CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02347761GOLDEN-3Updated Mar 22, 2018Results posted

Efficacy and Safety Trial of 12 Weeks of Treatment With Nebulized SUN-101 in Patients With COPD

A Phase 3 interventional study of SUN-101 50 mcg BID eFlow (CS) nebulizer and SUN-101 25 mcg BID eFlow (CS) nebulizer in COPD, sponsored by Sunovion Respiratory Development Inc.. Completed at 44 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 40 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-03-22.

Sponsored by Sunovion Respiratory Development Inc. · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
653
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a trial of 12 weeks of treatment with nebulized SUN-101 using an Investigational eFlow® Closed System (CS) nebulizer in subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) according to the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD 2014) guidelines.

Read the detailed description

This is a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter, efficacy and safety trial of 12 weeks of treatment with nebulized SUN-101 using an Investigational eFlow® Closed System (CS) nebulizer in approximately 645 subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) according to the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD 2014) guidelines.

SUN-101 or placebo will be administered twice daily as an oral inhalation using the investigational eFlow CS nebulizer. Approximately 150 subjects will be enrolled in the substudy (at selected sites only). These subjects will be required to participate in serial spirometry, vital signs, ECGs, and an additional Holter monitor assessment at Visit 6 (Week 12). This subset of subjects will be referred to as the Substudy Population.

02

Conditions studied

  • COPD

Keywords

  • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Sunovion Respiratory Development Inc. is the lead sponsor of 10 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Male or female patients age ≥ 40 years, inclusive
  2. A clinical diagnosis of COPD according to the GOLD 2014 guidelines
  3. Current smokers or ex-smokers with at least 10 pack-year smoking history (eg, at least 1 pack/day for 10 years, or equivalent)
  4. Post-bronchodilator (following inhalation of ipratropium bromide) FEV1 \< 80% of predicted normal and > 0.7 L during Screening (Visit 1)
  5. Post-bronchodilator (following inhalation of ipratropium bromide) FEV1/FVC ratio \< 0.70 during Screening (Visit 1)
  6. Ability to perform reproducible spirometry according to the American Thoracic Society (ATS) and European Respiratory Society (ERS) guidelines (2005)
  7. Subject, if female ≤ 65 years of age and of child bearing potential, must have a negative serum pregnancy test at Visit 1. Females of childbearing potential must be instructed to and agree to avoid pregnancy during the study and must use an acceptable method of birth control: a) an oral contraceptive, an intrauterine device (IUD), implantable contraceptive, transdermal or injectable contraceptive for at least 1 month prior to entering the study with continued use throughout the study and for thirty days following participation; b) barrier method of contraception, eg, condom and /or diaphragm with spermicide while participating in the study; and/or c) abstinence
  8. Willing and able to provide written informed consent
  9. Willing and able to attend all study visits and adhere to all study assessments and procedures

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Severe comorbidities including unstable cardiac or pulmonary disease or any other medical conditions that would, in the opinion of the Investigator, preclude the subject from safely completing the required tests or the study, or is likely to result in disease progression that would require withdrawal of the subject
  2. Concomitant clinically significant respiratory disease other than COPD (eg, asthma, tuberculosis, bronchiectasis or other non-specific pulmonary disease).
  3. Recent history of COPD exacerbation requiring hospitalization or need for increased treatments for COPD within 6 weeks prior to Screening (Visit 1)
  4. Use of daily oxygen therapy > 12 hours per day
  5. Respiratory tract infection within 6 weeks prior to Screening (Visit 1)
  6. Use of oral, intravenous, or intramuscular steroids within 3 months prior to Screening (Visit 1)
  7. History of malignancy of any organ system, treated or untreated within the past 5 years, with the exception of localized basal cell carcinoma of the skin
  8. Prolonged QTcF (> 450 msec for males and > 470 msec for females) during Screening (Visit 1) as determined from the report provided by the central laboratory, or history of long QT syndrome
  9. History of or clinically significant ongoing bladder outflow obstruction or history of catheterization for relief of bladder outflow obstruction within the previous 6 months.
  10. History of narrow angle glaucoma
  11. History of hypersensitivity or intolerance to aerosol medications
  12. Recent documented history (within the previous 3 months) of substance abuse
  13. Significant psychiatric disease that would likely result in the subject not being able to complete the study, in the opinion of the Investigator
  14. Participation in another investigational drug study where drug was received within 30 days prior to Screening (Visit 1) or current participation in another investigational drug trial, including a SUN-101 study
  15. Previously received SUN-101 (active treatment; formerly known as EP-101).
  16. Contraindicated for treatment with, or having a history of reactions/hypersensitivity to anticholinergic agents, beta2 agonists, or sympathomimetic amines
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
653 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    SUN-101 50 mcg BID eFlow (CS) nebulizer

    SUN-101 50 mcg twice daily (BID) eFlow (R) Closed System (CR) nebulizer

    Drug: SUN-101 50 mcg BID eFlow (CS) nebulizer

  • Experimental
    SUN-101 25 mcg BID eFlow (CS) nebulizer

    SUN-101 25 mcg twice daily (BID) eFlow (R) Closed System (CR) nebulizer

    Drug: SUN-101 25 mcg BID eFlow (CS) nebulizer

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo BID eFlow (CS) nebulizer

    Placebo twice daily (BID) eFlow (R) Closed System (CR) nebulizer

    Drug: Placebo BID eFlow Closed System (CS) nebulizer

Interventions

  • DrugSUN-101 50 mcg BID eFlow (CS) nebulizer

    SUN-101 50 mcg twice daily (BID) eFlow Closed System (CS) nebulizer

  • DrugSUN-101 25 mcg BID eFlow (CS) nebulizer

    SUN-101 25 mcg twice daily (BID) eFlow Closed System (CS) nebulizer

  • DrugPlacebo BID eFlow Closed System (CS) nebulizer

    Placebo twice daily (BID) eFlow Closed System (CS) nebulizer

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 12

    ALL COLLECTED-Spirometry was performed according to internationally accepted standards.Trough FEV1 at Week 12 was defined as the mean of the values collected at two time points 30 minutes apart at approximately 24 hours (± 1 hour) after the previous morning dose.Change from baseline in trough FEV1 was calculated as the trough FEV1 value at Week 12 minus the morning trough FEV1 at baseline (mean of the two pre-dose values at 45 and 15 minutes prior to the first dose). All collected values were used in this analyses, regardless if the subject remained on randomized treatment or not, and regardless if the values might potentially be affected by other therapies or not Values not collected remained as missing values and were assumed to be missing at random (MAR) "ALL COLLECTED" and "ON TREATMENT" data are the same. The only difference is in the number of visits included for those participants who may have discontinued randomized treatment but remained in the study." for all endpoints

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  2. Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Week 12

    ON TEATMENT-Spirometry was performed according to internationally accepted standards.Trough FEV1 at Week 12 was defined as the mean of the values collected at two time points 30 minutes apart at approximately 24 hours (± 1 hour) after the previous morning dose.Change from baseline in trough FEV1 was calculated as the trough FEV1 value at Week 12 minus the morning trough FEV1 at baseline (mean of the two pre-dose values at 45 and 15 minutes prior to the first dose).Only on-treatment values (which included only data collected while subjects were taking study drug) are used for this analysis. Values affected by other medication use were set to missing. Non-collected or missing data were not imputed for this analysis. Values not collected remained as missing values and were assumed to be missing at random (MAR).

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Secondary outcomes

  1. Standardized Change From Baseline at Week 12 in FEV1 Area Under the Curve (AUC) (0-12) in the Substudy Population

    ALL COLLECTED The standardized FEV1 AUC(0-12) was calculated at weeks 0 and 12 for the Substudy Population with extended spirometry measurements. The trapezoidal rule was used to calculate FEV1 AUC and then normalized to the length of time. Intermittent missing spirometry measurements were ignored and the trapezoidal rule would simply span the missing time point(s). If the Hour 12 time point was missing, then the AUC(0-12) calculation was based on the time interval up to the last non-missing time point prior to Hour 12. If a subject has a missing baseline FEV1, then that subject had a missing AUC. All collected values were used in the analyses, regardless if the subject remained on randomized treatment or not, and regardless if the values might potentially be affected by other therapies or not Values not collected remained as missing values and were assumed to be missing at random (MAR).

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  2. Standardized Change From Baseline at Week 12 in FEV1 Area Under the Curve (AUC) (0-12) in Substudy Population

    ON TREATMENT The standardized FEV1 AUC(0-12) was calculated at weeks 0 and 12 for the Substudy Population with extended spirometry measurements. The trapezoidal rule was used to calculate FEV1 AUC and then normalized to the length of time. Intermittent missing spirometry measurements were ignored and the trapezoidal rule would simply span the missing time points. If the Hour 12 time point was missing, then the AUC(0-12) calculation was based on the time interval up to the last non-missing time point prior to Hour 12. If a subject has a missing baseline FEV1, then that subject had a missing AUC.Only on-treatment values (which included only data collected while subjects were taking study drug) are used for this analysis. Values affected by other medication use were set to missing. Non-collected or missing data were not imputed for this analysis. Values not collected remained as missing values and were assumed to be missing at random (MAR).

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  3. Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Week 12

    ALL COLLECTED Spirometry was performed according to internationally accepted standards. Trough FVC at Week 12 was defined as the mean of the values collected at two time points 30 minutes apart at approximately 24 hours (± 1 hour) after the previous morning dose. All collected values were used in the analyses, regardless if the subject remained on randomized treatment or not, and regardless if the values might potentially be affected by other therapies or not Values not collected remained as missing values and were assumed to be missing at random

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  4. Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Week 12

    ON TREATMENT Spirometry was performed according to internationally accepted standards. Trough FVC at Week 12 was defined as the mean of the values collected at two time points 30 minutes apart at approximately 24 hours (± 1 hour) after the previous morning dose. Change from baseline in trough FVC was calculated as the trough FVC value at Week 12 minus the morning trough FVC at baseline (mean of the two pre-dose values at 45 and 15 minutes prior to the first dose).Only on-treatment values (which included only data collected while subjects were taking study drug) are used for this analysis. Values affected by other medication use were set to missing. Non-collected or missing data were not imputed for this analysis. Values not collected remained as missing values and were assumed to be missing at random (MAR).

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  5. Change From Baseline in Health Status Measured by St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) at Week 12/End of Study

    ALL COLLECTED Participants reported change in health status by using the SGRQ. The SGRQ contains 50 items divided into 2 parts covering 3 aspects of health related to COPD: symptoms, activity, and impacts. A score was calculated for each of these 3 subscales and a "Total" score was calculated. In each case the lowest possible value is 0 and the highest 100. Higher values correspond to greater impairment of health status. All collected values were used in the analyses, regardless if the subject remained on randomized treatment or not. Values not collected remained as missing values and were assumed to be missing at random (MAR).

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  6. Change From Baseline in Health Status Measured by St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Week 12/End of Study

    ON TREATMENT Participants reported change in health status by using the SGRQ. The SGRQ contains 50 items divided into 2 parts covering 3 aspects of health related to COPD: symptoms, activity, and impacts. A score was calculated for each of these 3 subscales and a "Total" score was calculated. In each case the lowest possible value is 0 and the highest 100. Higher values correspond to greater impairment of health status. Only on-treatment values (which included only data collected while subjects were taking study drug) are used for this analysis. Values affected by other medication use were set to missing. Non-collected or missing data were not imputed for this analysis. Values not collected remained as missing values and were assumed to be missing at random (MAR).

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  7. Change in Number of Rescue Medication Puffs Per Day Over the 12-week Double-blind Treatment Period

    ALL COLLECTED Participants completed an electronic diary (eDiary) daily (night time) to record the number of puffs of rescue medication inhaled in the previous 24 hours. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. All collected values were used in the analyses, regardless if the subject remained on randomized treatment or not. Values not collected remained as missing values and were assumed to be missing at random (MAR).

    Time frame: Week 0-12

  8. Number of Subjects With Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE)

    ALL COLLECTED All deaths and any other findings suggestive of a potential MACE (including clinically relevant information and SAEs, and all PTs form the SMQs "myocardial infarction", "other ischemic heart disease", "central nervous system hemorrhages and cerebrovascular conditions") were sent to an adjudication committee for review and categorized as CV death, nonfatal MI, and nonfatal stroke. The MACE score was defined as the total number of subjects with CV deaths, nonfatal MIs, and nonfatal strokes. These events were collected for the double-blind period (from the first date of study medication until the date of last contact)

    Time frame: Week 0-12

  9. Percentage of Subjects With Major Cardiac Events (MACE)

    ALL COLLECTED All deaths and any other findings suggestive of a potential MACE (including clinically relevant information and SAEs, and all PTs form the SMQs "myocardial infarction", "other ischemic heart disease", "central nervous system hemorrhages and cerebrovascular conditions") were sent to an adjudication committee for review and categorized as CV death, nonfatal MI, and nonfatal stroke. The MACE score was defined as the total number of subjects with CV deaths, nonfatal MIs, and nonfatal strokes. These events were collected for the double-blind period (from the first date of study medication until the date of last contact)

    Time frame: Week 0-12

  10. Number of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)

    ON TREATMENT A TEAE is defined as any non-serious AE that occurred on or after the first dose of study medication and within 7 days after the last dose of study medication, or any serious AE that occurred on or after the first dose of study medication and within 30 days after the last dose of study medication. A treatment emergent AE is an on-treatment AE.

    Time frame: Week 0-12

  11. Percent of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)

    ON TREATMENT A TEAE is defined as any non-serious AE that occurred on or after the first dose of study medication and within 7 days after the last dose of study medication, or any serious AE that occurred on or after the first dose of study medication and within 30 days after the last dose of study medication. A treatment emergent AE is an on-treatment AE.

    Time frame: Week 0-12

  12. Number of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAE)

    ON TREATMENT A treatment emergent SAE is defined as any SAE that occurred on or after the first dose of study medication and within 30 days after the last dose of study medication. A treatment emergent SAE is an on-treatment SAE

    Time frame: Week 0-12

  13. Percent of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAE)

    ON TREATMENT A treatment emergent SAE is defined as any SAE that occurred on or after the first dose of study medication and within 30 days after the last dose of study medication. A treatment emergent SAE is an on-treatment SAE

    Time frame: Week 0-12

  14. Number of Subjects Who Discontinue Treatment Due to TEAE

    ON TREATMENT A TEAE is defined as any AE that occurred on or after the first dose of study medication and within 7 days after the last dose of study medication, or any serious AE that occurred on or after the first dose of study medication and within 30 days after the last dose of study medication. A treatment emergent AE is an on-treatment AE.

    Time frame: Week 0-12

  15. Percent of Subjects Who Discontinue Treatment Due to TEAE

    ON TREATMENT A TEAE is defined as any AE that occurred on or after the first dose of study medication and within 7 days after the last dose of study medication, or any serious AE that occurred on or after the first dose of study medication and within 30 days after the last dose of study medication. A treatment emergent AE is an on-treatment AE.

    Time frame: Week 0-12

  16. Incidence Rate Per 100 Person-years of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)

    ALL COLLECTED All deaths and any other findings suggestive of a potential MACE (including clinically relevant information and SAEs, and all PTs form the SMQs "myocardial infarction", "other ischemic heart disease", "central nervous system hemorrhages and cerebrovascular conditions") were sent to an adjudication committee for review and categorized as CV death, nonfatal MI, and nonfatal stroke. The MACE score was defined as the total number of subjects with CV deaths, nonfatal MIs, and nonfatal strokes. These events were collected for the double-blind period (from the first date of study medication until the date of last contact)I ncidence rate: TT= Total Time in years. Total Time (TT) is defined as the time from the first date of study drug until the latter of the date of last contact or 30 days after the date of last dose. Incidence Rate (per 1000 person-years) = n/TT x 1000.

    Time frame: Week 0-12

07

Results

Posted Mar 22, 2018

Participant flow

All Collected
Participant flow — All Collected
MilestoneSUN-101 50 mcg BID eFlow (CS) NebulizerSUN-101 25 mcg BID eFlow (CS) NebulizerPlacebo BID eFlow (CS) Nebulizer
Started218217218
Completed201203191
Not completed171427
Withdrew: Death100
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up323
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject111122
Withdrew: Invetigator disretion200
Withdrew: Instillation site pain001
Withdrew: Exacerbation of copd001
Withdrew: Moved/travel010
On Study Treatment
Participant flow — On Study Treatment
MilestoneSUN-101 50 mcg BID eFlow (CS) NebulizerSUN-101 25 mcg BID eFlow (CS) NebulizerPlacebo BID eFlow (CS) Nebulizer
Started218217218
Completed191194176
Not completed272342
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy234
Withdrew: Non-compliance with study medication002
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject735
Withdrew: Move/travel265
Withdrew: Dissastisfaction with device214
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up211
Withdrew: Investigator discretion200
Withdrew: Durg not working011
Withdrew: Adverse event10820

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Baseline in Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 12

ALL COLLECTED-Spirometry was performed according to internationally accepted standards.Trough FEV1 at Week 12 was defined as the mean of the values collected at two time points 30 minutes apart at approximately 24 hours (± 1 hour) after the previous morning dose.Change from baseline in trough FEV1 was calculated as the trough FEV1 value at Week 12 minus the morning trough FEV1 at baseline (mean of the two pre-dose values at 45 and 15 minutes prior to the first dose). All collected values were used in this analyses, regardless if the subject remained on randomized treatment or not, and regardless if the values might potentially be affected by other therapies or not Values not collected remained as missing values and were assumed to be missing at random (MAR) "ALL COLLECTED" and "ON TREATMENT" data are the same. The only difference is in the number of visits included for those participants who may have discontinued randomized treatment but remained in the study." for all endpoints

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · liters
Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 12
litersSUN-101 50 mcg BID eFlow (CS) NebulizerSUN-101 25 mcg BID eFlow (CS) NebulizerPlacebo BID eFlow (CS) Nebulizer
Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 120.0961 ± 0.013710.0886 ± 0.01369-0.0075 ± 0.01397
Statistical analysis
  • SUN-101 50 mcg BID eFlow (CS) Nebulizer vs Placebo BID eFlow (CS) Nebulizer · MMixed Model Repeat Measurement · p = <0.0001 (The primary null hypothesis for this study is that the mean change from baseline in trough FEV1 at Week 12 for the SUN-101 50 mcg dose is equal to the mean change from baseline in trough FEV1 at Week 12 for Placebo.) · Least squares mea difference (se): 0.1036 · 95% CI 0.0663 to 0.1409standard error of the least squares mean
  • SUN-101 25 mcg BID eFlow (CS) Nebulizer vs Placebo BID eFlow (CS) Nebulizer · Mixed Model Repeat Measurement · p = <0.0001 (The primary null hypothesis for this study is that the mean change from baseline in trough FEV1 at Week 12 for the SUN-101 50 mcg dose is equal to the mean change from baseline in trough FEV1 at Week 12 for Placebo.) · Least squares mean difference (se): 0.0961 · 95% CI 0.0589 to 0.1334Standard error of the least squares mean
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Week 12

ON TEATMENT-Spirometry was performed according to internationally accepted standards.Trough FEV1 at Week 12 was defined as the mean of the values collected at two time points 30 minutes apart at approximately 24 hours (± 1 hour) after the previous morning dose.Change from baseline in trough FEV1 was calculated as the trough FEV1 value at Week 12 minus the morning trough FEV1 at baseline (mean of the two pre-dose values at 45 and 15 minutes prior to the first dose).Only on-treatment values (which included only data collected while subjects were taking study drug) are used for this analysis. Values affected by other medication use were set to missing. Non-collected or missing data were not imputed for this analysis. Values not collected remained as missing values and were assumed to be missing at random (MAR).

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · liters
Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Week 12
litersSUN-101 50 mcg BID eFlow (CS) NebulizerSUN-101 25 mcg BID eFlow (CS) NebulizerPlacebo BID eFlow (CS) Nebulizer
Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Week 120.1025 ± 0.014970.0814 ± 0.01475-0.0238 ± 0.01534
Statistical analysis
  • SUN-101 50 mcg BID eFlow (CS) Nebulizer vs Placebo BID eFlow (CS) Nebulizer · Least squares mean (SE) · p = <0.0001 (In order to control the family-wise Type I error rate, the Hochberg procedure (a tree-structured gatekeeping procedure) was used for comparisons of the primary efficacy endpoints and the key secondary efficacy endpoints.) · Least squares mean (se): 0.1264 · 95% CI 0.0856 to 0.1672
  • SUN-101 25 mcg BID eFlow (CS) Nebulizer vs Placebo BID eFlow (CS) Nebulizer · LS mean (SE) · p = <0.0001 · Ls mean (se): 0.1052 · 95% CI 0.0647 to 0.1457
SecondaryStandardized Change From Baseline at Week 12 in FEV1 Area Under the Curve (AUC) (0-12) in the Substudy Population

ALL COLLECTED The standardized FEV1 AUC(0-12) was calculated at weeks 0 and 12 for the Substudy Population with extended spirometry measurements. The trapezoidal rule was used to calculate FEV1 AUC and then normalized to the length of time. Intermittent missing spirometry measurements were ignored and the trapezoidal rule would simply span the missing time point(s). If the Hour 12 time point was missing, then the AUC(0-12) calculation was based on the time interval up to the last non-missing time point prior to Hour 12. If a subject has a missing baseline FEV1, then that subject had a missing AUC. All collected values were used in the analyses, regardless if the subject remained on randomized treatment or not, and regardless if the values might potentially be affected by other therapies or not Values not collected remained as missing values and were assumed to be missing at random (MAR).

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · liters
Standardized Change From Baseline at Week 12 in FEV1 Area Under the Curve (AUC) (0-12) in the Substudy Population
litersSUN-101 50 mcg BID eFlow (CS) NebulizerSUN-101 25 mcg BID eFlow (CS) NebulizerPlacebo BID eFlow (CS) Nebulizer
Standardized Change From Baseline at Week 12 in FEV1 Area Under the Curve (AUC) (0-12) in the Substudy Population0.0749 ± 0.026380.0579 ± 0.3011-0.0474 ± 0.03229
SecondaryStandardized Change From Baseline at Week 12 in FEV1 Area Under the Curve (AUC) (0-12) in Substudy Population

ON TREATMENT The standardized FEV1 AUC(0-12) was calculated at weeks 0 and 12 for the Substudy Population with extended spirometry measurements. The trapezoidal rule was used to calculate FEV1 AUC and then normalized to the length of time. Intermittent missing spirometry measurements were ignored and the trapezoidal rule would simply span the missing time points. If the Hour 12 time point was missing, then the AUC(0-12) calculation was based on the time interval up to the last non-missing time point prior to Hour 12. If a subject has a missing baseline FEV1, then that subject had a missing AUC.Only on-treatment values (which included only data collected while subjects were taking study drug) are used for this analysis. Values affected by other medication use were set to missing. Non-collected or missing data were not imputed for this analysis. Values not collected remained as missing values and were assumed to be missing at random (MAR).

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · liters
Standardized Change From Baseline at Week 12 in FEV1 Area Under the Curve (AUC) (0-12) in Substudy Population
litersSUN-101 50 mcg BID eFlow (CS) NebulizerSUN-101 25 mcg BID eFlow (CS) NebulizerPlacebo BID eFlow (CS) Nebulizer
Standardized Change From Baseline at Week 12 in FEV1 Area Under the Curve (AUC) (0-12) in Substudy Population0.0708 ± 0.027920.0496 ± 0.03280-0.0527 ± 0.03450
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Trough Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Week 12

ALL COLLECTED Spirometry was performed according to internationally accepted standards. Trough FVC at Week 12 was defined as the mean of the values collected at two time points 30 minutes apart at approximately 24 hours (± 1 hour) after the previous morning dose. All collected values were used in the analyses, regardless if the subject remained on randomized treatment or not, and regardless if the values might potentially be affected by other therapies or not Values not collected remained as missing values and were assumed to be missing at random

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · liters
Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Week 12
litersSUN-101 50 mcg BID eFlow (CS) NebulizerSUN-101 25 mcg BID eFlow (CS) NebulizerPlacebo BID eFlow (CS) Nebulizer
Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Week 120.1476 ± 0.022260.1515 ± 0.022200.0147 ± 0.2266
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Trough Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Week 12

ON TREATMENT Spirometry was performed according to internationally accepted standards. Trough FVC at Week 12 was defined as the mean of the values collected at two time points 30 minutes apart at approximately 24 hours (± 1 hour) after the previous morning dose. Change from baseline in trough FVC was calculated as the trough FVC value at Week 12 minus the morning trough FVC at baseline (mean of the two pre-dose values at 45 and 15 minutes prior to the first dose).Only on-treatment values (which included only data collected while subjects were taking study drug) are used for this analysis. Values affected by other medication use were set to missing. Non-collected or missing data were not imputed for this analysis. Values not collected remained as missing values and were assumed to be missing at random (MAR).

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · liters
Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Week 12
litersSUN-101 50 mcg BID eFlow (CS) NebulizerSUN-101 25 mcg BID eFlow (CS) NebulizerPlacebo BID eFlow (CS) Nebulizer
Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Week 120.1566 ± 0.023920.1393 ± 0.02353-0.0101 ± 0.2450
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Health Status Measured by St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) at Week 12/End of Study

ALL COLLECTED Participants reported change in health status by using the SGRQ. The SGRQ contains 50 items divided into 2 parts covering 3 aspects of health related to COPD: symptoms, activity, and impacts. A score was calculated for each of these 3 subscales and a "Total" score was calculated. In each case the lowest possible value is 0 and the highest 100. Higher values correspond to greater impairment of health status. All collected values were used in the analyses, regardless if the subject remained on randomized treatment or not. Values not collected remained as missing values and were assumed to be missing at random (MAR).

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in Health Status Measured by St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) at Week 12/End of Study
scores on a scaleSUN-101 50 mcg BID eFlow (CS) NebulizerSUN-101 25 mcg BID eFlow (CS) NebulizerPlacebo BID eFlow (CS) Nebulizer
Change From Baseline in Health Status Measured by St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) at Week 12/End of Study-2.363 ± 0.8344-4.250 ± 0.8211-0.844 ± 0.8396
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Health Status Measured by St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Week 12/End of Study

ON TREATMENT Participants reported change in health status by using the SGRQ. The SGRQ contains 50 items divided into 2 parts covering 3 aspects of health related to COPD: symptoms, activity, and impacts. A score was calculated for each of these 3 subscales and a "Total" score was calculated. In each case the lowest possible value is 0 and the highest 100. Higher values correspond to greater impairment of health status. Only on-treatment values (which included only data collected while subjects were taking study drug) are used for this analysis. Values affected by other medication use were set to missing. Non-collected or missing data were not imputed for this analysis. Values not collected remained as missing values and were assumed to be missing at random (MAR).

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in Health Status Measured by St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Week 12/End of Study
scores on a scaleSUN-101 50 mcg BID eFlow (CS) NebulizerSUN-101 25 mcg BID eFlow (CS) NebulizerPlacebo BID eFlow (CS) Nebulizer
Change From Baseline in Health Status Measured by St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Week 12/End of Study-2.538 ± 0.8391-3.762 ± 0.8187-0.690 ± 0.8535
SecondaryChange in Number of Rescue Medication Puffs Per Day Over the 12-week Double-blind Treatment Period

ALL COLLECTED Participants completed an electronic diary (eDiary) daily (night time) to record the number of puffs of rescue medication inhaled in the previous 24 hours. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. All collected values were used in the analyses, regardless if the subject remained on randomized treatment or not. Values not collected remained as missing values and were assumed to be missing at random (MAR).

Time frame:
Week 0-12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · puffs (medication used)
Change in Number of Rescue Medication Puffs Per Day Over the 12-week Double-blind Treatment Period
puffs (medication used)SUN-101 50 mcg BID eFlow (CS) NebulizerSUN-101 25 mcg BID eFlow (CS) NebulizerPlacebo BID eFlow (CS) Nebulizer
Change in Number of Rescue Medication Puffs Per Day Over the 12-week Double-blind Treatment Period-0.815 ± 0.1234-0.609 ± 0.1259-0.632 ± 0.1257
SecondaryNumber of Subjects With Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE)

ALL COLLECTED All deaths and any other findings suggestive of a potential MACE (including clinically relevant information and SAEs, and all PTs form the SMQs "myocardial infarction", "other ischemic heart disease", "central nervous system hemorrhages and cerebrovascular conditions") were sent to an adjudication committee for review and categorized as CV death, nonfatal MI, and nonfatal stroke. The MACE score was defined as the total number of subjects with CV deaths, nonfatal MIs, and nonfatal strokes. These events were collected for the double-blind period (from the first date of study medication until the date of last contact)

Time frame:
Week 0-12
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Subjects With Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE)
participantsSUN-101 50 mcg BID eFlow (CS) NebulizerSUN-101 25 mcg BID eFlow (CS) NebulizerPlacebo BID eFlow (CS) Nebulizer
MACE score300
Cardiovascular Death100
non-fatal myocardial infraction100
non-fatal stroke100
SecondaryPercentage of Subjects With Major Cardiac Events (MACE)

ALL COLLECTED All deaths and any other findings suggestive of a potential MACE (including clinically relevant information and SAEs, and all PTs form the SMQs "myocardial infarction", "other ischemic heart disease", "central nervous system hemorrhages and cerebrovascular conditions") were sent to an adjudication committee for review and categorized as CV death, nonfatal MI, and nonfatal stroke. The MACE score was defined as the total number of subjects with CV deaths, nonfatal MIs, and nonfatal strokes. These events were collected for the double-blind period (from the first date of study medication until the date of last contact)

Time frame:
Week 0-12
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Subjects With Major Cardiac Events (MACE)
percentage of participantsSUN-101 50 mcg BID eFlow (CS) NebulizerSUN-101 25 mcg BID eFlow (CS) NebulizerPlacebo BID eFlow (CS) Nebulizer
MACE score1.400
Cardiovascular Death0.500
non-fatal myocardial infraction0.500
non-fatal stroke0.500
SecondaryNumber of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)

ON TREATMENT A TEAE is defined as any non-serious AE that occurred on or after the first dose of study medication and within 7 days after the last dose of study medication, or any serious AE that occurred on or after the first dose of study medication and within 30 days after the last dose of study medication. A treatment emergent AE is an on-treatment AE.

Time frame:
Week 0-12
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)
participantsSUN-101 50 mcg BID eFlow (CS) NebulizerSUN-101 25 mcg BID eFlow (CS) NebulizerPlacebo BID eFlow (CS) Nebulizer
Number of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)10586114
SecondaryPercent of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)

ON TREATMENT A TEAE is defined as any non-serious AE that occurred on or after the first dose of study medication and within 7 days after the last dose of study medication, or any serious AE that occurred on or after the first dose of study medication and within 30 days after the last dose of study medication. A treatment emergent AE is an on-treatment AE.

Time frame:
Week 0-12
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percent of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)
percentage of participantsSUN-101 50 mcg BID eFlow (CS) NebulizerSUN-101 25 mcg BID eFlow (CS) NebulizerPlacebo BID eFlow (CS) Nebulizer
Percent of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)48.239.652.3
SecondaryNumber of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAE)

ON TREATMENT A treatment emergent SAE is defined as any SAE that occurred on or after the first dose of study medication and within 30 days after the last dose of study medication. A treatment emergent SAE is an on-treatment SAE

Time frame:
Week 0-12
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAE)
participantsSUN-101 50 mcg BID eFlow (CS) NebulizerSUN-101 25 mcg BID eFlow (CS) NebulizerPlacebo BID eFlow (CS) Nebulizer
Number of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAE)10811
SecondaryPercent of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAE)

ON TREATMENT A treatment emergent SAE is defined as any SAE that occurred on or after the first dose of study medication and within 30 days after the last dose of study medication. A treatment emergent SAE is an on-treatment SAE

Time frame:
Week 0-12
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percent of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAE)
percentage of participantsSUN-101 50 mcg BID eFlow (CS) NebulizerSUN-101 25 mcg BID eFlow (CS) NebulizerPlacebo BID eFlow (CS) Nebulizer
Percent of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAE)4.63.75.0
SecondaryNumber of Subjects Who Discontinue Treatment Due to TEAE

ON TREATMENT A TEAE is defined as any AE that occurred on or after the first dose of study medication and within 7 days after the last dose of study medication, or any serious AE that occurred on or after the first dose of study medication and within 30 days after the last dose of study medication. A treatment emergent AE is an on-treatment AE.

Time frame:
Week 0-12
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Subjects Who Discontinue Treatment Due to TEAE
participantsSUN-101 50 mcg BID eFlow (CS) NebulizerSUN-101 25 mcg BID eFlow (CS) NebulizerPlacebo BID eFlow (CS) Nebulizer
Number of Subjects Who Discontinue Treatment Due to TEAE8721
SecondaryPercent of Subjects Who Discontinue Treatment Due to TEAE

ON TREATMENT A TEAE is defined as any AE that occurred on or after the first dose of study medication and within 7 days after the last dose of study medication, or any serious AE that occurred on or after the first dose of study medication and within 30 days after the last dose of study medication. A treatment emergent AE is an on-treatment AE.

Time frame:
Week 0-12
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percent of Subjects Who Discontinue Treatment Due to TEAE
percentage of participantsSUN-101 50 mcg BID eFlow (CS) NebulizerSUN-101 25 mcg BID eFlow (CS) NebulizerPlacebo BID eFlow (CS) Nebulizer
Percent of Subjects Who Discontinue Treatment Due to TEAE3.73.29.6
SecondaryIncidence Rate Per 100 Person-years of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)

ALL COLLECTED All deaths and any other findings suggestive of a potential MACE (including clinically relevant information and SAEs, and all PTs form the SMQs "myocardial infarction", "other ischemic heart disease", "central nervous system hemorrhages and cerebrovascular conditions") were sent to an adjudication committee for review and categorized as CV death, nonfatal MI, and nonfatal stroke. The MACE score was defined as the total number of subjects with CV deaths, nonfatal MIs, and nonfatal strokes. These events were collected for the double-blind period (from the first date of study medication until the date of last contact)I ncidence rate: TT= Total Time in years. Total Time (TT) is defined as the time from the first date of study drug until the latter of the date of last contact or 30 days after the date of last dose. Incidence Rate (per 1000 person-years) = n/TT x 1000.

Time frame:
Week 0-12
Reported as:
Number · events per 100 person-years
Incidence Rate Per 100 Person-years of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)
events per 100 person-yearsSUN-101 50 mcg BID eFlow (CS) NebulizerSUN-101 25 mcg BID eFlow (CS) NebulizerPlacebo BID eFlow (CS) Nebulizer
MACE score45.500
Cardiovascular Death15.200
non-fatal myocardial infraction15.200
non-fatal stroke15.200

Adverse events

Collected over Week 0-12. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
SUN-101 50 mcg BID eFlow (CS) Nebulizer—10/218 (4.6%)37/218 (17%)
SUN-101 25 mcg BID eFlow (CS) Nebulizer—8/217 (3.7%)23/217 (10.6%)
Placebo BID eFlow (CS) Nebulizer—11/218 (5%)38/218 (17.4%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 32
Most frequent serious events
EventSUN-101 50 mcg BID eFlow (CS) NebulizerSUN-101 25 mcg BID eFlow (CS) NebulizerPlacebo BID eFlow (CS) Nebulizer
chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders4/2182/2172/218
pneumoniaImmune system disorders2/2180/2170/218
angina pectorisCardiac disorders0/2181/2170/218
coronary artery stenosisCardiac disorders0/2181/2170/218
small intestinal obstructionGastrointestinal disorders0/2181/2170/218
pyelonephritisInfections and infestations0/2181/2170/218
lung adenocarcinoma stage IVNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/2181/2170/218
carotid artery stenosisNervous system disorders0/2181/2170/218
obstructive uropathyRenal and urinary disorders0/2181/2170/218
angina unstableCardiac disorders1/2180/2171/218
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventSUN-101 50 mcg BID eFlow (CS) NebulizerSUN-101 25 mcg BID eFlow (CS) NebulizerPlacebo BID eFlow (CS) Nebulizer
coughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders21/21816/21722/218
chronic obstructive ulmonary diseaseRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders19/2189/21717/218

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)SUN-101 50 mcg BID eFlow (CS) NebulizerSUN-101 25 mcg BID eFlow (CS) NebulizerPlacebo BID eFlow (CS) NebulizerTotal
<=18 years0000
Between 18 and 65 years135122109366
>=65 years8395109287
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)SUN-101 50 mcg BID eFlow (CS) NebulizerSUN-101 25 mcg BID eFlow (CS) NebulizerPlacebo BID eFlow (CS) NebulizerTotal
Mean62.5 ± 8.0963.1 ± 8.7863.7 ± 8.3763.1 ± 8.42
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)SUN-101 50 mcg BID eFlow (CS) NebulizerSUN-101 25 mcg BID eFlow (CS) NebulizerPlacebo BID eFlow (CS) NebulizerTotal
Female9899107304
Male120118111349
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)SUN-101 50 mcg BID eFlow (CS) NebulizerSUN-101 25 mcg BID eFlow (CS) NebulizerPlacebo BID eFlow (CS) NebulizerTotal
Hispanic or Latino67619
Not Hispanic or Latino212210212634
Unknown or Not Reported0000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)SUN-101 50 mcg BID eFlow (CS) NebulizerSUN-101 25 mcg BID eFlow (CS) NebulizerPlacebo BID eFlow (CS) NebulizerTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native1113
Asian0112
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander1001
Black or African American18152053
White198200196594
More than one race0000
Unknown or Not Reported0000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)SUN-101 50 mcg BID eFlow (CS) NebulizerSUN-101 25 mcg BID eFlow (CS) NebulizerPlacebo BID eFlow (CS) NebulizerTotal
United States218217218653
cardiovascular risk (low/high) and categories for high caridovascular risk
cardiovascular risk (low/high) and categories for high caridovascular risk(Participants)SUN-101 50 mcg BID eFlow (CS) NebulizerSUN-101 25 mcg BID eFlow (CS) NebulizerPlacebo BID eFlow (CS) NebulizerTotal
low cardiovascular risk777876231
high cardiovascular risk141139142422
cerebrovascular disease10131437
peripheral arterial disease10131437
clinically significant arrhythmia713222
heart failure97824
hyertension127128138393
background long-acting beta(2) agonist (LABA) use
background long-acting beta(2) agonist (LABA) use(Participants)SUN-101 50 mcg BID eFlow (CS) NebulizerSUN-101 25 mcg BID eFlow (CS) NebulizerPlacebo BID eFlow (CS) NebulizerTotal
background LABA use =yes686663197
background LABA use =no150151155456

1 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

44 sites
  • Pinnacle Research Group, LLC
    Anniston, Alabama 36207, United States
  • Pulmonary Associates, PA
    Phoenix, Arizona 85006, United States
  • Clinical Research Consortium - Arizona
    Tempe, Arizona 85283, United States
  • Desert Sun Clinical Research, LLC
    Tucson, Arizona 85710, United States
  • Western States Clinical Research, Inc.
    Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033, United States
  • Clinical Research of West Florida, Inc.
    Clearwater, Florida 33765, United States
  • Clermont Medical Research
    Clermont, Florida 34711, United States
  • Riverside Clinical Research
    Edgewater, Florida 32132, United States
  • Pulmonary Disease Specialists, PA, d/b/a PDS Research
    Kissimmee, Florida 34741, United States
  • AppleMed Research, Inc.
    Miami, Florida 33155, United States
  • Clinical Trials of Florida, LLC
    Miami, Florida 33186, United States
  • Florida Institute for Clinical Research, LLC
    Orlando, Florida 32825, United States
  • Emerald Coast Research Associates
    Panama City, Florida 32405, United States
  • Clinical Research of West Florida, Inc
    Tampa, Florida 33603, United States
  • Abraham Reasearch, PLLC
    Fort Mitchell, Kentucky 41017, United States
  • Pulmonary Research Institute of Southeast Michigan
    Livonia, Michigan 48152, United States
  • Minnesota Lung Center
    Edina, Minnesota 55435, United States
  • Minnesota Lung Center
    Woodbury, Minnesota 55125, United States
  • Midwest Chest Consultants, P.C.
    Saint Charles, Missouri 63301, United States
  • Clinical Research Consortium
    Las Vegas, Nevada 89119, United States
  • AAIR Research Center
    Rochester, New York 14618, United States
  • American Health Research, Inc.
    Charlotte, North Carolina 28207, United States
  • Hickory Research Center
    Hickory, North Carolina 28602, United States
  • North Carolina Clinical Research
    Raleigh, North Carolina 27607, United States
  • PMG Research of Wilmington
    Wilmington, North Carolina 28401, United States
  • Columbus Regional Research Institute
    Columbus, Ohio 31904, United States
  • Columbus Clinical Research, Inc
    Columbus, Ohio 43213, United States
  • Optimed Research, LTD
    Columbus, Ohio 43235, United States
  • Clinical Research Institute of Southern Oregon, PC
    Medford, Oregon 97504, United States
  • Research Protocol Management Specialists
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15243, United States
  • Safe Harbor Clinical Research
    East Providence, Rhode Island 02914, United States
  • Palmetto Medical Research Associates, LLC
    Easley, South Carolina 29640, United States
  • Greenville Pharmaceutical Research, Inc
    Greenville, South Carolina 29615, United States
  • Upstate Pharmaceutical Research
    Greenville, South Carolina 29615, United States
  • Piedmont Research Partners, LLC
    Indian Land, South Carolina 29707, United States
  • S. Carolina Pharmaceutical Research
    Spartanburg, South Carolina 29303, United States
  • Spartanburg Medical Research
    Spartanburg, South Carolina 29303, United States
  • CU Pharmaceutical Research
    Union, South Carolina 29379, United States
  • Texas Pulmonary and Critical Care Consultants, PA
    Fort Worth, Texas 76104, United States
  • Pioneer Research Solutions, Inc.
    Houston, Texas 77099, United States
  • Central Texas Health Research
    New Braunfels, Texas 78130, United States
  • Sylvana Research Associates
    San Antonio, Texas 78229, United States
  • Pulmonary Research of Abingdon, LLC
    Abingdon, Virginia 24210, United States
  • Pulmonary Associates of Richmond, Inc.
    Richmond, Virginia 23225, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Kerwin E, Donohue JF, Goodin T, Tosiello R, Wheeler A, Ferguson GT. Efficacy and safety of glycopyrrolate/eFlow(R) CS (nebulized glycopyrrolate) in moderate-to-very-severe COPD: Results from the glycopyrrolate for obstructive lung disease via electronic nebulizer (GOLDEN) 3 and 4 randomized controlled trials. Respir Med. 2017 Nov;132:238-250. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2017.07.011. Epub 2017 Jul 19. PubMed 28838685 ↗
  • Ohar J, Tosiello R, Goodin T, Sanjar S. Efficacy and safety of a novel, nebulized glycopyrrolate for the treatment of COPD: effect of baseline disease severity and age; pooled analysis of GOLDEN 3 and GOLDEN 4. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018 Dec 18;14:27-37. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S184808. eCollection 2019. PubMed 30587959 ↗
  • Ferguson GT, Kerwin EM, Donohue JF, Ganapathy V, Tosiello RL, Bollu VK, Rajagopalan K. Health-Related Quality of Life Improvements in Moderate to Very Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients on Nebulized Glycopyrrolate: Evidence from the GOLDEN Studies. Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2018 Jun 6;5(3):193-207. doi: 10.15326/jcopdf.5.3.2017.0178. PubMed 30584583 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 22, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02347761
Lead sponsor
Sunovion Respiratory Development Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 27, 2015
Start date
Feb 2015
Primary completion
Nov 2015
Completion
Nov 2015
Results posted
Mar 22, 2018
Last update
Mar 22, 2018

Study contacts

Respiratory Medical Director, MD
study director · Sunovion Respiratory Director

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion