ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02392195Updated Dec 10, 2020Results posted

Brain Characteristics Noted Prior to and Following Treatment

An observational study in Nonsynostotic Plagiocephaly, sponsored by Boston Children's Hospital. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged Up to 8 Months, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-12-10.

Sponsored by Boston Children's Hospital · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
10
Ages
Up to 8 Months
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will enable investigators to find out if brain structure and characteristics are affected by the shape of the infant's head, and if changes in the brain occur with helmet therapy.

Read the detailed description

A dramatic increase in the number of infants diagnosed with Deformational Plagiocephaly (DP) has been observed worldwide since institution of the American Academy of Pediatrics' Back to Sleep Program. According to one published report, the incidence of DP ranges between 3-48%; this translates into120,000-2 million infants/year who develop DP in the United States alone. Some healthcare providers believe that DP is a purely cosmetic condition. This mindset undermines the importance of prevention and correction. In New Zealand, a recent study demonstrated that 39% of children without corrective action had persistent DP at age 3 to 4 years. Additionally, several studies have demonstrated associations between impaired social interactions, developmental problems and DP.Thus some researchers now believe that there may be a spectrum of untoward outcomes from brain remodeling resulting from DP. Recent technological advances now allow the detection of diminutive changes in brain structure. In this multidisciplinary descriptive pilot study we will use brain MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) and a cerebral tissue oxygenation monitor, namely Frequency Domain Near Infrared and Diffuse Correlation Spectroscopy (FDNIR/DCS) to describe if differences in brain structure and characteristics exist in infants with significant DP before and after correction of the deformational defect. This study will enable investigators to seek preliminary evidence that brain development is influenced by the shape of the cranial vault, and that changes in brain structure and characteristics occur with helmet therapy. Additionally this study will help to determine the need for a larger investigation of this phenomenon that would further establish an association between DP and developmental delay.

02

Conditions studied

  • Nonsynostotic Plagiocephaly

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Plagiocephaly
03

In context

Plagiocephaly

16 studies on the registry are indexed under Plagiocephaly; 4 are open to participants now.

Browse Plagiocephaly studies →

Lead sponsor

Boston Children's Hospital is the lead sponsor of 608 studies on the registry; 147 are open to participants now.

Of its 32 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 19 (59%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 8 Months
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Deformational Plagiocephaly in full term, healthy infants.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

    • DP requiring helmet therapy
  1. -Term gestation at birth (37 weeks or greater)
  2. -Less than/or equal to 8 months of age
  3. -No history of major health problem such as birth injury, genetic disorder, intracranial hemorrhage, hydrocephalus, neurologic abnormality
  4. -No history of implantable metal device or internal/external orthotic device

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

    • DP not requiring helmet therapy
  1. -Premature gestation at birth (less than 37 weeks gestation).
  2. -Greater than 8 months of age
  3. -History of major health problem such as birth injury genetic disorder, intracranial hemorrhage, hydrocephalus, neurologic abnormality
  4. -History of implantable metal device or internal/external orthotic device
  5. -Infants not completing prescribed treatment for correction with a helmet
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
10 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Single arm; Non-interventional

    A convenience sample of 10-15 infants born at term gestation, that are \</= 6 months of age with significant DP (defined as head flattening requiring helmet therapy) and no major health issues will be recruited into this phase 1 descriptive pilot study

    Other: Non-interventional

Interventions

  • OtherNon-interventional

    Observational

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Qualitatively Determined Normalization of White Matter Pathways

    We will compare if nerve pathways are appreciably different in the area of head flattening following helmet therapy by visual examination and comparison of areas of asymmetry vs. symmetry.

    Time frame: 2-6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Improved Developmental Exams Post Helmet Therapy

    The Mullen (Scales of Early Learning) was used to determine developmental scores. This tool provides a profile of cognitive ability in five areas: Gross Motor, Fine Motor, Expressive Language, Receptive Language, and Visual Reception. Each of the 5 assessment that has a raw score that is then given a percentile rank and descriptive category (below average, average, above average) for interpretation purposes. Descriptive categories pre treatment were compared to post treatment to determine if scores had improved.

    Time frame: 2-6 months

Other outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Improved Cranial Asymmetry After Cranial Orthotic Treatment

    Cranial asymmetry was assessed using the Cranial Vault Asymmetry Index (CVAI). MRI's were utilized to determine CVAI. Asymmetry pre treatment was compared to post treatment to see if asymmetry improved.

    Time frame: Collected retrospectively

07

Results

Posted Dec 10, 2020

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneSingle Arm; Non-interventional
Started10
Completed2
Not completed8
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up4
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject4

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants With Qualitatively Determined Normalization of White Matter Pathways

We will compare if nerve pathways are appreciably different in the area of head flattening following helmet therapy by visual examination and comparison of areas of asymmetry vs. symmetry.

Time frame:
2-6 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Qualitatively Determined Normalization of White Matter Pathways
ParticipantsSingle Arm; Non-interventional
Number of Participants With Qualitatively Determined Normalization of White Matter Pathways2
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Improved Developmental Exams Post Helmet Therapy

The Mullen (Scales of Early Learning) was used to determine developmental scores. This tool provides a profile of cognitive ability in five areas: Gross Motor, Fine Motor, Expressive Language, Receptive Language, and Visual Reception. Each of the 5 assessment that has a raw score that is then given a percentile rank and descriptive category (below average, average, above average) for interpretation purposes. Descriptive categories pre treatment were compared to post treatment to determine if scores had improved.

Time frame:
2-6 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Improved Developmental Exams Post Helmet Therapy
ParticipantsSingle Arm; Non-interventional
Number of Participants With Improved Developmental Exams Post Helmet Therapy2
Other pre-specifiedNumber of Participants With Improved Cranial Asymmetry After Cranial Orthotic Treatment

Cranial asymmetry was assessed using the Cranial Vault Asymmetry Index (CVAI). MRI's were utilized to determine CVAI. Asymmetry pre treatment was compared to post treatment to see if asymmetry improved.

Time frame:
Collected retrospectively
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Improved Cranial Asymmetry After Cranial Orthotic Treatment
participantsSingle Arm; Non-interventional
Number of Participants With Improved Cranial Asymmetry After Cranial Orthotic Treatment2

Adverse events

Collected over 6 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Single Arm; Non-interventional0/2 (0%)0/2 (0%)0/2 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Single Arm; Non-interventional
<=18 years2
Between 18 and 65 years0
>=65 years0
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(months)Single Arm; Non-interventional
Median6 (5 to 7)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Single Arm; Non-interventional
Female2
Male0
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Single Arm; Non-interventional
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian0
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American0
White1
More than one race1
Unknown or Not Reported0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Single Arm; Non-interventional
United States2
Cranial vault asymmetry index (CVAI) > 8.75%
Cranial vault asymmetry index (CVAI) > 8.75%(Participants)Single Arm; Non-interventional
Count of participants2
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Children's Hospital Boston
    Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 10, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02392195
Responsible party
Michele DeGrazia (Director Nursing Research NICU, Boston Children's Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 18, 2015
Start date
Feb 2013
Primary completion
Sep 2020
Completion
Sep 2020
Results posted
Dec 10, 2020
Last update
Dec 10, 2020

Study contacts

Michele DeGrazia, PhD, RN, NNP
principal investigator · Boston Children's Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion