An interventional study of Telephone Support and SMS Support in Sedentary Lifestyle, sponsored by Stanford University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 35 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-01-10.
Sponsored by Stanford University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention
This research aims to investigate the effectiveness of an automated Simple Message Service (SMS, also known as text messaging) advisor system relative to a proven human advisor program to promote regular, sustained physical activity among inactive, overweight Latinos. The SMS Advisor program represents a potentially lower-cost and high yield alternative to person-delivered health promotion programs that could be more rapidly disseminated with greater and faster uptake.
Latinos are the fastest growing ethnic group in the US and are disproportionately impacted by chronic conditions (e.g., overweight/obesity, diabetes) that can be mitigated by physical activity. While evidence-based programs are available to improve physical activity, dissemination is constrained by reliance on costly, limited resources. Short message service (SMS or text messaging) has strong potential as an intervention medium for Latinos, as they are dominant users of mobile phones and text messaging, including those with limited literacy and computer skills. The investigators propose to develop a personalized, culturally-congruent and interactive SMS program to promote the adoption and maintenance of physical activity for overweight, underactive Latino adults and test it for comparable efficacy to an evidence-based telephone-based advising program that has been used successfully with Latinos. Grounded in Social Cognitive and Self-Determination Theories, both programs will include a core set of self-regulatory skill building, social support, and autonomous motivation enhancement, and will be tailored for cultural, linguistic and literacy appropriateness. Randomized at the individual level, 376 sedentary, overweight Latinos ages 45 years and older will be assigned to one of three arms: the SMS-delivered physical activity program, the Human-delivered physical activity program, or an attention-control arm of SMS-delivered basic healthful nutrition advice. They will receive their assigned program for 12 months, and then will be followed for a 6-month maintenance phase, with a final assessment at 18 months. Analyses will determine if the two physical activity programs result in equivalent efficacy in adoption and maintenance of clinically meaningful physical activity increases, and superiority over the attention-control arm at 12 and 18 months. The two physical activity interventions will also be compared for equivalency in prevention of weight gain and reduction in abdominal adiposity. The investigators will explore the relative costs of the programs to determine which program increases physical activity for a lower cost. While health promotion programs delivered by professional staff may be more expensive than those delivered electronically, it is unclear if the automated version can produce more cost-efficient outcomes (i.e., comparable improvements in outcomes for significantly reduced cost). This study will determine if SMS is equivalent in efficacy to the traditional human-delivery channel in increasing physical activity and preventing weight gain, and if it results in a more cost-efficient program. If achieved, this research can significantly reduce health disparities associated with physical activity for Latinos by providing an efficacious, tailored and culturally appropriate program poised for widespread dissemination and rapid uptake.
3,671 studies on the registry are indexed under Overweight; 850 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 350 is above the median of 74 across 3,176 interventional studies indexed under Overweight.
Browse Overweight studies →Stanford University is the lead sponsor of 2,117 studies on the registry; 425 are open to participants now.
Of its 259 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 197 (76%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Participants will receive bi-weekly 20 minute telephone calls from a trained professional facilitator offering physical activity advice with the goal of increasing moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity.
Behavioral: Telephone Support
Participants will receive weekly text messages (3-5 text messages per week) offering physical activity advice with the aim of increasing moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity.
Behavioral: SMS Support
Participants will receive telephone-based general nutrition advice.
Behavioral: SMS Support
telephone-based physical activity advice and support delivered by a trained professional facilitator.
Also known as: Active Choices
Telephone-based physical activity advice and support delivered by SMS.
Change in weekly walking minutes from baseline to 12 months
Total weekly walking minutes measured by CHAMPS questionnaire (Stewart AL, Mills KM, King AC, Haskell WL, Gillis D, Ritter PL. CHAMPS physical activity questionnaire for older adults: outcomes for interventions. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001 Jul;33(7):1126-41)
Time frame: baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Body weight stability from baseline to 12 months
body weight measured by portable digital scale in kg
Time frame: baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Change in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity from baseline to 12 months
Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity measured by CHAMPS questionnaire (Stewart AL, Mills KM, King AC, Haskell WL, Gillis D, Ritter PL. CHAMPS physical activity questionnaire for older adults: outcomes for interventions. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001 Jul;33(7):1126-41)
Time frame: baseline, 6 months, 12 months
This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Stanford University