CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02325791Updated Nov 6, 2018Results posted

Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Suptavumab (REGN2222) for the Prevention of Medically Attended RSV (Respiratory Syncytial Virus) Infection in Preterm Infants

A Phase 3 interventional study of Suptavumab 30 mg/kg and Placebo Matched to Suptavumab in Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections, sponsored by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. Completed at 205 sites in 19 countries. Open to participants aged Up to 6 Months, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-11-06.

Sponsored by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,177
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
Up to 6 Months
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and immunogenicity of suptavumab (REGN2222) in infants born no more than 35 weeks, 6 days gestational age who are no more than 6 months of age at the time of enrollment in their respective geographic location. In order to optimize the potential benefit in this vulnerable population, we conducted this study during the RSV season using dosing regimens that are expected to be effective.

Read the detailed description

This study occurred in two parts: Part A and Part B.

Part A of the study was an open-label, PK evaluation of intramuscular (IM) administered suptavumab in preterm infants for whom palivizumab was not recommended to enable the selection of dosing regimens for Part B.

Part B of the study was randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled, designed to evaluate efficacy, safety, serum concentration and immunogenicity of IM administration of suptavumab in preterm infants for whom palivizumab was not recommended. The total duration of Part B was up to 265 days (includes a 28-day screening period, 57-day treatment period and 180-day follow-up period).

Up to 1515 subjects were planned to be included in Part B of the study. Participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 different groups, each with 505 infants; one group received one dose of suptavumab and one dose of placebo, the second group received two doses of suptavumab, and the third group received two doses of placebo.

There was a separate genetic testing sub study.

02

Conditions studied

03

In context

Infections

6,687 studies on the registry are indexed under Infections; 807 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 1,177 is above the median of 120 across 4,200 interventional studies indexed under Infections.

Browse Infections studies →

Lead sponsor

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals is the lead sponsor of 400 studies on the registry; 91 are open to participants now.

Of its 120 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 77 (64%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 6 Months
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Eligibility criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Preterm, otherwise healthy male or female infant who is ≤6 months of age at the time of the first dose (i.e., infant must be treated on or before their 6 month birthday)
  2. Gestational age is ≤35 weeks, 6 days at birth
  3. Parent(s) or legal guardian(s) of the infant is able to understand the study requirements and willing to provide informed consent

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Eligible, recommended and have access to receive palivizumab per AAP or other local guidelines, standard practice, or by their healthcare provider
  2. History of CLD defined as requirement of supplemental oxygen for 28 days after birth
  3. Known hemodynamically significant congenital heart disease
  4. Known immunodeficiency, neuromuscular disease, or congenital abnormalities of the airway
  5. Known renal or hepatic dysfunction
  6. Major congenital malformations, including congenital cleft palate, cytogenetic abnormalities, or serious chronic disorders
  7. Known or suspected impairment of immunological functions or autoimmune diseases
  8. History of anaphylaxis
  9. Previously received palivizumab or any other investigational RSV prophylaxis or vaccine product
  10. Previous reaction to IV immunoglobulin, blood products or other foreign proteins, including vaccines and monoclonal antibodies

Note: Other inclusion and exclusion criteria apply

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
1,177 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Part A: Suptavumab 30 mg/kg

    Drug: Suptavumab 30 mg/kg

  • Experimental
    Part B: Placebo Matched to Suptavumab

    Drug: Placebo Matched to Suptavumab

  • Experimental
    Part B: Suptavumab 30 mg/kg- 1 Dose

    Drug: Suptavumab 30 mg/kg- 1 Dose

  • Experimental
    Part B: Suptavumab 30 mg/kg - 2 Doses

    Drug: Suptavumab 30 mg/kg - 2 Doses

Interventions

  • DrugSuptavumab 30 mg/kg

    Participants received single dose of suptavumab 30 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) intramuscularly (IM) on Day 1.

    Also known as: REGN2222

  • DrugPlacebo Matched to Suptavumab

    Participants received 2 IM doses of placebo matched to suptavumab: the first dose on Day 1 and the second dose on Day 57.

  • DrugSuptavumab 30 mg/kg- 1 Dose

    Participants received single dose of suptavumab 30 mg/kg IM on Day 1 and single dose of placebo matched to suptavumab on Day 57.

  • DrugSuptavumab 30 mg/kg - 2 Doses

    Participants received 2 doses of suptavumab 30 mg/kg IM: the first dose on Day 1 and the second dose on Day 57.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Part A: Serum Concentration of Suptavumab Over Time

    Part A was primarily designed to determine the pharmacokinetics (PK) of suptavumab in infants to inform the dose regimen used in Part B of the study. The study protocol specified the process and criteria for assessment of the dose. The dose used in Part B was to remain the same as Part A if the PK data up to Day 57 demonstrated that the individual PK observations were consistent with model-predicted concentrations, following age and body weight corrections.

    Time frame: Day 1 through Day 150

  2. Part B: Percentage of Participants With Medically Attended Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Infection (Hospitalization or Outpatient Visit With Lower Respiratory Tract Infection [LRTI]) Up to Day 150

    A medically attended RSV infection defined as an infant with positive RSV test by Reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) with any of following events: Hospitalized (on basis of assessment of admitting physician) for RSV infection or outpatient visit (emergency room \[ER\], urgent care \[UC\], or pediatric clinic visits \[for either a sick or well visit\]) with RSV lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI). An RSV LRTI in an infant: RSV proven respiratory infection (i.e positive RSV RT-PCR test) with parent(s)/guardian(s) report of cough/difficulty breathing, \& with 1 of following signs of LRTI, as assessed by healthcare provider: - lower chest wall in drawing -hypoxemia (peripheral capillary oxygen saturation \<95% breathing room air) - Wheezing/crackles. The 150-day efficacy assessment period: first study drug intake through the Day 150 visit.

    Time frame: From first study drug administration up to Day 150

Secondary outcomes

  1. Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

    Any untoward medical occurrence in participants, who received investigational medicinal product (IMP) was considered an adverse event (AE) without regard to possibility of causal relationship with this treatment. TEAEs: AEs that developed/worsened/became serious during on-treatment period (defined as time between the date of first study drug administration \& date of end of study/last visit).Serious AE: Any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in any of following outcomes: death, life-threatening, required initial or prolonged in-patient hospitalization, persistent/significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, or considered as medically important event. Any TEAE included participants with both serious \& non-serious AEs. National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTCAE) version 4.03(Grade 3 \[severe\] \& Grade 4\[life-threatening\]) was used in this study to grade clinical AEs.

    Time frame: Baseline through Day 150

  2. Part B: Serum Concentration of Suptavumab

    Serum samples for drug concentration will be collected at pre-specified time points

    Time frame: Day 29, 57, 85, 113 and Day 150 Post-dose

  3. Part B: Number of Participants With At Least One Positive Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Assay

    ADA category of each participant was classified as pre-existing immunoreactivity (a positive ADA response at baseline with a \<4-fold increase in titer for all post baseline samples), treatment-boosted (a positive response at baseline with at least one post baseline titer at \>=4-fold the baseline titer), or treatment-emergent (TE \[any positive post baseline assay response when baseline results were negative or missing\]). TE ADA responses were further classified as persistent (treatment-emergent positive ADA response detected in at least 2 consecutive post baseline samples separated by at least a 12-week post baseline period \[based on nominal sampling time\], with no ADA-negative samples in-between, regardless of any missing samples or a positive response at the last ADA sampling time point), indeterminate (a positive assay response at the last collection time point only, regardless of any missing samples), or transient (not persistent/indeterminate, regardless of any missing samples).

    Time frame: Day 1 through Day 150

  4. Part B: Percentage of Participants Hospitalized With Medically Attended RSV Infection or Outpatient Visit Lower Respiratory Tract Infection (LRTI) or Upper Respiratory Tract Infection (URTI) Up to Day 150

    A medically attended RSV infection was defined as an infant with a positive RSV test by RT-PCR with any of the following events: -Hospitalized (on the basis of the assessment of the admitting physician) for RSV infection - or Outpatient visit (ER, UC), or pediatric clinic visits \[for either a sick or well visit\]) with RSV LRTI. An RSV LRTI in an infant: RSV-proven respiratory infection (i.e, positive RSV RT-PCR test) with parent(s)/guardian(s) report of cough or difficulty breathing, and with 1 of the following signs of LRTI, as assessed by a healthcare provider: -Lower chest wall indrawing -Hypoxemia (peripheral capillary oxygen saturation \<95% breathing room air) -Wheezing or crackles. The 150-day efficacy assessment period:first study drug intake through the Day 150 visit.

    Time frame: From the first study drug administration up to Day 150

07

Results

Posted Nov 6, 2018

Participant flow

The study was conducted in 2 parts between 21-Jul-2015 and 26-Sep-2017. Part A of study was conducted at 6 sites in 3 countries and Part B was conducted at 175 sites in 18 countries. Only Part B of the study was conducted in Europe. A total of 23 participants were enrolled in Part A and a total of 1,154 participants were randomized in Part B.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePart A: Suptavumab 30 mg/kgPart B: Placebo Matched to SuptavumabPart B: Suptavumab 30 mg/kg- 1 DosePart B: Suptavumab 30 mg/kg - 2 Doses
Started23383385381
Completed23358360355
Not completed0252526
Withdrew: Adverse event0110
Withdrew: Death0301
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up015149
Withdrew: Physician decision0110
Withdrew: Protocol violation0010
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject05816

Outcome measures

PrimaryPart A: Serum Concentration of Suptavumab Over Time

Part A was primarily designed to determine the pharmacokinetics (PK) of suptavumab in infants to inform the dose regimen used in Part B of the study. The study protocol specified the process and criteria for assessment of the dose. The dose used in Part B was to remain the same as Part A if the PK data up to Day 57 demonstrated that the individual PK observations were consistent with model-predicted concentrations, following age and body weight corrections.

Time frame:
Day 1 through Day 150
Reported as:
Mean · mg/L
Part A: Serum Concentration of Suptavumab Over Time
mg/LPart A: Suptavumab 30 mg/kg - 1 Dose
Day 2280 ± 92.9
Day 8177 ± 40.2
Day 15145 ± 28.7
Day 22128 ± 3.21
Day 29110 ± 10.3
Day 5770.9 ± 7.62
Day 8560.4 ± 14.0
Day 15015.9 ± 7.88
PrimaryPart B: Percentage of Participants With Medically Attended Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Infection (Hospitalization or Outpatient Visit With Lower Respiratory Tract Infection [LRTI]) Up to Day 150

A medically attended RSV infection defined as an infant with positive RSV test by Reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) with any of following events: Hospitalized (on basis of assessment of admitting physician) for RSV infection or outpatient visit (emergency room \[ER\], urgent care \[UC\], or pediatric clinic visits \[for either a sick or well visit\]) with RSV lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI). An RSV LRTI in an infant: RSV proven respiratory infection (i.e positive RSV RT-PCR test) with parent(s)/guardian(s) report of cough/difficulty breathing, \& with 1 of following signs of LRTI, as assessed by healthcare provider: - lower chest wall in drawing -hypoxemia (peripheral capillary oxygen saturation \<95% breathing room air) - Wheezing/crackles. The 150-day efficacy assessment period: first study drug intake through the Day 150 visit.

Time frame:
From first study drug administration up to Day 150
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Part B: Percentage of Participants With Medically Attended Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Infection (Hospitalization or Outpatient Visit With Lower Respiratory Tract Infection [LRTI]) Up to Day 150
Percentage of participantsPart B: Placebo Matched to SuptavumabPart B: Suptavumab 30 mg/kg- 1 DosePart B: Suptavumab 30 mg/kg - 2 Doses
Part B: Percentage of Participants With Medically Attended Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Infection (Hospitalization or Outpatient Visit With Lower Respiratory Tract Infection [LRTI]) Up to Day 1508.17.79.3
Statistical analysis
  • Part B: Placebo Matched to Suptavumab vs Part B: Suptavumab 30 mg/kg - 2 Doses · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.5773 · Percentage treatment difference: 1.15 · 95% CI -2.898 to 5.201
  • Part B: Placebo Matched to Suptavumab vs Part B: Suptavumab 30 mg/kg- 1 Dose · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · Percentage treatment difference: -0.44 · 95% CI -4.318 to 3.438
SecondaryPart A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

Any untoward medical occurrence in participants, who received investigational medicinal product (IMP) was considered an adverse event (AE) without regard to possibility of causal relationship with this treatment. TEAEs: AEs that developed/worsened/became serious during on-treatment period (defined as time between the date of first study drug administration \& date of end of study/last visit).Serious AE: Any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in any of following outcomes: death, life-threatening, required initial or prolonged in-patient hospitalization, persistent/significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, or considered as medically important event. Any TEAE included participants with both serious \& non-serious AEs. National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTCAE) version 4.03(Grade 3 \[severe\] \& Grade 4\[life-threatening\]) was used in this study to grade clinical AEs.

Time frame:
Baseline through Day 150
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Part A: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Percentage of participantsPart A: Suptavumab 30 mg/kg
Any TEAE69.6
Any Grade 3/Serious TEAE4.3
SecondaryPart B: Serum Concentration of Suptavumab

Serum samples for drug concentration will be collected at pre-specified time points

Time frame:
Day 29, 57, 85, 113 and Day 150 Post-dose
Reported as:
Mean · Milligram per liter (mg/L)
Part B: Serum Concentration of Suptavumab
Milligram per liter (mg/L)Part B: Suptavumab 30 mg/kg- 1 DosePart B: Suptavumab 30 mg/kg - 2 Doses
Day 29142 ± 45.5145 ± 43.4
Day 5795.6 ± 44.293.5 ± 29.8
Day 8570.1 ± 29.0238 ± 52.9
Day 11338.1 ± 20.1149 ± 54.0
Day 15018.7 ± 9.8970.6 ± 26.4
SecondaryPart B: Number of Participants With At Least One Positive Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Assay

ADA category of each participant was classified as pre-existing immunoreactivity (a positive ADA response at baseline with a \<4-fold increase in titer for all post baseline samples), treatment-boosted (a positive response at baseline with at least one post baseline titer at \>=4-fold the baseline titer), or treatment-emergent (TE \[any positive post baseline assay response when baseline results were negative or missing\]). TE ADA responses were further classified as persistent (treatment-emergent positive ADA response detected in at least 2 consecutive post baseline samples separated by at least a 12-week post baseline period \[based on nominal sampling time\], with no ADA-negative samples in-between, regardless of any missing samples or a positive response at the last ADA sampling time point), indeterminate (a positive assay response at the last collection time point only, regardless of any missing samples), or transient (not persistent/indeterminate, regardless of any missing samples).

Time frame:
Day 1 through Day 150
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Part B: Number of Participants With At Least One Positive Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Assay
ParticipantsPart B: Placebo Matched to SuptavumabPart B: Suptavumab 30 mg/kg- 1 DosePart B: Suptavumab 30 mg/kg - 2 Doses
Negative/Pre-Existing351380336
Treatment Boosted000
Treatment-Emergent1290
Treatment-Emergent: Persistent000
Treatment-Emergent: Transient100
Treatment-Emergent: Indeterminate1190
SecondaryPart B: Percentage of Participants Hospitalized With Medically Attended RSV Infection or Outpatient Visit Lower Respiratory Tract Infection (LRTI) or Upper Respiratory Tract Infection (URTI) Up to Day 150

A medically attended RSV infection was defined as an infant with a positive RSV test by RT-PCR with any of the following events: -Hospitalized (on the basis of the assessment of the admitting physician) for RSV infection - or Outpatient visit (ER, UC), or pediatric clinic visits \[for either a sick or well visit\]) with RSV LRTI. An RSV LRTI in an infant: RSV-proven respiratory infection (i.e, positive RSV RT-PCR test) with parent(s)/guardian(s) report of cough or difficulty breathing, and with 1 of the following signs of LRTI, as assessed by a healthcare provider: -Lower chest wall indrawing -Hypoxemia (peripheral capillary oxygen saturation \<95% breathing room air) -Wheezing or crackles. The 150-day efficacy assessment period:first study drug intake through the Day 150 visit.

Time frame:
From the first study drug administration up to Day 150
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Part B: Percentage of Participants Hospitalized With Medically Attended RSV Infection or Outpatient Visit Lower Respiratory Tract Infection (LRTI) or Upper Respiratory Tract Infection (URTI) Up to Day 150
Percentage of participantsPart B: Placebo Matched to SuptavumabPart B: Suptavumab 30 mg/kg- 1 DosePart B: Suptavumab 30 mg/kg - 2 Doses
Part B: Percentage of Participants Hospitalized With Medically Attended RSV Infection or Outpatient Visit Lower Respiratory Tract Infection (LRTI) or Upper Respiratory Tract Infection (URTI) Up to Day 15012.511.914.5
Statistical analysis
  • Part B: Placebo Matched to Suptavumab vs Part B: Suptavumab 30 mg/kg- 1 Dose · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · Percentage treatment difference: -0.67 · 95% CI -5.291 to 3.959
  • Part B: Placebo Matched to Suptavumab vs Part B: Suptavumab 30 mg/kg - 2 Doses · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · Percentage treatment difference: 2.02 · 95% CI -2.836 to 6.867

Adverse events

Collected over All Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Part A: Day 150 and Part B: Day 237) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Part A: Suptavumab 30 mg/kg0/23 (0%)0/23 (0%)13/23 (56.5%)
Part B: Placebo Matched to Suptavumab3/384 (0.8%)44/384 (11.5%)218/384 (56.8%)
Part B: Suptavumab 30 mg/kg- 1 Dose1/418 (0.2%)54/418 (12.9%)219/418 (52.4%)
Part B: Suptavumab 30 mg/kg - 2 Doses0/348 (0%)29/348 (8.3%)198/348 (56.9%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 66
Most frequent serious events
EventPart A: Suptavumab 30 mg/kgPart B: Placebo Matched to SuptavumabPart B: Suptavumab 30 mg/kg- 1 DosePart B: Suptavumab 30 mg/kg - 2 Doses
Respiratory syncytial virus bronchiolitisInfections and infestations0/235/38413/4182/348
BronchiolitisInfections and infestations0/239/38410/4187/348
Respiratory syncytial virus infectionInfections and infestations0/231/3845/4181/348
BronchitisInfections and infestations0/234/3842/4180/348
Inguinal herniaGastrointestinal disorders0/231/3841/4183/348
PyrexiaGeneral disorders0/230/3843/4180/348
CyanosisCardiac disorders0/232/3840/4180/348
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders0/232/3840/4180/348
Pneumonia respiratory syncytial viralInfections and infestations0/232/3842/4181/348
ApnoeaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/232/3842/4181/348
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 17
Most frequent other events
EventPart A: Suptavumab 30 mg/kgPart B: Placebo Matched to SuptavumabPart B: Suptavumab 30 mg/kg- 1 DosePart B: Suptavumab 30 mg/kg - 2 Doses
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations3/2374/38492/41875/348
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations0/2353/38430/41835/348
Viral upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations3/2320/38419/41821/348
Otitis mediaInfections and infestations0/2329/38449/41826/348
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders2/2313/38416/41811/348
BronchiolitisInfections and infestations2/2316/38419/41827/348
Blood alkaline phosphatase increasedInvestigations2/230/3841/4181/348
EczemaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders2/2312/3848/4188/348
Gastrooesophageal reflux diseaseGastrointestinal disorders1/2331/38425/41824/348
PyrexiaGeneral disorders0/2331/38432/41822/348

Baseline characteristics

Age, Customized
Age, Customized(Participants)Part A: Suptavumab 30 mg/kgPart B: Placebo Matched to SuptavumabPart B: Suptavumab 30 mg/kg- 1 DosePart B: Suptavumab 30 mg/kg - 2 DosesTotal
<=31 weeks 6 days5625959185
>=32 weeks & <=35 weeks 6 days18321326322987
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Part A: Suptavumab 30 mg/kgPart B: Placebo Matched to SuptavumabPart B: Suptavumab 30 mg/kg- 1 DosePart B: Suptavumab 30 mg/kg - 2 DosesTotal
Female9186172179546
Male14197213202626
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Part A: Suptavumab 30 mg/kgPart B: Placebo Matched to SuptavumabPart B: Suptavumab 30 mg/kg- 1 DosePart B: Suptavumab 30 mg/kg - 2 DosesTotal
Hispanic or Latino3808175239
Not Hispanic or Latino20297300302919
Unknown or Not Reported064414
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Part A: Suptavumab 30 mg/kgPart B: Placebo Matched to SuptavumabPart B: Suptavumab 30 mg/kg- 1 DosePart B: Suptavumab 30 mg/kg - 2 DosesTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native00202
Asian02338
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander20024
Black or African American0323435101
White193383343261017
Other2791129
Unknown or Not Reported043411
08

Study locations

205 sites
  • Regeneron Investigational Site
    Birmingham, Alabama, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Mobile, Alabama, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Anaheim, California, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Bell Gardens, California, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Dinuba, California, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Downey, California, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Huntington Beach, California, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    La Puente, California, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Los Angeles, California, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Madera, California, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Palmdale, California, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Ventura, California, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    West Covina, California, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Aurora, Colorado, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Thornton, Colorado, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Hartford, Connecticut, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Boynton Beach, Florida, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Gainesville, Florida, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Jacksonville, Florida, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Miami, Florida, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Orlando, Florida, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Pensacola, Florida, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Tampa, Florida, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Winter Park, Florida, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Atlanta, Georgia, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Columbus, Georgia, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Dalton, Georgia, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Meridian, Idaho, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Nampa, Idaho, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Peoria, Illinois, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    South Bend, Indiana, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Hutchinson, Kansas, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Topeka, Kansas, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Bardstown, Kentucky, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Louisville, Kentucky, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Metairie, Louisiana, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Shreveport, Louisiana, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Baltimore, Maryland, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Silver Spring, Maryland, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Fall River, Massachusetts, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Woburn, Massachusetts, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Stevensville, Michigan, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Duluth, Minnesota, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Jackson, Mississippi, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Bridgeton, Missouri, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Kansas City, Missouri, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Lincoln, Nebraska, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Norfolk, Nebraska, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Omaha, Nebraska, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Reno, Nevada, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Neptune, New Jersey, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Bronx, New York, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Brooklyn, New York, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Mineola, New York, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    New Hyde Park, New York, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    New York, New York, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Rochester, New York, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Syracuse, New York, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Boone, North Carolina, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Durham, North Carolina, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Cleveland, Ohio, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Columbus, Ohio, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Dayton, Ohio, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Fairfield, Ohio, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Mayfield Heights, Ohio, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Toledo, Ohio, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Youngstown, Ohio, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Gresham, Oregon, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Allentown, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Erie, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Hermitage, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Charleston, South Carolina, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Cheraw, South Carolina, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Greenville, South Carolina, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    North Charleston, South Carolina, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Alcoa, Tennessee, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Kingsport, Tennessee, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Nashville, Tennessee, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Austin, Texas, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Fort Sam Houston, Texas, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Houston, Texas, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    San Antonio, Texas, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Layton, Utah, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Roy, Utah, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Saint George, Utah, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Syracuse, Utah, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Midlothian, Virginia, United States
  • Regeneron Study Site
    Richmond, Virginia, United States

Showing the first 100 of 205 sites across 19 countries.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • Simoes EAF, Forleo-Neto E, Geba GP, Kamal M, Yang F, Cicirello H, Houghton MR, Rideman R, Zhao Q, Benvin SL, Hawes A, Fuller ED, Wloga E, Pizarro JMN, Munoz FM, Rush SA, McLellan JS, Lipsich L, Stahl N, Yancopoulos GD, Weinreich DM, Kyratsous CA, Sivapalasingam S. Suptavumab for the Prevention of Medically Attended Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection in Preterm Infants. Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Dec 6;73(11):e4400-e4408. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa951. PubMed 32897368 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Apr 11, 2017
  • Statistical analysis plan · Aug 9, 2016
  • Statistical analysis plan · Jul 28, 2017

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 6, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02325791
Lead sponsor
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 25, 2014
Start date
Jul 21, 2015
Primary completion
Jul 5, 2017
Completion
Sep 26, 2017
Results posted
Nov 6, 2018
Last update
Nov 6, 2018

Study contacts

Clinical Trial Management
study director · Regeneron Pharmaceuticals

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion