CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02340728Updated Oct 22, 2020Results posted

Endoscopic Biliary Co-axial Stent Placement Plus/Minus Use of Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) for Clearance of Occluded Self Expandable Metal Stents (SEMS) in Patients With Distal Biliary Obstruction From Unresectable Biliary-pancreatic Malignancies

A Phase 3 interventional study of ERCP with SEMS plus radiofrequency ablation and ERCP with SEMS alone (standard of care) in Pancreatic Cancer and Unresectable Biliary-pancreatic Malignancies, sponsored by Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-10-22.

Sponsored by Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
24
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the effects good and/or bad of combining radiofrequency ablation with placement of a second stent, versus a second stent alone. The investigators will also look at the safety of the combination treatment, and see which treatment is better. In either case, the second stent will be placed inside the existing stent as is done in standard practice when treating a blocked stent for the first time.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pancreatic Cancer
  • Unresectable Biliary-pancreatic Malignancies

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Stent Placement
  • Biliary Obstruction
  • 14-260
03

In context

Neoplasms

9,365 studies on the registry are indexed under Neoplasms; 2,489 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 24 is below the median of 50 across 7,253 interventional studies indexed under Neoplasms.

Browse Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center is the lead sponsor of 1,930 studies on the registry; 328 are open to participants now.

Of its 129 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 66 (51%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with any tumor obstructing the distal bile duct and causing an indwelling biliary SEMS
  • Patients with jaundice or clinical cholangitis, with new elevation of alkaline phosphatase, total bilirubin, and imaging findings supportive of stent occlusion (loss of stent patency, debris within stent, loss of or excessive pneumobilia)
  • Age ≥ 18 years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have altered gastro-duodenal or hepatobiliary anatomy such that ERCP is felt to be unacceptably technically difficult or unsafe
  • Have additional sites of biliary strictures (intrahepatic/hilar) such that ERCP stenting is felt to be unlikely to provide adequate clinical benefit
  • Have cardiac pacemakers
  • Have Child B/C cirrhosis
  • Are pregnant
  • Are unsuitable for endoscopy (either because of hemodynamic instability, respiratory distress or unsafe hematological parameters such as refractory anemia \<7g/dL, thrombocytopenia \<50K/mcL, or coagulopathy with INR >2.0)
  • Have biliary strictures not technically amenable to endoscopic therapy
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
24 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    ERCP with SEMS plus radiofrequency ablation

    Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatogram (ERCP) is performed under standard conditions with cannulation of the bile duct, and demonstration on a cholangiogram the location, diameter and length of the biliary stricture. The HabibTM EndoHBP probe (EMcision, London, United Kingdom) is advanced through the working channel of a side viewing endoscope over a 0.035in guidewire, and positioned across the occluded SEMS under fluoroscopy. 7-10W are usually delivered for 90 seconds with a standard high frequency generator, followed by a 1 minute resting period. Sequential applications of RFA are applied along the entire length of the stricture with an overlap of 1cm.

    Device: ERCP with SEMS plus radiofrequency ablation

  • Active comparator
    ERCP with SEMS alone (standard of care)

    Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatogram (ERCP) is performed under standard conditions with cannulation of the bile duct, and demonstration on a cholangiogram the location, diameter and length of the biliary stricture. The HabibTM EndoHBP probe (EMcision, London, United Kingdom) is advanced through the working channel of a side viewing endoscope over a 0.035in guidewire, and positioned across the occluded SEMS under fluoroscopy. 7-10W are usually delivered for 90 seconds with a standard high frequency generator, followed by a 1 minute resting period.

    Device: ERCP with SEMS alone (standard of care)

Interventions

  • DeviceERCP with SEMS plus radiofrequency ablation

    Also known as: self expandable metal stents, co-axial stent placement

  • DeviceERCP with SEMS alone (standard of care)

    Also known as: self expandable metal stents, co-axial stent placement

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Rate of Failure

    Time frame: 180 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Rate of Stent Patency

    Time frame: 1 and 3 months post procedure

  2. Incidence of Procedure Related Complications

    Time frame: 1 month

07

Results

Posted Oct 22, 2020

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneERCP With SEMS Plus Radiofrequency AblationERCP With SEMS Alone (Standard of Care)
Started1311
Completed1311
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryRate of Failure
Time frame:
180 days

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryRate of Stent Patency
Time frame:
1 and 3 months post procedure

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryIncidence of Procedure Related Complications
Time frame:
1 month

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Adverse events

Collected over Up to 180 days. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
ERCP With SEMS Plus Radiofrequency Ablation12/13 (92.3%)4/13 (30.8%)13/13 (100%)
ERCP With SEMS Alone (Standard of Care)11/11 (100%)4/11 (36.4%)11/11 (100%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventERCP With SEMS Plus Radiofrequency AblationERCP With SEMS Alone (Standard of Care)
Gastrointestinal disorders - Other, specifyGastrointestinal disorders0/131/11
Duodenal hemorrhageGastrointestinal disorders0/131/11
Thromboembolic eventVascular disorders0/131/11
Upper gastrointestinal hemorrhageGastrointestinal disorders0/131/11
HemorrhoidsGastrointestinal disorders0/131/11
Blood bilirubin increasedInvestigations0/131/11
Neoplasms ben/mal/unk (inc cyst/polyp) Other, specNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/130/11
ColitisGastrointestinal disorders1/130/11
Hepatobiliary disorders - Other, specifyHepatobiliary disorders1/130/11
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders1/130/11
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 27
Most frequent other events
EventERCP With SEMS Plus Radiofrequency AblationERCP With SEMS Alone (Standard of Care)
AnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders13/1311/11
HypocalcemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders13/1310/11
HyperglycemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders13/1311/11
HypoalbuminemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders13/1311/11
Blood bilirubin increasedInvestigations10/1311/11
Alkaline phosphatase increasedInvestigations11/1311/11
Aspartate aminotransferase increasedInvestigations12/1311/11
INR increasedInvestigations12/139/11
Alanine aminotransferase increasedInvestigations11/1310/11
Platelet count decreasedInvestigations11/137/11

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)ERCP With SEMS Plus Radiofrequency AblationERCP With SEMS Alone (Standard of Care)Total
Mean62.5 (42 to 84)57.9 (44 to 69)60.4 (42 to 84)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)ERCP With SEMS Plus Radiofrequency AblationERCP With SEMS Alone (Standard of Care)Total
Female5510
Male8614
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)ERCP With SEMS Plus Radiofrequency AblationERCP With SEMS Alone (Standard of Care)Total
Hispanic or Latino000
Not Hispanic or Latino131124
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)ERCP With SEMS Plus Radiofrequency AblationERCP With SEMS Alone (Standard of Care)Total
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American112
White11920
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported112
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)ERCP With SEMS Plus Radiofrequency AblationERCP With SEMS Alone (Standard of Care)Total
United States131124
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
    New York, New York 10065, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Oct 3, 2016

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 22, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02340728
Lead sponsor
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 19, 2015
Start date
Jan 2015
Primary completion
Nov 2019
Completion
Nov 2019
Results posted
Oct 22, 2020
Last update
Oct 22, 2020

Study contacts

Mark Schattner, MD
principal investigator · Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion