An observational study in Spinal Disease, sponsored by Seoul National University Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Korea, Republic of. Open to participants aged 15 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-07-08.
Sponsored by Seoul National University Hospital · Observational
Recently the importance of electrical PRO system is increased for the accuracy, convenience, and efficiency for both patients and physicians. For the evaluation of quality of life, various self-reported questionnaires is filled-out by the patient, mostly in front of outpatient clinic, and doctor usually take times to calculate the score. If there is electrical PRO which is available with mobile device, the efficacy of clinic would be improved. The investigators developed such a system and applied the system for patients with spinal disease. The investigators assessed the effectiveness of application of electrical-PRO in outpatients' clinic for patients who had filled-up same questionnaire in paper version.
Age, sex, education levels, use of smartphone, the number of applications.
267 studies on the registry are indexed under Spinal Diseases; 54 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 100 is close to the median of 108 across 87 observational studies indexed under Spinal Diseases.
Browse Spinal Diseases studies →Seoul National University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 1,860 studies on the registry; 275 are open to participants now.
Of its 12 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (17%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
the patients who have experienced paper questionnaire
Exclusion Criteria:
Electrical version patient reported outcome questionnaire was used for patients who had filled-up same questionnaire in a paper version
Other: Electrical version patient reported outcome questionnaire
Assess satisfaction of patients with "electrical version patient reported outcome questionnaire".
Also known as: Electrical patient reported outcome
The necessity of electrical PRO system (quantitative analysis)
Do you feel the e-PRO system is necessary? 1. Absolutely yes 2. Yes 3. No 4. Absolutely no
Time frame: up to 6 months after introduction of e-PRO system
Consultation efficacy with doctor Satisfaction for the enough exchange of information
Do you feel the e-PRO system make the consultation time with doctor to be efficient? 1. Absolutely yes 2. Yes 3. No 4. Absolutely no Do you think your status was expressed better with the use of e-PRO 1. Absolutely yes 2. Yes 3. No 4. Absolutely no
Time frame: up to 6 months after introduction of e-PRO system
This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Seoul National University Hospital