States
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Waterbury, Connecticut 06708, United States
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Washington, District of Columbia 20011, United States
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Crystal River, Florida 34429, United States
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Jacksonville, Florida 32205, United States
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Jacksonville, Florida 32216, United States
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Plantation, Florida 33324, United States
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Elkridge, Maryland 21075-6437, United States
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Rochester, New York 14609, United States
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45219, United States
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Wadsworth, Ohio 44281, United States
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Portland, Oregon 97239, United States
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Charleston, South Carolina 29425, United States
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Greer, South Carolina 29651, United States
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Bristol, Tennessee 37620-7352, United States
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Dallas, Texas 75251, United States
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Round Rock, Texas 78681, United States
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Sugar Land, Texas 77479, United States
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Arlington, Virginia 22206, United States
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Richmond, Virginia 23294, United States
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Camperdown, New South Wales 2050, Australia
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Merewether, New South Wales 2291, Australia
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    St Leonards, New South Wales 2065, Australia
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Heidelberg Heights, Victoria 3081, Australia
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Bruxelles, 1200, Belgium
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Edegem, 2650, Belgium
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Leuven, 3000, Belgium
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Liège, 4000, Belgium
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Mons, 7000, Belgium
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Calgary, Alberta T2V 4J2, Canada
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Surrey, British Columbia V3S 2N6, Canada
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Moncton, New Brunswick E1G 1A7, Canada
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 2Y9, Canada
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Hamilton, Ontario L8L 5G8, Canada
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Hamilton, Ontario L8M 1K7, Canada
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Toronto, Ontario M4P 1P2, Canada
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Montreal, Quebec H4N 2W2, Canada
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Quebec, G1V 4G2, Canada
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Dresden, 01219, Germany
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Dresden, 01307, Germany
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Duisburg, 47051, Germany
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Leipzig, 04103, Germany
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Saint Ingbert-Oberwürzbach, 66386, Germany
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Stuttgart, 70378, Germany
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Wangen, 88239, Germany
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Haifa, 31096, Israel
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Jerusalem, 91120, Israel
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Kfar-Saba, 44281, Israel
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Petah-Tikva, 49100, Israel
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Petah-Tikva, 49372, Israel
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Tel Hashomer, 52621, Israel
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Tel-Aviv, 64239, Israel
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Moscow, 101990, Russian Federation
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Moscow, 109240, Russian Federation
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Moscow, 115478, Russian Federation
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Moscow, 117036, Russian Federation
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Novosibirsk, 630047, Russian Federation
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Penza, 440026, Russian Federation
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Saint-Petersburg, 191015, Russian Federation
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Tumen, 625023, Russian Federation
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Voronezh, 394018, Russian Federation
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Yaroslavl, 150003, Russian Federation
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Yaroslavl, 150062, Russian Federation
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Bristol, BS10 5NB, United Kingdom
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Glasgow, G31 2ER, United Kingdom
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Liverpool, L9 7AL, United Kingdom
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    London, SE1 9RT, United Kingdom
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Luton, LU4 0DZ, United Kingdom
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Norwich, NR4 7TJ, United Kingdom
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Rotherham, S651DA, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Kolotkin RL, Williams VSL, Ervin CM, Williams N, Meincke HH, Qin S, von Huth Smith L, Fehnel SE. Validation of a new measure of quality of life in obesity trials: Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite Clinical Trials Version. Clin Obes. 2019 Jun;9(3):e12310. doi: 10.1111/cob.12310. Epub 2019 Apr 16. PubMed 30993900 ↗
  • O'Neil PM, Birkenfeld AL, McGowan B, Mosenzon O, Pedersen SD, Wharton S, Carson CG, Jepsen CH, Kabisch M, Wilding JPH. Efficacy and safety of semaglutide compared with liraglutide and placebo for weight loss in patients with obesity: a randomised, double-blind, placebo and active controlled, dose-ranging, phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2018 Aug 25;392(10148):637-649. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31773-2. Epub 2018 Aug 16. PubMed 30122305 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Oct 24, 2017
  • Statistical analysis plan · Oct 24, 2017

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 17, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02453711
Lead sponsor
Novo Nordisk A/S
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 25, 2015
Start date
Oct 1, 2015
Primary completion
Mar 30, 2017
Completion
Apr 12, 2017
Results posted
Apr 17, 2020
Last update
Apr 17, 2020

Study contacts

Global Clinical Registry (GCR, 1452)
study director · Novo Nordisk A/S

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion