ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02377687Updated Feb 24, 2016

Is Life Worth Living After Major Emergency GI Surgery? Patient Reported Outcome in Elderly Emergency Surgery Patients

An observational study in Emergency and Surgery, sponsored by Hvidovre University Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Denmark. Open to participants aged 75 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-02-24.

Sponsored by Hvidovre University Hospital · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
52
Ages
75 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To study the impact of emergency high risk GI surgery on HRQOL in elderly patients, seventy-five years or above and to explore the patients' experience with the informed consent process and the status 6 months after surgery.

Read the detailed description

We will identify all patients aged ≥ 75 having an emergency GI laparotomy or laparoscopy between the 1st of November 2014 and the 30st of April 2015.

The first part of the study will take place in the first postoperative week, while the patient is in hospital. After consent we will ask both patient and relatives/caregivers questions concerning the preoperative course and the informed consent. We will ask for permission to call the patients for a followup (the second part of the study) 5-7 months after discharge and permission to contact their closest relative. The closest relative is chosen by the patient and will after consent be asked the same questions in the first postoperative week and after 6 months.

The second part of the study will be initiated with a letter with SF-36 and an additional questionnaire . The SF-36 will be returned by letter. We will contact the patients by telephone 2 weeks after sending the letter ask them the questions from the additional questinaire.

We will compare the results from the SF-36 with age-matched controls (Data from the Danish SF-36 Manual).

If the patient is not capable of answering the questionnaires, the primary reason is noted (e.g. suffering from dementia or didn't speak Danish, dead).

We will aim at a 6 month follow-up period after discharge allowing a range from 5-7 months. Data acquisition will be done in the fall 2014 until late 2015.

02

Conditions studied

  • Emergency
  • Surgery

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Emergency surgery
  • HRQoL
  • Elderly
03

In context

Emergencies

1,721 studies on the registry are indexed under Emergencies; 335 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 52 is below the median of 351 across 726 observational studies indexed under Emergencies.

Browse Emergencies studies →

Lead sponsor

Hvidovre University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 299 studies on the registry; 20 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
75 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

We will identify all patients aged ≥ 75 having an emergency GI laparotomy or laparoscopy between the 1st of November 2014 and the 30st of April 2015. We will also include reoperations after elective surgery (major bleeding, anastomotic leakage etc.) and endoscopic procedures converted during the intervention (upper GI-bleeding, unsuccessful stenting of obstructing colorectal cancer etc.).

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • patients aged ≥ 75 having an emergency GI laparotomy or laparoscopy between the 1st of November 2014 and the 30st of April 2015. We will also include reoperations after elective surgery (major bleeding, anastomotic leakage etc.) and endoscopic procedures converted during the intervention (upper GI-bleeding, unsuccessful stenting of obstructing colorectal cancer etc.).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • appendectomies, negative laparoscopy/laparotomy, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, acute hernias without strangulation, sub-acute internal hernia after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery, sub-acute IBD-surgery and sub-acute Colorectal Cancer-surgery. Sub-acute is defined as planned in less than 48 hours.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
52 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • elderly >75 years

    all patients aged ≥ 75 having an emergency GI laparotomy or laparoscopy

    Other: observational study

Interventions

  • Otherobservational study
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. HRQoL

    Time frame: 6 months after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Functional status

    Time frame: 6 months after surgery

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hvidovre University Hospital
    Hvidovre, 2650, Denmark
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Nov 2014, a primary completion of Nov 2015 and a completion of Nov 2015. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 25, 2015
First posted
Mar 3, 2015
Start
Nov 2014
Primary completionActual
Nov 2015
CompletionActual
Nov 2015
Last update
Feb 24, 2016
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 24, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02377687
Responsible party
Line Toft Tengberg (MD, Hvidovre University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 3, 2015
Start date
Nov 2014
Primary completion
Nov 2015
Completion
Nov 2015
Last update
Feb 24, 2016

Study contacts

Morten Bay-Nielsen, DMSc
study chair · Hvidovre University Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion