ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02370875Updated Sep 15, 2023Results posted

rTMS and Botulinum Toxin in Benign Essential Blepharospasm

An interventional study of Magstim RapidStim2 and Sham Magstim RapidStim2 in Benign Essential Blepharospasm, sponsored by University of Florida. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 30 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-09-15.

Sponsored by University of Florida · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
12
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
30 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Benign essential blepharospasm (BEB) is a functionally disabling focal dystonia. Botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) therapy is suboptimal in many BEB patients. Repetitious transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) therapy is a promising noninvasive therapy and has shown positive benefits in BEB. rTMS therapy can be easily combined with BoNT injections to enhance the effects of BoNT in BEB.

Read the detailed description

A two week course of rTMS therapy to achieve sustained benefits will be employed. With standard BoNT treatment, the peak-dose benefits are seen at about 4-6 weeks after the administration of injections. rTMS will be introduced during this peak-dose period (about 6 weeks after BoNT or T1).The effects of combined therapy at about 10 weeks after BoNT injections (T2) and at about 12 weeks after BoNT injections (T3) will be examined along with the physiological effects at these time points.

02

Conditions studied

  • Benign Essential Blepharospasm
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of Florida is the lead sponsor of 1,285 studies on the registry; 199 are open to participants now.

Of its 177 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 141 (80%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
30 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • subjects diagnosed with blepharospasm or cranio-cervical dystonia who receive BoNT therapy at the Center for Movement Disorders will be approached. The investigators will enroll only those subjects who report experiencing positive benefits with BoNT but lasting about 10 weeks or less.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnancy
  • active seizure disorder
  • significant cognitive impairment
  • exposure to neuroleptics
  • presence of a metallic body such as pacemaker, implants, prosthesis, artificial limb or joint, shunt, metal rods and hearing aid.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
12 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Real rTMS stimulation

    Repetitious transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) will be delivered using the Magstim RapidStim2 over each anterior cingulate cortex, using a figure-of-eight coil. The investigators will apply rTMS with 0.2 Hz frequency to the ACC. 180 stimuli will be delivered with a stimulator output of 100% active motor threshold (AMT). AMT will be assessed at the tibialis anterior muscle with the coil. The AMT will be defined as the lowest stimulation intensity required to evoke a 150 μV potential in the target muscle. To determine the stimulation site for ACC, the coil will be placed over Fz and then moved over the midline of the brain in 0.5-cm steps anteriorly, until the point of maximum motor evoked potential in the orbicularis oculi (OO) muscle. The coil position will be marked on the skin. These rTMS sessions will be repeated daily for 10 days.

    Device: Magstim RapidStim2

  • Sham comparator
    Sham rTMS Stimulation

    During sham repetitious transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), subjects will undergo the same procedure for identifying stimulus location as used in patients receiving real rTMS using the sham Magstim RapidStim2 coil. This coil will be placed on the patient's head in an identical manner however will not be connected to the Magstim device. Instead another coil will be connected to provide stimulation sound. In each stimulation condition, the Magstim will be placed behind the patient and not visible to him or her. Placebo sham coil which produces discharge noise and vibration similar to a real coil without stimulating the cerebral cortex. During rTMS, all patients will continue to wear ear plugs as instructed during the real stimulation sessions.

    Device: Sham Magstim RapidStim2

Interventions

  • DeviceMagstim RapidStim2

    Application of repetitious transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) pulses using Magstim RapidStim2 to a specific brain target at predefined stimulation parameters.

  • DeviceSham Magstim RapidStim2

    Same procedure as real rTMS without stimulating the cerebral cortex.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in JRS Severity Score

    The change in the score of the Jankovic Rating Scale subscore for severity. Rated on a 5-point scale (0-4), where a higher score indicates higher severity of blepharospasm.

    Time frame: 2 weeks after rTMS

  2. Change in JRS Frequency Score

    The change in the score of the Jankovic Rating Scale subscore for frequency. Rated on a 5-point scale (0-4), where a higher score indicates higher frequency of forced blinks in blepharospasm.

    Time frame: 2 weeks after rTMS

  3. Change in Number of Sustained Forced Eye Blinks

    A video recording (5 minutes) was scored by two blinded neurologists to count the number of sustained forced eye-blinks.

    Time frame: 2 weeks after rTMS

  4. Change in Duration of Forced Blinks

    A video recording (5 minutes) was scored by two blinded neurologists to count the duration of sustained forced eye-blinks.

    Time frame: 2 weeks after rTMS

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in CDQ-24 QOL Score

    Change in score of the Craniocervical dystonia questionnaire (CDQ-24), a self-reported questionnaire designed to evaluate the impact of dystonia on activities of daily living and quality of life. The total CDQ-24 score can therefore range from 0 to 96, with higher scores meaning greater impairment due to dystonia.

    Time frame: 2 weeks after rTMS

  2. Change in CDQ-24 ADL Subscore

    Change in Actitivities of Daily Living (ADL) subscore of the Craniocervical dystonia questionnaire (CDQ-24), a questionnaire designed to evaluate quality of life outcomes for patients with dystonia. The ADL subscore is obtained from 6 of the 24 questions. Each question is rated on a 5-point scale (0-4), where a higher number indicates increasing severity of impairment for that daily activity due to dystonia. The total ADL subscore takes the sum of the number from five questions (a value from 0 to 24), then linearly transforms that sum to a 0-100 scale, where a higher score means greater impairment in daily life.

    Time frame: 2 weeks after rTMS

  3. Change in Social Subscale of CDQ-24

    Change in the social subscore of the Craniocervical dystonia questionnaire (CDQ-24), a questionnaire designed to evaluate quality of life outcomes for patients with dystonia. The social subscore is obtained from 4 of the 24 questions. Each question is rated on a 5-point scale (0-4), where a higher number indicates increasing severity of social impairment due to dystonia. The total social subscore can therefore range from 0 to 16, with higher scores meaning greater impairment of social activities.

    Time frame: 2 weeks after rTMS

07

Results

Posted Sep 15, 2023

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneReal rTMS StimulationSham rTMS Stimulation
Started66
Completed66
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in JRS Severity Score

The change in the score of the Jankovic Rating Scale subscore for severity. Rated on a 5-point scale (0-4), where a higher score indicates higher severity of blepharospasm.

Time frame:
2 weeks after rTMS
Reported as:
Mean · Change in score
Change in JRS Severity Score
Change in scoreReal rTMS StimulationSham rTMS Stimulation
Change in JRS Severity Score-1.8 ± 0.8-0.1 ± 0.23
PrimaryChange in JRS Frequency Score

The change in the score of the Jankovic Rating Scale subscore for frequency. Rated on a 5-point scale (0-4), where a higher score indicates higher frequency of forced blinks in blepharospasm.

Time frame:
2 weeks after rTMS
Reported as:
Mean · Change in score
Change in JRS Frequency Score
Change in scoreReal rTMS StimulationSham rTMS Stimulation
Change in JRS Frequency Score-1.4 ± 0.8-0.1 ± 0.2
PrimaryChange in Number of Sustained Forced Eye Blinks

A video recording (5 minutes) was scored by two blinded neurologists to count the number of sustained forced eye-blinks.

Time frame:
2 weeks after rTMS
Reported as:
Mean · blinks per 5 minutes
Change in Number of Sustained Forced Eye Blinks
blinks per 5 minutesReal rTMS StimulationSham rTMS Stimulation
Change in Number of Sustained Forced Eye Blinks-2.3 ± 0.8-0.5 ± 0.1
PrimaryChange in Duration of Forced Blinks

A video recording (5 minutes) was scored by two blinded neurologists to count the duration of sustained forced eye-blinks.

Time frame:
2 weeks after rTMS
Reported as:
Mean · Change in seconds
Change in Duration of Forced Blinks
Change in secondsReal rTMS StimulationSham rTMS Stimulation
Change in Duration of Forced Blinks-2.6 ± 1.1-0.3 ± 0.8
SecondaryChange in CDQ-24 QOL Score

Change in score of the Craniocervical dystonia questionnaire (CDQ-24), a self-reported questionnaire designed to evaluate the impact of dystonia on activities of daily living and quality of life. The total CDQ-24 score can therefore range from 0 to 96, with higher scores meaning greater impairment due to dystonia.

Time frame:
2 weeks after rTMS
Reported as:
Mean · Change in score
Change in CDQ-24 QOL Score
Change in scoreReal rTMS StimulationSham rTMS Stimulation
Change in CDQ-24 QOL Score-10.6 ± 5.1-4.3 ± 2.1
SecondaryChange in CDQ-24 ADL Subscore

Change in Actitivities of Daily Living (ADL) subscore of the Craniocervical dystonia questionnaire (CDQ-24), a questionnaire designed to evaluate quality of life outcomes for patients with dystonia. The ADL subscore is obtained from 6 of the 24 questions. Each question is rated on a 5-point scale (0-4), where a higher number indicates increasing severity of impairment for that daily activity due to dystonia. The total ADL subscore takes the sum of the number from five questions (a value from 0 to 24), then linearly transforms that sum to a 0-100 scale, where a higher score means greater impairment in daily life.

Time frame:
2 weeks after rTMS
Reported as:
Mean · Change in score
Change in CDQ-24 ADL Subscore
Change in scoreReal rTMS StimulationSham rTMS Stimulation
Change in CDQ-24 ADL Subscore-30 ± 12.1-15 ± 13.2
SecondaryChange in Social Subscale of CDQ-24

Change in the social subscore of the Craniocervical dystonia questionnaire (CDQ-24), a questionnaire designed to evaluate quality of life outcomes for patients with dystonia. The social subscore is obtained from 4 of the 24 questions. Each question is rated on a 5-point scale (0-4), where a higher number indicates increasing severity of social impairment due to dystonia. The total social subscore can therefore range from 0 to 16, with higher scores meaning greater impairment of social activities.

Time frame:
2 weeks after rTMS
Reported as:
Mean · Change in score
Change in Social Subscale of CDQ-24
Change in scoreReal rTMS StimulationSham rTMS Stimulation
Change in Social Subscale of CDQ-24-15 ± 11.2-2.5 ± 13.2

Adverse events

Collected over 2 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Real rTMS Stimulation0/6 (0%)0/6 (0%)0/6 (0%)
Sham rTMS Stimulation0/6 (0%)0/6 (0%)0/6 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Real rTMS StimulationSham rTMS StimulationTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years448
>=65 years224
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)Real rTMS StimulationSham rTMS StimulationTotal
Mean68.8 ± 7.469.3 ± 7.269.1 ± 7.1
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Real rTMS StimulationSham rTMS StimulationTotal
Female459
Male213
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Real rTMS StimulationSham rTMS StimulationTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American000
White6612
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Real rTMS StimulationSham rTMS StimulationTotal
United States6612
BEB severity on Jankovic Rating Scale
BEB severity on Jankovic Rating Scale(Score on evaluation)Real rTMS StimulationSham rTMS StimulationTotal
Mean3.1 ± 0.12.5 ± 1.12.8 ± 0.5
BEB frequency on Jankovic Rating Scale
BEB frequency on Jankovic Rating Scale(Score on evaluation)Real rTMS StimulationSham rTMS StimulationTotal
Mean3.3 ± 0.72.6 ± 1.22.9 ± 0.8
BEB blink frequency on video rating
BEB blink frequency on video rating(Blinks per minute)Real rTMS StimulationSham rTMS StimulationTotal
Mean38.7 ± 15.237 ± 16.737.9 ± 9.2
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Center for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration
    Gainesville, Florida 32607, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Aug 10, 2015

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Feb 2015 to primary completion in May 2017, 27 months.

Results were first posted in Sep 2023, 6 years 4 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 10, 2015
First posted
Feb 25, 2015
StartActual
Feb 2015
Primary completionActual
May 2017
CompletionActual
Nov 2017
Results first posted
Sep 15, 2023
Last update
Sep 15, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 15, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02370875
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 25, 2015
Start date
Feb 2015
Primary completion
May 2017
Completion
Nov 2017
Results posted
Sep 15, 2023
Last update
Sep 15, 2023

Study contacts

Aparna Wagle-Shukla, MD
principal investigator · University of Florida

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion