CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02451917Updated Dec 20, 2017Results posted

Glargine Versus NPH in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease

A Phase 4 interventional study of Glargine insulin and NPH insulin in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Chronic Kidney Disease, sponsored by University of Sao Paulo General Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Brazil. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-12-20.

Sponsored by University of Sao Paulo General Hospital · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
34
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is one of the most common microvascular complications of diabetes mellitus, and it is the leading cause of end stage renal disease on developed countries. The CKD diagnosis and its progression require re-evaluation of hypoglycemic therapy and constant dosing adjustments, in order to optimize glycemic control and minimize its side effects. Long acting insulin analogs and its pharmacokinetics have not been studied through different stages of kidney disease and there is no consensus defining the appropriate dosing adjustment based on the glomerular filtration rate (GFR). This research project will compare the glycemic response to intensive insulin treatment with NPH insulin and basal insulin analog (insulin glargine) in type 2 diabetes (DM 2) patients with CKD stages 3 and 4. Patients and methods - Inclusion Criteria: DM 2 patients with CKD secondary to diabetic nephropathy and GFR of 15-59 ml/min/1.73m². Exclusion Criteria: Patients with systemic neoplasia, HIV, CKD or nephropathy from other etiologies, severe psychiatric disorders and pregnant women. Study design: This study consists of a randomized, cross-over, open-label controlled clinical trial. Patients will be randomly divided into two groups: GROUP 1 - insulin analog glargine once a day and GROUP 2 - NPH human insulin, three applications per day, both group will be treated with insulin lispro at mealtime. The laboratory tests will be performed at baseline and 12, 24, 36 and 48 weeks after the study start. During routine medical appointments will be analyzed self- monitoring of capillary blood glucose (SMBG) and the hypoglycemia score. After 24 weeks the basal insulin will be changed, i.e. patients using NPH insulin will receive insulin glargine and patients on insulin glargine will be changed to NPH insulin. A CGMS will be carried out at 24 and 48 weeks. Methodology: The metabolic profile will be evaluated throughout SMBG; biochemical, hormonal and hematological measurements; hypoglycemia score and CGMS. Statistical analysis will be performed using comparative descriptive analyzes, such as chi-square distribution, t-test and non-parametric tests. Analyze of data CGMS will include the area under the curve and the related statistic. Finally, logistic regression models will be adopted to evaluate the effect of the treatment on the several variables in question.

Read the detailed description

This study consists of a randomized, cross-over, open-label controlled clinical trial. Randomized patients will be allocated alternately into two groups to receive the following therapies: GROUP 1 - insulin analog glargine once a day associated to insulin lispro at mealtime and GROUP 2 - NPH human insulin, three applications per day ( breakfast, lunch and bedtime) and insulin lispro at mealtime. Patients receiving insulin NPH plus insulin lispro will be oriented to mix both of them in the same syringe at breakfast and lunchtime. The laboratory tests will be performed at baseline and 12, 24, 36 and 48 weeks after the study start. During routine medical appointments the patient should bring the self- monitoring of capillary blood glucose (SMBG), eight points per day once a week, and hypoglycemia score.

After 24 weeks of insulin therapy, a continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) will be implemented for three days, and after that, the basal insulin changed i.e. patients using NPH insulin will receive insulin glargine and patients on insulin glargine will be changed to NPH insulin, both groups will keep insulin lispro before meals. A new CGMS will be carried out 24 weeks after therapy has been changed. Methodology: The metabolic profile will be evaluated throughout SMBG; biochemical, hormonal and hematological measurements; hypoglycemia score and CGMS (Medtronic/Northridge, CA). All randomized patients who use at least one dose of any study treatment will be considered in the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. The initial plan is to randomize 40 patients, assuming a drop-out rate of 15%, to obtain a sample size of at least 34 randomized patients. .Statistical analysis will be performed using comparative descriptive analyzes, such as chi-square distribution, t-test and non-parametric tests. Analyze of data CGMS will include the area under the curve and the related statistic. Finally, logistic regression models will be adopted to evaluate the effect of the treatment on the several variables in question.

02

Conditions studied

  • Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
  • Chronic Kidney Disease

Keywords

  • Glargine insulin
  • Chronic Kidney Disease
  • CGMS
03

In context

Kidney Diseases

3,840 studies on the registry are indexed under Kidney Diseases; 500 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 34 is below the median of 70 across 2,640 interventional studies indexed under Kidney Diseases.

Browse Kidney Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Sao Paulo General Hospital is the lead sponsor of 595 studies on the registry; 98 are open to participants now.

Of its 8 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease secondary to diabetic nephropathy in stages 3 and 4 (moderate and severe nephropathy, corresponding to glomerular filtration rate of 15-59 ml/min/1.73m²) will be included in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with systemic neoplasias,
  • HIV, chronic kidney disease or nephropathy from other etiologies,
  • severe psychiatric disorders
  • pregnant women.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
34 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Glargine insulin

    This is an open-label, randomized, two-way crossover study , one is IGlar/INPH treatment sequence and, another is INPH/IGlar sequence. Wherein, IGlar refers to glargine insulin and INPH refers to NPH insulin. At the end of the study, all data acquired during the use of insulin glargine, regardless of the sequence were grouped as glargine.

    Drug: Glargine insulin

  • Active comparator
    NPH insulin

    This is an open-label, randomized, two-way crossover study , one is IGlar/INPH treatment sequence and, another is INPH/IGlar sequence. Wherein, IGlar refers to glargine insulin and INPH refers to NPH insulin. At the end of the study, all data acquired during the use of NPH insulin, regardless of the sequence were grouped as NPH.

    Drug: NPH insulin

Interventions

  • DrugGlargine insulin

    The initial insulin dose for those randomized to IGlar was 80% of the total daily NPH dose that was being discontinued. All of them had pre-prandial Regular insulin switched to Lispro insulin (Humalog™, Lilly, Brazil), at the same dose as in use previously. After 24 weeks, basal insulins were switched; in other words, individuals on IGlar in the first period switched to INPH, and the doses of pre-meal insulin were sustained

    Also known as: Lantus insulin ™, Sanofi-Aventis, Brazil

  • DrugNPH insulin

    The same total daily NPH insulin dose was maintained for those randomized to INPH. All of them had pre-prandial Regular insulin (Humulin R™, Lilly, Brazil) switched to Lispro insulin (Humalog™, Lilly, Brazil), at the same dose as in use previously. . After 24 weeks, basal insulins were switched; in other words, individuals on NPH in the first period switched to glargine insulin, and the doses of pre-meal insulin were sustained.

    Also known as: Humulin N™, Lilly, Brazil

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Difference in A1c Levels

    A1c using high performance liquid chromatography measured in percentage

    Time frame: baseline and 24 weeks

  2. Number of Hypoglycemic Events

    Hypoglycemia was defined by capillary glycemia\< 70 mg/dL (3.9 mmol/L), even if it was not accompanied by typical symptoms. Otherwise, hypoglycemia was classified as "severe" with SMBG below 50 mg/dL (2.8 mmol/L) or when it resulted in stupor, seizure, or unconsciousness that precluded self-treatment, thus requiring the assistance of another individual. Nocturnal events were defined as SMBG \< 70mg/dL occurring after midnight and before wake-up in the morning (before 7:00am)12.

    Time frame: between 1rst and 24 weeks of each treatment arm

Other outcomes

  1. Glycemic Variability

    In order to observe variability in interstitial glucose levels related to the therapy in use, participants wore a blinded CGM for 3 days. Changes in glycemic patterns were expressed by the average daily time spent in hypoglycemia (≤70 mg/dL or \<3.9 mmol/L), hyperglycemia (\>180 mg/dL or \>10 mmol/L) and euglycemia (70-180 mg/dL or 3.9-10 mmol/L).

    Time frame: 24 week

  2. Total Daily Insulin Dose

    Daily total insulin dose at baseline compared to dose at week 24.

    Time frame: baseline and 24 weeks

  3. Body Mass Index (BMI)

    The BMI is defined as the body mass divided by the square of the body height, and is universally expressed in units of kg/m2, resulting from mass in kilograms and height in metres.

    Time frame: baseline and 24 weeks

  4. Serum Creatinine

    Creatinine is measured in milligrams per deciliter of blood (mg/dL

    Time frame: baseline and 24 weeks

  5. Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) Calculated by CKD-EPI

    Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation is one of the most widely used IDMS traceable equations for estimating GFR in patients age 18 and over. CKD-EPI equation includes variables for age, gender, and race, which may allow providers to observe that CKD is present despite a serum creatinine concentration that appears to fall within or just above the normal reference interval. CKD-EPI equation expressed as a single equation: GFR = 141 × min (Scr /κ, 1)α × max(Scr /κ, 1)-1.209 × 0.993Age × 1.018 \[if female\] × 1.159 \[if black\] where: Scr is serum creatinine in mg/dL, κ is 0.7 for females and 0.9 for males, α is -0.329 for females and -0.411 for males,min indicates the minimum of Scr /κ or 1, and max indicates the maximum of Scr /κ or 1.

    Time frame: baseline and 24 weeks

07

Results

Posted Nov 7, 2017
Limitations and caveats
The results only apply to patients with T2DM and DKD stages 3 and 4 and do not allow us to extrapolate any conclusion to those on dialysis or initial stages of DKD. The patients were randomized alternately, in accordance with the initial A1c.

Participant flow

First Intervention (24 Weeks)
Participant flow — First Intervention (24 Weeks)
MilestoneGlargine Insulin, Then NPH InsulinNPH Insulin, Then Glargine Insulin
Started1618
Completed1415
Not completed23
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up20
Withdrew: Death01
Withdrew: Adverse event02
Second Intervention (24 Weeks)
Participant flow — Second Intervention (24 Weeks)
MilestoneGlargine Insulin, Then NPH InsulinNPH Insulin, Then Glargine Insulin
Started1415
Completed1415
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryDifference in A1c Levels

A1c using high performance liquid chromatography measured in percentage

Time frame:
baseline and 24 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · percentage
Difference in A1c Levels
percentageGlargine Insulin PeriodNPH Insulin Period
Baseline8.86 ± 1.48.21 ± 1.3
24 weeks treatement7.95 ± 1.18.44 ± 1.3
Statistical analysis
  • Glargine Insulin Period vs NPH Insulin Period · ANOVA · p = 0.00045 (The intention-to-treat population consisted of all randomized participants.)
PrimaryNumber of Hypoglycemic Events

Hypoglycemia was defined by capillary glycemia\< 70 mg/dL (3.9 mmol/L), even if it was not accompanied by typical symptoms. Otherwise, hypoglycemia was classified as "severe" with SMBG below 50 mg/dL (2.8 mmol/L) or when it resulted in stupor, seizure, or unconsciousness that precluded self-treatment, thus requiring the assistance of another individual. Nocturnal events were defined as SMBG \< 70mg/dL occurring after midnight and before wake-up in the morning (before 7:00am)12.

Time frame:
between 1rst and 24 weeks of each treatment arm
Reported as:
Mean · events per patients during 24 weeks
Number of Hypoglycemic Events
events per patients during 24 weeksGlargine Insulin PeriodNPH Insulin Period
total hypoglycemic events4.87 ± 5.396.34 ± 9.37
nocturnal hypoglycemias0.52 ± 1.031.52 ± 2.54
Statistical analysis
  • Glargine Insulin Period vs NPH Insulin Period · ANOVA · p = 0.35 (Analysis of covariance (ANOVA) model - total hypoglycemic events per patient during 24 weeks) · Number of total events per patient: 0The calculated value for the estimation parameter was zero, since the best treatment option for those with diabetes is reach a good glycemic control without hypoglycemia.
  • Glargine Insulin Period vs NPH Insulin Period · ANOVA · p = 0.047 (Analysis of covariance (ANOVA) model - number of nocturnal hypoglycemic events per patient during 24 weeks) · Number of nocturnal events per patient: 0The calculated value for the estimation parameter was zero, since the best treatment option for those with diabetes is reach a good glycemic control without hypoglycemia.
Other pre-specifiedGlycemic Variability

In order to observe variability in interstitial glucose levels related to the therapy in use, participants wore a blinded CGM for 3 days. Changes in glycemic patterns were expressed by the average daily time spent in hypoglycemia (≤70 mg/dL or \<3.9 mmol/L), hyperglycemia (\>180 mg/dL or \>10 mmol/L) and euglycemia (70-180 mg/dL or 3.9-10 mmol/L).

Time frame:
24 week
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of time
Glycemic Variability
percentage of timeGlargine Insulin PeriodNPH Insulin Period
hyperglycemia30 ± 1938 ± 19
normoglycemia67 ± 1959 ± 19
hypoglycemia3 ± 63 ± 5
Statistical analysis
  • Glargine Insulin Period vs NPH Insulin Period · t-test, 1 sided · p = <0.05
Other pre-specifiedTotal Daily Insulin Dose

Daily total insulin dose at baseline compared to dose at week 24.

Time frame:
baseline and 24 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · units/Kg/day
Total Daily Insulin Dose
units/Kg/dayGlargine InsulinNPH Insulin
Baseline0.61 ± 0.210.63 ± 0.21
24 weeks treatment0.64 ± 0.260.64 ± 0.25
Statistical analysis
  • Glargine Insulin vs NPH Insulin · ANOVA · p = 0.668
Other pre-specifiedBody Mass Index (BMI)

The BMI is defined as the body mass divided by the square of the body height, and is universally expressed in units of kg/m2, resulting from mass in kilograms and height in metres.

Time frame:
baseline and 24 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · Kg/m²
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Kg/m²Glargine Insulin PeriodNPH Insulin Period
Baseline29.7 ± 4.730.0 ± 4.3
24 weeks treatement30.0 ± 4.330.4 ± 4.7
Statistical analysis
  • Glargine Insulin Period vs NPH Insulin Period · ANOVA · p = 0.999
Other pre-specifiedSerum Creatinine

Creatinine is measured in milligrams per deciliter of blood (mg/dL

Time frame:
baseline and 24 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dL
Serum Creatinine
mg/dLGlargine Insulin PeriodNPH Insulin Period
Baseline2.4 ± 0.72.5 ± 1.0
24 weeks treatement2.6 ± 0.82.6 ± 1.0
Statistical analysis
  • Glargine Insulin Period vs NPH Insulin Period · ANOVA · p = 0.999
Other pre-specifiedEstimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) Calculated by CKD-EPI

Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation is one of the most widely used IDMS traceable equations for estimating GFR in patients age 18 and over. CKD-EPI equation includes variables for age, gender, and race, which may allow providers to observe that CKD is present despite a serum creatinine concentration that appears to fall within or just above the normal reference interval. CKD-EPI equation expressed as a single equation: GFR = 141 × min (Scr /κ, 1)α × max(Scr /κ, 1)-1.209 × 0.993Age × 1.018 \[if female\] × 1.159 \[if black\] where: Scr is serum creatinine in mg/dL, κ is 0.7 for females and 0.9 for males, α is -0.329 for females and -0.411 for males,min indicates the minimum of Scr /κ or 1, and max indicates the maximum of Scr /κ or 1.

Time frame:
baseline and 24 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · ml/min/1.7m²
Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) Calculated by CKD-EPI
ml/min/1.7m²Glargine Insulin PeriodNPH Insulin Period
Baseline28.0 ± 9.627.4 ± 9.1
24 weeks treatement26.9 ± 10.025.9 ± 9.7
Statistical analysis
  • Glargine Insulin Period vs NPH Insulin Period · ANOVA · p = 0.994

Adverse events

Collected over 1 year. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Glargine Insulin—0/34 (0%)0/34 (0%)
NPH Insulin—2/34 (5.9%)0/34 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventGlargine InsulinNPH Insulin
Severe hypoglycemiaNervous system disorders0/342/34

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Glargine Insulin, Then NPH InsulinNPH Insulin, Then Glargine InsulinTotal
Mean62.8 ± 7.060.1 ± 8.761.4 ± 7.9
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Glargine Insulin, Then NPH InsulinNPH Insulin, Then Glargine InsulinTotal
Female4711
Male121123
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Glargine Insulin, Then NPH InsulinNPH Insulin, Then Glargine InsulinTotal
Brazil161834
Duration of Diabetes
Duration of Diabetes(years)Glargine Insulin, Then NPH InsulinNPH Insulin, Then Glargine InsulinTotal
Mean19.0 ± 11.719.2 ± 7.019.1 ± 9.4
Body weight
Body weight(kg)Glargine Insulin, Then NPH InsulinNPH Insulin, Then Glargine InsulinTotal
Mean75.4 ± 11.982.6 ± 17.479.2 ± 15.3
BMI
BMI(kg/m²)Glargine Insulin, Then NPH InsulinNPH Insulin, Then Glargine InsulinTotal
Mean28.6 ± 4.830.4 ± 4.329.6 ± 4.6
Systolic Blood Pressure
Systolic Blood Pressure(mmHg)Glargine Insulin, Then NPH InsulinNPH Insulin, Then Glargine InsulinTotal
Mean147 ± 22136 ± 18141 ± 20
Diastolic Blood Pressure
Diastolic Blood Pressure(mmHg)Glargine Insulin, Then NPH InsulinNPH Insulin, Then Glargine InsulinTotal
Mean79 ± 1275 ± 1376 ± 12
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Sao Paulo
    Sao Paulo, 05410001, Brazil
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Semlitsch T, Engler J, Siebenhofer A, Jeitler K, Berghold A, Horvath K. (Ultra-)long-acting insulin analogues versus NPH insulin (human isophane insulin) for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 9;11(11):CD005613. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005613.pub4. PubMed 33166419 ↗
  • Betonico CC, Titan SMO, Lira A, Pelaes TS, Correa-Giannella MLC, Nery M, Queiroz M. Insulin Glargine U100 Improved Glycemic Control and Reduced Nocturnal Hypoglycemia in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Chronic Kidney Disease Stages 3 and 4. Clin Ther. 2019 Oct;41(10):2008-2020.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2019.07.011. Epub 2019 Aug 2. PubMed 31383366 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 20, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02451917
Lead sponsor
University of Sao Paulo General Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 22, 2015
Start date
Dec 2013
Primary completion
Aug 2016
Completion
Aug 2016
Results posted
Nov 7, 2017
Last update
Dec 20, 2017

Study contacts

Marcia S Queiroz, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Assistant Professor at Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Clinic Hospital of the University of São Paulo Medical School

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion