CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02334007Updated Sep 18, 2018

Extended Low-Molecular Weight Heparin VTE Prophylaxis in Thoracic Surgery

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of LMWH: Dalteparin and Placebo in Venous Thromboembolism, Lung Neoplasms and Pulmonary Embolism, sponsored by McMaster University. Completed at 2 sites in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-09-18.

Sponsored by McMaster University · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
102
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

After any surgery, there is a risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), including Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) in the major veins of the legs and Pulmonary Embolus (PE) in the lungs. These clots are usually prevented by the administration of low-molecular-weight heparin, a blood thinner that prevents clotting. In most surgical specialties like thoracic or vascular surgery, this treatment is used until patients are discharged from the hospital. However, in orthopaedic surgery, there is strong evidence that longer term preventative treatment up to 35 days after hospital discharge helps to reduce VTE occurrences. In thoracic surgery, there is an even greater risk of developing PE because of the surgical stress, the common presence of cancer and direct damage to blood vessels in the lung during surgery. Despite the potential utility, the use of extended VTE prevention has never been evaluated in the thoracic surgery population. If extended treatment prevents clots, more patients will avoid complications related to VTE. There is currently very limited information available on the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients undergoing lung cancer resection and the utility of extended thromboprophylaxis (ET) in this patient population. Furthermore, in contrast to patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery where ET has become standard of care, duration of thromboprophylaxis is not well defined in this patient population. Therefore, there is a clear need to systematically evaluate the effects of extended VTE prophylaxis on the incidence of VTE in the post-op population.

Read the detailed description

There is currently very limited information available on the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients undergoing lung cancer resection and the utility of extended thromboprophylaxis (ET) in this patient population. Furthermore, in contrast to patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery where ET has become standard of care, duration of thromboprophylaxis is not well defined in this patient population. Therefore, there is a clear need to systematically evaluate the effects of extended VTE prophylaxis on the incidence of VTE in the post-op population.

As a pilot study, the primary outcome will involve feasibility measures. The investigators aim to measure the proportion of recruitment within each centre, compliance, loss to follow-up, and tolerability of the intervention, defined as the number and severity of per-defined adverse events. The primary outcome of interest for the future full-scale trial is the 30-day incidence rate of VTE following extended 30-day prophylaxis (defined as pulmonary emboli or deep venous thromboembolism of the lower limb as detected by CT (Computed Tomography) pulmonary angiography and full leg Doppler ultrasound, respectively) following lung resection for malignancies.

The proposed pilot project is a multicenter blinded placebo-controlled randomized controlled pilot clinical trial assessing the feasibility and effectiveness of extended-duration VTE prophylaxis (30 days post-operatively) vs. short-term prophylaxis restricted to in-hospital stay with outpatient injected placebo, in patients undergoing lung resection for lung cancer or metastatic disease. All patients will receive both a peri-operative dose followed by postoperative VTE prophylaxis for the duration of their hospital stay. Those who were randomized to prolonged prophylaxis will continue the same dosage regime for an overall of 30 days, whereas the control group will receive placebo injections for the same duration of time.

02

Conditions studied

  • Venous Thromboembolism
  • Lung Neoplasms
  • Pulmonary Embolism

Keywords

  • venous thromboembolism prophylaxis
  • deep vein thrombosis
  • pulmonary embolism
  • lung resection
  • low molecular weight heparin
03

In context

Lung Neoplasms

7,243 studies on the registry are indexed under Lung Neoplasms; 1,557 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 102 is above the median of 60 across 5,295 interventional studies indexed under Lung Neoplasms.

Browse Lung Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

McMaster University is the lead sponsor of 720 studies on the registry; 124 are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (33%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patients must be at least 18 years of age.
  2. Patient may be of either gender.
  3. Patients must be diagnosed with resectable lung cancer or metastatic lung disease eligible to complete metastasectomy.
  4. Patients must be undergoing one of the following surgeries: segmentectomy, wedge resection, lobectomy, bilobectomy or pneumonectomy.
  5. Patients must be competent to understand consent documents.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. All patients with known allergic or anaphylactic reaction to contrast dye, heparin or low molecular weight heparin (LMWH).
  2. Patients must not be under current anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism or other medical conditions.
  3. Patients must not have known renal impairment (defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate of less than 30ml/min/m2 as calculated by the Cockcroft-Gault method) either pre-operatively or as identified based on blood work obtained prior to the scheduled 30-day post-operative scan.
  4. Patients must not have known hepatic failure, with international normalized ratio (INR) of >1.5.
  5. Patients with history of, or ongoing liver disease, manifested as ascites or previous peritoneal tapping for ascites.
  6. Patients must not be pregnant or planning to become pregnant.
  7. Patients must not have been diagnosed or treated for VTE in the past 3 months prior to surgery.
  8. Patients must not have a known, objectively confirmed bleeding disorder.
  9. Patients must not have a present or previous increase risk of haemorrhage.
  10. Patients must not have a history of previous heparin induced thrombocytopenia.
  11. Baseline platelet count \<75,000 but transient, recovered thrombocytopenia associated with chemotherapy will not be a basis for exclusion.
  12. Patients must not have previously inserted inferior vena cava filter.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
102 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    LMWH: Dalteparin

    Consenting patients undergoing lung resection will receive standard postoperative thromboprophylaxis in hospital until the time of discharge. Subsequently, patients will be administered LMWH for duration of 30 days as outpatients.

    Drug: LMWH: Dalteparin

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    After undergoing lung resection these patients will research standard post-op TE prophylaxis and upon discharge will be administered a placebo injection of subcutaneous saline for 30 days duration.

    Other: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugLMWH: Dalteparin

    Dalteparin is a low-molecular weight heparin. The dosage used will be 5000 units once daily (administered as a subcutaneous injection). This is an established prophylactic dose used to prevent the incidence of VTE after surgery.

    Also known as: Fragmin

  • OtherPlacebo

    Upon hospital discharge, half of the patients will be assigned to receive saline placebo injections for up to 35 days after surgery. These injections will have no effect.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Composite primary outcome: To determine the feasibility of a full scale trial by determining the recruitment rates and loss to follow up rates

    Measuring accrual rates, patient compliance, adherence to protocol, any-cause loss to follow up, tolerability of the intervention (safety), adverse events, and coordination of participating centre infrastructure

    Time frame: 1-1.5 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Clinical outcome:Comparison of Incidence of DVT and PE at 30 days after surgery between control and interventional arms (Outcome will be measured by a Chest Computed Tomography (CT) scan with PE contrast protocol and a full leg doppler ultrasound)

    As a pilot study, there is an insufficient number of patients to definitively calculate incidence and compare treatment arms. However, this is a key outcome and the study will seek to determine this outcome. Outcome will be measured by a Chest Computed Tomography (CT) scan with PE contrast protocol and a full leg doppler ultrasound at approximately 30 days after surgery to seek the occurrence of clots

    Time frame: 30 days, +/- 5 days

  2. Occurrence of major and minor bleeding at 30 days post-surgery, +/- 5 days

    Bleeding is a potential adverse event of Fragmin use. Major bleeding is defined as: Fatal bleeding OR Critical bleeding in a symptomatic area (intracranial, intraspinal, retroperitoneal, pericardial, or intramuscular with compartment syndrome) OR Bleeding causing a fall in hemoglobin level of 2g/dL or more as measured by a blood test at 30 days follow up, OR Bleeding requiring a blood transfusion of at least 2 units of packed red blood cells (excluding transfusions administered intra-operatively or 6-hrs post-operatively since these could not be impacted by post-surgical prophylaxis). Minor bleeding is defined as any bleeding episode not classified as major.

    Time frame: 30 days after surgery

  3. Comparison of mortality within 90 days of surgery between control and interventional arms

    Both procedure-specific and all-cause mortality rates will be calculated

    Time frame: 90 days

  4. Number of cases of heparin administration related HIT (Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia) within 90 days of surgery

    Time frame: 90 days

  5. Number of participants with study-related adverse events within 90 days of surgery

    Time frame: 90 days

  6. Comparison of non-DVT-associated PE events (those occurring without an antecedent DVT) between control and interventional arms

    Time frame: 90 days

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton
    Hamilton, Ontario L8N 4A6, Canada
  • Toronto General Hospital
    Toronto, Ontario M5G 2C4, Canada
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Fahim C, Hylton D, Simunovic M, Agzarian J, Finley C, Hanna WC, Shargall Y. Development of the IRIS-AR strategy: an intervention to improve rates of accrual and retention for the VTE-PRO randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2019 Jul 19;20(1):447. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3536-8. PubMed 31324209 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 18, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02334007
Lead sponsor
McMaster University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 8, 2015
Start date
Sep 2015
Primary completion
Sep 2018
Completion
Sep 2018
Last update
Sep 18, 2018

Study contacts

Yaron Shargall, MD, FRCSC, FCCP
principal investigator · McMaster University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion