ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02361242PLEODIAL-IIUpdated Feb 15, 2016

24-week Open-label Extension Study Evaluating PXT00864 Effect in Mild AD Patients Further to PLEODIAL-I Completion

A Phase 2 interventional study of PXT00864 in Alzheimer Disease, sponsored by Pharnext S.C.A.. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 60 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-02-15.

Sponsored by Pharnext S.C.A. · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
45
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
60 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

PLEODIAL-II study is an extension of the previous pilot PLEODIAL-I study (CLN-PXT00864-03 protocol) and is designed for the descriptive analysis of patients with mild AD who are exposed to PXT00864 over an additional 24-week period.

Read the detailed description

Patients having completed the previous 12-week PLEODIAL-I study were eligible to receive PXT00864 in this 24-week open-label extension PLEODIAL-II study in order to collect some additional long-term data regarding the safety and the potential effect of PXT00864 on cognitive and behavioural impairments.

02

Conditions studied

  • Alzheimer Disease

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • PXT00864
  • mild AD
  • phase 2a
03

In context

Alzheimer Disease

3,965 studies on the registry are indexed under Alzheimer Disease; 926 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 45 is below the median of 70 across 3,019 interventional studies indexed under Alzheimer Disease.

Browse Alzheimer Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Pharnext S.C.A. is the lead sponsor of 6 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
60 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Main Inclusion Criteria:

  • Mild Alzheimer's Disease patient who was included in PLEODIAL-I study
  • (MMSE) score greater or equal to 20

Main Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient who was not compliant with the previous PLEODIAL-I study protocol
  • Patient who experienced significant adverse events which necessitated treatment discontinuation during the PLEODIAL-I study
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

MMSE and MoCA

Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
45 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    PXT00864 Dose 1

    1 orange capsule containing 0.4 mg of acamprosate and 1 white capsule containing 6 mg of baclofen are taken orally b.i.d during 24 weeks.

    Drug: PXT00864

  • Experimental
    PXT00864 Dose 2

    1 orange capsule containing 1 mg of acamprosate and 1 white capsule containing 15 mg of baclofen are taken orally b.i.d during 24 weeks.

    Drug: PXT00864

  • Experimental
    PXT00864 Dose 3

    1 orange capsule containing 20 mg of acamprosate and 1 white capsule containing 12 mg of baclofen are taken orally b.i.d during 24 weeks.

    Drug: PXT00864

Interventions

  • DrugPXT00864

    PXT00864 is a fixed-dose combination of baclofen and acamprosate

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from Baseline in the total score of the 11-items Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale- Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog)

    Scores on the ADAS-Cog range from 0 to 70 with higher scores indicating greater cognitive impairment

    Time frame: V5 (study entry), V6 (after 12 weeks), V7 (after 24 weeks)

  2. Number of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

    Time frame: throughout the 24-week study period

07

Study locations

1 site
  • CMRR
    Bordeaux, France
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Jun 2013, a primary completion of Dec 2015 and a completion of Dec 2015. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 6, 2015
First posted
Feb 11, 2015
Start
Jun 2013
Primary completionActual
Dec 2015
CompletionActual
Dec 2015
Last update
Feb 15, 2016
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 15, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02361242
Lead sponsor
Pharnext S.C.A.
Collaborators
Ascopharm Groupe Novasco
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 11, 2015
Start date
Jun 2013
Primary completion
Dec 2015
Completion
Dec 2015
Last update
Feb 15, 2016

Study contacts

Jean-Marc Orgogozo, MD
principal investigator · Hospital Pellegrin, Bordeaux, France

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion