CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02340078Updated Jan 23, 2019Results posted

A Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of YVOIRE Volume Plus Versus YVOIRE Volume in Nasolabial Fold Injection

An interventional study of HA IDF II plus and HA IDF II in Wrinkles, sponsored by LG Life Sciences. Completed. Open to female participants aged 30 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-01-23.

Sponsored by LG Life Sciences · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
62
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
30 Years to 60 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of HA IDF II plus (with lidocaine) injected in the nasolabial fold compared to HA IDF II (without lidocaine).

02

Conditions studied

  • Wrinkles

Keywords

  • the facial nasolabial fold
03

In context

Lead sponsor

LG Life Sciences is the lead sponsor of 75 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
30 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Women aged between 30 and 60
  2. Those whose wrinkles in the treatment area (nasolabial fold) correspond to Stage 3 or 4 in the 5-stage Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) symmetrically
  3. Those who were informed on the purpose, method, and effect etc. of this study and signed the informed consent form
  4. Those who fell under any of the following 3 cases:

    1. Surgically sterile women
    2. Women in menopause over 2 years from the last menstruation, aged at least 45
    3. Among the women meeting neither of a nor b, those who agreed to use at least 2 contraception methods specified below (one of the barrier methods must be included) until 14 days after the last treatment with the investigational device

      • Barrier methods: Condom, diaphragm, cervical cap (pessary), spermicide
      • Hormonal methods: Pills, injection (depot), skin patch, hormonal implant (Implanon), vaginal ring
      • Intrauterine devices (IUDs): Cooper IUD (Loop), hormonal IUD (Mirena)
      • Natural methods: Basic body temperature, ovulation period, coitus interruptus, abstinent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Those with a skin disease (skin infection, eczema, psoriasis, rosacea, herpes etc.) in the lower 2/3 part of the face in which the wrinkle evaluation may be affected
  2. Patients with a malignant tumor recognized medically important and considered as potentially affecting the clinical study
  3. Women in pregnancy or lactation
  4. Those with the bilirubin level exceeding 1.5 times of the upper limit of normal or the ALT/AST level exceeding 2.5 times of the upper limit of normal
  5. Those with the confirmed infection of syphilis or HIV
  6. Those who had an anticoagulant therapy or antiplatelet therapy within 2 weeks prior to Visit 1 (screening)
  7. Those who used a topical preparation (steroid, retinoid) in the facial area within 4 weeks prior to Visit 2 (randomization )
  8. Those who experienced a deep chemical peeling or a procedure judged as potentially affecting the clinical study within 3 months prior to Visit 2 (randomization)
  9. Those who experienced a non-permanent filler procedure or a cosmetic surgery in the face within 9 months prior to Visit 2 (randomization)
  10. Those who had an implantation procedure with a permanent substance (silicone, PAAG, PMMA, CaHA etc.) in the treatment area (nasolabial fold )
  11. Those currently with a streptococcal disease
  12. Those with a history of severe allergy or hypersensitivity (anaphylaxis) judged as potentially affecting the clinical study
  13. Those with a history of hypertrophic scar or keloid
  14. Those with a history of bleeding disorder
  15. Those with a hypersensitivity to the investigational device of this clinical study or lidocaine
  16. Those who refused to agree not to use a local or systemic pain-relieving agent or other pain-relieving method (e.g.: ice pack) from the midnight of the treatment day with the investigational device through the post-measurement of the last VAS pain scale
  17. Those who had participated in another clinical study within 1 month prior to Visit 1 (screening)
  18. Those judged by the investigator as ineligible for this clinical study
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
62 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    HA IDF II

    cross-linked HA filler

    Device: HA IDF II

  • Experimental
    HA IDF II plus

    cross-linked HA filler with lidocaine

    Device: HA IDF II plus

Interventions

  • DeviceHA IDF II plus
  • DeviceHA IDF II
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of the Subjects With at Least 10mm Difference in VAS Pain Scale Scores Within the Subject (VAS of the Control Device - VAS of the Test Device) Immediately After Treatment With the Investigational Devices

    The degree of pain was evaluated by VAS (Visual Analog Scale), measuring the length from the left and to the mark by the subject in millimeter (mm) unit.

    Time frame: Visit 2 (week 0, immediately after treatment)

07

Results

Posted Jan 23, 2019

Participant flow

at 2 hospitals in korea, 62 patients. period : Nov 2013\~Feb 2015

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneSubject Disposition
Started62
Completed61
Not completed1
Withdrew: Protocol violation1

Outcome measures

PrimaryProportion of the Subjects With at Least 10mm Difference in VAS Pain Scale Scores Within the Subject (VAS of the Control Device - VAS of the Test Device) Immediately After Treatment With the Investigational Devices

The degree of pain was evaluated by VAS (Visual Analog Scale), measuring the length from the left and to the mark by the subject in millimeter (mm) unit.

Time frame:
Visit 2 (week 0, immediately after treatment)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Proportion of the Subjects With at Least 10mm Difference in VAS Pain Scale Scores Within the Subject (VAS of the Control Device - VAS of the Test Device) Immediately After Treatment With the Investigational Devices
participantsSubjects With at Least a 10mm Difference in VASSubjects With Below 10mm Difference in VAS
Proportion of the Subjects With at Least 10mm Difference in VAS Pain Scale Scores Within the Subject (VAS of the Control Device - VAS of the Test Device) Immediately After Treatment With the Investigational Devices593
Statistical analysis
  • Subjects With at Least a 10mm Difference in VAS vs Subjects With Below 10mm Difference in VAS · Subjects % with difference in vas ≥ 10mm: 0.9516 · 95% CI 0.87 to 0.99

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 4% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Safety—0/62 (0%)3/62 (4.8%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventSafety
Administration Site ConditionsGeneral disorders3/62

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Demographic Charateristics
Mean46.39 ± 7.03
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex/Gender, Customized(participants)Demographic Charateristics
Female62
Male0
08

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 23, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02340078
Lead sponsor
LG Life Sciences
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 16, 2015
Start date
Nov 2013
Primary completion
Feb 2015
Completion
Feb 2015
Results posted
Jan 23, 2019
Last update
Jan 23, 2019
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion