CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02411149ACB in TKAUpdated Nov 24, 2017

Adductor Canal Block and Recovery After Total Knee Replacement Surgery

A Phase 4 interventional study of Adductor Canal Block and Adductor Canal Block with Morphine in Total Knee Arthroplasty, sponsored by University Health Network, Toronto. Completed at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-11-24.

Sponsored by University Health Network, Toronto · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
200
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to compare the functional recovery of patients undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty based on the administration of an adductor canal block during their anesthesia treatment

Read the detailed description

The period after total knee replacement (TKR) surgery is known to be painful for the first 24 hours, lasting up to 3 days in many cases. Successful management of pain after TKR is regarded as necessary to early recovery, rehabilitation and timely discharge. Severe pain following major joint arthroplasty can hinder early rehabilitation, may result in prolonged hospitalization and is a strong predictor of persistent pain beyond 3 months. Adequate analgesia following TKR is paramount to early recovery, rehabilitation and timely discharge. Therefore early postoperative analgesic and rehabilitation goals are intricately related.

Until now, different methods of pain treatment have been used, including intravenous narcotic pain medication, continuous femoral nerve block (numbing medication to a nerve in the thigh) and epidural analgesia (identical to the numbing method for childbirth). These are all effective methods but each is limited by side effects. In recent years, research has focused on administering local anesthetic further down in the leg, trying to minimize quadriceps muscle weakness while giving adequate pain relief after surgery. Local Infiltration Analgesia (LIA) and Adductor Canal Block (ACB) are examples of new farther sites of administration.

The purpose of this study is to determine which combination of analgesic interventions is the most effective treatment for pain and improvement in functional outcome for TKR.

02

Conditions studied

  • Total Knee Arthroplasty

Keywords

  • Adductor Canal Block
  • Total Knee Arthroplasty
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University Health Network, Toronto is the lead sponsor of 1,411 studies on the registry; 292 are open to participants now.

Of its 17 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 3 (18%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status I-III
  • 18 - 80 years of age
  • BMI 18 - 40
  • Scheduled for elective total knee replacement under spinal anesthesia
  • Able to ambulate independently with a standard wheeled walker as maximum mobility aid

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Revision knee arthroplasty
  • Bilateral knee arthroplasty
  • Lack of mental ability to provide informed consent
  • Neuropathic pain or sensory disorders of the surgical limb
  • Contraindication to regional anesthesia (intolerance to the study drugs, bleeding diathesis, coagulopathy, malignancy or infection at the site of block)
  • Chronic opioid use defined as > 30 mg of daily oral morphine equivalents
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
200 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    Local Inflitration Only

    This group will receive LIA and saline solution (placebo) in the adductor canal block with NO morphine in the spinal anesthesia: * 30 ml normal saline * 3ml 0.5% preservative-free bupivacaine

    Drug: Local Infiltration

  • Active comparator
    Adductor Canal Block

    This group will receive LIA and the standard local anesthetic in the ACB with NO morphine in the spinal anesthetic: * ropivacaine 0.5% with 1:400,000 epinephrine * 3ml 0.5% preservative-free bupivacaine

    Drug: Adductor Canal Block

  • Active comparator
    Adductor Canal Block with Morphine

    This group will receive LIA with local anesthetic in the ACB and morphine in the spinal anesthetic: * ropivacaine 0.5% with 1:400,000 epinephrine * 3ml 0.5% preservative-free bupivacaine with 100mcg of intrathecal morphine (0.1ml of intrathecal morphine 1mg/ml)

    Drug: Adductor Canal Block with Morphine

Interventions

  • DrugAdductor Canal Block

    Use of ropivacaine 0.5% with 1:400,000 epinephrine in the adductor canal along with a spinal anesthesia of 3ml 0.5% preservative-free bupivacaine.

    Also known as: ropivacaine with epinephrine

  • DrugAdductor Canal Block with Morphine

    Use of ropivacaine 0.5% with 1:400,000 epinephrine in the adductor canal along with a spinal anesthesia of 3ml 0.5% preservative-free bupivacaine and 100mcg of intrathecal morphine (0.1ml of intrathecal morphine 1mg/ml)

    Also known as: ropivacaine with epinephrine and spinal intrathecal morphine

  • DrugLocal Infiltration

    30 ml normal saline in the adductor canal along with a spinal anesthesia of 3ml 0.5% preservative-free bupivacaine, in addition to the local infiltration.

    Also known as: saline

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Timed Up and Go test

    TUG test reflects the time it takes a subject to stand up from a standard height armchair, walk 3 meters, walk back to the chair and sit down. It intends to assess a patient's global mobility as well as balance and risk of falling.

    Time frame: 2-3 days post srugery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain outcome - NRS

    a) Pain scores assessed with an 11 point verbal numeric rating scale (NRS) where 0 is "no pain" and 10 is "the worst pain imaginable", both at rest and during active physiotherapy (measured daily for 3 days post-operatively) .

    Time frame: 2-3 days post surgery

  2. Analgesic outcomes - Cumulative systemic opioid consumption

    Cumulative systemic opioid consumption measured as oral morphine mg equivalents (daily for 3 days post-operatively).

    Time frame: 2-3 days post surgery

  3. Analgesic outcomes - Proportion of patients who required "rescue" intravenous patient controlled analgesia

    Proportion of patients who required "rescue" intravenous patient controlled analgesia (iv PCA) anytime in the post-operative period.

    Time frame: 2-3 days post surgery

  4. Analgesic outcomes - Incidence of opioid-related side effects

    Incidence of opioid-related side effects

    Time frame: 2-3 days post surgery

  5. Secondary short-term physical and performance-based functional outcome measures - Proportion of patients achieving knee flexion range of motion (ROM) of 90 degrees

    Proportion of patients achieving knee flexion range of motion (ROM) of 90 degrees (measured daily for 3 days post-operatively)

    Time frame: 2-3 days post surgery

  6. Secondary short-term physical and performance-based functional outcome measures - Distance walked

    Distance walked

    Time frame: 2-3 days post surgery

  7. Secondary short-term physical and performance-based functional outcome measures - Hospital length of stay

    Hospital length of stay

    Time frame: 2-3 days post surgery

  8. Secondary short-term physical and performance-based functional outcome measures - Discharge destination

    Discharge destination (home or rehabilitation facility)

    Time frame: 2-3 days post surgery

  9. Medium-term self-reported functional outcome measures - WOMAC

    Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) measured at baseline and at 3 months post-operatively

    Time frame: baseline and 2-3 days post surgery

  10. Medium-term self-reported functional outcome measures - LEFS

    Lower extremity functional scale (LEFS) measured at baseline and at 3 months post-operatively.

    Time frame: baseline and 2-3 days post surgery

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Toronto Western Hospital
    Toronto, Ontario M5T 2S8, Canada
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Puolakka PA, Rorarius MG, Roviola M, Puolakka TJ, Nordhausen K, Lindgren L. Persistent pain following knee arthroplasty. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010 May;27(5):455-60. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e328335b31c. PubMed 20299989 ↗
  • Capdevila X, Barthelet Y, Biboulet P, Ryckwaert Y, Rubenovitch J, d'Athis F. Effects of perioperative analgesic technique on the surgical outcome and duration of rehabilitation after major knee surgery. Anesthesiology. 1999 Jul;91(1):8-15. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199907000-00006. PubMed 10422923 ↗
  • Busch CA, Shore BJ, Bhandari R, Ganapathy S, MacDonald SJ, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, McCalden RW. Efficacy of periarticular multimodal drug injection in total knee arthroplasty. A randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 May;88(5):959-63. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00344. PubMed 16651569 ↗
  • Biswas A, Perlas A, Ghosh M, Chin K, Niazi A, Pandher B, Chan V. Relative Contributions of Adductor Canal Block and Intrathecal Morphine to Analgesia and Functional Recovery After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Feb;43(2):154-160. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000724. PubMed 29315129 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 24, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02411149
Lead sponsor
University Health Network, Toronto
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 8, 2015
Start date
Apr 2014
Primary completion
Dec 2016
Completion
Dec 2016
Last update
Nov 24, 2017

Study contacts

Anahi Perlas, MD
principal investigator · University of Toronto. University Health Network. Toronto Western Hospital.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion