CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02308228Updated Sep 17, 2019Results posted

Metformin to Augment Strength Training Effective Response in Seniors (MASTERS)

An Early Phase 1 interventional study of Progressive Resistance Training and Metformin in Aging, sponsored by Philip Kern. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 65 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-09-17.

Sponsored by Philip Kern · Early Phase 1, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
109
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
65 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether a commonly prescribed drug, metformin, can enhance the benefits seen during resistance exercise such as increased muscle mass and strength.

Read the detailed description

Muscle mass and strength are critical determinants not only of a person's quality of life and functional independence, but also metabolic health, as muscle is the organ primarily responsible for insulin-mediated glucose uptake. The elderly suffer obligatory losses of muscle mass and strength, exacerbated by illness and physical inactivity. Progressive resistance exercise training (PRT) is the most effective intervention identified to improve muscular strength, and combat the muscle atrophy of aging (sarcopenia); however, overall the muscle response to PRT is blunted in the elderly and variability of response increased, with some individuals actually losing muscle mass. The Bamman and Peterson labs have independently been studying the molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying the "non-responder" phenotype, with the goal of identifying novel intervention strategies to promote mass and strength gains to improve function. We hypothesize that the abundance of anti-inflammatory, alternatively activated M2 macrophages in muscle predicts response to PRT in the elderly; those with the highest number of M2 macrophages and lowest inflammatory gene expression prior to the start of training gained the most mass. Further, we determined that metformin treatment increased M2 macrophage abundance, and decreased inflammatory cytokine gene expression. These provocative findings have led us to our central hypothesis that adjuvant metformin may improve the responses to PRT in the elderly by altering the muscle tissue inflammatory environment, thereby enhancing mechanisms that drive PRT-induced myofiber hypertrophy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Aging

Keywords

  • Aging
  • Hypertrophy
  • Metformin
  • Strength
  • Muscle
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Philip Kern is the lead sponsor of 9 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 3 (60%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • ≥65 years of age.
  • Independently mobile with a SPPB score 3-12.
  • Access to transportation.
  • Capable of providing informed consent (cognitively intact).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Obesity (BMI>30)
  • Serum creatinine >1.4 because of risk of lactic acidosis with metformin.
  • History of regular resistance training within the past year.
  • History (or ECG evidence) of previous myocardial infarction, history of congestive heart failure.
  • Current angina pectoris or symptoms of myocardial ischemia or congestive heart failure.
  • Chronic aspirin or NSAID use (unless it can be safely stopped prior to the biopsies), and any other use of an anticoagulant (e.g., Coumadin) or history of bleeding.
  • History of alcoholism or liver disease.
  • History of hypo- or hyper-coagulation disorders including subjects taking Coumadin.
  • Any end-stage disease and/or a life expectancy less than one year.
  • Neurological, musculoskeletal, or other disorder that would preclude them from completing resistance training and all performance tests.
  • Uncontrolled hypertension.
  • Diabetes mellitus as demonstrated with- HgbA1C>6.5, or fasting glu>126 mg/dl.
  • Any other medical condition that would interfere with testing or increase one's risk of complications during exercise, as judged by the study physicians.
  • Any other condition or events considered exclusionary by the PI and/or physician, such as non-compliance.
  • Lidocaine allergy (1% lidocaine is the local anesthetic used during the muscle biopsy procedure).
05

Study design

Phase
Early Phase 1
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
109 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Metformin

    Participants will be randomized to receive Metformin (1700 mg/day) for a period of 16 weeks; 2 weeks of Metformin only followed by 14 weeks of continued Metformin use in combination with progressive resistance training.

    Behavioral: Progressive Resistance Training · Drug: Metformin

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo, Sugar Pill

    Participants will be randomized to receive placebo sugar pills (1700 mg/day) for a period of 16 weeks; 2 weeks of placebo only followed by 14 weeks of continued placebo use in combination with progressive resistance training. Placebos will be almost identical to the Metformin medication.

    Behavioral: Progressive Resistance Training

Interventions

  • BehavioralProgressive Resistance Training

    Participants will complete 14 weeks (42 sessions, 3x/week) of progressive resistance training which will consist of 8 constant load movements to train all major muscle groups bilaterally.

    Also known as: Strength Training

  • DrugMetformin

    Participants will be randomized to receive metformin in conjunction with their strength training program.

    Also known as: Glucophage XR

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percent Change in Type 2 Myofiber Cross Sectional Area

    The ability of metformin to improve the hypertrophic response to resistance training will be determined. Muscle biopsies of the vastus lateralis will be used to quantify myofiber cross-sectional area. The percent change in type 2 myofiber size between week 16 and week 0 was used.

    Time frame: 16 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percent Change in Normal Density Muscle Size by Computed Tomography

    The ability of metformin to improve the hypertrophic response at the whole muscle level will be quantified by computed tomography. Percent change in normal density muscle area will be calculated as the difference between week 16 and week 0.

    Time frame: 16 weeks

Other outcomes

  1. Percent Change in Muscle Strength

    Determine if metformin treatment augments strength gains in conjunction with progressive resistance training by one repetition maximum assessments. Maximum (1RM) leg extension muscle strength was assessed at week 4 (to account for neurological adaptations during the initial stages of the resistance program) and week 16. The percent change from week 4 to week 16 is reported.

    Time frame: Week 4 and week 16

  2. Percent Change in Total Body Lean Mass by DXA

    To determine if metformin improves changes in body composition associated with progressive resistance training. Percent change in total body lean mass in kg was calculated as the difference between week 16 and week 0 from a total body DXA scan.

    Time frame: 16 weeks

  3. Insulin Sensitivity

    A standard OGTT will be used to determine insulin sensitivity using the Matsuda Index.

    Time frame: 16 weeks

07

Results

Posted Sep 17, 2019

Participant flow

Number of individuals consented and further screened for eligibility = 144 Number of participants randomized to drug/placebo = 109 Number of participants completing exercise intervention with drug/placebo use = 94

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneMetforminPlacebo, Sugar Pill
Started5455
Completed4648
Not completed87
Withdrew: Adverse event34
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject53

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercent Change in Type 2 Myofiber Cross Sectional Area

The ability of metformin to improve the hypertrophic response to resistance training will be determined. Muscle biopsies of the vastus lateralis will be used to quantify myofiber cross-sectional area. The percent change in type 2 myofiber size between week 16 and week 0 was used.

Time frame:
16 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · Percent change
Percent Change in Type 2 Myofiber Cross Sectional Area
Percent changeMetforminPlacebo, Sugar Pill
Percent Change in Type 2 Myofiber Cross Sectional Area18.5 ± 31.514.5 ± 29.7
SecondaryPercent Change in Normal Density Muscle Size by Computed Tomography

The ability of metformin to improve the hypertrophic response at the whole muscle level will be quantified by computed tomography. Percent change in normal density muscle area will be calculated as the difference between week 16 and week 0.

Time frame:
16 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · Percent change
Percent Change in Normal Density Muscle Size by Computed Tomography
Percent changeMetforminPlacebo, Sugar Pill
Percent Change in Normal Density Muscle Size by Computed Tomography4.2 ± 9.110.5 ± 7.0
Other pre-specifiedPercent Change in Muscle Strength

Determine if metformin treatment augments strength gains in conjunction with progressive resistance training by one repetition maximum assessments. Maximum (1RM) leg extension muscle strength was assessed at week 4 (to account for neurological adaptations during the initial stages of the resistance program) and week 16. The percent change from week 4 to week 16 is reported.

Time frame:
Week 4 and week 16
Reported as:
Mean · Percent change
Percent Change in Muscle Strength
Percent changeMetforminPlacebo, Sugar Pill
Percent Change in Muscle Strength15.3 ± 18.523.1 ± 18.9
Other pre-specifiedPercent Change in Total Body Lean Mass by DXA

To determine if metformin improves changes in body composition associated with progressive resistance training. Percent change in total body lean mass in kg was calculated as the difference between week 16 and week 0 from a total body DXA scan.

Time frame:
16 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · Percent change
Percent Change in Total Body Lean Mass by DXA
Percent changeMetforminPlacebo, Sugar Pill
Percent Change in Total Body Lean Mass by DXA0.41 ± 2.251.95 ± 2.69
Other pre-specifiedInsulin Sensitivity

A standard OGTT will be used to determine insulin sensitivity using the Matsuda Index.

Time frame:
16 weeks

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events are reported from the time the subjects sign the consent form until the completion of the study which includes baseline, medication ramp, exercise intervention, and follow up assessments. The total duration of the study for each subject is approximately 1 year.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Metformin0/54 (0%)0/54 (0%)17/54 (31.5%)
Placebo, Sugar Pill0/55 (0%)0/55 (0%)6/55 (10.9%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventMetforminPlacebo, Sugar Pill
Nausea, Diarrhea, FlatulenceGastrointestinal disorders17/541/55
Musculoskeletal Pain or InjuryMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders4/545/55

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)MetforminPlacebo, Sugar PillTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years123
>=65 years5353106
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)MetforminPlacebo, Sugar PillTotal
Mean69.4 (66.8 to 72.3)69.3 (66.8 to 74.0)69.4 (66.8 to 73.2)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)MetforminPlacebo, Sugar PillTotal
Female222951
Male241943
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)MetforminPlacebo, Sugar PillTotal
Hispanic or Latino000
Not Hispanic or Latino464894
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)MetforminPlacebo, Sugar PillTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian011
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American101
White454792
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)MetforminPlacebo, Sugar PillTotal
United States5455109
BMI
BMI(kg/m^2)MetforminPlacebo, Sugar PillTotal
Mean26.9 ± 3.125.7 ± 3.126.3 ± 3.1
Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)
Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)(Scores on a Scale)MetforminPlacebo, Sugar PillTotal
Mean11 (10 to 12)11 (11 to 12)11 (10.5 to 12)

3 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

2 sites
  • University of Alabama Birmingham
    Birmingham, Alabama 35294, United States
  • University of Kentucky
    Lexington, Kentucky 40536, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Long DE, Kosmac K, Dungan CM, Bamman MM, Peterson CA, Kern PA. Potential Benefits of Combined Statin and Metformin Therapy on Resistance Training Response in Older Individuals. Front Physiol. 2022 Apr 14;13:872745. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.872745. eCollection 2022. PubMed 35492586 ↗
  • Long DE, Peck BD, Tuggle SC, Villasante Tezanos AG, Windham ST, Bamman MM, Kern PA, Peterson CA, Walton RG. Associations of muscle lipid content with physical function and resistance training outcomes in older adults: altered responses with metformin. Geroscience. 2021 Apr;43(2):629-644. doi: 10.1007/s11357-020-00315-9. Epub 2021 Jan 18. PubMed 33462708 ↗
  • Walton RG, Dungan CM, Long DE, Tuggle SC, Kosmac K, Peck BD, Bush HM, Villasante Tezanos AG, McGwin G, Windham ST, Ovalle F, Bamman MM, Kern PA, Peterson CA. Metformin blunts muscle hypertrophy in response to progressive resistance exercise training in older adults: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial: The MASTERS trial. Aging Cell. 2019 Dec;18(6):e13039. doi: 10.1111/acel.13039. Epub 2019 Sep 26. Erratum In: Aging Cell. 2020 Mar;19(3):e13098. doi: 10.1111/acel.13098. PubMed 31557380 ↗
  • Long DE, Villasante Tezanos AG, Wise JN, Kern PA, Bamman MM, Peterson CA, Dennis RA. A guide for using NIH Image J for single slice cross-sectional area and composition analysis of the thigh from computed tomography. PLoS One. 2019 Feb 7;14(2):e0211629. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211629. eCollection 2019. PubMed 30730923 ↗
  • Long DE, Peck BD, Martz JL, Tuggle SC, Bush HM, McGwin G, Kern PA, Bamman MM, Peterson CA. Metformin to Augment Strength Training Effective Response in Seniors (MASTERS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2017 Apr 26;18(1):192. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1932-5. PubMed 28441958 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Oct 16, 2018
  • Informed consent form · Feb 17, 2014

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 17, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02308228
Lead sponsor
Philip Kern
Collaborators
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Responsible party
Philip Kern (M.D., University of Kentucky) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Dec 4, 2014
Start date
Jan 14, 2015
Primary completion
Dec 14, 2017
Completion
Jun 28, 2018
Results posted
Sep 17, 2019
Last update
Sep 17, 2019

Study contacts

Charlotte Peterson, Ph.D.
principal investigator · University of Kentucky
Philip Kern, M.D.
principal investigator · University of Kentucky
Marcas Bamman, Ph.D
principal investigator · University of Alabama at Birmingham

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion