CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02336334Updated Jul 19, 2016

Evaluation of Posturing-Adherence in Patients After Intraocular Surgery

An interventional study of Positioning measurement and Patient feedback in Retina; Lesion and Adherence, sponsored by University Hospital Tuebingen. Completed at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-07-19.

Sponsored by University Hospital Tuebingen · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
48
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Measuring and logging head positions of patients which underwent surgery with gasendotamponades.

Read the detailed description

After surgery with gasendotamponades various positions are recommended to support the success of surgery. In patients with macular holes face-down-position is recommended. In patients with retinal detachment the recommended position depends on the region of the detachment.

The adherence of patients to follow this posturing instructions is very inhomogenous. Therefore the investigators want to measure the posturing by the use of a position-sensor. In some study arms the patients also receive a feedback from the sensor (tone, vibration) to correct the position.

The sensor-device was developed by the study-staff and is not commercial available. In addition there is no trade name. The patients safety of the used device was approved by the in house technical department.

02

Conditions studied

  • Retina; Lesion
  • Adherence
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University Hospital Tuebingen is the lead sponsor of 476 studies on the registry; 104 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • age >18 years
  • full thickness macular hole or retinal detachment
  • informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • intraoperative complications with the need of other endotamponades
  • combined treatment
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
48 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    With macular hole

    Inclusion of patients with macular holes and randomized allocation to sensor-types and information-types Interventions: Positioning measurement Patient feedback Usefulness of a sketch Closure rate of macular holes

    Device: Positioning measurement · Device: Patient feedback · Procedure: Usefulness of a sketch · Device: Closure rate of macular holes

  • Experimental
    Without macular hole

    Inclusion of patients without macular holes and randomized allocation to sensor-types and information-types Interventions: Positioning measurement Patient feedback Usefulness of a sketch

    Device: Positioning measurement · Device: Patient feedback · Procedure: Usefulness of a sketch

Interventions

  • DevicePositioning measurement

    Logging of posturing informations

  • DevicePatient feedback

    Evaluation of patients questionary

  • ProcedureUsefulness of a sketch

    Helping the patients to understand posturing positions by randomized allocation of sketches

  • DeviceClosure rate of macular holes

    closure rates of macular holes in the group with macular holes. Measurement using SD-OCT (spectral domain optical coherence tomography=

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Effective time of ideal posturing with different sensors-systems

    Time (measured in minutes and in percent of 24h) with correct posturing in relation to the used sensor-type (with and without feedback)

    Time frame: up to 12 month

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time analysis with optimal posturing after detailed explanation of posturing positions

    Time (measured in minutes and in percent of 24h) with correct posturing in patients which received an detailed posturing explanation (with graphics)

    Time frame: up to 12 month

  2. Analysis of time with optimal posturing for both Sensor-Feedback-Systems

    Time (measured in minutes and in percent of 24h) with correct posturing depending on the used sensor-type (noise vs. vibration)

    Time frame: up to 12 month

  3. Closure rate of macular holes after 3 month as measured by optical coherence tomography (hole closed: yes or no)

    Status of macular holes after 3 month in macular hole group measured by optical coherence tomography (hole closed: yes or no) and in relation to time with optimal posturing

    Time frame: up to 12 month

  4. Tolerability of sensor-systems for patients as measured by questionnaire

    Using a questionnaire patients are asked to give their view on the tolerability of the used system.

    Time frame: up to 12 month

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University Eye Hospital
    Tuebingen, BW 72076, Germany
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 19, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02336334
Lead sponsor
University Hospital Tuebingen
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 13, 2015
Start date
Oct 2014
Primary completion
Apr 2016
Completion
Jul 2016
Last update
Jul 19, 2016

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion