CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02371824PERFOSUpdated Feb 26, 2015

Study of Normal Hip and Lumbar Bone Marrow With Dynamic Contrast Enhancement Magnetic Resonance Imaging

An observational study in Bone Marrow, sponsored by University Hospital, Lille. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-02-26.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Lille · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
60
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

DCE-MRI were performed in sixty adults (hips and lumbar spine). For each region of interest studied, the investigators determined the morphology of each time-concentration curve (TCC) and calculated semi-quantitative and pharmacokinetic parameters: initial slope (IS), area under the curve (AUC), time to peak (TTP), Ktrans, Kep and Ve. Clinical data were collected anamnestically.

Read the detailed description

MRI protocol Patients were examined on a 3T MR scan (Ingenia, Philips Healthcare, The Netherlands). Conventional sequences were acquired depending on the clinical problem. A T1 spin echo sequence imaged the right hip in the coronal plane. A previously described Dynamic 3D T1 Spoiled Gradient Echo covered the right hip (8). Its main features were as follows. 94 axial slices covered a Field of View (FOV) of 228 x 130 x 169 mm. TR, TE, flip angle and bandwidth per pixel were respectively 4.5 and 2.1 ms, 10°, 389 Hz. Acquisition and reconstruction matrix were 64 x 66 and 128 x 128 respectively. Temporal resolution was 13.5 seconds.

Three variable flip angles (VFA) sequences (3°, 10° and 17°) were acquired before injection. Each acquisition lasted 55 seconds. Five baseline scans were acquired. 0.1 mmol/kg of gadoteric acid (DOTAREM, Guerbet, France) were injected at the beginning of the sixth scan at a rate of 2.5ml/sec followed by 20cc of saline flush. Twenty dynamic scans were collected. Total examination time was 9 minutes.

Post-processing The investigators analyzed DCE images with the open-source software Osirix and DCE tool software (http://kyungs.bol.ucla.edu/software/DCE_tool/DCE_tool.html). A ROI was deposed in the common femoral artery to determine Arterial Input Function. T1 map was calculated from VFA acquisitions. The precise r1 relaxivity (3.4) of the contrast agent was introduced. These elements were used to calculate the time / gadolinium concentration curve. Tofts model was used.

The morphology of the curve was assessed visually according to the description made by van Rijswik (10). For each ROI, semi-quantitative and pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated: initial slope (IS), area under the curve (AUC), time to peak (TTP), transfer constant (Ktrans), rate constant (Kep) and extravascular-extracellular space volume (Ve). IS calculation included points 5 to 15. AUC and TTP were calculated from points 5 to 25. Parametric maps were obtained for the illustration of this work, but were not used for the analysis itself in order to avoid bias in the deposition of ROIs.

02

Conditions studied

  • Bone Marrow

Keywords

  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Bone Marrow
  • Hip
  • Lumbar Vertebrae
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Lille is the lead sponsor of 625 studies on the registry; 141 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adult patients referred to the musculoskeletal imaging department for a MRI examination of the hip or sacro-iliac joints with normal appearing bones on MR images.

Inclusion criteria

  • Major patients
  • patients who requires MRI examination of the hip or sacro-iliac joints
  • patients who required a gadolinium injection for the clinical needs were included.
  • normal appearing bones on MR images.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients under 18 years old,
  • pregnant women, prisoners,
  • patients unable to give informed consent,
  • patients very painful and non-cooperative patients,
  • Absolute contraindication to 3Tesla MRI (pacemaker, implantable pacemaker, metallic foreign body intraorbital)
  • patients with previous or current history of hip, neoplastic, inflammatory or hematologic diseases, known osteoporosis or osteopenia, hip orthopedic hardware, chronic renal failure, known hyperparathyroidism, known acute or chronic inflammatory syndrome.
  • abnormalities of the hip bones were seen on MR images, the patient was not included.
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • MRI Sequence

    Other: MRI sequence

Interventions

  • OtherMRI sequence

    One supplementary MRI sequence Dynamic Contrast Enhancement (DCE) was added to the clinical protocol.

    Also known as: Supplementary MRI sequence

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Measure of transfer constant (Ktrans)

    This measure reflecting tissular perfusion is made in all the regions of interest.

    Time frame: On the day of the visit

  2. Measure of rate constant (Kep)

    This measure reflecting tissular perfusion is made in all the regions of interest.

    Time frame: On the day of the visit

  3. Measure of extra-vascular extra-cellular space (Ve)

    This measure reflecting tissular perfusion is made in all the regions of interest.

    Time frame: On the day of the visit

  4. Measure of the initial slope (IS) of the Time-Concentration Curves

    This measure reflecting tissular perfusion is made in all the regions of interest.

    Time frame: On the day of the visit

  5. Measure of the area under the curve (AUC) on the Time-Concentration Curves

    This measure reflecting tissular perfusion is made in all the regions of interest.

    Time frame: On the day of the visit

  6. Measure of the time to peak (TTP) on the Time-Concentration Curves

    This measure reflecting tissular perfusion is made in all the regions of interest.

    Time frame: On the day of the visit

Secondary outcomes

  1. Gender ratio

    In all the regions of interest, we sought for statistical correlation with the perfusion parameters listed as primary outcome measurements.

    Time frame: On the day of the visit

  2. Age ratio

    In all the regions of interest, we sought for statistical correlation with the perfusion parameters listed as primary outcome measurements.

    Time frame: On the day of the visit

  3. body mass index

    In all the regions of interest, we sought for statistical correlation with the perfusion parameters listed as primary outcome measurements.

    Time frame: On the day of the visit

  4. number of smokers

    In all the regions of interest, we sought for statistical correlation with the perfusion parameters listed as primary outcome measurements.

    Time frame: On the day of the visit

  5. number of alcohol consumers

    In all the regions of interest, we sought for statistical correlation with the perfusion parameters listed as primary outcome measurements.

    Time frame: On the day of the visit

  6. number of participants with diabetes

    In all the regions of interest, we sought for statistical correlation with the perfusion parameters listed as primary outcome measurements.

    Time frame: On the day of the visit

  7. number of participants with hypertension

    In all the regions of interest, we sought for statistical correlation with the perfusion parameters listed as primary outcome measurements.

    Time frame: On the day of the visit

  8. number of participants with hypercholesterolemia

    In all the regions of interest, we sought for statistical correlation with the perfusion parameters listed as primary outcome measurements.

    Time frame: On the day of the visit

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hospital Center Roger Salengro
    Lille, 59037, France
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 26, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02371824
Lead sponsor
University Hospital, Lille
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 26, 2015
Start date
Apr 2014
Primary completion
Oct 2014
Completion
Oct 2014
Last update
Feb 26, 2015

Study contacts

Anne COTTEN, MD
principal investigator · University Hospital, Lille

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion