CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02425332Updated Dec 19, 2017

Validation of a Novel Robot-aided Assessment of Gait Ability

An interventional study of Lokomat gait trainer in Spinal Cord Injury, sponsored by University of Zurich. Completed at 1 site in Switzerland. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 99 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-12-19.

Sponsored by University of Zurich · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 99 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this study is the validation of a novel gait assessment method implemented in the Lokomat gait trainer with respect to established clinical gait assessment methods. The walking assessment method is based on the progressive reduction of the support of the device. The outcome measures of this algorithm will be the support needed in the different gait phases (guidance force of hip and knee joints) and the support required to the body weight support system (unloading). The hypothesis is that the guidance force and the support of the device will converge to a profile individual for each subject that is representative of one's impairment in the different gait phases. The reliability of the method will be tested collecting data from two sessions of Lokomat training. The validity of the method will be tested comparing the outcome of the assessment task with established clinical walking assessment measures.

02

Conditions studied

  • Spinal Cord Injury

Keywords

  • Spinal Cord Injury
  • adaptive control
  • assessment
  • assist-as-needed
  • walking ability
  • Lokomat
03

In context

Spinal Cord Injuries

1,948 studies on the registry are indexed under Spinal Cord Injuries; 505 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 50 is above the median of 24 across 1,566 interventional studies indexed under Spinal Cord Injuries.

Browse Spinal Cord Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Zurich is the lead sponsor of 1,030 studies on the registry; 130 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 99 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • individuals >1 year post Spinal Cord Injury or able bodied persons

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • presence of contraindications to Lokomat training, inability or unwillingness to provide written informed consent or follow study procedures
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
50 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Lokomat assessment

    Device: Lokomat gait trainer

Interventions

  • DeviceLokomat gait trainer
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Intraclass Correlation Coefficient between Lokomat score.

    Reliability of Lokomat assessment

    Time frame: up to one week

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Universitätsklinik Balgrist
    Zürich, Switzerland
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 19, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02425332
Lead sponsor
University of Zurich
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 23, 2015
Start date
May 2015
Primary completion
Nov 2016
Completion
Nov 2016
Last update
Dec 19, 2017

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion