A Phase 3 interventional study of Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation and Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Recurrent Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Activated B-Cell Type and Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Activated B-Cell Type, sponsored by National Cancer Institute (NCI). Active, not recruiting at 281 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-31.
Sponsored by National Cancer Institute (NCI) · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment
This randomized phase III trial studies ibrutinib to see how well it works compared to placebo when given before and after stem cell transplant in treating patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma that has returned after a period of improvement (relapsed) or does not respond to treatment (refractory). Before transplant, stem cells are taken from patients and stored. Patients then receive high doses of chemotherapy to kill cancer cells and make room for healthy cells. After treatment, the stem cells are then returned to the patient to replace the blood-forming cells that were destroyed by the chemotherapy. Ibrutinib is a drug that may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking a protein that is needed for cell growth. It is not yet known whether adding ibrutinib to chemotherapy before and after stem cell transplant may help the transplant work better in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
I. To evaluate the ability of ibrutinib to improve 24-month progression free survival (PFS) compared to placebo in patients with non-germinal center B-cell-like (GCB) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) as determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC).
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To evaluate the ability of ibrutinib to improve overall survival (OS) compared to placebo.
II. To evaluate the ability of ibrutinib to improve progression free survival (PFS) compared to placebo.
III. To evaluate the ability of ibrutinib to improve post-transplant response rates compared to placebo.
IV. To evaluate time to hematopoietic recovery in the two arms. V. To evaluate the safety and tolerability of ibrutinib compared to placebo. VI. To evaluate the incidence of secondary malignancies in the two arms. VII. To evaluate immune reconstitution in the two arms.
CORRELATIVE SCIENCE OBJECTIVES:
I. To assess whether pre-autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AutoHCT) positive fludeoxyglucose F-18 (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET) is associated with inferior 24-month PFS as well as PFS and OS.
II. To assess whether pre-AutoHCT FDG-PET results are differentially associated with 24-month PFS, PFS and OS in the ibrutinib versus placebo arms.
III. To evaluate the application of the Lugano criteria and change in quantitative measurements between pre-AutoHCT and post AutoHCT (e.g. delta standard uptake variable [SUV], %SUV decline and %metabolic tumor volume [MTV] decline, and other available applicable quantitative measurements) to assess the association between changes in these variables and outcomes, such as PFS and OS.
IV. To assess whether the GSTT1 null polymorphism is correlated with pulmonary toxicity after BCNU (carmustine)-containing conditioning regimens as part of autologous stem cell transplantation.
V. To assess whether other polymorphisms in the BCNU metabolism pathway or BCNU damage repair pathway(s) are associated with pulmonary toxicity after BCNU-containing conditioning regimens as part of autologous stem cell transplantation.
VI. To evaluate whether any of the proposed deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) polymorphisms are associated with other toxicities.
VII. To assess whether DLBCL subtype based on the lymphoma subtyping test (LST) is associated with 24-month PFS, PFS, and OS with ibrutinib compared to placebo in patients treated on this protocol.
VIII. To assess whether activating mutations in the BCR pathway are associated with response to ibrutinib and with clinical outcomes in patients treated on this protocol.
IX. To assess whether there are any phenotypic associations with IHC markers (particularly MYC protein expression level) and presence of these mutations.
X. To assess whether BCL2, MYC, and Ki67 expression by IHC affect clinical outcomes in patients treated on this protocol.
XI. To assess whether translocations in MYC with or without BCL2 and BC6 have poor outcomes in patients treated on this protocol and whether ibrutinib modifies the prognosis.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
CONDITIONING REGIMEN:
ARM I: Investigators may choose to use either the BEAMi (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan, ibrutinib) or CBVi (cyclophosphamide, carmustine, etoposide, ibrutinib) regimen.
BEAMi: Patients receive ibrutinib orally (PO) on days -6 to -1, carmustine intravenously (IV) over 2 hours on day -6, etoposide IV twice daily (BID) over 1-2 hours and cytarabine IV BID over 1-2 hours on days -5 to -2, and melphalan IV over 20-30 minutes on day -1. Optionally, if a day of rest is planned, patients may receive BEAMi on days -7 to -2.
CBVi: Patients receive ibrutinib PO on days -6 to -1, carmustine IV over 2 hours on day -6, etoposide IV over 4 hours on day -4, and cyclophosphamide IV on day -2. Optionally, if a day of rest is planned, patients may receive CBVi on days -7 to -2.
ARM II: Patients receive placebo PO on days -6 to -1 and receive 1 of the 2 conditioning regimens as in Arm I.
TRANSPLANT: In both arms, patients undergo autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell or bone marrow transplant on day 0.
CONTINUATION REGIMEN:
ARM I: Beginning 30-60 days after transplant, patients receive ibrutinib PO on days 1-28. Treatment repeats every 28 days for 12 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
ARM II: Beginning 30-60 days after transplant, patients receive placebo PO on days 1-28. Treatment repeats every 28 days for 12 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients experiencing disease progression may crossover Arm I.
After completion of treatment, patients are followed up every 6 months for up to 60 months from registration.
National Cancer Institute (NCI) is the lead sponsor of 3,506 studies on the registry; 334 are open to participants now.
Of its 402 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 365 (91%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Inclusion Criteria:
Not pregnant and not nursing, because this study involves an agent that has known genotoxic, mutagenic and teratogenic effects; therefore, for women of childbearing potential only, a negative serum pregnancy test must be obtained within 14 days prior to registration
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infected patients are eligible provided they meet all other eligibility criteria, and:
Patients cannot have:
CONDITIONING REGIMEN: Investigators may choose to use either the BEAMi or CBVi regimen. BEAMi: Patients receive ibrutinib PO on days -6 to -1 or days -7 to -2 if a day of rest is planned, carmustine IV over 2 hours on day -6, etoposide IV BID over 1-2 hours and cytarabine IV BID over 1-2 hours on days -5 to -2, and melphalan IV over 20-30 minutes on day -1. CBVi: Patients receive ibrutinib PO on days -6 to -1 or days -7 to -2 if a day of rest is planned, carmustine IV over 2 hours on day -6, etoposide IV over 4 hours on day -4, and cyclophosphamide IV on day -2. TRANSPLANT: In both arms, patients undergo autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell or bone marrow transplant on day 0. CONTINUATION REGIMEN: Beginning 30-60 days after transplant, patients receive ibrutinib PO on days 1-28. Treatment repeats every 28 days for 12 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Procedure: Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation · Procedure: Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation · Drug: Carmustine · Drug: Cyclophosphamide · Drug: Cytarabine · Drug: Etoposide · Drug: Ibrutinib · Other: Laboratory Biomarker Analysis · Drug: Melphalan · Other: Pharmacogenomic Study
CONDITIONING REGIMEN: Patients receive placebo PO on days -6 to -1 and receive 1 of the 2 conditioning regimens as in Arm I. TRANSPLANT: Patients undergo autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell or bone marrow transplant on day 0. CONTINUATION REGIMEN: Beginning 30-60 days after transplant, patients receive placebo PO on days 1-28. Treatment repeats every 28 days for 12 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients experiencing disease progression may crossover Arm I.
Procedure: Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation · Procedure: Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation · Drug: Carmustine · Drug: Cyclophosphamide · Drug: Cytarabine · Drug: Etoposide · Other: Laboratory Biomarker Analysis · Drug: Melphalan · Other: Pharmacogenomic Study · Other: Placebo Administration
Undergo autologous hematopoietic progenitor cells or bone marrow transplant
Also known as: ABMT, Autologous Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Autologous Bone Marrow Transplant, Autologous Marrow Transplantation
Undergo autologous hematopoietic progenitor cells or bone marrow transplant
Also known as: AHSCT, Autologous, Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, Autologous Stem Cell Transplant, Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation, Stem Cell Transplantation, Autologous
Given IV
Also known as: BCNU, Becenum, Becenun, BiCNU, Bis(chloroethyl) Nitrosourea, Bis-Chloronitrosourea, Carmubris, Carmustin, Carmustinum, FDA 0345, N,N'-Bis(2-chloroethyl)-N-nitrosourea, Nitrourean, Nitrumon, NSC 409962, NSC409962, SK 27702, SRI 1720, WR 139021, WR-139021, WR139021
Given IV
Also known as: (-)-Cyclophosphamide, 2H-1,3,2-Oxazaphosphorine, 2-[bis(2-chloroethyl)amino]tetrahydro-, 2-oxide, monohydrate, Asta B 518, B 518, B-518, B518, Carloxan, Ciclofosfamida, Ciclofosfamide, Cicloxal, Clafen, Claphene, CP monohydrate, CTX, CYCLO-cell, Cycloblastin, Cycloblastine, Cyclophospham, Cyclophosphamid monohydrate, Cyclophosphamide Monohydrate, Cyclophosphamidum, Cyclophosphan, Cyclophosphane, Cyclophosphanum, Cyclostin, Cyclostine, Cytophosphan, Cytophosphane, Cytoxan, Fosfaseron, Frindovyx, Genoxal, Genuxal, Ledoxina, Mitoxan, Neosar, Revimmune, Syklofosfamid, WR 138719, WR- 138719, WR-138719, WR138719
Given IV
Also known as: .beta.-Cytosine arabinoside, 1-.beta.-D-Arabinofuranosyl-4-amino-2(1H)pyrimidinone, 1-.beta.-D-Arabinofuranosylcytosine, 1-Beta-D-arabinofuranosyl-4-amino-2(1H)pyrimidinone, 1-Beta-D-arabinofuranosylcytosine, 1.beta.-D-Arabinofuranosylcytosine, 2(1H)-Pyrimidinone, 4-Amino-1-beta-D-arabinofuranosyl-, 2(1H)-Pyrimidinone, 4-amino-1.beta.-D-arabinofuranosyl-, Alexan, Ara-C, ARA-cell, Arabine, Arabinofuranosylcytosine, Arabinosylcytosine, Aracytidine, Aracytin, Aracytine, Beta-Cytosine Arabinoside, CHX-3311, Cytarabinum, Cytarbel, Cytosar, Cytosine Arabinoside, Cytosine-.beta.-arabinoside, Cytosine-beta-arabinoside, Erpalfa, Starasid, Tarabine PFS, U 19920, U-19920, Udicil, WR-28453
Given IV
Also known as: Demethyl Epipodophyllotoxin Ethylidine Glucoside, EPEG, Lastet, Toposar, Vepesid, VP 16, VP 16-213, VP 16213, VP-16, VP-16-213, VP-16213, VP16, VP16213
Given PO
Also known as: BTK Inhibitor PCI-32765, CRA 032765, CRA-032765, CRA032765, Imbruvica, PCI 32765, PCI-32765, PCI32765
Correlative studies
Given IV
Also known as: Alanine Nitrogen Mustard, CB-3025, L-PAM, L-Phenylalanine Mustard, L-Sarcolysin, L-Sarcolysin Phenylalanine mustard, L-Sarcolysine, Melphalan for Injection-Hepatic Delivery System, Melphalanum, Phenylalanine Mustard, Phenylalanine Nitrogen Mustard, Sarcoclorin, Sarkolysin, WR-19813
Correlative studies
Also known as: PHARMACOGENOMIC
Given PO
24-month Progression-free Survival (PFS), Defined as the Proportion of Patients Who Are Alive and Progression-free 2 Years From Randomization
Will be assessed using the Lugano classification.
Time frame: Time between registration and disease progression or death, whichever comes first, assessed at 24 months
Overall Survival (OS)
For each arm, the distribution of OS will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. OS will be compared between the two arms using the log-rank test and Cox regression method adjusting for the known predictors.
Time frame: The time between randomization and death from any cause, assessed up to 5 years (60 months)
Time to Hematopoietic Engraftment
Will be defined as platelet count greater than or equal to 20,000/uL following nadir.
Time frame: First day of one week without platelet transfusion, assessed up to 5 years
PFS
For each arm, the distribution of PFS will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. PFS will be compared between the two arms using the log-rank test and Cox regression method adjusting for the known predictors.
Time frame: Time between registration and disease progression or death, whichever comes first, assessed up to 5 years (60 months)
Response Rate Using the Lugano Classification
The metabolic response proportion following AutoHCT will be compared between the two arms using chi-squared test.
Time frame: Up to 60 months
Treatment-related Mortality
Treatment-related mortality will be summarized using contingency tables.
Time frame: Up to 60 months
Incidence of Hematologic Toxicity of Ibrutinib Therapy
Hematologic toxicity will be summarized using contingency tables.
Time frame: Up to 60 months
Incidence of Secondary Malignancies
Incidence of secondary malignancies will be summarized using contingency tables.
Time frame: Up to 60 months
Fludeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography (FDG-PET) Imaging Results
PFS and OS will be compared between PET/computed tomography (CT) positive and negative groups using the two-sample log-rank test with a 2-sided alpha of 5%. A Cox regression model will be conducted to regress PFS and OS on PET/CT positivity. Deauville criteria analyses will be conducted with cutoffs at scores of 2 and 3, and quantitative measurements, e.g. delta standard uptake value (SUV), %SUV decline and %MTV decline, in place of the dichotomous FDG-PET/CT outcome. Positive/negative predictive values, sensitivity and specificity of PET/CT further estimated by dichotomizing the PFS and OS at 2 years.
Time frame: Baseline
GSTT1 Null Allele Expression
GSTT1 null allele expression will be associated with carmustine toxicity. Quantified using the standard Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events and changes in diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide from baseline.
Time frame: Baseline
Single-nuclear Polymorphisms (SNPs) in the BCNU Metabolism or Damage Repair Pathways
All SNPs will be evaluated for deviation from Hardy-Weinberg. In the absence of a hypothesized effect, analyses will be powered for allele dosing (i.e., additive) effects. The Cochran-Armitage test (for binary endpoints), Jonkheere-Terpstra test (for quantitative traits including biomarker or gene expressions in serum or tumor ribonucleic acid) and the Cox score test (for censored time-to-event outcomes) will be used to quantify marginal associations. Multivariable models, with molecular, clinical and demographic variables, will be constructed using conditional inference trees and random forests.
Time frame: Baseline
BCR Pathway Mutations
The mutation of CD79a/b, caspase recruitment domain family, member 11 (CARD11), tumor necrosis factor, alpha-induced protein 3 TNFAIP3), and myeloid differentiation primary response 88 (MYD88) will be associated with each outcome in the ibrutinib arm (Arm A) using the chi-squared test for response rate and the log-rank test for each censored outcome. Similar analyses will be conducted for the placebo arm (Arm B) to show that the association between mutation and the outcomes observed in the ibrutinib arm is not observed in the placebo arm.
Time frame: Baseline
BCL2, MYC, and Ki67 Expression in Tissue Samples by Immunohistochemistry (IHC)
The expression of BCL2, MYC, and Ki67 will be analyzed to assess whether they affect clinical outcomes.
Time frame: Baseline
MYC Translocations
Translocations in MYC with or without BCL2, and BCL6 will be analyzed to determine whether they are related to poor outcomes and whether ibrutinib modifies the prognosis.
Time frame: Baseline
| Milestone | Arm I (Ibrutinib, Chemotherapy, autoHCT) | Arm II (Placebo, Chemotherapy, autoHCT) | Safety Cohort |
|---|---|---|---|
| Started | 45 | 43 | 6 |
| Crossover | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Completed | 10 | 9 | 6 |
| Not completed | 35 | 34 | 0 |
Will be assessed using the Lugano classification.
| proportion of participants | Arm I (Ibrutinib, Chemotherapy, autoHCT) | Arm II (Placebo, Chemotherapy, autoHCT) |
|---|---|---|
| 24-month Progression-free Survival (PFS), Defined as the Proportion of Patients Who Are Alive and Progression-free 2 Years From Randomization | 0.576 (0.421 to 0.788) | 0.408 (0.265 to 0.628) |
For each arm, the distribution of OS will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. OS will be compared between the two arms using the log-rank test and Cox regression method adjusting for the known predictors.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
Will be defined as platelet count greater than or equal to 20,000/uL following nadir.
| days | Arm I (Ibrutinib, Chemotherapy, autoHCT) | Arm II (Placebo, Chemotherapy, autoHCT) |
|---|---|---|
| Time to Hematopoietic Engraftment | 14.0 (12.0 to 17.0) | 14.5 (13.0 to 19.0) |
For each arm, the distribution of PFS will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. PFS will be compared between the two arms using the log-rank test and Cox regression method adjusting for the known predictors.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
The metabolic response proportion following AutoHCT will be compared between the two arms using chi-squared test.
| proportion of participants | Arm I (Ibrutinib, Chemotherapy, autoHCT) | Arm II (Placebo, Chemotherapy, autoHCT) |
|---|---|---|
| Response Rate Using the Lugano Classification | 0.590 (0.421 to 0.744) | 0.553 (0.383 to 0.714) |
Treatment-related mortality will be summarized using contingency tables.
| participants | Arm I (Ibrutinib, Chemotherapy, autoHCT) | Arm II (Placebo, Chemotherapy, autoHCT) |
|---|---|---|
| Disease-related | 6 | 8 |
| Infection | 4 | 0 |
| New Primary | 1 | 0 |
| Other/Unknown | 2 | 4 |
Hematologic toxicity will be summarized using contingency tables.
| Participants | Arm I (Ibrutinib, Chemotherapy, autoHCT) | Arm II (Placebo, Chemotherapy, autoHCT) |
|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 Event | 6 | 9 |
| Grade 4 Event | 13 | 11 |
| Grade 5 Event | 0 | 0 |
Incidence of secondary malignancies will be summarized using contingency tables.
| Participants | Arm I (Ibrutinib, Chemotherapy, autoHCT) | Arm II (Placebo, Chemotherapy, autoHCT) |
|---|---|---|
| Incidence of Secondary Malignancies | 1 | 0 |
PFS and OS will be compared between PET/computed tomography (CT) positive and negative groups using the two-sample log-rank test with a 2-sided alpha of 5%. A Cox regression model will be conducted to regress PFS and OS on PET/CT positivity. Deauville criteria analyses will be conducted with cutoffs at scores of 2 and 3, and quantitative measurements, e.g. delta standard uptake value (SUV), %SUV decline and %MTV decline, in place of the dichotomous FDG-PET/CT outcome. Positive/negative predictive values, sensitivity and specificity of PET/CT further estimated by dichotomizing the PFS and OS at 2 years.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
GSTT1 null allele expression will be associated with carmustine toxicity. Quantified using the standard Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events and changes in diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide from baseline.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
All SNPs will be evaluated for deviation from Hardy-Weinberg. In the absence of a hypothesized effect, analyses will be powered for allele dosing (i.e., additive) effects. The Cochran-Armitage test (for binary endpoints), Jonkheere-Terpstra test (for quantitative traits including biomarker or gene expressions in serum or tumor ribonucleic acid) and the Cox score test (for censored time-to-event outcomes) will be used to quantify marginal associations. Multivariable models, with molecular, clinical and demographic variables, will be constructed using conditional inference trees and random forests.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
The mutation of CD79a/b, caspase recruitment domain family, member 11 (CARD11), tumor necrosis factor, alpha-induced protein 3 TNFAIP3), and myeloid differentiation primary response 88 (MYD88) will be associated with each outcome in the ibrutinib arm (Arm A) using the chi-squared test for response rate and the log-rank test for each censored outcome. Similar analyses will be conducted for the placebo arm (Arm B) to show that the association between mutation and the outcomes observed in the ibrutinib arm is not observed in the placebo arm.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
The expression of BCL2, MYC, and Ki67 will be analyzed to assess whether they affect clinical outcomes.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
Translocations in MYC with or without BCL2, and BCL6 will be analyzed to determine whether they are related to poor outcomes and whether ibrutinib modifies the prognosis.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
Collected over Up to 60 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arm I (Ibrutinib, Chemotherapy, autoHCT) | 14/45 (31.1%) | 22/45 (48.9%) | 36/45 (80%) |
| Arm II (Placebo, Chemotherapy, autoHCT) | 10/43 (23.3%) | 23/43 (53.5%) | 38/43 (88.4%) |
| Safety Cohort | 3/6 (50%) | 4/6 (66.7%) | 6/6 (100%) |
| Crossover Arm | 2/2 (100%) | 1/2 (50%) | 1/2 (50%) |
| Event | Arm I (Ibrutinib, Chemotherapy, autoHCT) | Arm II (Placebo, Chemotherapy, autoHCT) | Safety Cohort | Crossover Arm |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders | 0/45 | 1/43 | 0/6 | 1/2 |
| Creatinine increasedInvestigations | 0/45 | 0/43 | 0/6 | 1/2 |
| Metabolism, nutrition disord - Oth specMetabolism and nutrition disorders | 0/45 | 0/43 | 0/6 | 1/2 |
| Acute kidney injuryRenal and urinary disorders | 1/45 | 1/43 | 1/6 | 1/2 |
| SepsisInfections and infestations | 3/45 | 2/43 | 2/6 | 0/2 |
| HypotensionVascular disorders | 3/45 | 1/43 | 2/6 | 0/2 |
| Atrial fibrillationCardiac disorders | 0/45 | 1/43 | 1/6 | 0/2 |
| FeverGeneral disorders | 5/45 | 2/43 | 1/6 | 0/2 |
| Localized edemaGeneral disorders | 0/45 | 0/43 | 1/6 | 0/2 |
| Infections and infestations - Oth specInfections and infestations | 2/45 | 4/43 | 1/6 | 0/2 |
| Event | Arm I (Ibrutinib, Chemotherapy, autoHCT) | Arm II (Placebo, Chemotherapy, autoHCT) | Safety Cohort | Crossover Arm |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DiarrheaGastrointestinal disorders | 29/45 | 28/43 | 6/6 | 1/2 |
| FatigueGeneral disorders | 34/45 | 30/43 | 6/6 | 1/2 |
| NauseaGastrointestinal disorders | 27/45 | 26/43 | 5/6 | 1/2 |
| FeverGeneral disorders | 18/45 | 20/43 | 5/6 | 0/2 |
| AnorexiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders | 15/45 | 17/43 | 4/6 | 0/2 |
| CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 14/45 | 12/43 | 4/6 | 0/2 |
| VomitingGastrointestinal disorders | 13/45 | 14/43 | 3/6 | 0/2 |
| Lymphocyte count decreasedInvestigations | 7/45 | 6/43 | 1/6 | 1/2 |
| AnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders | 18/45 | 9/43 | 1/6 | 0/2 |
| Platelet count decreasedInvestigations | 18/45 | 10/43 | 1/6 | 0/2 |
Only randomized arms were analyzed. Safety cohort was excluded per protocol: These patients will not be randomized and will be excluded in the statistical analysis to compare the two arms.
| Age, Continuous(years) | Arm I (Ibrutinib, Chemotherapy, autoHCT) | Arm II (Placebo, Chemotherapy, autoHCT) | Safety Cohort | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median | 61 (55 to 67) | 59 (51 to 66) | 52.5 (46 to 64) | 61 (51 to 66) |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Arm I (Ibrutinib, Chemotherapy, autoHCT) | Arm II (Placebo, Chemotherapy, autoHCT) | Safety Cohort | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 20 | 20 | 1 | 41 |
| Male | 25 | 23 | 5 | 53 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants) | Arm I (Ibrutinib, Chemotherapy, autoHCT) | Arm II (Placebo, Chemotherapy, autoHCT) | Safety Cohort | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hispanic or Latino | 2 | 3 | 0 | 5 |
| Not Hispanic or Latino | 43 | 40 | 6 | 89 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants) | Arm I (Ibrutinib, Chemotherapy, autoHCT) | Arm II (Placebo, Chemotherapy, autoHCT) | Safety Cohort | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Asian | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Black or African American | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| White | 38 | 39 | 3 | 80 |
| More than one race | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 3 | 3 | 3 | 9 |
| Prior Ibrutinib(Participants) | Arm I (Ibrutinib, Chemotherapy, autoHCT) | Arm II (Placebo, Chemotherapy, autoHCT) | Safety Cohort | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Count of participants | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Time to relapse(Participants) | Arm I (Ibrutinib, Chemotherapy, autoHCT) | Arm II (Placebo, Chemotherapy, autoHCT) | Safety Cohort | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| <= 12 months (includes refractory) | 21 | 21 | 5 | 47 |
| > 12 months | 24 | 22 | 1 | 47 |
| Type of transplant regimen planned(Participants) | Arm I (Ibrutinib, Chemotherapy, autoHCT) | Arm II (Placebo, Chemotherapy, autoHCT) | Safety Cohort | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BEAM | 42 | 41 | 5 | 88 |
| CBV | 3 | 2 | 1 | 6 |
| Number of prior lines of chemo(chemo lines) | Arm I (Ibrutinib, Chemotherapy, autoHCT) | Arm II (Placebo, Chemotherapy, autoHCT) | Safety Cohort | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median | 2 (1 to 3) | 2 (1 to 3) | 2 (2 to 3) | 2 (1 to 3) |
6 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.
Showing the first 100 of 281 sites across 2 countries.
Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.
This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)