A Phase 1/2 interventional study of autologous CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ natural regulat. T cells (nTregs) in Immunosuppressive Treatment of Living-donor Renal Transplantation, sponsored by Prof. Dr. Petra Reinke. Completed at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-02-05.
Sponsored by Prof. Dr. Petra Reinke · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment
The aim of this trial is to collect evidence of the safety of administering autologous CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ natural regulatory T cells (nTregs) to living-donor renal transplant recipients. In addition, the study will determine whether post-transplant nTregs infusion allows a tapering of conventional maintenance immunosuppression within 60 weeks after transplantation.
The ONE Study aims to explore the feasibility, safety and efficacy of regulatory cell therapies as adjunct immunosuppressive treatments in the context of living-donor renal transplantation.The clinical trial presented here (ONEnTreg13) will test autologous, polyclonally expanded CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ nTregs as a somatic cell-based medicinal product.
The objective of this study is to determine whether administration of nTregs to recipients of living-donor kidney transplants is safe and able to polarize the immunological response of the recipient away from graft rejection and towards graft acceptance, allowing a reduction in the doses of pharmacological maintenance immunosuppression.
Prof. Dr. Petra Reinke is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria for organ recipients:
Patients in ONEnTreg13 will be treated with four immunosuppressive agents, all of which are classified as an Investigational Medicinal Products (IMPs): * nTregs * Prednisolone * MMF * Tacrolimus
Biological: autologous CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ natural regulat. T cells (nTregs)
autologous CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ natural regulatory T cells (nTregs). nTregs will be infused at escalating doses of 0.5 x 10\^6, 1 x 10\^6, and 2.5-3 x 10\^6 cells/kg body weight in cohorts of three patients each.
Incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (BCAR) within 60 weeks of organ transplantation
Time frame: 60 weeks
Incidence of infectious complications associated with cell administration.
Time frame: 60 weeks
Incidence of embolic pulmonary complications and other embolic events.
Time frame: 60 weeks
Incidence of immune responses resulting in anaphylactic reactions, cardiovascular compromise or other acute organ failure.
Time frame: 60 weeks
Biochemical disturbances associated with the cell infusion.
Time frame: 60 weeks
Over-suppression of the immune system assessed by the incidence of opportunistic infections, especially, CMV, EBV and polyoma virus.
Time frame: 60 weeks
Over-suppression of the immune system assessed by the incidence of neoplasia.
Time frame: 60 weeks
Prevention of acute rejection will be secondarily assessed by measuring
i) time to first acute rejection episode ii) severity of acute rejection episodes based on response to treatment and histological scoring iii) the level of total immunosuppression drugs at the final trial visit.
Time frame: 60 weeks
Incidence of patients treated for subclinical acute rejection on the basis of histopathological findings
Time frame: 60 weeks
Prevention of chronic graft dysfunction (chronic rejection or IF/TA) will be assessed by clinical (impairment of GFR) and histopathological (Banff staging) measures.
Time frame: 60 weeks
Incidence of post-transplant dialysis, inclusion on the transplant waiting list or retransplantation following graft loss through rejection (acute or chronic).
Time frame: 60 weeks
Avoidance of drug-related complications by immunosuppressant reduction will be assessed by the incidence of reported adverse drug reactions.
Time frame: 60 weeks
This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.