ClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT02287714Updated Mar 29, 2016

Instep Plantar Fasciotomy With and Without Gastrocnemius Recession

An interventional study of Instep without gastrocnemius recession and Instep with gastrocnemius recession in Plantar Fasciitis and Equinus Deformity, sponsored by OhioHealth. Withdrawn at 4 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-03-29.

Sponsored by OhioHealth · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was withdrawn
Low (no) enrollment.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
0
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Compare results of Instep Plantar Fascial release with and without gastrocnemius recession

Read the detailed description

Plantar fasciitis is one of the most common causes of heel pain. Approximately 2 million Americans seek treatment for plantar fasciitis every year, with 10% of the population developing plantar fasciitis over a lifetime. The vast majority of cases respond to conservative care; however, the 5-10% of cases that are recalcitrant to conservative measures may require surgical intervention. Several surgical options do exist and are cited in the literature for treatment of recalcitrant plantar fasciitis. One such approach is the instep plantar fascial release, utilizing an approximately 2-3 cm plantar incision over the prominent fascial band, just distal to the fat pad of the heel. It has been demonstrated that many patients with plantar fasciitis also have an isolated contracture of the gastrocnemius, known as gastrocnemius equinus. Gastrocnemius recession is performed to correct an isolated gastrocnemius contracture and recent studies have demonstrated its successful use in the treatment of recalcitrant foot pain. To date, no prospective studies exist examining the utilization of the gastrocnemius recession in combination with instep plantar fascial release in the treatment of recalcitrant plantar fasciitis. This prospective randomized trial will aim to compare the use of instep plantar fasciotomy both with and without gastrocnemius recession in the treatment of plantar fasciitis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Plantar Fasciitis
  • Equinus Deformity

Keywords

  • Instep plantar fasciotomy
03

In context

Fasciitis, Plantar

223 studies on the registry are indexed under Fasciitis, Plantar; 58 are open to participants now.

Browse Fasciitis, Plantar studies →

Lead sponsor

OhioHealth is the lead sponsor of 25 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients that have failed conservative treatment for greater than 6 months.
  • Patients with recalcitrant plantar fasciitis and simultaneous gastrocnemius contracture in the ipsilateral limb. Contracture will be defined as the inability to dorsiflex the ankle past neutral with the knee in extension.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Adjunctive procedure at the time of surgery.
  • History of heel spur surgery, plantar fasciotomy or extracorporeal shockwave therapy.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Instep without Gastrocnemius Recession

    Patient will receive an instep plantar fascial release but not a gastrocnemius recession.

    Procedure: Instep without gastrocnemius recession

  • Experimental
    Instep with Gastrocnemius Recession

    Patient will receive an instep plantar fascial release as well as a gastrocnemius recession.

    Procedure: Instep with gastrocnemius recession

Interventions

  • ProcedureInstep without gastrocnemius recession

    Patient will receive an instep plantar fascial release without gastrocnemius recession.

  • ProcedureInstep with gastrocnemius recession

    Patient will receive an instep plantar fascial release as well as gastrocnemius recession.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Score

    Subjective and objective measurements which scale a patients' pain and function collected at selected intervals and compared to pre-operatively.

    Time frame: change from baseline (within 30 days prior to intervention) AOFAS score at 3 mo, 6 mo, and one year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Adjunctive treatment

    Participant chart will be reviewed for any adjunctive treatment required following their surgical intervention

    Time frame: One year

  2. Complications

    Participant chart will be reviewed for any complications that occurred during their one year follow-up, including but not limited to: Recurrence of symptoms, no improvement, infection, tear or rupture of plantar fascia following procedure

    Time frame: One year

  3. Change in Activity level

    A patient submitted survey regarding their activity level and ability to perform those activities pain free.

    Time frame: change from baseline (within 30 days prior to intervention) activity level at 3 months, 6 months, and one year

  4. Change Pain level

    Patients will be asked to submit their pain level utilizing the Visual Analog Scale

    Time frame: change from baseline (within 30 days prior to intervention) pain level at 3 months, 6 months, and one year

07

Study locations

4 sites
  • Step Lively Foot and Ankle Center
    Dublin, Ohio 43016, United States
  • Foot and Ankle Specialists of Central Ohio
    Gahanna, Ohio 43230, United States
  • Step Lively Foot and Ankle Center
    Grove City, Ohio 43123, United States
  • Step Lively Foot and Ankle Center
    Reynoldsburg, Ohio 43068, United States
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 29, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02287714
Lead sponsor
OhioHealth
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 11, 2014
Start date
May 2014
Primary completion
Feb 2016
Completion
Feb 2016
Last update
Mar 29, 2016

Study contacts

Amanda Quisno, DPM
principal investigator · OhioHealth

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Mar 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion