ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02291003Updated Aug 31, 2018

Identification of Novel Circadian Biomarkers

An observational study in Circadian Rhythm Disorders, sponsored by Northwestern University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-08-31.

Sponsored by Northwestern University · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
3
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Circadian clocks are not only found in discrete areas of the brain, but are found in virtually every organ in our bodies, including the heart, lungs and immune system. Disruptions in circadian clocks, or chronopathology, may underlie various forms of cardiovascular, pulmonary, and metabolic disorders. Over the past two decades, molecular geneticists have "cracked" the clock to reveal its core biochemical mechanisms evident in organisms from fruit flies to humans. These mechanistic insights have led to the discovery of links between clock function and an ever-expanding array of prevalent diseases, including heart, lung, metabolic and sleep disorders. Yet the prevalence of circadian disruption in these patient populations is unclear because current tests are not easily applied in clinical settings or have yet to be developed. Here the investigators exploit our newfound understanding of clock mechanisms and the development of new genomic technologies to identify novel complements of clock-regulated genes ("signatures") that will reveal the state of the internal biological clock. This approach will allow us to take a genomic snapshot of clock status from a single blood draw, substantially easing the diagnosis of these individuals with evidence of circadian disruption or misalignment, i.e., chronopathology.

Read the detailed description

Circadian clocks are not only found in discrete areas of the brain, but are found in virtually every organ in our bodies, including the heart, lungs and immune system. Disruptions in circadian clocks, or chronopathology, may underlie various forms of cardiovascular, pulmonary, and metabolic disorders. Over the past two decades, molecular geneticists have "cracked" the clock to reveal its core biochemical mechanisms evident in organisms from fruit flies to humans. These mechanistic insights have led to the discovery of links between clock function and an ever-expanding array of prevalent diseases, including heart, lung, metabolic and sleep disorders. Yet the prevalence of circadian disruption in these patient populations is unclear because current tests are not easily applied in clinical settings or have yet to be developed. Perhaps the major limitation of these techniques is the need for serial sampling over extended periods of at least 24 hours and in some cases longer. The development of an assay from a single blood draw would represent a major step forward, facilitating assessments of circadian disruption in a range of diseases.

An alternative strategy to existing assays is to use genomic microarrays to analyze circadian rhythms. Many studies in a number of organisms as well as multiple organs and tissues have found that substantial fractions of the genome (2-10%) are under robust circadian clock control. Importantly, these hundreds of rhythmic genes exhibit expression peaks at all times throughout the day, presumably reflecting their time-of-day specific functions. Using this as a foundation, Ueda and colleagues proposed an alternative strategy that would allow assessment of circadian time from a single blood draw allowing more routine assessments of circadian clock state. In brief, they identified the complement of rhythmic genes in livers of mice. They then selected a set of approximately 50 genes with unique peak times as "time-indicating genes." They then assessed the transcript levels of these time-indicating genes at a single time of day and found that they could accurately determine the time of day that the liver was taken based on the relative expression levels of the time-indicating genes. These studies provide proof-of-principle for the approach that we propose here. Establishing a molecular assay in humans for circadian rhythms from a single time point will allow us to identify circadian rhythm disorders, and to assess internal biological time to deliver therapies at their most efficacious time.

02

Conditions studied

  • Circadian Rhythm Disorders

Keywords

  • circadian
  • sleep
03

In context

Chronobiology Disorders

92 studies on the registry are indexed under Chronobiology Disorders; 22 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 3 is below the median of 80 across 31 observational studies indexed under Chronobiology Disorders.

Browse Chronobiology Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

Northwestern University is the lead sponsor of 1,420 studies on the registry; 199 are open to participants now.

Of its 103 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 75 (73%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Healthy controls, age 18-60 with habitual sleep

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Healthy controls
  • Age 18-60
  • Intermediate circadian chronotype as determined by the Horne-Ostberg and Munich questionnaire
  • Habitual sleep start times between 9:30pm and 1am
  • Habitual sleep duration of 6-9 hours

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History or current Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-V major psychiatric disorder
  • Use of psychoactive medications
  • Beck Depression inventory ≥ 16 indicating possible depression
  • A history or current diagnosis of a primary sleep disorder (insomnia, sleep apnea, circadian rhythm sleep disorder, restless legs)
  • Shift work or other types of self-imposed irregular sleep/wake cycles
  • History of, or concurrent unstable or serious medical illness
  • Allergy to heparin
  • Blindness or other visual impairment other than glasses
05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
3 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Healthy controls

    Healthy controls -observational, no intervention administered.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Circadian gene expression profile

    The circadian pattern of gene expression will be determined through collecting saliva and blood at regular intervals over a 24 hour and analyzing with microarrays.

    Time frame: 1 day

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Northwestern University
    Chicago, Illinois 60611, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 31, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02291003
Responsible party
Phyllis Zee (Benjamin and Virginia T. Boshes Professor of Neurology, Northwestern University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 14, 2014
Start date
Jan 29, 2015
Primary completion
Dec 16, 2015
Completion
Sep 30, 2017
Last update
Aug 31, 2018

Study contacts

Phyllis C Zee, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Northwestern University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion