CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02334761Updated Jul 16, 2024

Biopsies in Oncology - Prospective Study of Impact on Patient's Quality of Life.

An observational study in Pathology, sponsored by University Health Network, Toronto. Completed at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-07-16.

Sponsored by University Health Network, Toronto · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
129
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Over the past decade the paradigm of care in oncology has evolved with the advent of personalized medicine. Yet, despite this exciting prospect, there are currently only a few disease subtypes where therapeutic approaches with proven benefit exist such as EGFR (Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor) targeted therapies in EGFR-mutant lung tumours. With the increasing number of novel molecularly targeted agents available, the importance of building our understanding of cancer biology is critical.

Challenges to implement personalized medicine include the limitations of molecular testing, tumour heterogeneity and molecular evolution, costs, and the quality and morbidity associated with tumour biopsies. Sequential biopsies are essential to better understand biological markers of response and resistance, and identify predictive or prognostic markers. Despite the scientific rationale for biopsies, incorporating them into practice can be challenging, as in many cases there is no direct advantage to the patient. This project aims to understand the effect of research biopsies on the patient. The Investigator hypothesize by learning more and gaining a better appreciation of the impact on the patient, Investigators will increase the likelihood of achieving serial biopsies.

The ability to obtain serial biopsies is dependent on the patient's experience. To understand the clonal progression of cancer and validate predictive and prognostic markers of response, studies now target biopsies both at enrollment and at progression. As Investigators strive to achieve this, improving our understanding of the patient's experience will help us identify factors that positively and negatively impact on patient participation and influence the probability of successfully obtaining sequential samples.

Read the detailed description

Both primary and secondary objectives will be assessed in a questionnaire. Primary Objectives To assess the impact of research biopsies on patients quality of life.

Secondary Objectives To assess the impact of diagnostic biopsies on quality of life in comparison to research biopsies.

To assess the true complication rates associated with biopsies. To compare types of biopsies - surgical versus radiological with respect to implications on quality of life.

To assess the individual potentially modifiable factors of reason for biopsy; perceived risk; perceived benefit; wait time for biopsy; wait time for results; complications; and altruism and association with anxiety.

To determine which factors are associated with a higher and lower likelihood of achieving serial biopsies.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pathology

Keywords

  • Biopsy
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University Health Network, Toronto is the lead sponsor of 1,411 studies on the registry; 292 are open to participants now.

Of its 17 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 3 (18%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The patient must be 18 years or older with a life expectancy of greater than 3 months. The patient must be undergoing a biopsy for research or diagnostic purposes with a diagnosis of malignancy or an assumed diagnosis of malignancy. The patient must be able to complete the questionnaires independently.

Criteria:

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

Patient must be ≥18 years old. ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status ≤2 (Karnofsky ≥60%).

Life expectancy of greater than 3 months Must be undergoing a biopsy for research or diagnostic purposes. Have a diagnosis of malignancy or an assumed diagnosis of malignancy in patients where the biopsy is being performed for diagnostic purposes.

Able to complete questionnaires independently. Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document.

Both men and women of all races and ethnic groups are eligible for this trial. Verbal translation will be available for the consent and assistance with the questionnaires. If language is a second language or the patient is unable to read the questionnaire for any reason a family member may assist with the questionnaires.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients who do not have a biopsy scheduled and performed.

05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
129 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The primary objective is to assess the impact of research biopsies on patients quality of life.

    Time frame: 6-8 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. To assess the impact of diagnostic biopsies on quality of life in comparison to research biopsies

    Time frame: at minimum: 6 months

  2. To assess the true complication rates associated with biopsies

    Time frame: at minimum: 6 months

  3. To compare types of biopsies - surgical versus radiological with respect to implications on quality of life

    Time frame: at minimum: 6 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
    Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X6, Canada
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Madariaga A, Bhat G, Wilson MK, Li X, Cyriac S, Bowering V, Hunt W, Gutierrez D, Bonilla L, Kasherman L, McMullen M, Wang L, Ghai S, Dhani NC, Oza AM, Lheureux S. Research biopsies in patients with gynecologic cancers: patient-reported outcomes, perceptions, and preferences. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Dec;225(6):658.e1-658.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.06.071. Epub 2021 Jun 23. Erratum In: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Jul;231(1):141. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.03.039. PubMed 34174204 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 16, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02334761
Lead sponsor
University Health Network, Toronto
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 8, 2015
Start date
Jan 2014
Primary completion
Dec 2022
Completion
Dec 2022
Last update
Jul 16, 2024

Study contacts

Amit Oza, MD
principal investigator · University Health Network, Toronto

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion